Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, January 09, 2006





Lewis vs. Paramount --- Was Jerry Right?


It’s never a surprise to hear about Jerry Lewis popping off , losing his temper, storming away from the dais. All of that is what makes him Jerry, and even if you can’t stand him, or don’t even remember the last time you sat through one of his movies, there’s something about the man that reminds us of hidden potential we all share to make an absolute, cringing, horrific fool of ourselves in public. It’s happened lots to Jerry over the years. You’d think age would soften him, but no. He’s as combative today as ever. Only a few weeks ago, a couple of wags in the audience pushed him over the edge at a promotional event for the new Dean and Jerry bio he’s written, and the guy turned into a live-action Donald Duck right there on stage. He never lets us down. We can always walk away from a Jerry moment secure in the knowledge that, no matter how moody, impolite, or impatient we may be at times, we can never be as bad as Jerry. But what about those isolated moments in time, few in number it’s true, when Jerry is right? Those occasions when someone else really was at fault, leaving an entirely innocent Jerry to bear weight of an injustice not of his own making. Well, here's an example I'd propose, and for sake of rehabbing Jerry’s admittedly battered image, here's the summary:


The article attached is dated May 16, 1966, a date from which one might chart the rapid decline of Jerry Lewis as a major boxoffice attraction. Some could argue a slippage further back (his last three for Paramount reflect that). You could say it started when Jerry’s extravagance first manifested on Cinderfella and The Ladies Man. Or maybe he went on skids that day he was horsing around in the commissary and launched a
football that almost knocked Paramount founder Adolph Zukor’s head off. For the sake of hypothesis, however, I'll maintain it began here, with the filing of Jerry Lewis vs. Paramount. What was it all about? Well, check out the double-feature ad for an idea. Seems Jerry had been making comedies for Paramount, at a rate of two or so a year, since 1949. They were almost all hits too. In fact, they were bigger than almost anything else the company had. Surely tears were copious (among Paramount bookkeepers) the day he and Dean split, but Jerry showed them all when his solo pics kept batting them right out of the park (check out the still above of Dean and Jer signing a contract with producer Hal Wallis). The trouble started innocently enough with a 1958 reissue combo of Scared Stiff and Jumping Jacks, M&L oldies that did $477,000 and $489,000 respectively in domestic rentals. Those are stout reissue figures, especially when you compare them with what other Paramount revivals were getting --- $261,000 for The Country Girl, $257,000 for The Naked Jungle, etc. The problem was that Jerry was beginning to compete with himself, and it would get worse. His new comedies were maintaining a domestic rentals average of around $2.7 million. A few of the early ones spiked --- The Sad Sack took a resounding $3.2 --- Don’t Give Up The Ship brought back $3.1 --- generally speaking, the Jerrys were a predictable, if profitable, franchise. There was Rock-A-Bye-Baby ($2.6), The Geisha Boy ($2.8), Visit To A Small Planet ($2.6), and biggest of all, The Bellboy ( a whopping $3.4), fantastically profitable because it cost so little to make. It’s right after this that complications set in, because Cinderfella, a big-budget 1960 Christmas opener, was back down to $2.6, a figure that actually surpassed the norm for the remaining Paramount Lewises (there was only one more big hit with The Nutty Professor
at $3.3). Unfortunately for Jerry, it was around this period that the studio began it’s Lewis re-issue program in earnest. 1962 brought a combo of The Delicate Delinquent ($685,000) and The Sad Sack ($687,000), by far the biggest return for any of these packages. Drive-ins were playing the things by the pallet-load, and hardtops were saving film rental by using the oldies for kiddie shows they could book for as little as $20. So why go to the expense of paying percentage for a new Jerry Lewis when the audience was making little distinction between the old and the new? Rental numbers for the star reflected a glut of Lewis product. The Errand Boy and It’s Only Money fell to $2.3, while The Patsy took a further dip to $2.0. Meanwhile, costs were up, and Lewis was taking a bigger fee each time out. With so many of his pictures, old and new, floating around, even the re-issues now began to suffer --- Visit To A Small Planet ($179,000) and The Bellboy ($186,00), a 1966 pairing, put the writing on the wall, while a 1968 duo, The Nutty Professor ($174,000) and The Patsy ($136,000), finished off the reissue program for good. Jerry’s claim before the court was a valid one. Paramount had wrung him dry. To add insult to injury, they were beginning to dump his product onto network television, where the home audience far surpassed the numbers he’d seen lately in theatres. Could he continue making new comedies? Columbia thought so, but Three On A Couch was good for only $2.5, pretty much what the Paramounts were yielding, and they’d gotten fed up with numbers like that. A side trip to Fox produced a crushing flop, Way Way Out, with it’s reckless negative cost of $2.8 million, puny domestic rentals of $1.3 (foreign $1.0), and an overall loss of $855,000. It only took a few more like this to finish Jerry, with Warners supplying the final blow-off of Which Way To The Front (an appalling $729,000 in domestic rentals). Maybe Jerry was his own worst enemy in a lot of ways, but for a comedian who’d been a top-liner in movies for twenty years (who’s done it since?), Jerry got a pretty raw deal. It would be interesting to know how that claim against Paramount turned out. I hope Jerry won.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024