Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, August 24, 2018

Ladd's Last For Warner Release


Guns Of The Timberland (1960) Is Action Against Piney Backdrop

Here's how Aaaron Spelling got his first feature producing credit, according to memoirs. He had buddied up with Alan Ladd, then-wife Carolyn Jones introducing them after her pic with AL, Man In The Net. The fading lead man handed Spelling the script for a "damn thing" being prepped at Warners,' Guns Of The Timberland. Spelling spent a weekend making it better, for which appreciative Ladd called Jack L. and told the Warners chief that Aaron Spelling would produce his movie. Here, said Spelling, was where his career took off, with Alan Ladd to thank for it. Such was Hollywood at rare moment where dreams came true. As to Timberland outcome, if it matters, there is debate. One Ladd book called it his worst ever, tough choice among flock of clucks the star had done around this time. Guns Of The Timberland was out of circulation thanks to ownership migrating after general release. Now Guns are firing with a nice 1.85 transfer at TCM and on DVD from Warner Archive.




Ladd's was a great star persona and people should have told him that more often where ebbing confidence needed a boost. By 1960, his lean look was gone, the face fleshed to jowly despair and knowledge there wouldn't be another Shane for the playbook. Some said his weight was up, that demonstrably untrue based on the pic; what made it seem so was loss of panther pace from the 40's when Ladd in motion was a graceful blur. Alcohol had slowed reaction and he lost interest in swimming, golf ... sport that kept athleticism AL used so well. Timberland's first close-up shocks for being outdoor-lit and unforgiving of looks that had dissipated. This may have been the moment when a widest audience realized Ladd's era was done.


Veteran Stars' Insurance Policy Taken Out Often During the 60's: A Teen Idol In Support To Assure Kid Patrons


There's nothing specifically wrong with the movie. It had nice exteriors on fresh Nevada/Arizona/Northern California location, trees felled to most arresting effect since Warners' 1937 God's Country and The Woman. Ladd's sidekick is ageless Gilbert Roland. They slug out differences as expected of Ladd, even if by now his double took most of punishment. There is nod to youth with Frankie Avalon and a handful of songs, Ladd's daughter Alana the teen's love interest. AL liked his "Jaguar" productions done old-fashioned ways, each admirable at giving fans what they'd want and expect. There was no complaint with Guns Of The Timberland so far as viewership in back seats and balconies went. This was a comfort western in 1960 and it still relaxes. For $1.2 million spent on the negative (very reasonable and proof of Jaguar/WB efficiency), there was $1.9 in worldwide rentals, most from foreign receipts. Trouble was diminishing domestic returns; Timberland took but $836K in the US, so no surprise that Warner closed books with Jaguar that year. Ladd would go the plummet from here, but worth noting is even after his death in 1964, there still was booking of AL oldies at NC drive-ins and grindhousing, showman/bookers ever-aware that for action satisfaction, there was no one quite like Ladd.

8 Comments:

Blogger Kevin K. said...

Although only 8 years old at the time, I remember Ladd's death because I was aware that he had some connection to Hollywood's golden era -- even then, my favorite time for movies. But as I watched promos of "The Carpetbaggers" on TV, and looked at his close-ups, all I could think of was, "Boy, 50 sure is old." Dissipated is the only word to describe Ladd in his final years.

11:02 AM  
Blogger stinky fitzwizzle said...

Stinky is a big Ladd fan, so he finds it too painful to watch those late Ladd movies. No major star aged so terribly; possibly Errol Flynn.

2:56 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

But Stinky, it does have Frankie Avalon.

4:43 PM  
Blogger StevensScope said...

I recall my first watch of ONE FOOT IN HELL(1960), decades ago, and it was shocking to see him looking so dissipated and underweight appearing like a wet rag doll and giving an embarrassing performance. Always a big fan of ALAN LADD; I just watched THE CARPETBAGGERS(1964), again-- and thought he looked pretty GOOD here in his final film in comparison to ONE FOOT IN HELL & those last 2 Warner Westerns. BTW-- has anyone ever seen DUEL OF CHAMPIONS(1961-ITALIAN)??? Somehow I missed this one at the 3-feature theaters as well as any TV showing of it. ....

