Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

When The Passion Seems Yours Alone

Film enthusiasts are at times like misguided evangelicals, persisting in a life’s mission of bringing others to the fold. How often have we tried (and mostly failed) at "introducing" family and friends to our idea of better viewing? From a time when I could first thread Castle reels upon our 8mm Bell & Howell Regent, mine has been an ongoing assault upon varied unfortunates dragged to darkened rooms for screenings they’d as soon avoid. Quick upon heels of acquiring a "Complete Edition" (eight minutes) of Dracula in 1964, I prevailed upon my father to abandon his morning oatmeal to attend my premiere of same. It’s hard for devotees to accept possibilities of such stuff not appealing to everyone. Just give it a chance, you’ll say, then try concealing disappointment over a tepid (or worse) response. I’ve given up cheerleading for having been burnt so many times. Here’s Rule Number One: Never assure your audience that they’re about to see the funniest movie ever made, or the scariest one. That’s merely challenging them to prove you wrong. No one enjoys taking receipt of their opinion before they’ve expressed it. The wiser course might be suggesting they’d (possibly) find your show interesting, which doesn’t necessarily guarantee it’s good or that they’ll like it. Interesting takes you off the hook for a brutal letdown sure to come when you make rash pronouncements.
Gosh, John, I didn’t laugh once during that Harry Langdon film you just showed, to which I’d rejoin, Yes, but you must admit it was least interesting. We need hides like alligators to preach on behalf of classic movies. And never use that word! --- I stopped years ago --- what expletive is more intimidating and off-putting than classic? TCM, change your name and find that mass audience you’ve sought! I twist in emotional winds as outsiders look at my stuff. Honestly, it’s more satisfying to watch alone. At least then you bear no responsibility for inflicting a bad show on anyone other than yourself. I’m through performing celluloid baptisms, a balm to myself and most of those (outside collector circles) who’ve lately shared my company (I come here instead to annoy you readers). My courtship of girlfriend Ann did touch upon Universal horrors and even Deanna Durbin in First Love. As our relationship blossomed and necessity of constant togetherness diminished, she drifted off to evenings with seventies sitcoms and I withdrew to Films Noir, serials unendurable to those aspiring toward normalcy, and umpteenth unspoolings of The Thing. For giving ourselves over to such esoteric matters (which reminds me of a cousin who’d recently checked out GPS for the first time --- It’s OK, John, but too esoteric), might we have become intellectual carrots? The mind boggles (and see, I needn’t explain that reference, but would to anyone off the Greenbriar reservation). All this is mere preamble to my account herein of what disaster fell when just this week, Ann asked if we might watch something spooky together. As such was a rare request after seven years and most entertainment choices made separately, I decided to lay Black Sabbath on her, with alternating foreign/domestic versions, much background as to what the 1964 omnibus chiller had meant to me (since age 10), and drum-beating over scares it would generate for us both. Did I get burnt again? Yes I did.

