Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Monday, December 06, 2010

Fox's Medicine Goes Down

Here was the tightrope 20th walked when time came to market Bigger Than Life: They'd done a melodrama full-out on the serious subject of prescription drug abuse and had to, that is, had to, avoid appearance of pointing fingers at the medical community. Initial trade ad question How Did They Dare To Make It? could be answered thus ... Very cautiously. Fox had tried and profited with social themes before. Their Snake Pit was one patrons entered to ultimate reward of five million on worldwide rentals, so drawing from similar wells seemed a (near) sure thing. James Mason's Bigger Than Life ordeal would surely compel as did Olivia De Havilland's (or so ads promised), for hot topics were evergreen and recent The Man With The Golden Arm ($5.9 million worldwide) proved drugs were potent when dispensed out of ticket windows. 20th merchandisers began heating potatoes in early July 1956 with an early sneak before drug industry executives, who, expectedly, disapproved (the film could produce horror enough in the average person to make a lasting impression, one said). All this was duly reported in Newsweek and The New York Herald Tribune, from which Fox ran with quotes that served their campaign's purpose. A "controversy," even if largely manufactured, was thus in play for weeks leading up to Bigger Than Life's August 1 open. Lots of space pro and con in the papers is creating a curiosity and "want-to-see' attitude amongst the public, said Motion Picture Exhibitor, even as insiders were likely in on truth of Fox having dampened their fuse by trimming Bigger Than Life of content likely to ruffle medical establishment feathers.

Trade ads from the start were determined to let doctors off the hook. I warned him, says a masked medico dominating art, One Pill Too Many and You Can't Stop! The AMA had been on ground floor as Bigger Than Life went before cameras and made sure interests were protected. The last thing they needed was a public roused over careless pill dispensing. Fox meantime bent over and took the shot. Well, they weren't making a documentary after all, and could still take bows for courageous filmmaking even as AMA reps applied blue pencil to Bigger Than Life's script. Orderly run-up to premiere saw one of the largest (radio and television) saturation campaigns for a 20th-Century-Fox picture (Motion Picture Herald), so the company wasn't napping as to promotion, but who could have anticipated producer/star James Mason firing off with both barrels to trade and anyone who'd listen over his dissatisfaction with TCF and how they'd timidly handled Bigger Than Life from its outset? The studios appease pressure groups large and small, declared the actor in a frank assessment of his not altogether happy producing experience at 20th. He accused the latter of bowing too easily to AMA watchdogs, a group Mason would be less inclined to satisfy given greater control of the project. He went on to state the obvious that had he made Bigger Than Life as an independent producer, there'd have been less studio inhibitions to contend with and perhaps heavy subject matter could have been leavened with humor.

Mason and Fox weren't alone in courting controversy. On the same day JM appeared for press questioning, producer Julian Blaustein was down the street at a luncheon and screening for Storm Center, Columbia's drama about civil liberties and book banning that had been slammed by the Catholic Legion of Decency. Blaustein called that censorship and contrary to American principles of freedom of thought and expression (the stir didn't help --- Storm Center collected only $196,000 in domestic rentals). For his part, James Mason emphasized the fact that Bigger Than Life had received a Code seal, while Otto Preminger's The Man With The Golden Arm, denied the same PCA approval, went out anyway through United Artists, a situation he called absurd. Besides, he added, Bigger Than Life wasn't really about drug addiction per se, despite Fox advertising to that effect. Mason had been told that "New York" controlled all aspects of selling, a fact leading him to conclude that the studio itself was dominated by east coast overseers. Fox was reliant upon the pre-sold property, be it a play or best-seller, according to the actor/producer: The major studios should pick controversial subjects to combat TV ... be forthright and aggressive even if your budget is low. The way Mason saw it, the film industry is now nearly a year behind other mediums of expression, including newsreels, TV, and even novels, in the use of forthright and timely subjects. Motion Picture Exhibitor's New York columnist Mel Konecoff noted Mason's desire, in spite of expressed criticisms, to become a sought-after producer and director (in fact, JM hoped to follow Bigger Than Life with a Jane Eyre remake for Fox, but this fell through when proposed co-star Audrey Hepburn proved unavailable). Konecoff cautioned Mason that giving answers like the foregoing (at the press reception) is one way not to reach that status (of producer/director) at 20th Fox, unless (the) film makes money, that is. Unfortunately for Mason and his studio partner, Bigger Than Life would end up taking the lowest domestic rentals ($524,000) of any Fox release in 1956.

