Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Favorites List --- Warren William and Employees' Entrance

Exhibit A For Print Ads Salacious As Precodes They Sold
Go whole hog enough on precode and you may wind up wanting to be Warren William's Kurt Anderson, or in the women's column, Ruth Chatterton's Female. Both are seductive role models for moderns yoked by social, sexual, and political proprieties re-writ since characters like these grazed on a (lots) more raffish culture. How many men bound in corporate or business chains would trade at least their souls to be an Employees' Entrance kind of boss? Current-day Mad Men is but 21st cent opportunity to quietly envy males rampant in what we're assured were bad old days thankfully past. Of course, Warren William makes even these look like lace doilies, for unlike Mad Men (and certainly us), there's never any hauling to account for Kurt Anderson, nor do we want him busted by Act Three rulebooks meekly applied since to preserve status quo. You need watch few movies or television today to recognize production codes still in place, even as same goes undocumented. It's one-of-a-kind disavowal of chalk-lines we walk that gives Employees' Entrance ongoing power to shock.

Recreate Kurt Anderson's Office From This Set Still --- Then Go Be Him!

I've seen Employees' Entrance enough times to know where best parts are. A hair trigger remote zipped me past "nice" characters Loretta Young and Wallace Ford to get back with precode oracle Warren William, whose best (dirty) work this has to be. It's challenging to speed-forward footage and stop on the dime of his face. Not an ideal way to watch movies, but once committed to memory, precode faves often repeat–play best shorn of virtue's valiant effort to overcome wickedness. I always exit Employees' Entrance right after WW drops the dog in his wastebasket --- who needs to know (or care) that less engaging Young and Ford got back together?

The Chiseled Cad --- They'd All Exit The Stage Eventually
 So where do we come off judging hard products of that hardest 30s school, depression society at large or 18 hour day classes taught at WB? A lot of Kurt Andersons must have graduated from the latter, for bastard that his characters tended to be, you don't get a sense of Warner scribes disapproving the Warren William persona any more than those of fast shufflers Lee Tracy, William Powell, Cagney ... how else but to deal off bottoms for a roof and meals? Smash Or Be Smashed was no more William's credo than that of many who figured gentility for weakness or at the least a straighter route to bread lines.

Two From Kurt Anderson's Harem: Loretta Young and Alice White

The Breakthrough --- WW Featured in WB's 1932 Product Annual
 College film study should begin with Employees' Entrance. It would surely open pores and disabuse assumption of what constituted old movies. Kids look at a Kurt Anderson and wonder, shouldn't he be punished?, as liberal art recipients are taught surely he must, for lustily engaging in every -ism they're conditioned to deplore. (Kurt but half-kiddingly suggests, Why don't you kill her?, when an Employees' colleague bemoans blackmailing trollop Alice White) Moderns imagine they know from bad-boy screen behavior, but look closer and there's always a reckoning for alpha dudes violating Unwritten Codes to take liberties far less egregious than William's. Mel Gibson divines innermost thoughts and learns What Women Want, but after brief middle-section of his enjoying it, we know he'll pay and dearly for invading that gender's private space. Was ever a leading man so broken and humbled, and in a comedy yet? (What Women Want's 3d act is as funny as Death Of A Salesman) Had such levelers been applied to Warren William's precode conduct, we'd not have an Employee's Entrance half so much fun.

Mock-Up a New York Skyline with a Penthouse View --- and Your Next Warren William Is Ready To Roll

It's known enough by now that William was best essaying business scoundrels and short-sellers, but who are ones (if any) that paced later his feral tracks? I enjoyed for a while Michael Douglas all Warren-ish at Me-decade scalawagging, and there was Alec Baldwin and James Woods (when cast right) to remind us of precode similars having once trod the earth. Trouble was these having to die or get jail time for perfidy from which Warren William often emerged scot-free. That unwritten Code again. Class-warring as practiced now was mirrored in William's prime. Inherited wealth is a badge of dishonor so far as Employees' Entrance portrays it. To have descended from James Monroe and Benjamin Franklin, plus unearned prosperity, amounts to three strikes and you're out. Self-made Kurt Anderson alone deserves his haul. Whatever ruthless else he does, Kurt won't live off the fat of estates, and that made him fundamentally OK to patrons also denied silver spoons.

Denton Ross' Office: Trophies, Golf Clubs, and Ancestor Portrait Reflect His Getting Rich The Easy Way --- Sure Cues For Patron Laughter and/or Disdain.

