Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Ads and Oddities #10

 


Ad/Odds: Rudy Remembered, 3-D Early Arrives, and Cleveland Gets Showboat

VALENTINO FOR ALWAYS? --- They promised we’d treasure Rudolph Valentino forever, part-true for at least me and lots reading, but 1926 was then, as in near a century, and I’m wondering what successors were bred off mobs stood hours to get in Campbell’s NY parlor for glimpse of Rudy at rest. This was what gripped me tightest of Irving Schulman’s Valentino bio in 1967. And to think many of those waiting were still with us at the time, while of Rudy wives, Natascha Rambova had but lately passed (1966), and Jean Acker would stay eleven more years, till 1978. Re mass of humanity lining approach to Campbell’s, this being August, and likely hot. So many had to be passed through, and fast. Did even epic mourner Pola Negri get a bum’s rush? If Valentino had such massive following as suggested here, why did The Eagle underperform? He was on the right track for putting humor in his latter films. Tearful line was understood to be mostly women. I’ll assume men present were to escort wives, sisters, mothers even (but try keeping Kenneth Anger away, him born but months after the event). I’ve never waited so long for anything as did these folks. New Yorkers had patience though, for look at lines routinely stood outside Radio City Music Hall, lots knowing admission would be for the show before the one they were lured for. Will movies or stars appearing in them ever command such fealty again? Speaking of distractions along cortege way, observe up-the-street Capitol Theatre, its attraction Buster Keaton in Battling Butler. Were I a standee on that sweltering street, this would tempt me. Why not duck in for a show, especially a Buster show. Not like that choking crowd is going anywhere for a next few hours, and it’s presumably cooler inside. But was it? Did the Capitol have air conditioning in 1926? Fans blowing over ice perhaps to supply “refrigerated air”? Shade alone would make things cooler inside, but keep in mind vacuum sealing crowd you’d be among and rethink it. Looks like I’m well along a time-drift back.


Rudy montages here are again fruit of collector scrapbooks dated back to the idol’s life, then death. I like ripped and raw quality of fan-kept treasure. You took what images were found, be it magazines, newspapers, flyers from theatres. Nothing you’d buy or find was sacred, nor to be kept intact. A Photoplay cover of Valentino was fair game for scissors, job to remove print referring to other subjects so as not to deface your creation with players sub to Rudy. Post-death captioning was rife with we-knew-all-alongs. Plenty claimed clairvoyance after fact of his passing was known. Yes, it was “abetted by overwork,” stills of the Sheik reflecting “terrific strain,” but was there any industry toiler not overworked? The Sheik was where “the silver sheet became the burning sands of Rudy’s greatest triumph,” a straight line and to be admired for being that. Soon enough the late and Latin lover would be camped up by clips of “old-time movie” sort for shorts, needled by irony that was Paramount’s re-selling of The Sheik in 1938, then independents doing as much for The Eagle and Son of the Sheik, the three noteworthy for being among few occasions for silent features to be relevant, if left-handedly so. For that matter, we’d enjoy better his final two if only prints were up to snuff like pristine silent survivors Wings, The Big Parade, limited others. Look how close the scrapbook keeper clips round text. Specimen I show were not yet pasted in albums, being removed from original context, trimmed accordingly, and made ready for book placement, which for whatever reason, did not happen. It was for me to gather up slivers to lay upon scan glass and do my own conception of updated tribute. The caricature of Valentino stood out for being an only such I came across. Was he too much revered to be object of even mild kidding during a brief lifetime? “Cinema-goers … always will revere his romantic memory” says caption, and so I ask, how long did reverence last? The lady in black who stood anniversary vigil at his grave kept coming for decades after 1926, and lest I’m in error, there are still ceremonies in recognition of August 23.

AUDIOSCOPIKS, WHATEVER THEY ARE --- Is half-arse 3-D better than none? Probably no, and I’ve corneal scars to prove it, squint through seventies-eighties effort to convey depth, but too seldom getting it right, or even tolerable. A collector in New York found elements of a Metro “Audioscopik” short and had prints made on red/green stock, plus glasses, for others of us to acquire and enjoy. I ran mine to no little disappointment of most, concluding remark like a chorus, No wonder 3-D died! Who needed stereo views in 1935 outside Grandma’s parlor? There were evidently three Audioscopiks made, the third being one I had, Murder in 3-D (1941), being novel for having a Frankenstein monster designed after model that was Karloff at Universal. Did Leo ask permission? I’m guessing not, cause why would Uni allow a rival to exploit their patented creation? The short itself was entertaining and some of depth effects worked, so all was not lost. It was more/less like flipping through a 60’s comic book or magazine sold with same red/green specs. Remarkable how fast boredom came of those, same now as when I was ten and giving from twelve to thirty-five cents for them. One could ask why Warners hasn’t issued the Audioscopiks on disc, or have they? Were there more than mere three it might work as a set, but how to justify a Blu-ray release, with glasses, for less than thirty minutes of content? Besides, Universal might suddenly awaken to long-ago poach, block release, and launch a million(s) dollar infringement claim. I like how this trade ad anticipates “the next step in box-office history,” if two decades early doing so, no denying Bwana Devil made its own history in 1952 with others to follow. How many more 3-D epochs might we expect? I still burn for TV manufacturers quitting sale of depth sets. What for --- perceived lack of interest? Just wait till 3-D makes yet another comeback …


