Film Noir #31
Noir: Crashout, Crack-Up, City of Shadows, and The Glass Web in 3D
CRASHOUT (1955) --- The Filmmakers Releasing Organization, a noble try at independent production and distribution, stuck mostly with exploitable product, none more so than this nasty streak of prison-breaking and quest for stolen loot. Toward covering their Crashout bet, Filmmakers took extraordinary measure of a Variety ad inviting exhibitors to bid for, and commit to, playing time. Sort of a showman's subscription service. This was done ahead of Crashout going into production, as had been case with Private Hell 36, also fronted with exhibition promises to play and pay. Hell had gathered a hellacious 1,000 signatures "on the basis of its story and cast names," said Variety, and made news for being "the first indie-produced, indie-distributed film to play a Broadway showcase" (
Subscribed playdates set in advance would pit Crashout against the clock. Producer
CRACK-UP (1946) --- A mystery that is really mysterious, at least to start, and maybe the movies' first crack at fine art put to noir purpose. Early in proceedings comes a lecture by Pat O’ Brien where he explains forgeries, canvas restoration, the modern movement vs. traditional, a real insider view of museum doings and politics that attend them. Will desperate enough collectors commit murder to own a masterpiece or two? Crack-Up says sure they will, and having collected myself, I can believe it. Frustration of an art thief, or ultimate owner of knowingly stolen art, must be in having to hide your pride and joy and trusting no one to know what you have for fear of being ratted to true owners. There’s plenty You Tube videos about art in illicit circulation. Crack-Up killer collector explains that great paintings are merely wasted on hoi polloi trekked in and out of museums, that only those like himself should have possession of a masterpiece. Crack-Up is very much a curve ball among Classic Era noirs. Time is taken to explain how fakes can be detected (X-Ray), and if modern galleries aren’t using Crack-Up for modern day instruction, they are missing a bet. Commerce of copies go handsy with insurance swindling all in a gallery day’s work, and again, I wonder how true this remains in current clime where art sells for tens of millions rather than mere thousands such commanded when Crack-Up was new. There are expected swipes at modern art, read radical, or better put, too radical so far as lecturer O’Brien sees it. Wonder what he’d say to toilet seats tendered as fine art not many years after 1946. Much of art appreciation is expressed by phonies and poseurs, some depicted, then poof and they’re gone, mere straw men and women to make the casual point. Crack-Up wanted to appeal to common clay that was watching, and plain folk was known not to like modernist art. Crack-Up in this sense is quite conservative, if admirable for taking the topic of art seriously at all. Bravo to RKO for going a fresh route, if unrewarded by customers, of which there were too few to put Crack-Up in profit ($732K in negative cost toward $846K in worldwide rentals and resulting loss of $265K). Pat O’Brien seems an unlikely noir lead, but he could convey intellect, and that was what the part needed. He’s an ex-wartime investigator of phony hordes gathered by the Axis and so knows plenty of bogus art. Occurs to me that postwar noir had a leg up for protagonists coming from service background. They're experienced with weaponry and have seen dying, so we believe in them, these among myriad of reasons we won’t see authentic noir again. Crack-Up is available on DVD from Warner Archive.
