Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Thursday, January 19, 2006





Cartoons On TV --- Part 2


The sale of the Warner Bros. pre-49 library to Associated Artists included 850 features, plus 1,500 shorts and cartoons, and the price was $21 million. That may have seemed like a lot in those days, and God knows they needed the money, but in hindsight, this was an act of pure lunacy on Warner’s part. The cartoons alone were worth many times the total price, as it turned out. We're too young to recall the initial launch of these packages, but by the late fifties, the Greenbriar was on board for Popeye’s every sailing, and those WB cartoons, with their distinctive AAP openings (where you’d get to hear the opening fanfare twice), were ubiquitous on every channel hauled in on our "tenna roter". We particularly recall a daily ritual out of WLOS in Asheville, NC, which began at 7:00 AM, and continued with two solid hours of non-stop WB’s and Popeyes, interrupted only by the weather reports. It didn’t take long to become cartoon literate, as we learned to recognize the pedigree of each short by their opening titles. The good Popeyes were the ones with the ship’s doors, opening and closing to reveal the credits (we always liked that sound they made … still do). The Warner groups were less predictable, as there were certain rogue distributors out there (at least they seemed roguish then) who would remove the studio openings altogether and replace them with ugly cards crediting "Sunset", or "Guild" Films. We’d never heard of those guys, and we could tell they’d not really made these cartoons. Those drawings of Porky holding a rifle, that peculiar dog, and a weirdly distorted Daffy Duck were a stench in the nostrils of many young viewers, including myself, but the cartoons were good, as they were actually the B/W Warner titles not included in the AAP group. It seemed every station had a Popeye show. That sailor man was an absolute sensation when he first hit the airwaves. We had kid shows down here that would sandwich him in between the live studio spots with a kid host and his studio full of moppets (invariably Cub Scout or Brownie troops --- I was briefly a Cub myself, but was drummed out for cowardice). Those Popeyes, even the Fleischers, could get a little tedious when you were seeing six or seven in a row, eventually reaching a point where you’d look at a minute or so, then yell, "Just eat the damn spinach and get on with it!" At some point during every broadcast, those kids in the studio would get their treat bags, then you’d sit for an interminable recitation of every merchant’s name who’d "donated" the useless, and/or tooth-rotting, bric-a-brac within those sacks. One thing about these pages from AAP’s campaign manual --- the emphasis on color cartoons. How many households even had color sets then? I know my family didn’t, and wouldn’t, until 1966. In the meantime, I wonder how many stations broadcast these cartoons in color. It was cheaper for the locals to use B/W prints, and I’d guess that’s what most of them did. Of course, the station managers eventually went looking for "fresh" cartoons, and that’s when we got those dreadful Dick Tracy and made-for-TV Mr. Magoos. They were five minutes long (to the second!) and really sucked, if you’ll excuse the vulgarism. They were an insult to every thinking child in the audience. The offense inflicted by their presence on the airwaves could only be surpassed by the arrival of Astro Boy around 1964. One station manager even acknowledged the unworthiness of that character in a reply to one of my indignant letters sent back in the late sixties (my first letter, at the age of six, included detailed suggestions for a revamping of the Saturday morning schedule, and I’m still waiting for a reply to that one). All this action on TV screens made theatrical cartoons seem superfluous, of course, and that's where the theatre exhibitors got up in arms. In tomorrow’s entry, they fight back!

6 Comments:

Blogger David DeGrand said...

That was a really interesting and fun post!! I thought I was the only kid to watch cartoons and tell which ones were good by the opening titles, and that was in the late 80's early 90's when they still showed the occasional Looney Tune on Saturday mornings. I can't believe how lucky you were to get 2 hours of cartoons!! Great blog!!

12:23 PM  
Blogger Chris Sobieniak said...

Heh, I grew up in the early '80s when the AAP library still had a spot on the UHF drive, as well as through Superstation WTBS. Never realized just how the business end was on those things until only a few years ago when I started to figure it out. I miss those days when they were still on terrestrial television (now being allocated to digital cable and/or home video).

Intresting how companies like AAP and U.M. & M. TV Corp didn't last too long for a while, yet their names lived on through the aquisitions from other companies that took over from the 1960's onward.

12:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your post reminds me of the time I spent watching Warner Bros. cartoons on local television -- and how confusing it was to me that the animation on the pre-1948 Looney Tunes always seemed so poor in comparison to other Warner Bros. cartoons from the same era (which were part of the AAP package on another local station).

It's funny -- I wouldn't wish the world of old, faded Eastmancolor prints and traced-and-refilmed color Looney Tunes on anyone -- but I sure have fond memories of seeing this stuff when I was growing up.

10:09 PM  
Blogger Michelle Klein-Hass said...

AAP was one of those odd memories from my childhood. I had no idea who those guys were but that lowercase aap logo seemed somewhat sinister to me. Sort of like how sinister the Screen Gems logo and the weird music behind it was, and the odd eggbeater logo (god I forget which company it was) that would be in front of all the Gerry Anderson puppet shows like Thunderbirds.

It's only recently that we're seeing the WB cartoons with their original title cards and without those damn aap logos. Just like Chris said, it's weird how those old syndication companies live on long after they're dead, by dint of all those TV syndication prints floating around.

12:32 AM  
Blogger Elisson said...

Jerry Beck's blog directed me to your fine site, which I have added to my blogroll.

You nailed it right on the head with this post. Even back in my Snot-Nose Days, I could tell a quality cartoon from a cheap piece of crap.

The pre-1950 Warner Brothers cartoons were the best. The old Popeyes - Max and Dave Fleischer's work - before Paramount got hold of the studio and started churning out garbage.

And I remember how disappointed I was when those Dick Tracy 'toons came out. Horrible. I mean - Joe Jitsu? Yeef. Pretty much every adaptation of a popular comic strip character was lousy in those days.

Ah, well. Now, at least, we can fill our cabinets with DVD's with good-quality prints of those old classics.

4:27 PM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

In a way, the whole "a.a.p." thing is a commentary (as if we need yet another one) on how little value was placed on cartoons. Associated Artists also got the Warner features for TV, yet you never saw one of those begin with the "a.a.p" logo on TV after the company was acquired by United Artists Television. Apparently it just wasn't worth the effort to remove and replace the old opening from all those silly cartoons. Who knew that a long-defunct company from the waning days of TV's golden age would keep on heralding some of the world's most beloved animated treasures into the 1990's?

Now, would anyone like to hazard a guess as to a.a.p.'s connection with "The Adventures of Superman"?

3:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024