5:10 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer reflects on Alan Ladd:


Alan Ladd in his prime moved with the “grace of a panther,” but how big a cat was he?

When Ladd was making a personal appearance in Chicago for “Chicago Deadline,” which had been filmed on location in that city during the summer of 1948, his biggest fan in the world, my mother, couldn’t get off work but dispatched one of her friends to get his personally autographed picture. The friend succeeded, but came back with the report that Ladd was “such a little guy.”

Most sources give his height as 5 feet 6 inches, while his U.S. Army induction papers list him at a more flattering 5 feet 8 inches tall. Other sources have him at anywhere from 5 feet 3 inches or 5 feet 5 inches tall. In “Shane,” he was paired against Ben Johnson in a fistfight. Johnson stood in at 6 feet 2 inches and was half a head taller than Ladd. Considering the lifts that the star wore, 5 feet 6 inches tall seems about right.

Ladd had the compact build of a gymnast or springboard diver, both of which he’d been in high school, and he moved with the ease of an athlete. His first break in show business was in radio, however, where his rich, well-modulated voice was used to advantage. Height isn’t a matter of concern in the theater of the imagination. His role in “Citizen Kane” was also in the nature of a radio role, with his distinctive voice heard in the exchanges of dialog among the ensemble, but his image only that of a shadowy figure with a fedora and pipe.

James Cagney was no taller than Ladd, but there never seemed a need to compensate for his height, when a well-timed right-hand punch could bring anyone down to size. It seemed at first that Paramount, Ladd’s new home in the studio world, was going to take the same route. In “This Gun for Hire,” he was obviously shorter than nearly everyone else, and certainly shorter than the ostensible lead, Robert Preston, at 6 feet 2 inches tall. Only Veronica Lake, at 4 feet 11 inches, was shorter. Ladd’s athletic ability was on display in a scene where he was pursued on foot by the police across a railroad yard, deftly running over or past obstacles as police bullets spattered the ground just behind him. His confrontation with Laird Cregar, at 6 feet 3 inches tall and 300 pounds plus in weight, was in the nature of a shark savaging a whale.

In “The Glass Key,” a follow-up film for the newly emerging star, there was also no attempt to make him seem taller than he was. His role was another character part, teaming him this time with Brian Donlevy. His short height and slender build were contrasted with those of the stocky William Bendix, at 5 feet 10 inches tall, to make Bendix seem a hulking monster when his character administers a sadistic beating to Ladd’s.

About this time, however, Paramount apparently decided that Ladd’s good looks were better suited for more conventional leading man roles, and that meant playing opposite actresses taller than the diminutive Veronica Lake. Hence the need for the usual subterfuges to disguise his height, with lifts for his shoes, boxes to stand on, ramps to walk along, and supporting players whose height was not so challenging to his own. Given Ladd’s insecurities, this could only have been another source of anxiety.

Also, few of these aids could be employed on personal appearances, though this would not have mattered to my mother, who was in the Veronica Lake class.

3:56 PM  
Blogger rnigma said...

Ladd's co-star in "Boy on a Dolphin" was 5'8" Sophia Loren, and a trench had to be dug for her to walk in for a beachside scene with Ladd.

His son David was starting his own career as an actor, in such films as "A Dog of Flanders" (there was a comic book detailing "David Ladd's Life Story"). David seemed to give up film acting as he grew up - his wife Cheryl became one of Charlie's Angels.

9:05 PM  
Blogger StevensScope said...

Obvious of note this month: you haven't changed your INTRO card/scene!! What gives?

8:50 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Problems with the index site, and unable to change the banner until I get them fixed. Am working on it.

8:57 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024