Big Game Boxoffice Hunt
Paramount Pins Highest Hope On Hatari! (1962)
Five Shows Daily Make For Long Shifts at NYC's DeMille Theatre |
Theatres brought wild animals to fronts and into lobbies. There were tie-ins with zoos and auto manufacturers that had supplied Hatari! with terrain vehicles. A strong soundtrack by Henry Mancini yielded instrumental hits to link with the film. Hawks saw new direction his music needed to head and so let go of Dimitri Tiomkin, whose peak had passed. The director approaching his mid-sixties kept an awareness of what a modern audience would want. His getting free reign to do Hatari! was reward for
Hawks had studied enough TV to realize that viewers no longer needed, in fact had no want, for structured stories. They were too distracted in any case to follow three disciplined acts, home watch being anything but disciplined. Maybe Hawks noted how his own old films were TV-diced into unrelated scenes that left viewers to guess what a yarn was all about. In the end it didn’t matter, for as Hawks well knew, they had seen all the old tropes fourscore times, so why fret with detail? The director-producer would henceforth opt for scenes that would please within loosest framework of relationships among people he enjoyed, and hoped we would. This is how his films relax and reward time and again like no one else’s. You know the highlights and are each time there to see them again. Even if there was a strong narrative, any novelty to that would have dissipated long ago, in event you were back to watch again. This is how Hawks parts from other filmmakers for me. I can drift from one pleasurable scene to a next, the goodies never more than a few minutes apart. Length doesn't matter, for who’s in a hurry for any good thing to end?
The half-dozen Hawks made from
Director-Producer Howard Hawks with John Wayne |
Hawks also had a possessive credit above titles on posters for virtually all output long before most noticed such things. This was less to honor him than to assure customers there was an outstanding show inside. The MOMA series for Hawks in May 1962, a first in the
15 Comments:
Sat in my local theatre and watched HATARI when first released. As an eleven-year-old, I kept thinking how the picture would have been better had a loin-clad Gordon Scott appearance been included, keeping me from being so bored. Haven't seen HATARI since.
HATARI is an extraordinary example on how to make an entertaining movie with no plot; just an opening, enjoyable situations, and an ending. This film played constantly in the Saturday afternoon movie marathons being, in fact, a very suitable title for such form of classic movie consumption. Cable channels that have access to classic Paramount titles airs it constantly: in Latin America, it is frequently rotated in the Fox Classics movie channel.
I wonder how much Trump loves these late '50s and beyond John Wayne-starred flicks?
The Duke was 55 and Elsa Martinelli was 27 when this was released. The length actually was a draw for this teenager, as I liked having "more" movie. "Baby Elephant Walk" was a tremdously successful offshoot of the film.
The Wolf, man.
Never saw the movie, but knew "Baby Elephant Walk" because there were "easy listening" radio stations playing it -- and things like it -- all the time. There seemed to be a period after the fadeout of radio programs (drama, comedy, hosted variety) when a lot of airtime went to records that weren't pop singles: movie soundtracks, Broadway cast albums, comedy discs, "mood music", etc. By the late 60s I noticed that while such albums were readily available in stores and usually lying around everybody's living rooms, it was increasingly rare to hear them on the radio. While radio sold pop, these albums were sold by movie and television exposure.
Red Buttons is extremely tiresome and devoid of charm.
The Invisible, man.
It was 'Baby Elephant Walk' all the way. We'd stay up multiple times on Saturday night just to wait for the song, and to see Capucine wash the Dumbo ... Everything else was a blur. Today it plays nicely, very relaxing.
The old Hollywood convention of pairing two actors with a disparity in age does not much bother Stinky, given the context, the charisma and star-appeal of the actor, and since one day in the distant future Stinky will be 55, and he would love to be cast with a 27-year old Elsa Martinelli.
Better this than seeing, say, Robert Taylor paired with anyone at any age.
This one looks great projected on a big screen at home or in the theater. The women add a lot to it, along with the music and scenery.
Stinky, I don't disagree, but think of all the 40-year-old actresses at the time who were passed over being too old (admittedly, 40 then is today's 60). Hell, I'm really old and I'd like to be paired with Emma Stone but that doesn't make it a good thing for anybody but me. The Wolf, man.