CITY OF SHADOWS (1955) --- a Victor McLaglen starring vehicle … from 1955. Seems late for him to headline, the more so in what amounts to a Wallace Beery part for Republic on rapid way toward shutting doors. City of Shadows at 70 minutes sees McLaglen raise a kid inclined toward petty crime who grows up to be John Baer, a crumb on 50’s plate of The Mississippi Gambler, We’re No Angels, and later television, his eventual move to real estate undoubtedly a wise one. Baer had a good voice, was sneery, and not to be trusted. He starts out me-first here, a law student top of his class for figuring ways to frustrate law and achieve ends for future crook clients, befriending professors and vet attorneys to learn tricks of their trade. He turns legit after meeting Kathleen Crowley and ultimately breaks with lowlife repped by McLaglen plus thuggish Anthony Caruso and Richard Reeves. Small pictures like this are where type casting saved much time and exposition by letting known faces get on with conduct we expect of them, a good thing for short span devoted to City of Shadows and such like it. Directing is William Witney. There is a western street dressed to look contemporary, but cars don’t fool me where it’s hosses I expect to trot up, with maybe Roy Barcroft or Phyllis Coates astride. Engaging is Baer practicing law on mentor McLaglen behalf while still a student, masterminding strategy then handing off result to Vic’s shyster. Noose tightens for a snowbound showdown done with chairlifts that had to take time and money untypical of budget observed by Republic. There couldn’t have been much potential for City of Shadows to bring back more than a sliver’s profit. Maybe Yates liked the property and told them to go ahead and shoot the works. Kino offers a Blu-Ray of this in one of their noir boxes.
THE GLASS WEB (1953) --- Film noir in three dimensions, a rarity as the process did not often go in that direction, except wait … there was Second Chance, Dangerous Mission, Inferno, maybe others I’m not recalling. Two of these are inaccessible on home 3-D, at least on a legitimate basis. The Glass Web however is out and splendid via auspices of the 3-D Film Archive and distributing Kino Lorber. The Universal thriller was merely a title to most for many years: who’d seen it flat or deep? Not me. This was among supposed B’s Edward G. Robinson felt himself consigned to after political hounds began nipping, but I don't regard The Glass Web as B at all, and certainly U-I did not at the time. Eddie’s a developer of true-life murder mysteries, a “Crime of the Week” for local L.A. television, the latest victim close to home that is staff members of the broadcast station including him. I liked prospect of E.G. reprising his Barton Keyes character, which to some extent he does, but there’s a mystery killer angle and I’ll admit wishing Richard Denning would be the surprise reveal, since I don’t tend to fully trust Denning even where he’s a supposed straight arrow. There’s a cute scene where Eddie shows off his art collection to a date, a gag worked into several Robinson performances during the 50’s, him by then well-identified as a big-league accumulator. All of Universal-International earmarks are here, direction (Jack Arnold), cast (Kathleen Hughes late of struggle with spacemen). Depth effects are mostly staged on sets, that is interiors where lamps, chairs, etc. can figure as foreground between us and enactors. Hitchcock went a same direction for Dial M for Murder, which used similar devices with expected Hitchcock flair, but Jack Arnold was no slouch re the process, having done It Came from Outer Space and Creature from the Black Lagoon, both effectively.
Not sure how many 3-D bookings The Glass Web had, it being late 1953 and maybe by then we were cooling off on the novelty. Of cast there also is John Forsythe, who I understand trained with the Actor’s Studio. So here was a presumed Method man who seems anything but Method. In fact, he was one of the founders of the Studio, and taught Marlon Brando, Montgomery Clift, others as well, or so it is said. I hope that’s true. The Glass Web is a highly recommended 3-D find and an entertaining 81 minutes with or without the gimmick. Also new from 3-D Film Archive is Domo Arigato, unknown to me till now and presumably a first time anyone has seen it deep, assuming they did even when new in 1972. Shot in Japan, Domo Arigato is a travelogue romance to ideally pair with any one of that country’s homegrown features, Arch Oboler the writer-director. This according to box info was his last feature. Oboler among previous movies and much radio did an odd drama called Strange Holiday which starred Claude Rains with support cast including my band teacher Priscilla Lyon. Had I but known she worked once with Rains. I’d have been thrown out of band even sooner than I was. Extras on the Blu-Ray are alone worth the price of purchase, an Ed Wood 3-D subject, Cleopatra Follies (aka Flame of Islam), and Skid Row Holdup, a 3-D burlesque short from 1953. 3-D Film Archive deserves much credit for unearthing such treasure, as who’d have thought any of this material would survive the long intervening years.
