Monday, December 15, 2025

Trade Talk #5

 


What Trades Told: Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo

“Hollywood’s still the same,” says Van Johnson from a mock-up cockpit circa seventies. “Call time, six in the morning,” he adds as if it were twenty-five years earlier with him back at MGM, where he’d become their most popular leading man, at least until the first team got out of uniform and back in front of cameras. Van spoofs his Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo self, latter which predated Post Fortified Oat Flakes the star now was selling. The ad ran near, if not concurrent, with an ABC special from 1972 called Hollywood --- The Dream Factory (cited previous, and often at Greenbriar). That primetime hour entranced for it introducing treasures off MGM’s Classic Era assembly line, a first see of sights so far out of reach in feature entirety. Capper was Van Johnson leading his bomber group over Tokyo to special effects accompany still dazzling decades after the fact, authentic enough to still be borrowed by filmmakers active in the seventies. If Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo was so remarkable as this in part, imagine its impact whole. The Doolittle raid took place April 18, 1942, a mission we’d call daring if not suicidal. Success was measured more by morale than damage done. In fact, Lt. Col. James H. Doolittle considered the whole thing a failure and was convinced he’d be court-martialed for bungling the job. In fact, he was promoted to Brigadier General and received the Medal of Honor. I understand from James Curtis’ Spencer Tracy biography that the actor hesitated to play Doolittle because all he’d do was brief crews, an all talk, no action part. Did Tracy observe what a canonical figure Doolittle had become? The association would do the actor nothing but good, Doolittle’s prestige and authority rubbing off on him as earlier had Father Flanagan. Tracy was famously reluctant to take any assignment, finding reasons to back out right up to start days. Popular as Van Johnson had become, it was Tracy who’d close attendance deal for Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, something MGM merchandisers understood even as he seemed less aware of that obvious fact.


For a mission wherein all aircraft were lost and only half of combatants got back, the Tokyo raid was unreservedly declared a winner in all aspects. The movie was based on memoirs by Ted W. Lawson, the flyer Van Johnson portrayed. The bombing was central and what everyone came to see. It was also anticlimactic for an hour left of story to tell how Johnson’s crew gets rescued out of China. We don’t see the Japanese but are assured they are closing in. Hollywood and military overseers were for toning down atrocity stuff as by this stage of war those in authority figured us for sure bet to win, certainly against Japan which by that time was on the ropes (Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo released November 1944). Speaking of rough play by the enemy, there was one that dealt that in spades to my adolescent sensibility, Fox’s The Purple Heart, being harrowing account of Doolittle crewmen captured and put on show trial for war crimes on Nippon soil. They are tortured (offscreen) and their cause seems hopeless, which indeed it was, eight of the actuals sentenced to die, three executed. Shook me up enough to cost sleep. Sure could have used three or four Ozu features for antidote, but what did I know of Ozu in 1969? Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo was long at 138 minutes but nobody squirmed. Rentals went skyward to $6.3 million worldwide and there was $1.4 million in profit. Here was a picture much of its time that sustains after fashion of Sergeant York and choice others of WWII by mainstream filmmakers. They had gung-ho jobs to do and did them, boundaries being the Code plus the U.S. Office of War Information, a censorship body not called that but every bit as controlling. Japan had assured us by word and hostile gestures that they were impregnable. No enemy could approach, let alone breach, their home islands. That seemed so for success they’d been having for opener months of the war. Americans needed to believe we could penetrate Japanese defenses, the Doolittle raid a necessary corrective to defeats more rule than exception in the conflict so far. Besides that, we wanted to get even for Pearl. This then was the first good strike we’d have at Japan, triumph at Midway achieved in part because so much of Japan’s defenses had to concentrate at home after what we did to Tokyo.


As majority of moviegoers were female during height of the war, it was essential for war-based features to address issues beyond violence characteristic of a genre long defined along such lines. Metro spread assurance among trades plus their own Lion’s Roar journal that Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo would address the private life of Capt. Lawson as essayed by Van Johnson, his wife and expectant mother played by Phyllis Thaxter. “He took off for Shangri-La,” said she and thousands of women who would wait, this then to be more than just another combat feature. An emotional finish harked back to The Big Parade, having been tested on that previous occasion, showed by a public’s acceptance to be effective, and so sure-fire for an encore in Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo. To bolster child support came Margaret O’Brien endorsing Van Johnson on behalf of junior patrons, no base ignored by merchandisers. Should Metro have consulted this model when they produced and tried subsequent to sell Command Decision in late 1948 and into 1949? Latter lost money perhaps for overlooking crucial segments of their potential audience, a failure too late recognized to adjust. Block-long lines braved rain to see Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo at Broadway’s Capitol Theatre as reported by the Motion Picture Herald. The Capitol Theatre had an enormous clock outside that traffic was routed around, keeping not only time but a record of war bonds dispersed by the minute, cheering for totals plus for entertainers stationed beneath the timepiece as it recorded sales. Live bands and singers would pull shifts and exchange tickets to Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo for each war bond purchased. Such was street theatre to bally the Capitol’s show, the clock face emblazoned with the film’s title. The event tied patriotism to moviegoing for a civilian home front army not to be underestimated by the industry or the War Department.


