Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, September 07, 2026

A Long, Hot Misfits Summer


More Stars Soon in Heaven ---Part Two


Problem with event movies was unwashed public needing to agree that they were indeed events. Subject matter still had to matter, doubts frankly as to whether The Misfits would. Robert Mitchum was wanted initially for lead man. Memos I read suggest they wanted him badly. Did Mitchum see this as too much reprise of his previous The Lusty Men for RKO? Was writer Arthur Miller too lofty a prospect? Maybe Monroe as screen mate distanced him. By 1960, would her people have insisted on top billing for MM? There was no argument she’d cede placement to Gable, age before beauty perhaps, or one legend checkmating another. But Monroe was still a working actress at heart, not yet legendary as early and mysterious death would confer. Respective pay level told truth as to that … Gable got $750K, her fee $300K same as director John Huston. Both were in for percentages. I understand Monroe’s estate still gets checks from The Misfits and Some Like It Hot. Gable under such physical stress, and working in Nevada’s beastly heat, made his hardest-earned money, comfort for the widow and unborn son in the end, but what a premature one. Not even sixty … and twenty years too old to play this roistering and hard-luck guy. Wish Mitchum had done The Misfits. But as I’ve said before of other icons who went early, would we wish the sixties upon any of them? Seeing Gable "really act" was maybe a lure, as it evidently was for him going in, though I suspect he’d have done a Pepe cameo if they had given him $750K for it (wouldn’t we all?). As for Gable acting, there is more and I think better of that in both Teacher’s Pet and But Not For Me.


Montgomery Clift was aboard as third of major name trio, billed as such and character support for settled leads that were Gable and Monroe. Clift plays his broken rodeo rider with authority, saddling up against sense or reason for a player seen as delicate since a road accident changed forever a public perception of him. I found myself wishing this time that Clift could somehow have gotten more chance at vigorous work, for sure he was willing to go whatever dangerous distance to make screen action credible. Might someone have mentioned him to John Wayne or Wallis as potential son of Katie Elder? I like Dean Martin, but Monty would have been electric as Tom Elder, even in diminished capacity … or am I just a fan wanting to rewrite history sixty years too late? Eli Wallach has a not very likeable part, and we can admire his not playing in opposition to it. Wallach was gifted at being a rat, or “hypocrite” as his “Guido” character is referred to, the actor for me more accessible where comic emphasis is applied to scurvy sorts, like The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, or The Magnificent Seven. Wallach would become spokesman for The Misfits cast by dent of all others gone before historical inquiry began, which must have been an uneasy sensation for him. The Misfits bore pressure from the start as an expected masterpiece, everyone just sure it would be the screen’s supreme drama, a natural consequence of genius present in all aspects. Were they as sure, however, of commercial acceptance?


Marilyn Monroe predicted that if The Misfits achieved greatness, it would come in retrospect, history awarding laurels, not first-run critics and audiences. This woman had smarts, pretending sometimes not to where it served her purpose. She for instance liked John Huston because he had been kind to her during The Asphalt Jungle, but Huston was here under a same pressure to mine gold from Arthur Miller’s concept. Maybe this caused Huston to look for escapes from over-heated toil that was The Misfits. “John Huston was constantly flouting his macho director image. He was always off to ride in local parades or attend parties,” said Ralph Roberts. There was also raw edge to the director where realism was sought, him by cast/crew agreement going too far to get effects he wanted. “A lot of the action scenes in the desert with the horses were actually shot indoors at Paramount after we’d left the Nevada location. That’s when I saw Gable take a lot of physical punishment. He was doing the close shots with a prop man holding the fake horse legs. He would thrust them at Gable who was lying on the floor trying to dodge the hoofs. John Huston felt that all this fell short of the realism he wanted to achieve and personally took charge of the prop master’s duties. Well, Gable really scrambled now because Huston was coming after him with everything he had. Huston poked and jabbed with those hoofs but Gable took it without complaining It must have been pretty painful though.” Marilyn Monroe caught blame in part for Gable’s post-Misfits heart attack and death, daily waits for her obliging him to sit idle in roasting heat. But did Huston experience guilt for how he drove the star who had after all barely got insurers’ go-ahead to appear in The Misfits?


