Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, May 05, 2025

Film Noir #31

 


Noir: Crashout, Crack-Up, City of Shadows, and The Glass Web in 3D


CRASHOUT (1955) --- The Filmmakers Releasing Organization, a noble try at independent production and distribution, stuck mostly with exploitable product, none more so than this nasty streak of prison-breaking and quest for stolen loot. Toward covering their Crashout bet, Filmmakers took extraordinary measure of a Variety ad inviting exhibitors to bid for, and commit to, playing time. Sort of a showman's subscription service. This was done ahead of Crashout going into production, as had been case with Private Hell 36, also fronted with exhibition promises to play and pay. Hell had gathered a hellacious 1,000 signatures "on the basis of its story and cast names," said Variety, and made news for being "the first indie-produced, indie-distributed film to play a Broadway showcase" (New York's Paramount theatre). Tempting too were lower terms Filmmakers offered to subscribers, 25-40% rather then average 50% demanded by majors as of September 1954 when PH36 opened. Success of this made Filmmakers more ambitious, with announcement of six features for 1955. The company's plan would require speed to meet terms of advance bookings. Filmmakers partners Collier Young and wife/director Ida Lupino wanted to branch out to at least partly finance outside producers, one of whom, Hal Chester, came to them with the concept for Crashout, which looked to be a safe commercial bet and so went into production with Chester-raised cash and Filmmakers participation.



Subscribed playdates set in advance would pit Crashout against the clock. Producer Chester and writing/directing Lewis R. Foster were sprint runners after quick completion, as would be others like American-International's Nicholson and Arkoff who would follow Filmmakers' example of committing films to opener dates before cameras turned. Crashout cast was known for bare-knuckle work, among them Gene Evans, who'd credit television for getting the Crashout gig. Seems Evans had been out of work for five months, till 1950's The Steel Helmet turned up on '54 freevee schedules around LA, this resulting in calls for him to star in a whopping three features. "TV is a boon to movie people," the actor said. Filmmakers acknowledged that Crashout was aimed at an "action market" made up of 16-30 year olds, and costs for it as well as other company projects were being held to $300,000 or below. Terms to exhibitors had to be generous ... after all, it was they who enabled pics being made ... so 25% minimum was starter scale and maybe graduated to more depending on the venue. Based on this formula, Filmmakers "was snaring 800 dates per picture," said Variety, which went long way toward getting modest costs back. Crashout was their most ambitious yet, headed for early 1955 combo release with Mad at the World and eventual 1000 bookings. This would mark both the peak and beginning of the end for Filmmakers, for despite modest success, the little company still had to compete with leviathans that were major distribs, these being tough and ruthless nuts to crack. In the end, Filmmaker jaws weren't strong enough, Collier and Lupino over and done by mid-1955.



CRACK-UP (1946) --- A mystery that is really mysterious, at least to start, and maybe the movies' first crack at fine art put to noir purpose. Early in proceedings comes a lecture by Pat O’ Brien where he explains forgeries, canvas restoration, the modern movement vs. traditional, a real insider view of museum doings and politics that attend them. Will desperate enough collectors commit murder to own a masterpiece or two? Crack-Up says sure they will, and having collected myself, I can believe it. Frustration of an art thief, or ultimate owner of knowingly stolen art, must be in having to hide your pride and joy and trusting no one to know what you have for fear of being ratted to true owners. There’s plenty You Tube videos about art in illicit circulation. Crack-Up killer collector explains that great paintings are merely wasted on hoi polloi trekked in and out of museums, that only those like himself should have possession of a masterpiece. Crack-Up is very much a curve ball among Classic Era noirs. Time is taken to explain how fakes can be detected (X-Ray), and if modern galleries aren’t using Crack-Up for modern day instruction, they are missing a bet. Commerce of copies go handsy with insurance swindling all in a gallery day’s work, and again, I wonder how true this remains in current clime where art sells for tens of millions rather than mere thousands such commanded when Crack-Up was new. There are expected swipes at modern art, read radical, or better put, too radical so far as lecturer O’Brien sees it. Wonder what he’d say to toilet seats tendered as fine art not many years after 1946. Much of art appreciation is expressed by phonies and poseurs, some depicted, then poof and they’re gone, mere straw men and women to make the casual point. Crack-Up wanted to appeal to common clay that was watching, and plain folk was known not to like modernist art. Crack-Up in this sense is quite conservative, if admirable for taking the topic of art seriously at all. Bravo to RKO for going a fresh route, if unrewarded by customers, of which there were too few to put Crack-Up in profit ($732K in negative cost toward $846K in worldwide rentals and resulting loss of $265K). Pat O’Brien seems an unlikely noir lead, but he could convey intellect, and that was what the part needed. He’s an ex-wartime investigator of phony hordes gathered by the Axis and so knows plenty of bogus art. Occurs to me that postwar noir had a leg up for protagonists coming from service background. They're experienced with weaponry and have seen dying, so we believe in them, these among myriad of reasons we won’t see authentic noir again. Crack-Up is available on DVD from Warner Archive.