My preparations toward getting things right, rather pathetic now in hindsight, involved leaps from DVD to DVR and back again. I’d known Black Sabbath most of my life and so was ready to play this chessboard. Ever identified the films with which you’ve shared an ongoing life’s history --- ones that resurface time and again as you get older? Black Sabbath is one of those for me. The first scrap of movie memorabilia ever to come my way had been a pressbook cover sent home by Colonel Forehand via my father just after the film’s 1964 first-run at the Liberty (that somewhat frayed item shown above). Already nostalgic for chillers like it by the time I was booking college programs, Black Sabbath played a 1975 Halloween tandem with Brides Of Dracula (if memory serves, each was had for $35 rental). I’d tightened that parlay by simply omitting Black Sabbath’s second of three stories, The Telephone, on my conviction that it was too weak a link and might prematurely drive off the audience. Decades passed and Black Sabbath limped its way onto video and laser disc, a drab representation of what we’d enjoyed in theatres. DVD supplied a pictorially superior rendition of the Italian original (in that language), and though it preserved (at last) Mario Bava’s intended cut, this Black Sabbath lacked a crucial element, Boris Karloff’s voice. Those tracks are controlled by MGM stateside, and they’ve shown no interest in releasing the domestic version as it was re-cut/scored/dubbed by American-International back in 1964. You’d have to combine the two for something approaching an ideal presentation. As of this month and MGM-HD’s long-awaited broadcast of the AIP Black Sabbath, I was at last able to share a childhood’s horrific milestone, and this time I’d include The Telephone, jazzed up as now it was with a lesbian subplot missing from the US edition. Ann and I sat down on the Sabbath just previous (not necessarily a Black one) to watch, beginning with A Drop Of Water, which most consider by far the most effective of BS’s three offerings. That’s just a doll, screeched Ann as the frightful old hag stared from her deathbed. May-be, said I, but it terrified a generation of children, including myself. I might have argued further had not Black Sabbath run further aground with still weak despite lesbian subtexted The Telephone (to which she declaimed, that’s just lame) and an abysmal (Ann’s word) The Wurdalak, from which she exited altogether. I was left to solitary contemplation of Black Sabbath and doubt of my own judgment as to what’s good and bad in movies. Had sentiment and an excess of critical forbearance blinded me to realities of a frankly so-so (if that) horror movie no one younger than me could (or should) care about? Ann vaguely recalled it showing up on Channel 8’s Shock Theatre when she was ten (that would have been around 1971). Her household, including three brothers, laughed it off their black-and-white tube, abetted by horror host Dr. Paul Bearer and hot dogs they’d boiled for the telecast. Was this any way to watch Black Sabbath, let alone remember it? That difference between large screen and small, and a perhaps even more crucial one between color and monochrome, was enough to bleed Black Sabbath white for Ann, whose own comeuppance would come years later when she tried introducing The Legend Of Hell House, a horror that had rocked her theatrically in 1973, to her own children. Did you really think that was scary, Mom? was their incredulous inquiry after snickering and rolling eyes throughout the show.

I’d have gladly carried James Nicholson and Samuel Arkoff’s bags through all those exhibitor conferences just to watch them operate in varied suites, lobbies, and cocktail lounges, for it was such hotel environs that breathed commercial life into Black Sabbath and others of its genre sort, bookings typically secured over AIP-sponsored luncheons and drinks supplied by Jim and Sam. American-International had become a showman’s best friend since opening shop in the mid-fifties. Nicholson was formerly in management and a movie fan besides. By 1963, he and Arkoff had sold bushel-barrels of low-budget horrors to theatres and drive-ins whose appetites for AIP’s kind of entertainment seemed insatiable. Their output was mostly color now, being necessitated by more and more monsters on TV since days when the company released their B/W cheapies pre-packaged in pairs. Jim and Sam figured to use known quantities from the home screen and toward that end made deals first with Peter Lorre, then Boris Karloff, both chiller veterans and late show regulars. Lorre’s pledge called for eight pictures over four years through 1967. Karloff would star in four through 1965, his contract barring any outside motion pictures dealing with horror, science-fiction, macabre subjects, or Edgar Allan Poe subjects. The restriction also applies to television, said trade mag Boxoffice. Lorre and Karloff had been a hit together in The Raven (here they are on a publicity junket for that) with $1.231 million in domestic rentals, but a follow-up, The Comedy Of Terrors, stumped its toe and brought back a disappointing $747,000. Maybe audiences didn’t want to laugh at their creepers after all (some theatre ads, like Chicago’s first-run shown here, actually tried minimizing light-hearted aspects of the film and sold it as a straight thriller). Another parodic project set to go, Graveside Story, which would have reunited the cast of The Comedy Of Terrors, was abandoned just short of production. Karloff dispatched to Europe for a shocker to be done in earnest by Italian director Mario Bava, whose Black Sunday in 1961 performed the best of any black-and-white genre pic AIP had released to that point ($706,000 in domestic rentals). Nicholson and Arkoff meanwhile continued looking for ways to enhance their good-will standing among exhibitors. The biggest noises generated by these were complaints over post-1948 features showing up on television. Ever ones for seizing opportunity that might enrich bookings, Jim and Sam took to convention floors and swore they’d stem the tide of product going over to the enemy… even as AIP was quietly preparing to close a video deal on much of its own library.

