Precode Picks #8
![]() |
| Turn Off the Spigot, Warners --- There's Folks Drowning Here! |
Precode: Safety Last Where Moviemaking, Duck, Jim!, and Museum Gets a 1970 Re-Wax
DEATH VALLEY DAYS --- There were losses recorded among those beloved in the business. Think Lon Chaney, Marie Dressler, Will Rogers … gone too soon. But what of ones snatched away under violent and unexpected circumstance … perished in flames, trampled beneath horses, claimed by bodies of water gone awry. Accidents that in many if not most cases could/should have been avoided. Someone, or some institution, was invariably to blame, none better equipped to clam up and circle wagons than corporate Hollywood having goofed at the expense of lives. Consider necrologies that came off these projects, The Trail of ’98, Noah’s Ark, The Painted Desert --- each surveyed previously at Greenbriar. I’m fascinated by carnage staged, result disastrous, concealed from there on. Survivors who lasted long enough told tales to interviewers, later enough to figure it was safe to share. “55 in Studio Employ Killed in Five Years,” this trade-published in 1931, cold insurance data gone down rabbit hole that was page 18 of an Exhibitor’s Herald. Old news this was, and how does that help business, now or at any time? Movies were for fun and fantasy, not men drowned while making them. Bury such incidents deep, industry with immense resource to do just that. Quick query: Was there ever a major star that died in service to film? I’m drawing blank, but there had to be a few. I do know of a horrific on-set incident that claimed Martha Mansfield in 1923 (she of previous co-starring with Barrymore’s Jekyll/Hyde). “Majority of these accidents occurred at Hollywood plants,” said the article, ring of truth as this info derived from California’s Industrial Commission. Imagine cone of silence that dropped whenever someone died on a soundstage, such thick walls with all inside warned to keep mum. How many families were settled on terms never to talk? Lots went to eventual graves holding their tongue. Remember what Scorsese said in Quiz Show, “corporations never forget”? What about where a star was responsible for the loss, a careless error, but being assets, they had to be protected. $421,850 is lots of money on late twenties/early thirties terms, equivalent to eight million today. Working lower rungs of movies was hazard duty for many. One could moonlight hauling nitro and be no worse off.
![]() |
| WWI Vet Discharges a Machine Gun Right Toward You ... What Can Go Wrong? |
SHOT FOR REAL --- Here is William Wellman at center lining up a next shot for Public Enemy, “shot” not inapt for WWI marksman Clem Peoples on the scaffold preparing to empty his machine gun just to the left of James Cagney, live ammo at the ready (Peoples was after many years correctly identified thanks to research by Frank Thompson and John Gallagher in their outstanding Wellman book). Wellman was a tough egg not afraid to take risks with himself or cast members. Did Bill realize he’d take the fall if something went wrong? Movies were footloose for sure in precode days, or maybe life was cheaper. Did Warners value talent so little as this? I’m surprised Cagney submitted, but he was just starting out so maybe that explains. Later on, he’d not cooperate so readily, a similar scene in Angels with Dirty Faces (1938) faked per his insistence. Cagney never trusted Warners for truth, money, even his own survival. It was their chiseling that finally made him split in 1942. What Public Enemy lacked in caution was made up with conviction. Gunshot gags were done for films other than here, plenty of sure-shot William Tells happy to blast apples or otherwise off actor heads provided latter was dumb or hungry enough to stand still for it. Hard ups chose these over apples they might otherwise be selling on streets, dogs of Depression baying without. WB was the sort of place where they worked you twenty hours a day and made you like it. What price Hollywood indeed. I read where overwork exhausted Joan Blondell to a point where she went temporarily blind. Was stardom worth this? Interviewed in old-age Cagney was asked about conditions, him waving off with “No great strain.” He’d long since put most down memory holes. I would have. Was there PTSD from working in 30’s movies? This image above crossed my sightline a first time at age twelve when I got The Movies, by Griffith and Mayer, Public Enemy on page 363. They also did a two-page “story in pictures” for the film that I swooned for, dreaming to someday see whole of the feature (as illustrated previous at Greenbriar). That wouldn’t happen because prints were cut down for the 1954 reissue and left that way for TV. Some errant footage later got into the Blu-ray.