Then-published ads reveal clearest Employees' mission. They'd expose shop counters and office pools as so much brothel space, with Kurt Anderson A Man Who Can "Make" Or Break More Women Than Any Sultan. Note parentheses around "Make," its sexual connotation unmistakable. Youth got worldly fast just reading newspaper promotion in those days. Employees' Entrance was further opportunity for showmen to heat things up. Girls "Selling Their Souls" for a job "At Any Price" said it all, but as opposed to cries for reform a prisoner on chain gangs elicited, these plights apparently shared by working women were mere stuff of titillation. Has the depression brought about bargains in love? was less expression of indignation than helpful tip-off to store merchandise more alluring than mere piece goods.

The Stable Home and Wife Didn't Have To Be Faked --- Offscreen WW Was a Straight Arrow

Dog Lover William Often Posed With Pets
 The wolf's head that was Warren William had to be cleaved. PCA enforcement crowded him into corners WW could only farce his way out of. He and movies suddenly occupied a fairy-tale world. Plain diminishing was this actor in screwball mode after tours of precode duty, the chairman of Anything Goes' board donning lampshades on his head. William became a rakish uncle who's promised to stop telling ribald jokes around the children. Back as office lothario in 1939's Day-Time Wife, he's so gelded as to pose anything but a threat to Linda Darnell's secretary. This de-fanged wolf seemed less Warren William than Lester Matthews, just a face among mustachioed cast listings in support.

Code Enforcement Made William a Safe Date for Linda Darnell in 1939's Day-Time Wife

Contemplative at Home --- Was He Inventing Something at That Desk?
Most of us saw William first in The Wolf Man. By then, he was Universal's idea of past-glory (and got cheap) marquee adornment, someone to confer class upon a disreputable monster movie. WW got shoes muddy in U westerns where his credit read beneath lighter weights Franchot Tone and Bruce Cabot, less a shark than a dandy in period dress. The Lone Wolf series meant steady pay packets for OK mysteries, made so purely for his starring. Offscreen Warren William invented (useful) things and kept wire terriers. He was probably more of a renaissance man than we'll ever appreciate. A wife and stable home life wouldn't have seemed in the cards, but there his was, proof again that screen images are purest illusion. Health problems that took William at age 53 (in 1948) must have been lingering, for he seemed prematurely aged final appearing in The Private Affairs Of Bel-Ami, where George Sanders applies a verbal rapier to this weakened opponent who in his prime would have been more than a match, even for GS.


Anonymous Cliff Aliperti said...

Fantastic piece on my favorite star revolving around what's also my favorite Warren William title. So glad that TCM recently aired it, really wish Warner Archives would release it.

If Warren William played Don Draper there'd be a Higgins jumping out a window in every Mad Men episode!

Surprised you didn't mention Strange Illusion, not a personal favorite here, but Warren does get to be bad, really bad, once more.

Ruth Chatterton's great in Female, though I don't think she comes within a whiff of William's perfect combination of pig and shark.

Thanks for such an entertaining piece, really loved this post!

12:15 PM  
Anonymous Grand Old Movies said...

Utterly agree w/your point--teach Employee's Entrance in film classes, let 'em see how freewheeling movies once were. Great post about a great cad, the king of pre-Code, Warren William. Also loved him in Skyscraper Souls, The Mind Reader, and The Mouthpiece (another must-see for the film studies crowd). Watching WW in those pre-Codes, you know that somewhere in celluloid it'll always be 1932.

8:58 PM  
Blogger CanadianKen said...

Have you seen Warren William in GOODBYE AGAIN from '33? A genuinely unfettered comedy performance - bouncing back and forth between Joan Blondell and Genevieve Tobin. I'd say he's at his most accomplished here, yet so startlingly loose and spontaneous as to make the whole thing look off-the-cuff. In the best possible way. TCM shows it sometime and it's definitely worth catching. The picture spawned a dud remake in '41(retitled HONEYMOON FOR THREE) with George Brent quietly treading water in the role.

9:32 PM  
Anonymous DBenson said...

Also enjoyed him as Perry Mason, a happy and unapologetic shyster -- protecting the innocent seemed like an unintended side effect of making money. You assumed he and Della Street had already honeymooned long before one of the movies married them off.

Saw an interview with Della of the TV series, recalling that Earle Stanley Gardner would personally veto things like her sitting on the boss's desk. And of course Raymond Burr was a rock of respectability as Mason. Did Gardner have the heft to pressure for less subversive stars and scripts after WW?

12:44 AM  
Anonymous Kevin K. said...

I used to think of William as a poor man's John Barrymore. But the more I saw of him, the more I realized William's pre-code performances were terrific in their own right. I wonder if Warners signed him when Barrymore left for Metro, just to have a great profile on hand.