CITY OF SHADOWS (1955) --- a Victor McLaglen starring vehicle … from 1955. Seems late for him to headline, the more so in what amounts to a Wallace Beery part for Republic on rapid way toward shutting doors. City of Shadows at 70 minutes sees McLaglen raise a kid inclined toward petty crime who grows up to be John Baer, a crumb on 50’s plate of The Mississippi Gambler, We’re No Angels, and later television, his eventual move to real estate undoubtedly a wise one. Baer had a good voice, was sneery, and not to be trusted. He starts out me-first here, a law student top of his class for figuring ways to frustrate law and achieve ends for future crook clients, befriending professors and vet attorneys to learn tricks of their trade. He turns legit after meeting Kathleen Crowley and ultimately breaks with lowlife repped by McLaglen plus thuggish Anthony Caruso and Richard Reeves. Small pictures like this are where type casting saved much time and exposition by letting known faces get on with conduct we expect of them, a good thing for short span devoted to City of Shadows and such like it. Directing is William Witney. There is a western street dressed to look contemporary, but cars don’t fool me where it’s hosses I expect to trot up, with maybe Roy Barcroft or Phyllis Coates astride. Engaging is Baer practicing law on mentor McLaglen behalf while still a student, masterminding strategy then handing off result to Vic’s shyster. Noose tightens for a snowbound showdown done with chairlifts that had to take time and money untypical of budget observed by Republic. There couldn’t have been much potential for City of Shadows to bring back more than a sliver’s profit. Maybe Yates liked the property and told them to go ahead and shoot the works. Kino offers a Blu-Ray of this in one of their noir boxes.


THE GLASS WEB (1953) --- Film noir in three dimensions, a rarity as the process did not often go in that direction, except wait … there was Second Chance, Dangerous Mission, Inferno, maybe others I’m not recalling. Two of these are inaccessible on home 3-D, at least on a legitimate basis. The Glass Web however is out and splendid via auspices of the 3-D Film Archive and distributing Kino Lorber. The Universal thriller was merely a title to most for many years: who’d seen it flat or deep? Not me. This was among supposed B’s Edward G. Robinson felt himself consigned to after political hounds began nipping, but I don't regard The Glass Web as B at all, and certainly U-I did not at the time. Eddie’s a developer of true-life murder mysteries, a “Crime of the Week” for local L.A. television, the latest victim close to home that is staff members of the broadcast station including him. I liked prospect of E.G. reprising his Barton Keyes character, which to some extent he does, but there’s a mystery killer angle and I’ll admit wishing Richard Denning would be the surprise reveal, since I don’t tend to fully trust Denning even where he’s a supposed straight arrow. There’s a cute scene where Eddie shows off his art collection to a date, a gag worked into several Robinson performances during the 50’s, him by then well-identified as a big-league accumulator. All of Universal-International earmarks are here, direction (Jack Arnold), cast (Kathleen Hughes late of struggle with spacemen). Depth effects are mostly staged on sets, that is interiors where lamps, chairs, etc. can figure as foreground between us and enactors. Hitchcock went a same direction for Dial M for Murder, which used similar devices with expected Hitchcock flair, but Jack Arnold was no slouch re the process, having done It Came from Outer Space and Creature from the Black Lagoon, both effectively.


Not sure how many 3-D bookings The Glass Web had, it being late 1953 and maybe by then we were cooling off on the novelty. Of cast there also is John Forsythe, who I understand trained with the Actor’s Studio. So here was a presumed Method man who seems anything but Method. In fact, he was one of the founders of the Studio, and taught Marlon Brando, Montgomery Clift, others as well, or so it is said. I hope that’s true. The Glass Web is a highly recommended 3-D find and an entertaining 81 minutes with or without the gimmick. Also new from 3-D Film Archive is Domo Arigato, unknown to me till now and presumably a first time anyone has seen it deep, assuming they did even when new in 1972. Shot in Japan, Domo Arigato is a travelogue romance to ideally pair with any one of that country’s homegrown features, Arch Oboler the writer-director. This according to box info was his last feature. Oboler among previous movies and much radio did an odd drama called Strange Holiday which starred Claude Rains with support cast including my band teacher Priscilla Lyon. Had I but known she worked once with Rains. I’d have been thrown out of band even sooner than I was. Extras on the Blu-Ray are alone worth the price of purchase, an Ed Wood 3-D subject, Cleopatra Follies (aka Flame of Islam), and Skid Row Holdup, a 3-D burlesque short from 1953. 3-D Film Archive deserves much credit for unearthing such treasure, as who’d have thought any of this material would survive the long intervening years.