Hollywood was extremely unfair, but that is another argument. Would Hatari have been better with Joan Crawford? The only change on with Stinky would insist would be anyone besides Red Buttons.
It just seems that the movie fantasy of reality was so different back then, and Stinky is willing to make allowances. Contemporary movies, not so much.
Stinky is the first to admit he is very selfish, and his casting of Elsa Martinelli is strictly inside his head, and not for public consumption.
My brothers and I saw HATARI as kids, loved every minute of it, and Elsa Martinelli's pairing with John Wayne didn't seem odd at all (I mean, he was JOHN WAYNE.) But the idea of casting a 40ish actress is intriguing and might have brought a new dimension to the character. Hell, Honor Blackman was still two years away from doing GOLDFINGER, and she was good enough for James Bond!
Honor Blackman at any age!
I always thought the TV show DAKTARI was based on HATARI but subsequent research says no. I can remember my Dad walking away from HATARI when it premiered on TV because it wasn't a western.
Would be great to see this film restored. Present home entertainment releases of Hatari look terrible.
Red Buttons' character in this film is called Pockets, because he appears to be the first person in a movie to wear cargo pants.
Truffaut wrote that Hatari is actually a film about movie making.
I have been following your look at late Howard Hawks films and it appears that again in this movie Hawks is having trouble with casting. You point out that in Rio Bravo, Hawks brings on singing star Rickie Nelson to fill out interest in this movie by appealing to the youth audience, which were becoming major attendees to theaters at the time. On paper, it looks like a strong cast appealing to both young and old. Middle aged audience members had grown up with John Wayne and Walter Brennan, and they had come of age when Dean Martin had teamed with Jerry Lewis. And now, their kids were fans of Rickie Nelson. Unfortunately, Nelson may have appeared on television but he wasn't an actor. Compare Nelson stiff, self conscious performance in this movie to James Caan's in El Dorado. This forces Hawks to cut back on Nelson's screen time in Rio Bravo and the need to fill out the running time by padding the movie out with more scenes with Angie Dickinson and Gonsalus Gonsalus. Which means that for Wayne and Martin to be in scenes with these two characters they have to go back and forth between two locations, the jailhouse and the hotel, which weakens the film's structure. Part of what makes Hawks' earlier film To Have and Have Not work so well is that most of that film is set within the hotel Bogart is living in. Rio Bravo appears to be planned with a similar structure with the characters now barricaded inside the jailhouse. But, Nelson's poor performance forces the film to seek out others outside of the main group, who are not barricaded in the jailhouse, so as not to annoy the audience with someone who can't act. In Hatari, it is the opposite problem, instead of having to work around someone who can't act, we have a hole in the movie left by not having someone whose main purpose is to act opposite John Wayne.
You mention how Hawks had wanted to have Clark Gable in this movie, who had died just before this, and it appears that there was either no effort made or no time to find a replacement and they just had to go off to Africa without any real costar. In hindsight we could imagine Ben Johnson or Randolph Scott in this movie? But I'm thinking that here we're seeing some of the limitations of film production in the early sixties that Hawks now had to deal with. When Hawks was connected to the studios, ten years earlier, there would have been the facility to have either an older or younger leading man, probably under contract to the studio, who could have been placed in the role. But now, Hawks is pretty much on his own devices and is unable or just unwilling to fill out his cast before going out on location? He's still able to work around not having a costar, probably due to the presence of screen writer Leigh Brackett? The character of Brandy is the daughter of Wayne's pardner, who has died. Wayne's character talks of her as if she is his own daughter. The dead pardner could have been the role Gable was going to play? In the end, Hatari is in no way an annoying film, but it is still a little slow and aimless in parts.
Compare this film to The Thing From Another World, which Hawks is supposed to been just the producer, but by all accounts he was the director. Even though the cast is unknown there is never a dull moment in The Thing. The dialogue scenes are almost as tense as the action. Not so in Hatari. So, I'm wondering how much the change in the studio business affected the old guard directors like Hawks and Hitchcock, who no longer had the resources of the old studio system by the 1960s? And is this responsible for the shortcomings in Hatari? I find El Dorado a more entertaining film, so maybe Hawks had adapted to the business better by the time he made his next western?
Post a Comment
<< Home