WHERE THE PLAY’S THE THING --- Ponder please the meaning of truly hard work or define it shorthand by pondering this 1933 Cleveland ad for Showboat road landing on tab terms for what Broadway would still call hinterland play, though no way you’d discount Helen Morgan (above with Irene Dunne) headlining “110 artists including 75 Glorified Ziegfeld Girls.” Picture houses situated well enough, and owned by sufficiently monolithic interests (like Loew’s here), could front a show that for “popular prices” offered entertainment beyond any rival’s capacity. What was Broadway then but feeder to wider patronage that never saw dark of Gotham legit and frankly did not need to so long as companies could be assembled and sent trainward like vaudeville of old. Trouping on Main Stem stage was never like this, Showboat oarsfolk expected to perform four shows on the same day as Cleveland arrival, first of bows not till 2:00, so imagine exhaustion by the time quitting bells rang. Vets of vaude could rise to worse circumstance, but this wasn’t a couple song numbers or skit, Showboat even if shortened a real commitment, the more so with all and sundry compressed. Patrons knew and expected highlights of the musical, and woe betide if favorite moments went missing. I’d assume much of drama was sacrificed to revue aspect of comedy and above all, music. Showboat if anything was spectacular bonus to the featured movie ordinarily traded for price of admission, though I suspect Hot Pepper was more/less a chaser, considering junior placement on the State’s ad and excitement surrounding Showboat. Here was where management, certainly Loew’s booker, would insist on flat rental, Showboat an expensive proposition and whatever percentage was paid going to the play’s ownership. Who knows but what Showboat pleased better on ninety or so minute basis, scheduled times as announced in the ad a little over three hours apart, with Hot Pepper running 76 minutes for total to rest comfortably within time allowed. Factoring a newsreel, shorts, overtures, etc. would be added, these flexible, even disposable due to specialness of Showboat.

7 Comments:

Blogger John McElwee said...

Phil Smoot considers rights and wrongs of 3-D presentation:


At this Summer (June 2025) Monster Bash in North Pittsburgh this year, I saw the best presentation of "Third Dimensional Murder" that I have ever seen, and it was still rather poor.

Before it screened, a couple next to me ask about which color went over which eye - -
And I responded that it should be the Blue gel on the right eye and the Red gel on the left,
but
in the prelude to the film itself, it says just the opposite - -
So,
for that short film, it is Red on Right and Blue on Left!

Strange, as that is not the norm.*

(*Note: In wiring, such as speaker wire or other, Red on Right is the rule, but this is not he case with Anaglyph Red/Blue 3D Glasses)

- Phil

5:10 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

3-D Rarities 1 has the footage used in AUDIOSCOPIKS. All three films are available in anaglyph and field sequential 3-D on DVD. I have converted my copies for use with my projector. I also posted them on the web. I had that 16mm print too. It was terrible for 3-D. The videos, although poor vhs quality, are better. On 3-D Rarities the footage is superb. RE: Valentino, United Artists didn't have access to the theatres Paramount and MGM had access to. Keaton's UA Features did not do the business his MGM features did, mainly I think, for that reason.

10:10 PM  
Blogger DBenson said...

Anybody recall the wildly uneven Dick Van Dyke feature "The Comic"? Narrating his own sparsely attended funeral, an old silent star imagines how it would have been if he died at his peak. A faux newsreel shows a nation mourning, a grim Calvin Coolidge reading a speech, and finally the ex-wife, hysterical with grief, trying to drag the coffin from the grave. Semi-related: Disney's 1922 Laugh-o-Gram "Puss in Boots" has a boy and his cat viewing a bullfight epic starring "Rodolph Vaselino". Disney was doing his own drawing, and Rodolph barely qualifies as a caricature, especially when compared to the famous faces appearing in "Felix in Hollywood".