7 Comments:

Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer tells how he once supported clean westerns:

As an impressionable youth, I was involved in something like the subscription program for "Crash Out." Don "Red" Barry circulated a message that if all his many fans each sent him one dollar, he could make a western with a wholesome young star that kids could enjoy.

I sent him a dollar.

I don't know what became of the movie, but I like to think that Don was able to raise a glass from time to time in appreciation of his many fans.

10:18 AM  
Blogger DBenson said...

Did Robinson would lend his own pieces for those scenes, and did he charge rent for them? Not unknown for stars to work such deals for using personal wardrobe and such. One can imagine him pushing for those moments, allowing him to justify the expense of collecting.

3:03 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I remember reading publicity for ILLEGAL to the effect that Robinson made his collection available for set decoration.

4:52 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Only THE 3D Film Archive would give us these wicked bonus shorts. It is a crime Warner Archive and Sony are not making use of their skills. DOMO ARIGATO was available in an absolutely wretched field sequential 3D version. Happily I can retire my copy. I have DANGEROUS MISSION, SECOND CHANCE, DEVIL'S CANYON, THE FRENCH LINE and CHARGE AT FEATHER in true digital 3D courtesy of friends who value what I have dug up over the years and made available from the trade magazines. Unexpected bonus. Thus I can say with authority these films more than deserve a Blu-ray Restoration.

8:02 PM  
Blogger Tommie Hicks said...

One thing I think about when I see a noir film is that prior to 1870, when it got dark, everyone went to bed or at least stayed indoors. Candles were expensive and darkness was considered by most as a manifestation of the devil. Comes the 20th century and artificial night illumination became the norm, causing miscreation to have a second shift and to provide a compelling cinema art form.

2:10 PM  
Blogger Tommie Hicks said...

One more observation: Edward G. Robinson loathed the "hood" roles. Yet these roles paid for his art collection

2:13 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer considers possibilities of 3D:


I'm sure that I've seen "The Glass Web," as it would have been almost unavoidable for such a Universal-International release not to have been made part of some television package or another, but if I did, it made no impression on me. As for "Domo Arigato," the question wouldn't be how I missed an Arch Oboler Space-Vision 3D movie but how anyone was able to see it? How many Trioptiscope lenses could there have been? That one factor probably drastically restricted the release of the movie. I've read, however, that it is worthwhile if only for providing a record of a Japan that was already disappearing before the tide of westernization; and at that, in color and 3D.

3D movies have long fascinated me, or at least the concept of such movies has, as expressed in the advertising image of a lion in your lap, but my actual experience of them has almost always been disappointing. "Jaws 3D" was quite poor and "Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jarad Sym" might have been worse, if I'd been able to see it. The projection was so dim that I wrote a letter of complaint to the theater, resulting in their apology and a free pass. No doubt they anticipated making up the cost in the popcorn I consumed and certainly they were justified in that.

A re-release of "House of Wax" was similarly botched--I was unable to see the bouncing ball at all--but a showing of "Dial M for Murder" at the Temple University Center City Cinematheque at least suggested that, in the hands of a master, the Natural Vision process could be used to aesthetically pleasing effect. I recall one scene where a purse, which had been unnoticeable in a flat print, acquired new prominence in 3D and became the center of attention, a crucial clue the characters were unaware of.

Digital projection is the standard now and 3D movies are much more common, though the process has rarely been used as effectively as it was by Hitchcock. Some years ago, I saw "Hugo" in 3D, a movie that I very much enjoyed for its dreamy evocation of the turn of the previous century and the performances of Chole Grace Moretz and Sacha Barron Cohen, but 3D offered no advantage over a flat print, other than that it allowed some distracting elements to intrude upon the frame.

Possibly my most pleasing experience of 3D was seeing your presentation of Blue-rays of "House of Wax" and "The Wizard of Oz," the latter reprocessed in 3D. Curiously, the 3D "Wizard of Oz" was enhanced by the transformation and the 3D effect more subtle and nuanced than that of "House of Wax." Could the future of depth of image in the movies be found in the flat?

4:32 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025