Producers and distributors have an obligation to offer some protection for exhibitors to prevent almost new pictures from being rushed into TV and in some cases conflicting with theatre bookings, said Nicholson to an assemblage of the Theatre Owners Of America and Allied States Exhibitors Organization in March 1963. We of American-International Pictures challenge the other companies to follow our pledge to exhibitors. The "No TV Clause" guaranteed that all future AIP product, beginning with The Raven and Operation Bikini, would be withheld from television for a minimum period of five years from the date of release, subject only to bank foreclosure or financial loss (the clearance would not apply if film rentals do not equal production and distribution costs and expenses within a period of two years from national release). Calling theirs an urgent and necessary move, Jim and Sam (posing below with exhibs) slammed actions of competing distributors as cannibalism of the worst sort and warned that this unregulated and indiscriminate early TV exposure cannot help but convince the public that they need only wait a few months and they will see all movies on TV free. This, of course, was music to a show world’s ears. Nicholson and Arkoff were all but hoisted up as if they’d kicked a winning field goal. TOA and Allied directors issued a resolution encouraging members to show their appreciation by booking AIP product at every possible opportunity. What came next could not have been entirely unexpected, for Nicholson announced in June 1963 that sixty-nine AIP features had been sold to five American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres television stations for two million dollars. All but seven of the sixty-nine were black and white, and included titles such as The Amazing Colossal Man, Blood Of Dracula, and I Was A Teenage Werewolf, along with westerns, war, and other genre actioners the company had dabbled in. AIP assured theatres that product involved has been in continuous theatrical release and many of the films have been reissued and have exhausted their full theatrical potential. In fact, many if not most of them were still playing heavily on weekend hardtop programs and all-night drive-in berths. The company said it would provide showmen with dates of initial TV showings so as to avoid conflict with theatre bookings. Runs on AB-PT stations throughout 1964, these located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Detroit, and New York, were followed by wider syndication of the sixty-nine AIP’s in January 1965 through a company called Screen Entertainment. These knocked a lot of the old Universal monsters off their perch (I remember The Day The World Ended playing Charlotte’s Horror Theatre on New Year’s night, initiating a year of AIP domination of Channel 3’s Friday late movie).

It didn’t take American-International long to forget its promise. The company’s own TV division offered the Amazing ’65 package of twenty features to become available in September 1964. These included Black Sunday, Circus Of Horrors, and Konga, each outside perimeters of the pledge, having been released prior to 1963, but the following year’s Amazing ’66 (available September 1965), offering The Terror, Dementia 13, and The Evil Eye, among twenty-two titles, seemed to have violated terms. Had AIP lost money on these and thus excluded them from its protected group? The company’s theatrical revenue was dropping from previous seasons. The Terror only realized $360,000 in domestic rentals, Dementia 13 a worse $116,000. AIP was in effect competing with itself, having so much similar horror and sci-fi backlog not only saturating in theatres, but now in homes as well. American-International Television began salting its syndication packages with Euro titles unreleased stateside and very cheap sci-fi’s they’d commissioned from producer Larry Buchanan. The Amazing Adventures 1967 group included twenty-five features and Black Sabbath was among them, its availability announced March 1966 for Autumn season play (Queen Of Blood was included as well, despite having been released theatrically that same March --- could this be why they changed its title to Planet Of Blood?). Black Sabbath had maxed out with $419,000 domestic rental dollars from 7,130 theatrical bookings. Boris Karloff in horror films tended to perform well below what Vincent Price could recover for the same brand. Black Sabbath may also have been shunned in church-going communities where small exhibs passed so as to avoid negative patron response to its title (I noticed that apparent trend in a lack of bookings for the film in surrounding NC towns, though our Liberty thankfully ran it as a single for two days). All this history is so much smoked meat now that we (more or less) have ready access to Black Sabbath, but its critical reputation remains largely stillborn outside fan followers who remember it new (Maltin’s Guide assigns it just two-and-a-half stars) and that’s largely because it was so hard to decently see for so long. Will presentations worthy (Thanks, Anchor Bay DVD and MGM-HD) and scrupulously researched production histories elevate Black Sabbath to a deserved pantheon? Only if they keep Ann out of the voting!