It astonishes me that Washington went so relentlessly after Hollywood for trust violations after all movies had done toward overcoming Axis forces. The government let Hollywood off the hook for years leading up to war, knowing the while how much they’d need industry assist once hostilities commenced. Studios willingly submitted to government oversight if not overtake of procedure formerly the exclusive province of company employees. Disney’s shop was virtually occupied throughout the war, salve being government dollars poured into production of animated shorts to bolster the war effort. War-themed features even mentioning the conflict or service branches had to be vetted by the OWI, movies perhaps not altogether a propaganda arm of Allied interests, but darn close according to complaints (quietly) made. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo would a decade later be the first of “Pre-48 Greats” from MGM to play television in Los Angeles and by most accounts got a record audience. Tokyo showed how certain old movies could mop up where star and subject coalesced to form an attractive viewing package. Greenbriar earlier (2012) visited L.A.’s MGM story and there is much emphasis on Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, including 1956 comments from the film’s producer Sam Zimbalist, who speculated on how well the film stood up after twelve years, a happy outcome he did not necessarily expect. Fascinating to read of attitudes re vintage tiles, how they’d wax and wane, even among creatives involved in their making. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo plays TCM and streams at Amazon, Vudu/Fandango, others, in HD. No Blu-Ray as yet.

12 comments:

  1. Besides Washington going after Hollywood for trust violations, how about the IRS treatment of Abbot and Costello? And they are probably not the only ones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They dogged both to their dying day, reason the more for me to like and sympathize with A&C.

      Delete
  2. My dad watched "30 Seconds..." every time it aired on TV. He and Van Johnson were friends in high school, so maybe that had something to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonder in what categories Van was tabbed a senior superlative. There's bound to have been one, if not several.

      Delete
  3. I inherited some dvds from a late relative a few years ago, and among them was a copy of this film.
    Unfortunately, when I went to play it, it wouldn't load into my player at all - one of the very few dvds I have owned which apparently is or has become defective, as there's no visible indication of any problem with dirt, etc. on the disc.
    Very disappointing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those old standard Warner DVD's are rife with rot. I could not finish COMMAND DECISION recently, and my BABES IN ARMS wouldn't even load onto the player.

      Delete
  4. Glad you mentioned the Spencer Tracy book by James Curtis. One of the finest movie biographies from the last 20 years!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ANY movie biography written by James Curtis is by definition terrific. Same goes for books bearing Scott Eyman's name. Also Richard Barrios. And Mark Vieira. And Alan Rode. And Joseph McBride. And Dan Callahan. And Tom Weaver. Buy with confidence whatever these have penned.

      Delete
  5. Dan Mercer considers the Doolittle raid (Part One):


    The Doolittle raid was a lightning bolt that electrified the nation. As with the Battle of Midway three months later, it seemed almost miraculous. If there was a miracle, though, it was found in a willingness to strike and wound the enemy. This aspect is well highlighted in “Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo.”

    At the time of the raid, the Japanese empire was dominating the Pacific war, having defeated the British and captured Singapore and Hong Kong, bombed the U.S. naval and air bases at Pearl Harbor, and invaded the Philippines and Dutch East Indies and was in the process of defeating the armies there. In its continuing war with China, it held Manchuria and most of the coastal cities and made deep inroads into the interior.

    United States forces were beginning to maneuver and seek targets of opportunity, but Japanese naval and air forces were more skillful, better equipped, and had better tactics. There were also flaws, even fatal ones, but they could only be uncovered by an aggressive, determined foe.


    The Japanese government boasted to its people that the home islands would never by threatened by their adversaries. The United States wanted to challenge this, as a strike would have an effect far beyond any material damage inflicted. The plan for the Doolittle raid was daring: an aircraft carrier would launch a strike on Tokyo from 450 miles out. The key would be using twin engine Army B-25 bombers to execute it, aircraft never used on a carrier before, with greater range and striking power than naval aircraft. The launch would be at sunset, Tokyo would be bombed during the night, to assure surprise, and then the bombers would fly on to prepared airfields in China, where they would regroup.

