Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Monday, May 08, 2006

Elvis --- You Had To Be There

I can’t recall anyone liking Elvis movies that didn’t grow up seeing them in the theatre. Coming across them for a first time on television or video seems to have the same negative reaction: They’re lame --- they’re stupid --- the music’s bad, and Elvis worse. The only ones they'll recognize are the two concert features, and maybe a couple of numbers from Jailhouse Rock. That’s it. Those of us willing to confess an affection, or even tolerance, for a Fun In Acapulco or Spinout immediately reveal our age, or rather, our middle-age. Actually, fifty or so is more like it --- maybe more. How could we otherwise enjoy such dreck? I’ll never convince a post-boomer of the worthiness of these musicals, and I’m years past the point of trying. To do is to adopt an untenable position. How do you convey in words a chilly autumn afternoon when you came home from seeing Roustabout and jumped headlong into a pile of raked leaves in your parent’s yard? --- or the time you rushed out of school one Spring day to catch the 3:00 show of Girl Happy, knowing you’d miss at least the previews unless you hurried? Elvis movies are about memories, not merit. None of them stand today without a happy childhood moment coming before, after, or during to prop them up. To confess that I once owned the RCA Victor soundtrack album of Harum Scarum and played it repeatedly in excited anticipation of seeing the feature is perhaps a shameful admission to those of a subsequent generation, but I’d like to think my contemporaries will understand. A lot of us grew up in a world of Elvis. If you went to the show a lot in the sixties, you saw Elvis. Maybe you don’t have to look at him now, and I suspect most of us seldom, if ever, do, but let’s at least acknowledge for a moment pleasures he gave once upon a long time ago, and revisit a Presley show I personally consider his best, and I didn’t even see it until I was an adult ---

Loving You was the second Elvis Presley feature. It was in Technicolor and Vistavision. The first one, Love Me Tender, was Cinemascope, but black-and-white. Unlike Loving You, it had a downer ending, and Richard Egan was the star. Elvis didn’t sing that much in it either. In Loving You, he sings constantly (and sometimes looks directly into the camera when doing so). He also fights and kisses girls. Producer Hal Wallis made it his business to deliver precisely what the fans wanted. This was the man who’d helped package Al Jolson. He was the mastermind behind Casablanca and Adventures Of Robin Hood. More recently, he’d developed the Martin and Lewis formula. Wallis was genius producer so far as I’m concerned. You could argue that Loving You was old-fashioned, even then, but who can blame Wallis for using contract players Lizabeth Scott and Wendell Corey to work off their final obligations to him in support of the boy singer? Those kids in line to see Elvis wouldn’t have known Scott and Corey from John Bunny and Flora Finch, but someone had to play in support of their idol. Might just as well be these two. Wallis puts all of Presley ingredients in place right from the opener. Elvis makes his entrance in a hot-rod. It’s understood he digs nice cars. Pretty girls too, but he’s diffident toward them. Never lustful, but fists at the ready when others are. The big punch-up in a diner reveals a hearty Presley appetite for brawling. One of the most noticeable things about Elvis is how viciously he lays into his opponents. This boy really knew how to make a fight look like something. Check out the fisticuffs in any of his movies and see what I mean. Sometimes the surly Elvis can be a little too menacing. There’s a scene in Loving You where Wendell Corey casually mentions the possibility of changing the Elvis character’s name, to which Presley responds with an alarming show of temper. That sweet Elvis countenance could take on a frightening edge when provoked. Sometimes you didn’t even have to provoke him to get a glimpse of it. That must have shook up some of teen girls in the first-run audience. Of course, there’s always dumbbell sidekicks to relieve the tension, and Loving You has at least two of them. This was a fraternity whose membership would increase over those near thirty Elvis pictures that would follow this one.

