Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, August 26, 2024

Film Noir #29

 


Noir: Chicago Deadline, Conflict, and Convicted


CHICAGO DEADLINE (1949) --- A person might watch Chicago Deadline bi-yearly and enjoy it as if new, having forgot much of mystery and all of its solution. As was common of noir, there is setting and atmosphere, also attitude to compensate for coherence deficiency. I like Ladd for whatever he’s up to, especially when modern-set and allowing for trench coat, gun, whatever accoutrements we’d aspire to minus his aplomb. There is girl casualty Donna Reed to propel thicket that is plot, Ladd closing in on killers, or does he? You see, already I forget, mere weeks after watching. Kino let this out among packet of noirs, Chicago Deadline long wanted because where else could we see it over a last four decades? Sometimes noirs need not be especially good so long as they are rare. Lewis Allen directs; results might have been better had John Farrow done so. I’ve wondered why Ladd went years before performing for the Hal Wallis unit (Red Mountain in 1951). Perhaps his tag was too high, for despite fact Wallis was on the Para lot and using their facilities, it was otherwise an arms-length deal and his independent unit would be expected to pay for contract talent same as anyone, Wallis and loaner banks financing much of what he made for studio release. Mysteries even muddled are hard to resist when there’s a cast of noir regulars as here, each reliable and arresting to watch even where leading us down rabbit holes a chore to climb out of. Donna Reed is an OK co-lead, but there’s no co-Ladd to that, since the two never meet, not even in flashbacks that drive much of narrative. There are noir classics like Out of the Past, and then there are the Chicago Deadline (s), more of latter than former, though the more familiar famous ones get, the more welcome are bent toys like Deadline, newfound treat in every visit one ventures to take. Nice then to have Chicago Deadline around, nicer still to close in upon Paramount noirs missing till lately, and we can hope (depend?) on the rest surfacing eventually.



CONFLICT (1946) --- Humphrey Bogart in a role he intensely did not want to play, a wife killer brought to book by a scheme the seeming entire cast works out to pull him down, Bogie as unwitting dupe manipulated back to the scene of his crime where cops and cuffs await. Rick the proprietor at Casablanca brought down to this? It plays like punishment, means of letting Bogart know he’ll pull a familiar plow however big a star he appears otherwise to be. There was a recorded conversation between HB and JL Warner where Bogie is bullied and Jack has clearly the upper hand. Ingrate Bogart will do Conflict or else … and sure enough he submitted. We don’t like this sort of Bogart lore, and yet Conflict emerged a good picture, written by Robert Siodmak, directed by Curtis Bernhardt, a first dip of HB toe into neurotic parts he’d embrace more firmly later. His killing is furtive, an escape from suffocating marriage (the wife nags incessantly and Bogie has to take it and like it), his object to wed a sister-in-law (Alexis Smith) who does not love him and never will. Bogart’s age is for the first time an issue. Sydney Greenstreet refers to himself and HB as “old fogies,” and notion that Smith could want him is dismissed out of hand, her better suited to age-appropriate Charles Drake. All this plays stark against To Have and Have Not and Bacall, a teenager when she and Bogart were co-starred, their vehicle released two years ahead of Conflict, latter which was completed (1943) ahead of To Have and Have Not going into production. Yes, Conflict was “wrong” for Bogart, but right for him now that we have perspective of the whole career, a noir drench that has more honest elements of the style than more flamboyant and comedic The Big Sleep, and here's the kicker, Conflict was a healthy earner and not at all the rat poison Bogart would have anticipated.



Conflict
seems almost anti-Bogart from the start, so far at least for feeding his image, him hen-pecked, complaining to no avail of mutton being served at dinner (“You know I hate mutton” to Rose Hobart’s hateful response). Hobart had worked with Bogie when he was still a juvenile on Broadway, so was not awed by the star aborning, her saying as much in years-later interviews. Too many had Bogart’s number, including the shrew wife at home, who when she didn’t throw bottles was sticking knives in him. The tough guy persona must have been a welcome retreat, even as it had nothing to do with who Bogart really was. Nice to see him back with Greenstreet however, only this time latter is the cat and former the mouse, so we don’t get to enjoy Bogie getting the better of the Fat Man. Why then do I like Conflict so? Maybe for the indoor exteriors, toy cars sped up hillsides that are like landscapes built for tabletop electric train sets, city street bustle on the Warner backlot, crowds aplenty to show us this is an A project. Plot device has Bogie driving ninety miles back-forth to a lake lodge over winding dirt roads. I’m spoiled enough to be terrified of a hundred feet over anything but solid asphalt, but back in the 40’s they abided, in fact appreciated any road that would get a car from one place to another, whatever its surface. This all reeks of noir, plus Bogie wears his trench coat to do the killing. Any clip of Conflict might make you think it was one of his best. For me it almost is, but then of course, I like any Bogart. 16mm renters back in the day could get Conflict cheap, $35 in UA’s 1975 catalogue, a tip as to low esteem it held. Warner Archive offers a DVD, and TCM plays Conflict in HD.



