Freaky vaudeville could be off-putting, at least
in hindsight to us, but were audiences of the day so timid? We're told of folks
run screaming away from Freaks in 1932, but I'm wondering now if
that's myth. Truth perhaps is forebears being lots tougher than moderns give
them credit for. They knew human oddities fromfair grounds before freak
showing was banned most places. Vaude acts had to be different to thrive, so
sought weirdest ways to startle and entertain. To that arena came Hadji-Ali, upchuck
king of unsettling acts. He'd swallow anything, then spit it up. Would Hadji be
permitted on a stage today? He's here thanks to an elegant ad I found
from Sacramento,
where Hadji flamed through week of 11-14-23. It's as well they didn't book
him a following frame, as I'm not sure Thanksgiving dinner would go down so
wellafter a dose of Hadji. How best to describe his act? Best probably not to
try, except to say he drinks kerosene and spits fire, and that, according to
lore, was itself short of the topper, which got more outrageous over years he
performed. In fact, for projection Hadji had, he could have set the back row
ablaze. People then loved outrageous things the human body could be made to
do. Would they still if offered a modern Hadji? We can see the original in a
seven minute segment of Politiquerias, the Spanish language version of Laurel andHardy's 1931
comedy, Chickens Come Home. It's part of a DVD set, Laurel and Hardy: The
Essential Collection. Hadji does his signature act, less spectacularly than it
would have been on large stages he could muss up with more abandon. Other
performers would recall Hadji with awe (Judy Garland spoke longingly of him in later interviews). When Hadji left, there would be no one to
even attempt stuff he did.
2 Comments:
IIRC after Hadji died in the late '30's, his body went on tour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW_EB0yBS5c
Post a Comment
<< Home