Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, October 18, 2021

A Mystery That Doesn't Cheat and Pays Off

 


Green For Danger (1947) is Who Done It For The Ages


Yank trades sure kept UK pics on the grill over what reads like hostile environment for imports, showmen outside art housing egging on discontent with outsider product flopping within our walls. Even most gracious Brit visitors got the ice, as here when Variety damned Green For Danger with faintest praise: "Very acceptable mystery film but hardly one that warrants giving Hollywood back to the Indians," cute at expense of what I'd call a masterpiece of whodunits, foreign or domestic. You know a mystery works when you're immersed enough in the set-up to forget there's going to be (has to be) murder within a next reel, this by way of saying the thing works well outside genre convention. Here is occasion where we really can defy guest viewers to guess the killer. Credit for that goes to writing/directing (and co-producer) Sidney Gilliat, whose name on UK credits make any a must to watch, his wit having enhanced The Lady Vanishes, Night Train To Munich, numerous others.



I've seen Green For Danger numerous times and still am surprised by the reveal. Follow closely and rewards are great, most memorably the great Alastair Sim as oddball Inspector Cockrell, a fabulous creation you could wish upon a series of thrillers over decades to follow, but regrettably this was a one and only case for Cockrell, though Sim would approximate him elsewhere. The actor, his performance, and Green For Danger itself were of such unconventional type as to put columnists to search of fresh accolades. Highest praise for the film would come from outside trade establishment like Variety protecting borders. Rave reviewing compared Green For Danger to The Thin Man and the best of Sherlock Holmes. Syndicated Billy Rose wrote that "it makes Hollywood's latest shoot-'em-ups look like pillow fights in a girl's dormitory," and called Alastair Sim a "civilized funnyman."



In fact, Sim's acerbic Cockrell was funny to extent of one's appetite for blackest of humor and character capacity to switch suddenly from apparent buffoon to sly and efficient investigator. Cockrell would see modern tribute in the person of Columbo and other sleuths habitually underestimated. Green For Danger was US-handled by Eagle-Lion, which got J. Arthur Rank leavings after Universal creamed best of his for distribution (E-L dealt twelve from Rank during 1948). Initial dates were LA saturated as second feature to E-L's Repeat Performance, while New York play at the Winter Garden yielded $16K over a first four days, unusually good for an import minus marquee lure.



What lit Gotham was rave notices from critics previewed by Eagle-Lion, the latter knowing it had strong merchandise to ride reviewer wave toward further word-of-mouth from satisfied patrons. A good enough picture could catch on thus where newspapers and radio guided movie choices, "smart" shows like Green For Danger a hook for those seeking something out of the ordinary. Airwave support was a big help, WOR running week-long contests tied to Green For Danger and conducting interviews with visiting star Leo Genn. Eagle-Lion had itself an urban hit if not one that would click in the heartland. As distribution rights reverted back to J. Arthur Rank, Green For Danger and others of his would be handled by Allied Films, Inc. for 1951 reissue. TV soon got the leavings, Green For Danger, like others of Rank origin, an early arrival to home consumption. Criterion offers a splendid DVD, and TCM has played Green For Danger occasionally in HD.

7 Comments:

Blogger DBenson said...

Haven't caught this one, but a couple of other amusing Sims:

"The Belles of St. Trinian's", inspired by Ronald Searle's cartoons of cheerfully malicious schoolgirls. Sim plays the headmistress and her wastrel brother. There were several sequels, but I think Sim only appeared in the first.

"School for Scoundrels", the original, based on a series of mock self-improvement books then popular in England. Declaring themselves texts of the art/science of Lifemanship, they detail "how to win without actually cheating" in sports, business, love, etc. via gambits developed at a seedy "college". Put-upon Ian Carmichael enrolls and learns to out-cad Terry-Thomas; Sim is the school's founder and top professor.

These are not classics, but affable sitcom-style amusements a tad less raucous and more middle class than the Carry Ons. An interesting look at what 50s British moviegoers got on an ordinary bill.