CONVICTED (1950) --- Convicted and others of Columbia crime family are like tunes that linger in one’s head. It always seems I’ve heard their scores before, cues repeated to signal each bump of modest mellers. Convicted was fruit of a play Columbia bought long before and filmed as The Criminal Code in 1930, latter “by” Howard Hawks and shown still because among other interests, there was a colorful part for rising Boris Karloff, the role done by Millard Mitchell for Convicted. I wonder if H. Hawks was even aware of Columbia re-doing The Criminal Code, or if he’d care. Glenn Ford is imprisoned for an accident-killing, him less dangerous or hothead than Everyman a by-then Ford signature, if Everyman was of sort to skirt law or soldier-of-fortune toward sudden wealth or exotic romantic opportunity as was this actor's often bent. Ford was a major and popular leading man that Columbia used for stock … he’d get no Academy Awards toiling for them. Broderick Crawford would know like circumstance after freak win for All the King’s Men, after-words to that more action than thought, hard case sorts we expected and preferred from him. Were there actors born only to play convicts? If so, they are all here. It is for that reason I adore faces put to toil in prison laundries and look it. Were such sorts feared by other shoppers when visiting the market for sundries? I envision men like Harry Cording or John Doucette sending the wife or kids rather than go themselves and be viewed with apprehension. Convicted is the more precious for being predictable. How many 1950 viewers do you suppose got part way in and then exclaimed, Wait, I’ve seen this exact same thing before!, not as register of complaint, but mere recognition that cards movies shuffle can’t help duplicating, limit after all in tales told or absorbed over a lifetime of filmgoing. Convicted for all of old clothing took $753K in domestic rentals, less than Glenn Ford generally yielded, but OK withal for what Columbia likely spent. It shows up streaming, lately at Amazon Prime.

6 Comments:

Blogger Phil Smoot said...

"Conflict" is coming to Blu-ray on Sept 30.

11:02 AM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

After years of watching Bogart classics, followed by his pre-"High Sierra" output, of late I've been into his post-1945 movies including "Conflict" and "The Two Mrs. Carrolls". I liked them both mainly because the characters were unlike the movies made him a star. (Bogart as an architect or artist isn't what most people had in mind.) Same for his Columbia releases and his final movies, like "The Left Hand of God" -- and in Cinemascope yet! There's an emotion in his later performances, as if he knew he didn't have long to live.

As for "Convicted" -- I think that's the first time I've seen Frank Faylen's name on a movie poster. Usually, he was too far down in the credits to fit.

11:06 AM  
Blogger RichardSchilling said...

I recently re-watched CONFLICT and loved it even more the second time; so I find this backstory about Bogart's displeasure with the project quite fascinating. He is terrific in it and plays the part so well; one would never know there was any reluctance on his part. The movie itself has a neat little plot too, which benefits greatly from all of the classic Warner Brothers talent, in front of and behind the camera. I am looking forward to the blu-ray.

11:58 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Richard M. Roberts considers Alan Ladd plus CONFLICT:


John,

As you know, I've been catching up on Alan Ladd movies I had never seen of recent, and have really upgraded my opinion on him as an actor and a star. I definitely think he has been somewhat underrated and forgotten by so much of current film fandom and it's a pity, he really was a terrific actor with a great voice and a versatility nobody seems to appreciate. Here is an actor who can indeed do Humphrey Bogart-type trenchcoat noir roles who, unlike Bogart, is just as at home in westerns or adventure films, and so many of his denigrated-by-the-historians later starring vehicles, self-produced or otherwise, have turned out to be solid and entertaining films at least by my viewings. It's a shame that only one biography has ever been written on him, but at least that biography shows that whatever problems and insecurities he may have had in his career, he seemed to have been a nice guy who kept his money and raised a family where his kids actually turned out rather well, which may be why his untimely death (most likely accidental rather than suicidal) has not earned him a following among the death cultists.

If Ladd is discussed today, usually the whole height thing gets rehashed, which always seemed a bit odd to me considering that, if he was in the 5.5, 5.6 range, he was no different than many of his contemporaries like Bogart, Cagney, George Raft, Edward G. Robinson, who didn't get the same hassle about their size (isn't it interesting though, that even the Paramount Publicity picture you have for CHICAGO DEADLINE presents a cut and paste puny Ladd amazoningly towered over by his three leading ladies?).