Marilyn Monroe was married to Arthur Miller, this a reason for his writing The Misfits. For her part, there was Miller’s looking like Lincoln, and she had a thing for men who looked like Lincoln. Has this been analyzed since? Surely one or more head doctors who grazed on MM explored it. I get the impression that most any guy with an Abe-face could have Marilyn on a plate. How far back did this quirk go with her? Another of Great Emancipators in her life was Yves Montand, who emancipated MM from Miller bed during Let’s Make Love, a last before The Misfits and done for Fox under George Cukor direction. Monroe knew the picture wasn’t much, but seemed intent on transitioning to Montand, this much to Miller’s humiliation and planned get-even to follow. Best way accomplishing this was to write revenge upon The Misfits, a to start love letter he’d rewrite with a now poison pen. Ralph Roberts witnessed the explosion to follow: “ I was standing outside Mr. Gable’s trailer one afternoon talking to his makeup man. The Misfits was nearing the end of production. Suddenly we heard Gable let out a roar to someone over the phone. He was talking to his agent and was obviously very upset and angry. Gable told his agent that he wanted to see “everything we have on The Misfits” the next morning. It turned out that Arthur Miller at this late date had decided to rewrite the screenplay. By now, Marilyn was completely estranged from him and he seemed to be taking it out on the characters in The Misfits. Gable was now an unsympathetic bum, Marilyn nothing more than a whore, and Eli Wallach suddenly emerged as the hero!”


“Monty Clift was eliminated altogether from the new script. You can imagine how Gable felt about these changes. The next day, he screened the footage they had shot and realized that there was enough to release the picture --- so he went to Frank Taylor (the producer) and John Huston and told them he was going home, that he’d done his last day’s work on The Misfits. Since Gable had script approval in his contract, he didn’t have to speak a word of dialogue unless it suited him. Marilyn was very grateful for the action he took since her contract would have required her to go ahead and complete the film under any circumstances.” Thus spake ego and love now thwarted, Miller more sanguine on the matter when interviewed for The Misfits documentary years later. Ralph Roberts was in a unique position for seeing the whole thing and living to tell it. Deep in Marilyn’s confidence, he was able to get her reaction and fear that a cast-off husband might ruin all of work she and others had done up to crisis point. The confrontation apparently did not get press at the time, curtain of silence lowered over all of professionals attached to The Misfits. It would have done none of them good to have this laundry aired. Work wrapped and The Misfits was released, some months after Clark Gable died. There was avalanche of publicity, but the movie was perceived a downer, partly for loss of Gable, plus Monroe’s personal circumstance being so unsettled, The Misfits sort of “meta” but not to anyone's benefit for being so. There was $3.904 million in domestic rentals and two million foreign, not enough to break even. The Misfits had 14,404 bookings, fair enough till you realize other UA product got many more, Follow That Dream for instance with 23,475, or Alias Jesse James which had 24,926.


The Misfits
would for many become a movie inhabited by ghosts. An interesting incident saw Gable having supper alone in the hotel dining room, the casino within view and Huston doing nightly drop of thousands. “Look at him,” CG said to management, “No sleep, full day’s work ahead of him … Huston won’t live long like this.” Irony would write its own coda, however, Gable gone within a month, Huston thriving on till 1987. Apropos to gamble setting, one never knew how chips would fall. For Marilyn Monroe, there would come one more feature partially made. Roberts again: “Marilyn had agreed to do Something’s Got to Give in order to work off a contractual commitment to Fox, though she had no respect for the material. She wanted to get it out of the way and move on to something more interesting. She’d always liked Betty Comden and Adolph Green and wanted to do What a Way to Go with them. Anita Loos had written a sequel to Gentlemen Prefer Blondes wherein Marilyn would play an older Lorelei Lee.” Monroe always sought to improve, and to be in better pictures. Added Ralph Roberts: “She was a big Garbo fan. She used to go to the Museum of Modern Art whenever they had a Garbo film.” There was every intent to finish the Fox job, said Ralph: “Marilyn wanted to finish Something’s Got to Give only a few days before her death. She had met with Fox, and they agreed to reactivate production on the film. At one point they had announced that Lee Remick would take over Marilyn’s role. She was very concerned about this and called Dean Martin to tell him she’d be back to finish it up. She wanted Dean to intercede with Fox. I remember her telling him on the phone, Don’t use Lee Remick.” The Misfits is on Blu-Ray and streams most places in High-Def.