    The dependence of the plan in having the element of surprise was a risk. This was lost when a Japanese picket vessel sighted the attack group of two aircraft carriers and four cruisers and sent an alert before it was destroyed. They were still 200 miles and 10 hours from the launch point. The United States group could have withdrawn, but Col. James Doolittle and Captain Marc Mitscher of the U.S.S. Hornet decided to gamble and strike at the enemy immediately. It meant, however, that the bombers would be over Tokyo in daylight and would be out of fuel by the time they reached the China coast at night. As it turned, out, all 16 bombers were lost, either being abandoned in the air by their crews and crashing or crashlanding in the sea off the China coast. One bomber reached Vladivostok, where it and its crew were interned by the Russians.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Part Two from Dan Mercer:


    Doolittle thought that he would be court martialed for expending the bomber force in this fashion. What his decision to attack regained, however, was the surprise that had been lost. The alert from the picket vessel had been of an American aircraft carrier. The Japanese assumed that the attack would be made by naval aircraft, which meant that the aircraft carrier would have to close within 200 miles of the Japanese coast to make it. Consequently, they believed that they had many hours to prepare for such a strike and even an opportunity to destroy the American fleet if they attempted it. Instead, the16 American bombers flew over Tokyo at low altitude in broad daylight and bombed it at will. As in the movie, the American crewmen were mystified that Japanese aircraft ignored them and that there was no antiaircraft fire until the bombing began. The Japanese defense forces simply didn’t expect to see them at that time and certainly not flying aircraft of that type.

    The movie “Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo” was based on the book of the same title by Captain Ted W. Lawson, the pilot commanding “The Ruptured Duck.” What I like best about it is the meticulous way in which it documents the planning of the raid and its execution. As to the raid itself, declassified documentary footage is almost seamlessly combined with large scale miniatures, full scale studio mockups, and footage of actual aircraft flying over suitable locations, including the Santa Monica Pier, disguised as an aircraft carrier deck. It is quite thrilling and builds up a great deal of suspense, even when you know the outcome of the attack.

    The first section of the film, when the crews are being chosen and trained, may have too much of the “Gee whiz, fellas” tone, at least by the much more cynical standards of our time, but it also has a more thoughtful and mature approach to the concerns of the men of that time than was found in other movies made during that period, especially when Lawson and another captain are walking the flight deck of the Hornet one night, talking about their concerns and hopes. The third section, after the attack, when the Chinese are helping Lawson and his crew to flee from the Japanese searching for them, is grim but compelling. Lawson would have an infected leg amputated without sufficient anesthesia to deaden the pain, something that would have been especially shocking to audiences then.

    A note, but the price paid by the Chinese for the Doolittle raid was quite severe. Over 10,000 civilians were killed when the Japanese tried to find the bomber crews and capture them. A punitive campaign was then launched against the Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces, which resulted in the deaths of 70,000 Chinese soldiers and a further 250,000 civilians.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Part Three from Dan Mercer:


    Part Three from Dan Mercer:


    The performances are quite good, with Van Johnson a fine Lawson, easily mastering the early enthusiasm of his character, the underlying professionalism in seeing the mission through, and the pain of his injury and his despair in thinking that his wife would see him as a cripple. Other standouts are Robert Walker, blending his next-door boy persona with the nuances the more mature actor would later demonstrate, a surprisingly good Don Defore, and a young Robert Mitchum bringing a quiet authority to that other thoughtful captain. As Doolittle, Spencer Tracy is a gigantic presence in his relatively few moments on film.

    M-G-M wanted the movie to be more than a war story, but a human story; hence the attention given to the home life of Lawson and his wife. As Ellen Lawson, Phyllis Thaxter is utterly endearing, fresh and pretty and very sweet, but also grounded in the reality of what her husband is doing, the support she must give him, and the child that is their own reason and hope in the world. The last scene of the movie is played as Lawson is recuperating in a stateside hospital, not wanting his wife to see him again until he has been fitted with a prothesis and is able to walk with her. When she unexpectedly arrives, he starts from his wheelchair in joy and surprise, forgetting in the moment that he has lost his leg, and tumbles to the floor. In a moment, she is with him, kissing him repeatedly. I imagine when they exchange those terms of endearment they have for each other, it was a wonderfully cathartic moment for the those in that audience with their own hopes and fears.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great list of movie biographers, most are heavily represented on my bookshelf right now. One addition might be Victoria Wilson - am only aware of her 'A Life of Barbara Stanwyck -Steel True', which is only a 'part one' volume, but terrific!

    ReplyDelete