Blogger G. D. Wilson said...

There's no way I would attempt to screen BLACK SABBATH for my girlfriend. Although there are a few ladies out there with enough intellect to enjoy and/or appreciate such fare, sadly such females are few and far bewteen.
Know any hardcore female film collectors who know how to thread up a projector? I know of none. At age 56, I've realized, like John, that the best way to enjoy films is by myself or at a gathering like Cinevent.
Which brings up a point John brought up in the prior Cinefest article, and three cheers for taking the hotels to task for those "iron maiden" chairs, which is the main reason such events no longer appeal to me, but I don't know what can be done except bring a lawn chair and a pillow. When I was a younger lad, I could endure the hotel torture chairs, but not at age 56 or beyond. And this is a great tragedy, for folks like myself or older are the ones who have supported such festivals in the past. It's hard to laugh at the antics of Charlie Chase for example, when your arthritic body is seated upon am unyielding torture device.
Another reason I quit attending festivals is that most all of my movie peer friends have passed away--they've threaded up their last reel in the film palace of life, to be whisked away by the Grim Reaper draped in a shroud of black 16mm film. No need to buy prints at the dealer tables or order projector bulbs to put on a movie show for dead people
Back to the ladies, if one of you gents has met that rarest of rare women who understands and appreciates film, than truly blessed are ye. The most aggravating thing is trying (which is FUTILE) to show a cinematic gem to your beloved, while she watches and CROCHETS at the same time--only watching the film in spurts, and failing to understand my appreciation of same.
Unfortunately, most of the ladies out there are mindless non-intellectuals who enjoy watching WIFE SWAP, SUPER NANNY, AMERICAN IDOL and other trash.
But am I bitter? Hell yes!
At least I kept my old Thorn EMI/HBO VHS tape of the AIP BLACK SABBATH with the Karloff voice tracks. It's the version I remember best from the old "Chiller Theatre" days in Central Ohio--with narrator Karloff lurking behind a fog-shrouded tree.
And as soon as my beloved witch leaves to attend yet another goddam baby shower in a few minutes, I'm going to crank up the sound on the AIP BLACK SABBATH, nuke some popcorn and relax in MY recliner.
Ah,life is good for a few hours.
This evening's 2nd feature: HOW TO MURDER YOUR WIFE.

12:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Horror pictures are always a risky thing to introduce to the uninitiated, anyway. The vintage chillers we love so much are more likely to induce rolling eyes and yawns rather than shivers in those unsympathetic to their admittedly often dated charms. That's particularly true when you're dealing with anyone who has come of age in the last three decades, when "horror" in a motion picture has become synonymous with graphic gore. How can Boris Karloff compete with nubile young bodies sliced, diced, and mutilated with surgically precise realism and in loving close-up?

There are movies I'll share with other people, but horrors are not among that number. Those I keep to myself, to enjoy in private, when no one is around to dampen the experience with their decided lack of enthusiasm.

2:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm with you, John, about using the word "classic" -- certainly, there are movies I call classics, but as a genre designation -- "classic movies" -- no. I find "vintage" preferable, but still unsatisfactory. Worst of all, for me, is "old movies." It sounds so patronizing. I mean, does anyone ever say: "Mmm, Bach...nothing like that old music"? Or: "Yeah, Shakespeare, you can't beat those old plays"? Or: "I'm really into Charles Dickens; I just love old books"? But I'm always hearing some whippersnapper beaming, "I just love old movies." Of course, to them, an "old" movie is anything made before Titanic (James Cameron's, that is, not Jean Negulesco's).