9 Comments:

Blogger Kevin K. said...

Arthur Miller gives me the same feeling as Tennessee Williams -- groundbreaking writer whose work now feels over the top and self-important. I wonder what a new generation of movie columnists would think of "The Misfits". I've always avoided it, but maybe I'm in the minority.

8:10 AM  
Blogger Filmfanman said...

I'm rather glad Mitchum did not do 'The Misfits', for around that same time he made 'The Sundowners', a Fred Zinnemann picture set in 1920s Australia and shot on location there, which I like very much.

10:29 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I don't think you are in a minority, Kevin. A lot of people have told me that "The Misfits" is a bummer movie they can live without.

5:56 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Mitchum covered similar ground with "The Lusty Men" and there was probably no need for plowing it again.

5:57 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

"A lot of people have told me that "The Misfits" is a bummer movie they can live without." Now I am interested.

6:10 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

I remember reading that Gable had never spoken dialogue like this before, calling it "pure poetry".

9:27 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer reflects on "The Misfits":


I saw "The Misfits" only once and that was many years ago. I recall having enjoyed Gable's performance at first, as he seemed to be playing a real character in Gay Langland and not just another star part. As the relationship of Gay and Marilyn Monroe's Roslyn became more intimate, however, and he began to share with her what he felt about life, he began to seem overly talkative, even garrulous, and not the more taciturn man I had expected. It wasn't that Gable couldn't handle the lines, but rather that he was made to talk and talk without resolution. Perhaps I was wrong in that, comparing what he was trying to do in this movie with what he had done in others that were very different. Possibly, too, I didn't really pick up the tenor of the film, which seems me now to be about men so desperate to preserve their identities that they don't realize that what they're doing is actually destroying them. The Rosylyn character is most important in that respect, with her beauty and love of life. She serves as a catalyst, forcing each of the men to come to terms with who he is and what he is doing. At the end, Gay releases the last stallion and turns to her, finding release from the snare of a vanishing life.

At least, so I recall.

12:09 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer is back with further observations (Part One):


“Son of Fury: The Story of Benjamin Blake”

An exciting melodrama with exotic settings, brilliant performances by Power, Farmer, Sanders, and Tierney, and a thrilling musical score by Alfred Newman. It should and can be seen repeatedly, as I found out once upon a time, to my pleasure.

The Influence of Louise Brooks

Louise Brooks is much more of an influence today than she ever was at the height of her career. Then she was an upcoming Hollywood actress who left to make two films in Germany and another in France, just when the movies were transitioning to sound. However brilliant she was in those three films, they were regarded as transitional and of no importance. So, when she came back, she was one of many actresses unproven in sound films, but also one who had been disobedient. The studios had no use for her, and she had no use for them, allowing her to fumble the one real opportunity she would be offered, playing the part in William Wellman's "Public Enemy" that would go to Jean Harlow. Ironically, the very films that killed her career are now recognized for their greatness and she is considered something she never was in that career, one of the greatest of stars.

Loretta Young

Loretta Young was such a slender, fawn-like creature when she began, but that suggestion of innocence was a quality that remained with her to the end of her career, even when subsumed in a lady-like grace. Her films for Warner Bros. during the early thirties, such as "Taxi!" and "Employee's Entrance" were all the more effective for placing such a one as her in what were tough times.

Norma Shearer

Joan Crawford cattishly attributed Norma Shearer's success to "sleeping with the boss." No doubt she had her pick of the roles at the studio, but it was the roles she chose and how she played them that was the real basis for her stardom. During the Pre-Code days, she effectively contrasted her patrician beauty with the passion playing just beneath the cool surface, as in "The Divorcee" and "A Free Soul." However, she also demonstrated much greater range than she has been credited with, especially in her superb performances in "The Barretts of Wimpole Street" and "Marie Antoinette." Crawford played opposite Shearer in "The Women," both of them appropriately cast in roles on opposite sides of the social spectrum.

