Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, November 24, 2025

Shot Near the Top of My Chart

 

Among the One-Hundred: Hell's Angels

There’s been conjecture as to cost and casualties on Hell’s Angels. Some claim four million was sunk in the negative, a most since the silent Ben-Hur, while others make it more, as in $4.5, claims also that two million was gone just on a near-completed talkless Angels that Howard Hughes scuttled in favor of sound. United Artists data says $2.8 million was the outlay, $1.6 million coming back in domestic rentals. Is truth somewhere in between? Probably so, as myths attached quick to Hell’s Angels. This was glorious Hollywood, madness Hollywood, fiscal indifference to give free-spend appearance, but seldom the reality of it. Hughes had roared into town on his own (inherited) money, was a cock of the air when aviation was a most romantic pursuit men could aspire to, him tall, dark, and obsessive, still sane enough to make projects begin and eventually conclude. He did features that clicked, are still shown at TCM, if silent and not a little strange. Universal owns the lot. They licensed Hell’s Angels to Criterion for its recent 4K release, which I might as well go ahead and call Disc of the Year. Did I mention casualties before? There were four deaths said most, some creeping it up to five. Suppose there were more that got covered up? --- that easy enough in wild-wooly H’wood of off-chart risks and reward. Stunt flyers went all but Kamikaze over jobs that paid best for a day’s (or hour) work. Nobody wanted to die in the air, but better men had, and theirs was an ennobled fraternity. Just occurs to me: Was there ever a woman stunt flyer? Surely yes … we just haven’t been introduced to her. What if a Louise Brooks lookalike posed as a pilot, bobbed hair beneath goggles, a years-long career daring death and we never knew about it. Sounds like a script idea, but who’d play it? There is after all no Louise Brooks or comparable to cast. So many tales about Hell’s Angels are tall. Things are to a point where I prefer invention if not outright fabrication.

They'd Never Let Her Look and Act This Way at Metro ... more's the pity

There were Hell’s Angels junkies that wrote to Films in Review, and often. They’d argue as to what kind of biplanes were used for dogfights. Mel Torme of singing fame was one of ultra-fans. How many boys were weaned on Hell’s Angels? I knew one during law-practice days. He was a superior court judge who kept juries waiting while he and I talked over old movies in chambers. Judge Tom Seay saw Hell’s Angels on first release and it stayed a religious experience from there on. You realize it had a color sequence, he said with expected intensity. Yes sir, your honor, I heard about that but never saw it (this the eighties after all). Forgot to ask if he also caught the spider pit in King Kong … too late now. Losing veteran picturegoers like Judge Seay was pretty much losing it all. Yes, Hell’s Angels had a color section, at least a reel, the cast said to have sweated under lights hotter than Satan shoveled. They also got Klieg eyes, which meant your eyeballs got singed by the heat. I repeat … eyeballs singed. There would have been no movie stardom worth that for me. Jean Harlow among others experienced it, Hell’s Angels also when she began putting poison in her hair to make it unnaturally blond, more laden upon a woman already doomed by adolescent scarlet fever with kidneys compromised as result. Harlow bore Indian sign as did others with early acquired health conditions. More of her to come … oh, why not now? Jean was eighteen, came from privilege, was not the ding-dong some films made her out to be, could read and all that. In fact, she wrote a book once, was good to fans, loved William Powell (don’t we all?). But Harlow also kept reckless company, was not so nice to husbands or lovers once she tired of them (Bill an exception, him nobody’s doormat). That’s the chance you took, fellows, her being Jean Harlow after all. She’d claim to the end that the screen image had nothing to do with her. To large extent, it didn’t. Whole of studio mourned, really mourned, when she died in 1937. Lots claim she was hopeless in Hell’s Angels. Not me --- I call Harlow as “Helen” fully formed and wish Harlow had stayed just the way she was here. Talk about a raw feed. She is that and loads more, primitive and gimme-gimme, all men’s dream and eventual nightmare. Many imagine they’d want something like her, but don’t go near that stove.

Attention-Grabbed by the Throat in Gotham

Hell’s Angels was the fastest ride 1930 ever saw. There had been Wings and The Big Parade before, both sedate alongside this. Hell’s Angels is kicking-door-down, brute entertainment, like King Kong and Tarzan and His Mate would be, these to exhilarate, if not unnerve a little. Movies tempered like steel, guard down, stops out. TCM had been playing Hell’s Angels High-Def, so OK, it was familiar, but this … as said, it’s 4K, and lookit, they widen ratio to 1.54 for the zep raid plus dogfights. Was 1.54 random arrived at or did theatres, at least first-run ones, run Hell’s highlights that way? No matter, it socks. 127 minutes goes by like grease spilled on hot surface (there is an intermission). We get prewar set-up in Germany, dueling right away, enlistment for brothers James Hall and Ben Lyon, then the color, then Ben seduced by Jean, and so on through pell-mell whole. Hell’s Angels all but wrung me out. Who among participants do you favor? I’ve drifted more toward Ben Lyon’s Monte. He’s selfish, a shameless fornicator, takes coward way out of all conflict, a mere boy in men’s uniform. Monte’s a lot like Hud Bannon had he been around to serve in the Great War. And he gets a terrific speech denouncing militarism and patriotic fervor that is said to have roused applause from 1930 audiences who’d long since re-thought baseless conflict that was WWI. Monte is in short a pioneering anti-hero. The talkies’ first? I say yes. Brother Roy is a simp beside him, always doing the “right” thing, a hopeless chump to Helen, who finally shrieks so, plus abusive more, when he catches her all but mounting a French officer in a smoky barroom. Movies to have drama must have their Roys, and Montes. Their back-forth leads to searing pay-off. Who wrote this? I’m told Marshall Neilan to begin with. Let’s say spine of the story was his. If that’s true, by all means lionize him instead of recap that he stayed drunk, irresponsible, unreliable, a sound-era washout. Alkies got good ideas too, sometimes great ones.