You're right, too, about the loneliness of the true film enthusiast. I'd rather not watch movies alone, but if I didn't, well, I'd hardly ever see any movies at all. Not an option.

1:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Three cheers, Mr. Lane! I just hate it when I walk down the street or into a restaurant and someone points and says, "Look at the old man!"

3:02 PM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

This past Sunday my wife put on Seventh Voyage of Sindbad, a childhood favorite of hers. She'd never seen it in COLOR before, having lived with a b&w TV until adulthood. Along with some popcorn, our two eldest children were in attendance.

That was a mistake. It was impossible for my poor wife to recapture (and share) beloved childhood memories when my son and daughter were eagerly assuming the roles of Tom Servo and Crow, with wisecracks and pop culture references flying about. I'm afraid I was no help, particularly when one them got off a good one.

I apologized when it was over, but - good sport that she is - my wife wasn't upset, or at least claimed not to be. "At least they enjoyed it," she said. But I suspect the kids'll be banned from the room after Netflix sends the next one.

3:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Hayde: Don't kid yourself. Your wife's grace does her credit, but believe me, she was upset, more than she cared to show. To see a beloved movie scorned and ridiculed is a wound deep and slow to heal, if ever. (My teeth still gnash at the memory of a living-roomful of "friends" hooting and jeering at my 8mm print of the 1925 Phantom of the Opera; only my backstairs neighbors, who left after one reel when they saw how things were going, know what that did to me.)

This phenomenon is not confined to inveterate buffs like me; it's pretty nearly universal -- just try making rude noises at Twilight in a roomful of teenage girls and see if you can get out alive.

Besides -- how much more devastating it must be when the target of the sneers is The 7th Voyage of Sinbad! Heresy! Heresy!

7:41 PM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

Naw, my wife's seen the kids do the same thing to my pet movies enough times... probably she was expecting it to happen.

As a kid with an 8mm projector, I've been very lucky. First of all, I only chose stuff meant to be laughed at, and had a plethora of cassette tapes with appropriate scores. I ran Chaplin's The Adventurer for a college class, and Laurel & Hardy's Big Business at a dinner party my parents were throwing. Both went over very well. When I was really little, staying overnight with my grandparents, I brought my projector and ran my Atlas Films copy of Fatty Arbuckle's The Waiters' Ball. One of my treasured memories is of my grandmother laughing hysterically at the fake fish hopping up and down under Kate Price's dress... I can still hear it.

11:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We should probably forsake the notion that we can somehow woo women with our favorite films. My wife quilts. I cannot become interested in a quilt no matter how wonderful it is. We simply live with these facts.
As to the torture seats at film festivals, I always attend Cinesation, where we watch movies in a real theater with real theater seats. But I still bring a pillow.
Alas, we are all getting older.

12:07 PM  
Blogger Christopher said...

I got my first projector for Christmas 1968 and collected films from then to all thru the 70s...I had a little better audience being that my friends were of the hippy freak variety that seemed to channel in classics and rarities better than your average fellow..But I do remember some more humiliating experiances running Silent Laurel and Hardy films for School classes where more of the COMMONERS abound..
...I haven't seen the AIP version of Black Sabbath in so long that I've grown quite accustomed to the Italian version..The Telephone used to be the story I always avoided,but now its slowly becoming my favorite of the trio.The suspense build up is excellent and the ladies are lovely..I still get a chill looking at the dead medium in The Drop of Water but even more so now,I marvel at those money saving, Rich rich imaginative color schemes that Bava conjured up so well in his films..Karloff's dubbed in italian dosen't bother me at all..I'm a little anxious to see the AIP version again to see if it will change my mind...

4:36 PM  
Blogger J.A. Morris said...