“The Cat and the Canary” (1927)

Ordinarily, I don't care for thrillers where the thrills are illusory or played for laughs. "The Cat and the Canary," however, is so stylishly directed by Paul Leni, with windblown curtains shrouding darkened corridors and other trappings of German expressionism, that I can’t help but be entertained. It is a way of saying there are such things, not here perhaps but surely elsewhere. Or else why our fearful laughter?

Lauren Bacall in “To Have and Have Not” (“I was nineteen. I didn’t know anything. I just did what I was told.”)

That may be so, yet there always seemed to be a self-possession and shrewdness about Bacall, old or young. There was also intelligence, however, found in her following those instructions with great fidelity.

Lauren Bacall in “To Have and Have Not” (“You know how to whistle” scene)

Amusing and iconic, but in keeping with her performance throughout the film, there is no sense of spontaneity or ease, only that of a young woman playing with her mother's makeup and silk stockings.

5:03 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Part Two from Dan Mercer:


“Invasion of the Body Snatchers”

Is it very different in a cancel culture? Superficially, it would not seem to be, if the simulation is sufficiently convincing. The question is what takes place within, to give expression to such an appearance.

Barbara Payton

She does seem a happy and content young woman in publicity portraits. Sometimes circumstances reveal the personality. Surrounded by love and respect, a person might respond in a way worthy of it. Other circumstances might call out a certain wildness, something that rides forth, uncontrolled. I wonder whether Barbara Payton would have enjoyed another kind of life, had she lived it somewhere other than Hollywood.

Frances Farmer

The lurid stories of her treatment in a mental institution shouldn’t have taken away from what she also was, a beautiful, intelligent, and hard-working actress. This scene from “Flowing Gold” suggests the nuance she was able to give her character, that believable show of a quiet anger and the hard edge of her tone of voice. But she was also temperamental and increasingly difficult to get along with. Some in Hollywood disliked what they regarded as her intellectual pretentions. This movie came after she walked away from a New York stage production of “The Fifth Column,” Ernest Hemingway’s only play. It led to an affair with her co-star, John Garfield, but no contract from Warner Bros. Her career afterwards descended into leads with poverty row studios and supporting roles with the majors, but her mental problems became more apparent. After run-ins with law enforcement, she would be institutionalized, released, and institutionalized again. What happened to her there was grim, though the details were a matter of speculation. Her autobiography, “Will There Really Be a Morning?”, published after her death, took its title from a favorite poem by Emily Dickinson.

Gene Tierney and Vincent Price in “Dragonwyck”

As Twentieth Century-Fox players, Gene Tierney and Vincent Price also appeared together in "Laura," and "Leave Her to Heaven"; and "Hudson's Bay" as well, though they shared no scenes in that one. Never would the twain of their characters meet, but the contrast between them would provide illumination and nuance playing out in the resolution of theme and story.

“The Black Cat” (Picture of Boris Karloff and Jacqueline Wells on set)

This is such an excellent film, contrasting the evil of Karloff’s Poelzig, who would seek any path leading to power and domination, even if he had to acknowledge the lordship of one yet more evil, and the flawed goodness of Vitus Werdegast, played by Bela Lugosi, whose decency had been corrupted by privation and suffering, allowing him to confront evil on its own terms, yet with an irreducible remnant that would allow him to want to do so for the sake of goodness. In the middle is the innocence of Jacqueline Wells' Joan, not so much a pawn as the prize sought by the forces of good and evil and thus, the catalyst for the final struggle.

Wendy Hiller in “Pygmalion”

Shaw had an excellent eye...and ear in insisting that she be cast. Wendy Hiller was brilliant as Eliza Doolittle, providing rich Cockney soil for the blossoming of her inner qualities. For her, a nomination for Best Actress at the Academy Awards was honor enough in field comprising Bette Davis in "Jezebel," Norma Shearer in "Marie Antoinette," Fay Bainter in "White Banners," and Margaret Sullavan in "Three Comrades." Davis won with a powerhouse performance, but no discussion of those awards could fail to include Hiller as having been "arguably" better.

5:11 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025
  • June 2025
  • July 2025
  • August 2025
  • September 2025
  • October 2025
  • November 2025
  • December 2025
  • January 2026
  • February 2026
  • March 2026
  • April 2026
  • May 2026
  • June 2026
  • July 2026
  • August 2026
  • September 2026