Best efforts were made to sell the film. Trade ads ran weekly for a month ahead of release. Fox was confident enough to start with limited engagements, hoping word-of-mouth would excite interest in Bigger Than Life's daring subject (TCF to exhibitors: If you want it, and can handle it, contact your 20th branch manager immediately). Washington's home office hosted a special preview for invited cabinet officers, members of the Senate and the House Of Representatives, plus top-ranking officials of the public health and welfare agencies. This was, after all, a vital subject, and worthy of serious national dialogue. By mid-September and widening play-off, The Motion Picture Herald issued fair warning in its Selling Approach column: A picture for adults only --- not for drive-ins. MPH's review was otherwise positive, even as it referred to Bigger Than Life as a question mark at the boxoffice ... there is virtually no comic relief and the only name of any significance is Mason's. In fact, Fox was pushing director Nicholas Ray as much as any cast member. He'd been responsible for the previous year's Rebel Without a Cause, a hit still racking numbers Bigger Than Life wouldn't approach. Boxoffice magazine's Barometer told the dispiriting story of the latter's wicket reception. Bigger Than Life averaged just eighty-eight percent of average receipts for the week of September 29. November and December saw it maintaining at ninety-six percent. These figures were far below Fox's other season offerings, including The King and I (eventual profit: $1.6 million), Bus Stop ($322,000), and The Last Wagon ($219,000). Mason was right as to these being "safe" properties. Both The King and I and Bus Stop were indeed pre-sold and hot off stage successes.

Bigger Than Life would end with a loss of $875,000. Why it failed is anyone's guess. Was James Mason a less captivating addict than Frank Sinatra? --- and if patrons must descend into snake pits, wouldn't Olivia DeHavilland's be more congenial? Everyone's latter-day punching bag Bosley Crowther, then critic for The New York Times, might have hit on an essential problem. In any case, his review read like one trades might have posited: ... to ask a paying audience to sit for almost an hour and watch somebody (Mr. Mason) go through a painfully slow routine of becoming intoxicated from taking too much cortisone is adding a tax of tedium to the price of admission. You expect something more for your money than a little flurry of violence at the end. Crowther spoke of good reason to get inpatient with the whole dismal thing. His reservations were seconded by exhibitors, for whom Moz Burles of the Canyon Theatre in Bingen, Washington summed up: These self-produced and directed efforts by falling stars are a real booking problem. Admittedly, the theme of the picture should be made known to all people, but since the inception of the movies, the fans just don't like to be educated or lectured to. They spend their money --- they hope for an evening's entertainment. Fox brass must have been perplexed. They hadn't hit such walls with 40's social documents, after all. Those were profitable. The answer may have been Darryl Zanuck's not being there to shepherd Bigger Than Life. He'd departed 20th's lot to produce independently, leaving Buddy Adler in charge, and Adler had not Zanuck's story and editing capability. Whatever Bigger Than Life's problem, the public smelled burnt meat and stayed away accordingly. 20th would much later have a payday of sorts when it licensed Bigger Than Life for a Blu-Ray Criterion release. That disc, with its flurry of extras, confirms the film's status as a noble 1956 failure turned ongoing cult success.
Check out an earlier Greenbriar Bigger Than Life post here.


Blogger Mike Cline said...

My town, Salisbury, North Carolina, followed the national trend of shying away from BIGGER THAN LIFE.

The movie had a measly, two-day, mid-week run at the CAPITOL THEATRE, playing December 19-20, 1956.

It's obligatory drive-in appearance occurred for a one-night stand at the SALISBURY DRIVE-IN on February 17, 1957, playing alongside ABBOTT & COSTELLO MEET THE MUMMY.

BIGGER THAN LIFE had fared no better in Salisbury than Adlai Stevenson in the just-past election.

9:46 AM  
Anonymous Dan in Missouri said...

Your posts continue to amaze me. All originals and going to areas not normally covered by film essayists.

7:17 PM  
Blogger radiotelefonia said...



2:30 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Thanks Bolo, for that info about the Salisbury runs. Always interesting to observe how smaller towns handled pictures such as this ...

Dan, I thank you for those kind words. They mean a lot.

Radiotelephonia, those are some unique images, as ones you send so often are! Thanks for sharing them.

8:30 AM  
Blogger MDG14450 said...

When I saw this a couple of years ago along with a fairly large audience, the crowd was generally appreciative. I wonder if a modern audience that's seen dozens of movies following this same formula enjoyed (if that's the word) the novelty of the story grafted onto a 50s melodrama. Also that this was almost a prototype.

Mason's, as usual, very good--didn't realize he'd produced it.

2:12 PM  
Blogger Oscar Grillo said...

"The Lord was wrong!": my favourite line in a movie after "The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle; the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true!"

3:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024