I agree about calling something the "scariest" or "funniest" or "my favorite" movie ever. My wife was a big fan of many "classic" movies before I met her(Hitchcock,30s screwball comedys,Hepburn & Tracy,most of the big Bogart films). But she'd never seen any Marx Brothers or W.C. Fields films. So,whenever I would introduce those, I would let her know she wasn't obligated to like them. So far, she's liked everything I've shown her. So the soft-sell approach works.

10:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


You're doing all this deliberately so I'll be a "permanent" nuisance to the good people who post here, aren't you? But what a kick in the pants to see today's' masthead! David Butler and my grandfather were very-close, and it was David, as producer of "Glory" who asked for my grandfather and lyricist Teddy Koehler to write the songs for the film. M.K., having suffered a minor heart-attack a few years before, had gone into semi-retirement by then, but came back to do this one. I saw it not long-ago and the songs are very good, particularly the title-number, but I really wouldn't recommend this one to a wide-audience. Margaret O'Brien was darling. My mother had been tested at Metro during the 40's by Robert "Pop" Leonard to play O'Brien's twin-sister for a film that never happened. But, she always talked about "Pop" Leonard, a legendary director, of course, and how extremely nice and helpful he was to her. I saw Miss O'Brien only about two-years ago and introduced myself. She certainly remembered my grandfather, and also did recall that aborted project at MGM at that time. And she still looked wonderful. And, my guess is that if by midnight tonight,PST,the readers of Greenbriar have not formed a lynch committee against me, then something's wrong! "Glory" by the way, was one of the very-last productions made by RKO, before they sold-out to Desilu.
Hope you had a good-time at your film festival.
As always,

4:00 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

RJ, Syracuse was great. I'll be back next year for sure.

I've never seen "Glory," but I liked this shot. Ever notice how jolly David Butler always looks in stills? He comes across the same way during his cameo in "It's A Great Feeling."

I met Margaret O'Brien once at a Courts show and she was very nice.

4:09 PM  
Blogger r.j. said...


David was very-close with our family. He and my grandfather went back to "Shine On Harvest Moon" at Warners, and it was M.K. and Ted Koeheler who did "Some Sunday Morning" for his production of "San Antonio". When Leo McCarey had yet another auto-accident after one buttermilk too many, and had to abort his projected "Adam and Eve" project, Dad and his partner Tony Ellis' contract with Rainbow Productions was then sold to Butler's independent company at Warner's. David, as I understand it, attended my parents' wedding. (I couldn't make it that day, unfortunately). I probably met him as a child, but I have no clear recollection of it. Still, you're right about his always looking jolly. As late as the late sixties, he had a project "on board" at Paramount -- get this -- it was going to be an "update" of some of the films he had done with Shirley Temple at Fox in the 30's! He once again dispatched my grandfather and Ted to write a score. I remember hearing my grandfather play part of it at that time. One of the songs was to be called "On Jelly Bean Row and Candy Bar Lane". Now, mind you, this is like '67 -'68 -- James Bond is now the "happening thing". I remembered thinking at the time that the song was very nice, very pretty, but seemed a bit of date in that era. I didn't say anything, because Moe was always very nice about taking me to lunch at his club, and picking-up the tab, and there's no point biting the hand, etc. Not surprisingly, Paramount called-off the project. And I had completely forgotten that till just this minute! You're an evil man, Mr. McElwee!


4:43 PM  
Blogger Vanwall said...

I'm lucky, I guess, my true love is a film preservationist and a movie junkie, prolly worse than me. I had a movie gal-pal nonpareil in my teens, too, but also indifference from other close women, so meh on them.

1:52 AM  
Blogger Tbone Mankini said...

Alas I too have been a victim of what I call "vintage" syndrome...where the cold hearted terror of memories begins to emit a very unpleasant odour to new comers as the fright begins to deteriorate beyond all hope of in point:15 year-old on phone to friend at the climax of QUATERMASS AND THE PIT..."naw. ...just some movie people used to think was scary. ...."

11:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024