I'm going to assume they cleared the house after each performance of "Showboat", and likely after any major attraction. When did continuous performances ("This is where I came in.") become the norm? And when did it become standard again to chase everybody out?

10:13 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

Somewhere long ago I read that the Marx Bros.' "The Big Store" was originally going to be filmed in 3D (and possibly Technicolor) as their big send-off from MGM. It would be interesting to know if any test footage was shot before the studio accountants stepped in.

And as for Valentino... when I was growing up 40 years after his death, his name was still the go-to comparison for movie lovers of the 1960s, whether facetiously or not. Going back 40 years from 2025, we find the deaths of Phil Silvers, Yul Brynner, Rock Hudson, and Margaret Hamilton. Hudson is remembered mainly for the cause of his passing, while Hamilton would be forgotten if not for Wizard of Oz. As for Silvers and Brynner -- anyone under the age of 40 recognize the names? And yet somehow all of my classmate, going right into college, knew who Valentino was, even though we had never seen any of his movies. How many of today's stars will have that kind of long-lasting fame?

7:55 AM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

The field sequential 3-D versions of these films gives much, much better 3-D results. You can use 3-D Combine to create left/right and over/under versions which deliver what anaglyph can't. Google the titles plus my name and you can find my versions which you can download.

10:11 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer considers Rudolph Valentino:


Rudolph Valentino was kidded during his lifetime and rather more. A cottage industry developed meeting the needs of American men offended by his more exotic approach towards lovemaking, as least as depicted in his films. Possibly they had not properly taken his measure, however. There is a title card in "The Sheik" which some still find engaging, when he stands over a cowering Agnes Ayres and responds to her question of what he wants, "Are you not woman enough to know?"

The most notorious incident came when the Chicago Tribune took umbrage in an editorial about a city hotel supposedly installing a vending machine in its men's washroom, which would dispense face powder into one's personal puff. The unnamed writer of the editorial said that he was shocked to witness two individuals actually making use of it. He ascribed blame for this descent into effeminacy to Valentino:

"A powder vending machine! In a men’s washroom! Homo Americanus! Why didn’t someone quietly drown Rudolph Guglielmo, alias Valentino, years ago?… Do women like the type of 'man' who pats pink powder on his face in a public washroom...?… Hollywood is the national school of masculinity. Rudy, the beautiful gardener’s boy, is the prototype of the American male.”

Valentino was enraged. He asked an acquaintance, the journalist and gadfly, H. L. Mencken, for advice on how to respond. Mencken said that he should just "let the dreadful farce roll to exhaustion."

Instead, he sent a furious challenge to the newspaper:

“To the man (?) who wrote the editorial headed ‘Pink Powder Puffs’ in Sunday’s Tribune, I call you in return, a contemptible coward and to prove which of us is a better man, challenge you to a personal test.”

The test he had in mind was a boxing match. The writer of the editorial was never identified and the challenge never accepted, however. It was probably just as well. Fights between reporters were not uncommon in the speakeasy age. They tended to be short, vicious affairs, often initiated by use of the "sucker punch" and with blows not confined to the regions prescribed by the Marquis of Queensbury. Valentino, would have been too gentlemanly to engage in that style of fighting. He also was not much of boxer.

The stuff of a good fighter was there, in the physical grace he demonstrated as a dancer and his well proportioned, smoothly muscled physique. Perhaps with time it might have been developed. Unfortunately, there are pictures of him sparring with the boxer Ace Hudkins, the "Nebraska Wildcat," and a few moments of film, as he engaged with a much smaller sparring partner, the heavyweight champion, Jack Dempsey, looking on. Dempsey was a friend of Valentino and had offered his services as a trainer. He had his work cut out for him. Rudy demonstrated a lazy left hand jab, his head high and chin in the air in what connoisseurs of the manly art would have described as a "hit me pose." Against any competent boxer, he would have taken punishment.

As noted, the fight never came off but Valentino took punishment nonetheless. The farcical aspects of his stardom galled him and this insult to his manhood stayed with him to the end of his life. When he came out of anesthesia after surgery to correct the problem that would kill him, his first words were, "Well, doctor, and do I now act like a 'pink powder puff'?" His physician replied, "No, sir. You have been very brave. Braver than most."

1:09 PM  
Blogger Ed Watz said...

After his passing, to call someone a “Sheik” remained shorthand reference to Valentino and his screen style of lovemaking. My favorite of these asides in movies comes from Robert Woolsey in PEACH-O-RENO (1931) when he asks a woman, “Would you describe your husband as a sheik or would that be insulting the Arabs?"

5:21 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025
  • June 2025
  • July 2025
  • August 2025
  • September 2025