7:44 AM  
Blogger Dave K said...

Yeah, terrific post! As you and others suggest, you can't talk pre-code without talkin' Warren William. But I also share DBenson's fondness for WW as Perry Mason. Apparently Gardner had little control over the Warners' adaptations and hated them. Curious, since William was far closer to the Mason of the novels than the TV version, as least in the first two films. Re-read any of the Perry Mason mysteries from the thirties or early forties, and it's hard not to imagine WW as the corner-cutting lawyer (and pretty difficult to picture Raymond Burr) spouting the sly, self admiring monologues the character was originally fond of! Yet the author did have control over the show, and Burr was his personal choice! As to the Barrymore connection, it also seemed post-code his role was as William Powell runner-up. Never the less, a great star.

4:36 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer speaks to the greatness and nobility of Kurt Anderson ...

As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. Kurt Anderson may seem utterly ruthless, but he gets away with it because that's precisely what he needed to be in the craziness of the Great Depression. His strength and intelligence, his shrewdness and cunning, are simply what once were thought to be masculine attributes, writ large now because he had to employ them with no concessions to pretty ideas of morality, if he was to preserve his store as a bastion amidst the chaos. Smash or be smashed! That was the temper of the times. Men searching desperately for work, when there was no work, wanted to be like Kurt Anderson, but more than that, women wanted such a man in their lives, because they knew that he could take care of them, if he wanted to. That was the essence of his allure for them. Today, it might be a different story, but I wonder how many women, facing the exhaustion and compromises inherent in modern corporate life, would prefer to keep home and hearth, if they could partner with a man of such power and potential nobility?

5:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for an incisive profile of someone who may well be titled "Mr. Pre-Code"! He's a lot of fun to watch, and he's certainly a master of this genre.

7:40 AM  
Anonymous Bob said...

William is my favorite 1930s personality, bar none. Many, many thanks!

12:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Enjoyed your piece so much I "booked"
Employees Entrance into my home theatre later in October---and linked all invitees to your site!

Fantastic work! Pre-codes give us a peek of how desperate and wicked a society under stress can get---kind of like today!

Evan in Toledo

2:09 PM  
Anonymous Bill Luton said...

Love the art at the top of the page from the original one-sheet. Had it once and so much wish I still did! I too enjoyed WW as Perry Mason (I'd love to see those 4 released on DVD). Also favorites The Mouthpiece & Golddiggers of 1933.

3:16 PM  
Blogger Kevin Deany said...

I agree with what Dave K said about Warren Williams' portrayal of Perry Mason.

When I first saw his Mason portrayal I was shocked at how different his portrayal was from Raymond Burr's. I thought it was a complete betrayal of the character.

Then I read many of the early Perry Mason novels, and holy cow, that's how Warren William portrayed him. Very flirtatious with Della Street and not averse to bending the law to prove his client's innocence.

It was only later that Perry Mason became more stolid, but those early novels show Perry Mason being quite the free-wheeling attorney - a Warren William type as it were.

5:18 PM  
Anonymous r.j. said...


While you and I generally agree on most things cinematic, I really must take issue with your inference that WW was "watered down" goods in "Daytime Wife". In having watched it several-times recently, I was mightily-impressed by his very presence and he tends to give the film a bit of an edge that it badly needs. Oh sure, it's several-light years away from the Warners days, but so as we know, were audience expectations (by then) and the whole industry itself. But in every single scene I find myself watching Warren -- and bucking the youthful glow of nominal-stars Tyrone Power and Linda Darnell, that says a lot!

Best, R.J.

9:10 PM  
Blogger Christopher said...

You're right..The Wolf Man is the first film I saw Warren William in,where hes practically camouflaged among the likes of Patrick Knowles and Ralph Bellamy ..

1:46 AM  
Blogger Linwood said...

The Pre-code Loretta Young, in Employee's Entrance, was also something of surprise to me. She clearly knows what she's getting into after their first encounter and she takes her position modeling in the dress department without regret or guilt. Just business as usual during the Great Depression.

3:59 AM  
Blogger Mark Mayerson said...

I saw the film for the first time recently and it was my first exposure to Alice White. I think she was great, sort of a Joan Blondell without the vulnerability. I'm going to look for her in other films.

9:47 PM  
Blogger Scott MacGillivray said...

Jeff Cohen has a feature about Alice White on his blog, including some interview quotes:

5:10 PM  
Blogger mndean said...

I'll echo the recommendation for Goodbye Again, with one caveat. TCM doesn't show it that often, so see it when you can. It may not come around again for some years.

11:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024