7 Comments:
Dan Mercer tells how he once supported clean westerns:
As an impressionable youth, I was involved in something like the subscription program for "Crash Out." Don "Red" Barry circulated a message that if all his many fans each sent him one dollar, he could make a western with a wholesome young star that kids could enjoy.
I sent him a dollar.
I don't know what became of the movie, but I like to think that Don was able to raise a glass from time to time in appreciation of his many fans.
Did Robinson would lend his own pieces for those scenes, and did he charge rent for them? Not unknown for stars to work such deals for using personal wardrobe and such. One can imagine him pushing for those moments, allowing him to justify the expense of collecting.
I remember reading publicity for ILLEGAL to the effect that Robinson made his collection available for set decoration.
Only THE 3D Film Archive would give us these wicked bonus shorts. It is a crime Warner Archive and Sony are not making use of their skills. DOMO ARIGATO was available in an absolutely wretched field sequential 3D version. Happily I can retire my copy. I have DANGEROUS MISSION, SECOND CHANCE, DEVIL'S CANYON, THE FRENCH LINE and CHARGE AT FEATHER in true digital 3D courtesy of friends who value what I have dug up over the years and made available from the trade magazines. Unexpected bonus. Thus I can say with authority these films more than deserve a Blu-ray Restoration.
One thing I think about when I see a noir film is that prior to 1870, when it got dark, everyone went to bed or at least stayed indoors. Candles were expensive and darkness was considered by most as a manifestation of the devil. Comes the 20th century and artificial night illumination became the norm, causing miscreation to have a second shift and to provide a compelling cinema art form.
One more observation: Edward G. Robinson loathed the "hood" roles. Yet these roles paid for his art collection
Dan Mercer considers possibilities of 3D:
I'm sure that I've seen "The Glass Web," as it would have been almost unavoidable for such a Universal-International release not to have been made part of some television package or another, but if I did, it made no impression on me. As for "Domo Arigato," the question wouldn't be how I missed an Arch Oboler Space-Vision 3D movie but how anyone was able to see it? How many Trioptiscope lenses could there have been? That one factor probably drastically restricted the release of the movie. I've read, however, that it is worthwhile if only for providing a record of a Japan that was already disappearing before the tide of westernization; and at that, in color and 3D.
3D movies have long fascinated me, or at least the concept of such movies has, as expressed in the advertising image of a lion in your lap, but my actual experience of them has almost always been disappointing. "Jaws 3D" was quite poor and "Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jarad Sym" might have been worse, if I'd been able to see it. The projection was so dim that I wrote a letter of complaint to the theater, resulting in their apology and a free pass. No doubt they anticipated making up the cost in the popcorn I consumed and certainly they were justified in that.
A re-release of "House of Wax" was similarly botched--I was unable to see the bouncing ball at all--but a showing of "Dial M for Murder" at the Temple University Center City Cinematheque at least suggested that, in the hands of a master, the Natural Vision process could be used to aesthetically pleasing effect. I recall one scene where a purse, which had been unnoticeable in a flat print, acquired new prominence in 3D and became the center of attention, a crucial clue the characters were unaware of.
Digital projection is the standard now and 3D movies are much more common, though the process has rarely been used as effectively as it was by Hitchcock. Some years ago, I saw "Hugo" in 3D, a movie that I very much enjoyed for its dreamy evocation of the turn of the previous century and the performances of Chole Grace Moretz and Sacha Barron Cohen, but 3D offered no advantage over a flat print, other than that it allowed some distracting elements to intrude upon the frame.
Possibly my most pleasing experience of 3D was seeing your presentation of Blue-rays of "House of Wax" and "The Wizard of Oz," the latter reprocessed in 3D. Curiously, the 3D "Wizard of Oz" was enhanced by the transformation and the 3D effect more subtle and nuanced than that of "House of Wax." Could the future of depth of image in the movies be found in the flat?
Post a Comment
<< Home