![]() |
| Photographing Mystery of the Wax Museum From the Ground Way Up |
WHO’S FOR HOT WAX? --- The “Eighth New York Film Festival” happened at Lincoln Center from 25 to 27 September 1970. Saw word of it in The New York Times at my high school library early one morning, Mystery of the Wax Museum to beggar belief that so lost a classic had finally been found. Scott MacQueen kindly sent me these images. He was age thirteen and at Lincoln Center for the show. I had to imagine it from 601 miles distant. Film fandom derives from far-flung places. Scott says the single surviving nitrate print was shown. He would decades later use selfsame 35mm toward Wax’s UCLA restoration. 1970 saw Mystery of the Wax Museum inaccessible to all but then-attendees. Now we have it or can readily get it. Above is behind-scenes Wax doings, the molten vat as centerpiece with Lionel Atwill, Glenda Farrell, and director Michael Curtiz on a scaffold atop. Such stills had to be as carefully composed as scenes for the film. This capture, which I never saw before Scott sent it along, was published as part of International Photographer’s June 1933 nod to “Chief Camerman” Ray Rennahan, who we know ran the table on Technicolor photography for years to come, among best men for these sorts of jobs. For the record, 1970’s NY Festival tendered also Back Street (1931), The Emperor Jones, The Front Page, The Kid Brother, King of Jazz, The Last Flight, Laughter, The Miracle Woman, and Once in a Lifetime. All but two (Laughter and Once in a Lifetime) can be had today on Blu-Ray. Wonders do not cease, for even aforementioned two can be accessed provided one knows the right bootlegger or dark streaming platform. I have a feeling Mystery of the Wax Museum got the most enthusiastic response of the group in 1970. Everybody figured it for gone, legend meantime assuring greatness few could confirm or deny, though at that time there still were plenty who could first-hand recall the 1933 experience. Program notes were supplied by Carlos Clarens, his seminal An Illustrated History of the Horror Film featuring first-ever glimpse of the unmasked Atwill from Wax Museum, a shock punch we never got from monster magazines to that time.






16 Comments:
"Was there ever a major star that died in service to film?" Vic Morrow certainly paid the price.
I'd say many name performers were ultimately killed by overwork, injuries never completely mended, and/or drugs taken to deal with either. The process could be slow enough that they were out of the industry before death, careers already ended by the effects.
There have been multiple gun and explosive-related accidents on sets, famously including Harold Lloyd. He lost thumb and finger of one hand, and successfully concealed the fact from the public for years lest it make his dangerous stunts less funny. The most recent was Alec Baldwin killing a cinematographer with what was supposed to be a prop.
Certainly there were fatalities among stunt men. A daredevil 1960s cameraman lost a leg to helicopter blades on a Bond picture and on a later film fell to his death from an airplane; seems likely there were other cameramen injured or killed over the years.
DBenson is quite right. Of the many deaths related to film work, one of the more notorious was that of silent film star Wallace Reid. He was injured in a train wreck while filming "Valley of the Giants" on location in 1919. Unwilling to stop the production, his studio had the company doctor keep him drugged with morphine so that he could continue working despite the pain. He became addicted as a result, but his popularity was such that the studio needed him to keep making films. To that end, it kept him supplied with the drug. His health broke down and he was in and out of sanitariums and hospitals during the last months of his life, finally dying of influenza in 1922. He was only 31 years old. The following year, his widow, Dorothy Davenport (billed as "Mrs. Wallace Reid"), co-produced and appeared in the film, "Human Wreckage," making a national tour with it to expose the dangers of drug addiction.
Donald Benson's comment about flyers reminded me of Paul Mantz, who had a career doing dangerous air stunts prior to his fatal accident on location for FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX.
Not a major star maybe Eric Fleming should be mentioned in this discussion.
I eagerly bought a 16mm color print of HOUSE OF WAX back in the 1980s. It was good but nowhere near as great as what is available to us now. Cheers.
It was his own damn fault, but you can add Jon Erik Hexum to that list…
Speaking of rare films, TCM's schedule says the channel will be broadcasting His Glorious Night, with John Gilbert, On November 13. "I love you, I love you, I love you."
Vic Morrow on the set of John Landis's Twilight Zone movie.
Longtime fan, first time poster. Not a classic movie, but an example I know of is Brandon Lee was accidentally killed by a shotgun near the end of filming “The Crow” in 1994. His brother and some trick photography allowed the film to be completed.
Dan Mercer remembers a 1973 sighting of MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM with DOCTOR X (Part One):
"Mystery of the Wax Museum" was a kind of grail for a time, a seemingly lost film with a wonderful reputation. Some believed that it was not only one of the best of the early horror films, but the most frightening. Since it couldn't be seen, it was easy for people to invest in it imaginatively, on the basis of evocative memories and intriguing stills. It must have come as thunderbolt, then, when you learned that a print of the film had been discovered and that it was going to be shown at a film festival. Afterwards, though, the discussion in the fanzines devolved from whether it was one of the best horror films to whether it was any good at all.