I recently watched CHICAGO DEADLINE as well, and it's not a bad picture, I think you're being a little unfair to Lewis Allen, who's saddled with a muddled script especially in terms of the Donna Reed backstory (I'm still not sure about her connections to all the villains of the piece). To me both Allen and John Farrow are as good as their scripts, and have their fair shares of mediocres and clunkers interspersed with some dandies. Allen does better immediately following up CHICAGO DEADLINE with another Ladd vehicle APPOINTMENT WITH DANGER, which has a much better script and supporting cast (Jack Webb and Harry Morgan playing gangster hitmen years before they were a DRAGNET team), and other Allen winners include his first feature, THE UNINVITED (1944) a superb ghost story with Ray Milland ,SUDDENLY (1954) with Frank Sinatra cast as another hitman, and the neglected but darn good ILLEGAL (1955), a crackling remake of THE MOUTHPIECE starring Edward G. Robinson.

I always liked Bogie's CONFLICT too, it looks great, he's great in it and I always enjoy seeing Sydney Greenstreet when he's playing sympathetic, he was intelligent and riveting in everything he played, and was a great villain, but I always felt it a pity that he only played Nero Wolfe on radio, what a great series of B films that would have made for him at Warners.

As to Bogie's bellyaching about playing in CONFLICT, I hate to say that when he was making his own choices of scripts in his Santana Productions over at Columbia, he was making films that for the most part don't work anywhere near as well as anything he starred in at Warners, maybe that studio did have a better idea of how to use him, even if it galled him that Jack Warner kept wanting him to play bad guys after he had broke away from that typecasting. Fortunately much of his fifties career after departing the Burbank Studio for good consisted of good or great Directors getting him for good films that even made him stretch his acting muscles and play more against type, but remember, he bellyached all through Billy Wilder's SABRINA as well, thinking he was wrong for the role and didn't want to play it, and ate some amount of crow over that when he got such good reviews for it afterwards. Actors are frequently not the best judges of the material that suits them best.

RICHARD M ROBERTS

7:00 AM  
Blogger William Ferry said...

Granted, it's a bit jarring to see Bogart as a pure villain at this stage of his career, but CONFLICT is a really underrated cat and mouse thriller., with both male leads cast against type. From our perspective, knowing about the Breen Code, we KNOW he won't get away with it, but it's exciting to anticipate HOW he'll fail.

I agree with Richard's assessment of the Columbia/Santana films. I like KNOCK ON ANY DOOR, but TOKYO JOE and SIROCCO really didn't impress me. It's hard for me to appreciate DEAD RECKONING, largely because of my preconceived notion of Lizabeth Scott as a Lauren Bacall substitute.

9:21 AM  
Blogger Neely OHara said...

Thank you, John -- not only a great essay, but a great guide to navigating "long covid." I watched CONFLICT (realizing half way that I'd fallen asleep on it the first time) and very much enjoyed it -- though Alexis Smith has always seemed a cold fish to me.

Then I watched CHICAGO DEADLINE on Internet Archive -- crappy copy but a great movie, and any chance to see June Havoc is welcome. (And twice I heard the main motif from NOW VOYAGER in CD's score -- having watched MILDRED PIERCE the night before, I was quick to pick up on it in both.). The YouTube trailed for CD are fairly pristine, and I'd watch it again if I could find a better copy. Couldn’t follow the plot, but as with THE BIG SLEEP, who cares when it’s so much fun.

I found that CONVICTED streams free on Amazon Prime, but Glenn Ford leaves me cold. The Internet Archive site then suggested THIS GUN FOR HIRE, which I had never seen and really enjoyed. Now I'm on a Ladd kick -- next up BLUE DALIAH and THE GLASS KEY.

I realized my entire previous exposure to Ladd had been SHANE, which (heresy, I know) I didn't like ("I killed Injuns to get this land, and nobody's gonna take it from me!" isn't an attitude I can get behind -- so there was nobody to root for), the Loretta Young soaper AND NOW TOMORROW, and his brief self-spoof in MY FAVORITE BRUNETTE.

I had alway underestimated him as an actor, but he was truly skilled -- and those eyes. I can see why THIS GUN FOR HIRE made him a star -- what a debut; and that great monologue about being beaten as a child still holds up. Now I wanna look at more of his work.

Thanks for making this "new and improved" strain of covid a little less miserable.

9:52 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024