Here’s some of the merchandising that accompanied Loving You. A few of these knick-knacks are undoubtedly worth money today --- you might even find them on ebay if you care to search thousands of Elvis items available at any given time. Paramount had begun issuing very nice color still sets for their major releases when Loving You came out in July 1957. Some of those are shown here. Our own Liberty and Allen Theatres staged an Elvis stand-off in August of that year when the Allen tried to steal the Liberty's Loving You’s thunder by bringing back Love Me Tender "by popular demand." Wonder how those two exhibitors greeted each other at the drug store sundry counter that week. Loving You grabbed a nifty $3.3 million in domestic rentals (against Love Me Tender’s much better $4.2) --- then added another $85,000 during a 1959 re-issue which found Loving You playing tandem in many situations with Paramount’s King Creole. Note the combo exhibitor ad here, and the "letter to Elvis" lobby stunt that accompanied the re-issues in 1959. I’d be willing to bet not one of those letters actually got mailed, despite management’s promise to do so. Stunts like the one here with the girls and the motorcycle were commonplace for bookings in the larger towns. Elvis photo giveaways were also a sure way to draw the kids. Showmen couldn’t miss when buying them by the gross. Hefty concession sales were a cinch when restless teens came out for refreshment between Elvis numbers, their cue usually arriving with the cutaway to Lizabeth Scott and/or Wendell Corey. Hope those two never attended a public screening of Loving You. Might have been pretty demoralizing if they had.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gosh, but Elvis looks odd in that second color photo. Sort of like Tori Spelling-in-drag meets Harpo Marx...

8:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I, too, remember seeing Elvis flicks in the theater - my hearing has never recovered :).

While I think JAILHOUSE ROCK was his best, I also like KING CREOLE (though I know at least one fellow who felt it was absolute dreck). LOVING YOU is a a lesser film, but important historically as a template for what nearly every subsequent Elvis movie would be like.

I agree that you 'had to be there'. Kinda sad that kids today will never completely grasp who and what he was, or what he meant to us.

Thanks for remembering the King.

9:54 PM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

Great post, but I might argue the "Wallis was a genius" assertion when it comes to "(developing) the Martin & Lewis formula." It's no surprise that the team's television work holds up better than their films; Jerry at least got the TV writers to listen when he said "Dean and I are two comics - not a comic and straight man." Wallis would have none of it. When the team's Colgate and radio writers, Ed Simmons and Norman Lear, were hired to punch up the script for Scared Stiff, they tried to inject some business for Dino. Wallis threw it out and laid down his 'formula': "Jerry's an idiot, Dean's a straight leading man who sings a couple of songs and gets the girl. That's it, don't (mess) with it."

Lewis was no prince to get along with, but it was Wallis' hard-line attitude toward Martin that really fueled the fire that dissolved the team. To the end of his days, Dean despised the M&L movies. Film was the medium by which he expected to be remembered - nightclub acts and live TV were ephemeral - and if he'd stayed with Lewis, he'd be immortalized as the singer who played a louse until the final reel when he suddenly became "a right guy."

2:54 PM  
Blogger StevensScope said...

ELVIS PRESLEY certainly proved he could ACT, ; has ANYONE really EVER given the boy SOME GOOD CREDIT HERE for THE ACTING BRAVOS THAT he GAVE US WITH HIS-first 4- AMAZINGLY DIFFERENT CHARACTER PORTRAYALS IN his first 4 FILMS, which I BELIEVE TO BE THE BEST FILMS of his career?! Everybody knows the rest of the story of the formula-flicks made after his return from the ARMY. SO,... OK...I MEAN, JUST TAKE ANOTHER LOOK at his 'CLINT RENO' brother in "LOVE ME TENDER" (1956)- TALK ABOUT A TERRIFIC SCREEN DEBUT! IN(B & W SCOPE). Then he plays a pretty good version of himself with Deke Rivers in THE TECHNICOLOR/VISTAVISION MUSICAL "LOVING YOU"(1957) ( co-starring adorable DOLORES HART); then #3 comes next with his absolute KNOCK-OUT performance as VINCE EVERETT in "JAILHOUSE ROCK"(1957)= ( B&W SCOPE)-- a character HE ALMOST socks us in the face with -- once again PLAYING a singer-, but a singer with an almost OBNOXIOUS VEIN of indifference evident--erasing ANY possible connection to the sensitive and somewhat innocent hillbilly-character he portrayed in the prior "LOVING YOU"! Then comes film #4-- the HAL WALLIS/ MIKE CURTIZ- FIREWORKS-FINALE of "KING CREOLE" (1958) - THE ONLY ELVIS FILM SHOT in THE "BLACK -AND -WHITE-FLAT" FORMAT; a good choice for THE FILMS' NEW ORLEANS-AT-NIGHT SURROUNDINGS --Indeed the best of ALL ELVIS remains here- in THESE 'FIRST FOUR FILMS'...AND WITH THE SONGS SO GOOD AS THEY ARE HERE IN "KING CREOLE" I'VE always THOUGHT IT TO BE HIS BEST SOUNDTRACK MOVIE ALBUM EVER--then... AND -NOW! Any thoughts from ANY Elvis fans out there re/this subject concerning his First four films?

2:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023