In retrospect, it would have been difficult for any film to have justified the reputation "House of Wax" enjoyed, but the disappointment of many who were finally able to see it was profound. This, too, did not take the film for what it was. The fact that its plot so closely paralleled that of its remake, "House of Wax," should have been a clue all along as to its actual quality, but also whether it remained a piece of good, commercial entertainment, as its remake was.
I followed this give and take with great interest. My love of films had evolved to where I wanted to see everything, especially the rare and arcane, but I had a special love for the horror films of my boyhood. So, I was thrilled when you let me know, three years after its rediscovery, that Wake Forest University was going to have a campus showing of "Mystery of the Wax Museum" around Halloween, along with "Dr. X" as a companion feature. Of course, we would go to see it, for this would be in the nature of an adventure, something strange and unknown in an out of the way place.
Part Two from Dan Mercer:
"Dr. X" was shown first that evening, a soft black and white print that only hinted at the eerie effects that would not be appreciated until it received its own restoration years later. Sad to say, it died a death with that audience. What they disliked most seemed to be the comedy of Lee Tracy. During the scene where he sat in cramped office, clapping in time to the bobbing of a skeleton, someone said aloud, "Oh, he's just too funny." I was appalled by his comment. I took everything seriously then, film-wise, even comedy. Besides, I found the film rather better than that, for its staging and build up to the revelation of the "Moon Monster." I was also infatuated with Fay Wray, so any film in which she made an appearance was worthwhile, if only for that.
We had come, though, for "Mystery of the Wax Museum," and when the theater lights dimmed again, I found myself tingling with excitement. The projector was turned on and the screen was painted by the beam of light in colors unfamiliar to me. In those first moments, I felt rather as Howard Carter must have, when he first opened King Tutankhamun's tomb and was asked what he saw. "Wonderful things," he replied. Those moments proved fleeting, however. The hues of that surviving print had not been fully captured, it seemed. They quickly faded and for long stretches the film was almost monochromatic.
Our conversation was lively on the drive back to Hickory, seeking to impress upon memory every moment of the occasion. We scorned the philistines in the audience, who obviously hadn't the sophistication to appreciate the import of what they were seeing. As for "Mystery of the Wax Museum," we realized that it was not so much a horror film as something like the hardboiled newspaper and gangster films Warner Bros. was making at the time, a number of which were part of the programming of UHF stations we had watched. We were glad to see Fay Wray in this film as well, but the show really belonged to Glenda Farrell, who we found to be a delightful personality. And we tried to understand how this print could have been so far removed from what had to have been seen at that Lincoln Center showing. Surely, two-color Technicolor was more than that.
The evening was disappointing in a way, yet tantalizing as well. We had gained a glimpse of the marvelous, but would have to travel a ways further to fully appreciate it. Certainly it was journey we were willing to take, as we have to this day. And indeed, we have seen wonderful things along the way.
Dan Mercer: Great contribution. My 16mm color print of MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM was brother to the one you saw. Warners seemed to gut its thrillers with comedy that isn't, to my taste, particularly comedic. THE BEAST WITH FIVE FINGERS wowed me when I saw it late night on TV as a kid. Genuinely creepy in my memory. That is now shattered by the reality of seeing it on digital thus learning it was just a dream. I dreamed it was much more. People who pick these films up at a local store, through the mail or downloaded online never share the feelings we had back when these were near impossible to see. Not complaing. My Blu-rays and DVD copies projected on a BIG screen with great equipment have erased all memories of 16mm. Sound is way better, too. Excelsoir.
Don`t forget Tyrone Power while filming SOLOMON AND SHEBA, heart attack while filming a sword fight
A few months after its Lincoln Center showing, ONCE IN A LIFETIME got national TV exposure February 11, 1971 on "N.E.T. Playhouse'' It hasn't been shown on TV since! In the New York City market, MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM arrived February 10, 1973 on WPIX's "Chiller Theater.''
I do remember seeing ONCE IN A LIFETIME on PBS around the time you indicate, probably on that same date, 2/11/71. It wouldn't again come my way until a "lab-leaked" 16mm print came available in the late eighties.
As to WAX MUSEUM, we didn't get on television until sometime in 1974 as I recall, on Greensboro's Channel 2, as a Friday night late show. Your getting it in New York so early as 2/10/73 was months before Dan Mercer and I attended the screening in 16mm at Wake Forest.
Post a Comment
<< Home