Germany's Attacking Zep Both Outside and In --- Sure Looked Real to Me!

Speaking of greatness applied to Hell’s Angels, there was also James Whale, brought on to direct dialogue, it estimated (biographer James Curtis) that Whale was ultimately responsible for sixty percent of completed Hell’s Angels. He’d not do aerial scenes of course, that was Hughes’ bailiwick. Whale instead focused on words and character. We know from later evidence that he was masterful at both. I’m almost at point of calling Hell’s Angels “A Film by James Whale.” All I hear is how mean he was to Jean Harlow, but he couldn’t have kept on being that way and gotten such a marvelous performance from her. Again, re Harlow: She would never be this fresh, unplugged, smoldering, again. How could mainstream Hollywood have stood it, let alone eventual employer MGM? Suppose Whale met her later at some industry function and maybe said, I always knew you had the stuff, Jean. Nice to think something like that maybe happened. Funny how so much movie “facts” come instead from our imaginations, not to mention that of those put to telling “truth” about a largely lying industry. Again Ben Lyon: He’s said (he claimed) to have discovered Marilyn Monroe. Was there enough of Monte in Ben to take advantage of that situation, or was he offscreen more Roy’s speed? I think Monte was the model. In fact, didn’t Jim Bacon say so in one of his indiscreet seventies paperbacks? Guys so experienced as Lyon were takers where they could be and givers where they must. Aren’t we all? Ben had Bebe, a catch for sure, but was he a Monte in tinsel clothing? Catch Ben interviewed by Kevin Brownlow about throwing Pola Negri out of the Valentino funeral for excess weeping and show-off floral arrangements. Lyon comes across as a realist and ultra-doer. I’ll bet Bebe used extra-strength rouge remover on his shirt collars. Had but guys like Ben Lyon left memoirs.

Kid on the Left in What Looks Like Goggles, Another Stood in Profile with Leathery (Flight?) Jacket

Did Hughes have Harlow? Earlier employer Hal Roach did, according to a trusted source. It’s been said HH “didn’t bother with her.” Oh, sure … in that dog kennel of a town, cathouse of an industry? High minders will say it’s of no concern, so long ago and all that, but believe me, when you watch Hell’s Angels on 4K, it's in part to hash over such indelicate things. Of course, some of us could look at a muddy dupe with same debased thoughts. I don’t admire Harlow any less whether she played ball or not, and figure she used predators better than they thought they were using her. One’s mind percolates where watching Hell’s Angels. No sooner are we off the color segment than the zep shows up, blue-tint, hand-applications (that red explosion!), scary in its authenticity (balloon “miniature” was sixty feet long). German personnel leap to deaths to reduce weight after their craft is hit, sacrifice of all to the Fatherland. Glad Monte wasn’t there and forced to jump. Speaking of scary, there are the air battles, “staged” not noticeably so, for these are real planes en masse and chasing each other as though real war was on with bonus (increased stunt pay?) for bringing down your opponent. Was courting death daily aspect of stunter life as was case in the war? Some of these men after all were combat vets. Those four/five lost could enlighten us. Ghosts aloft, Hell’s Angels unearthily effective as no other war depiction had been or would be. Did Ben Lyon offer extended explain of dogfighting he obviously did? He lived long enough (James Hall gone by 1940 after Harlow’s ’37 depart), and was interviewed, hopefully not just by Brownlow, Ben’s extended lifetime against backdrop of a Hell’s Angels cult long in place (could this have been the first cult movie?). The show stayed visible for decades after 1930 as a presumably cheap reissue, Hell’s Angels and Scarface out there (and often combined) to show what gutsy filmmaking was really all about. Stock footage saw as much service as blown-up lizards from One Million B.C. I can’t count the number of cheapies with that same truck blowing up, courtesy Hughes. To sum-up: Never mind what went before of Hell’s Angels. Criterion is the goods. Best ever, hands down, this rocketing up my Favorite List to Top 100 (more like Top 20) for what 4K, recaptured color and width-for-highlights have done for it. Plus there’s extras, unseen outtakes narrated by David Stenn, a Harlow segment with Farran Smith Nehme, her work as always terrific.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025
  • June 2025
  • July 2025
  • August 2025
  • September 2025
  • October 2025
  • November 2025