9:07 PM  
Blogger Beowulf said...

My film series patrons loved this. As for co-star Leo Genn, I worked with him when we video-taped a stage performance of CAESAR AND CLEOPATRA at Penn State. My favorite Brit actor was always Sir Alec G. (hence the book). Sim makes the last five minutes of SCROOGE magic.

10:49 AM  
Blogger James Abbott said...

I was lucky enough to befriend Christianna Brand during the last decade of her life. She was a wonderful, charming, sweet and generous lady.

She LOVED the movie version.

10:14 PM  
Blogger Jim Lane said...

Jim Lane here; I'm not sure I'll be properly identified when I post this comment; Google may insist on calling me by my sweetie's name, luannhiggs@gmail.com. But it's me.

Anyhow, I strongly recommend another picture where Alastair Sim "approximated" Inspector Cockrell: An Inspector Calls (1954), directed by Guy Hamilton from J.B. Priestley's play. Quite different from Cockrell, for reasons I can't explain without raising the Spoiler Police, but Sim is as commanding and indelible as ever. There's a DVD I can't speak for, but I have a splendid 16mm print that I've been trying to get on the program at Cinevent in Columbus (shall continue to try when Cinevent is superseded by the Columbus Moving Picture Show).

4:40 AM  
Blogger Filmfanman said...

Growing up in Canada, we were exposed to a greater number of British features on TV; that changed beginning in the 1980s as cable and then satellite-delivered TV expanded the area in which wider choice was available, but as a result of those youthful experiences, some of the films I enjoy most revisiting now are films made in Britain.
This has me thinking that a comparison of the criteria used by the British film censors and those promulgated and enforced by the US Production Code while it was in effect could be of interest; I suspect the differences would illuminate the differences and perhaps show the similarities, too, between these different cultures.

9:13 AM  
Blogger tmwctd said...

Am very late to the party here of course but thanks a lot, John, for bringing "Green for Danger" to the forefront again.
A great (comedy)-thriller based on an equally great book. I have read all of the Christina Brand-mysteries but this is the only one I remember.
Leslie Halliwell wrote a great piece on this movie in his "Halliwell´s Hundred".

Like "The Cat and the Canary" (1939), this movie can make you laugh and scare you within minutes...

An equally great mixture of mystery and laughs would the the Gervase-Fen-books by Edmund Crispin (Bruce Montgomery), unfortunately they were never turned into movies.

4:10 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Craig Reardon remembers GREEN FOR DANGER, and its link with SEVENTH VOYAGE OF SINBAD:


As a result of being the default fixer upper around here, I haven't been able to be a very good correspondent, to say the least. Just want to comment on two random posts I see in your stack which I enjoyed, though wasn't able to give them as thoroughgoing a 'read' as I would like to. One, on "Green For Danger". I agree--wonderful movie, and yes, very unusual. I laugh to myself that I've even forgotten "whodunnit"! I bought this along with some other British classics in Blu-ray in Region B (playable normally only in Europe, but I have one of those doped Blu-ray players which can defeat this block), some years back. It made a fine impression, I know that. I'll have to watch it again now! BTW, the photography was by Wilkie Cooper, who lent such playful distinction to the best of the Charles Schneer/Ray Harryhausen collaborations, to my taste. He had no fear of lavishing all kinds of very artificial and theatrical lighting effects on the sets which far from being detrimental lent them a kind of magical fascination, in my view. Strict realists or documentary film lovers would perhaps object to caves with purple, blue, and yellow patches of lighting all over them, but to me, Cooper did this so unselfconsciously and imaginatively that he transformed good but ordinary sets into wonderful spaces which complement Ray's incomparable special effects sequences. Add (often) the music of Bernard Herrmann and you have movies that will forever exert a very particular magic for those of us who love them. I'd hate to think this is merely my inner one-time baby boomer expressing itself, but that's a very real possibility, it not to my mind a liability. We can't help when we were born and we also can't help having been impressed by what we were then, nor what we came to love.


1:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024