Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Wednesday, July 12, 2006




The Black Swan Arrives

It’s been six years since I watched The Black Swan. The new DVD just came in this week, so it was time to catch up. The following is a reflection dated March 14, 2000, right after I saw it the last time. Prior to 2000, a 16mm LPP print (which promised not to fade) was much in demand among collectors, but the new century brought with it a sharp decline in film collecting, and the prized Black Swan was no longer such a prize. I don’t know what one would bring now, but it couldn’t be that much, especially with a new DVD you can get for $10 or less. Here’s some Jane Withers/Black Swan trivia. An avid memorabilia collector from the time she was a child actress at Fox in the thirties and early forties. I’m told she used to crawl into the dumpsters on the lot in order to retrieve discarded stills, props, costumes, etc. One of the items scored was an original scale model of The Black Swan. The size was such it had to be stored in a warehouse. I’d heard this story for years, but was never sure if it was on the level. Finally, I got to meet Jane Withers at a Ray Courts autograph show in North Hollywood about seven or eight years ago, and the first thing I asked about was The Black Swan. Did she really have that ship? Yes --- and for several decades, until time and deterioration finally obliged her to get rid of it. As to when she'd acquired the model, I didn’t ask. Possibly at that big Fox auction they had back in the early seventies. Chances are the studio kept using it on through the fifties, maybe in things like Anne Of The Indes. Anyway, at least Jane got to enjoy it for a while. So back to that 2000 Black Swan essay, keep in mind I wrote it before those recent Pirates of The Caribbean movies, or else I would have surely mentioned them (the reference here is to the theme park rides) ---



If you've visited either of the Disney worlds, you’ve no doubt experienced The Pirates of The Caribbean --- well, here is its motion picture counterpart --- every bit as artificial as Disney's indoor sail through pirate waters. I’m convinced this movie was a direct forerunner and inspiration for the ride, as they're both deliberately overblown and kid-friendly. Zanuck conceived The Black Swan as schoolboy pirate adventure from the beginning --- opening scenes announce as much. Whereas the Errol Flynns functioned as straight period drama, this one casts a wink toward the audience from the first reel on --- even Power's own Son Of Fury, released within the same year, managed an intensity never approached by The Black Swan. I remember waiting with great anticipation back around 1980 when it resurfaced on the old "SFM Holiday Network" after having been years out of circulation (except for a few scattered B/W prints in 16mm). It seemed a letdown then, and compared with The Mark Of Zorro and Son Of Fury, frankly still is --- yet somehow, The Black Swan seems to gain on repeated viewing, and for that reason, I’d recommend it as a video keeper. Two elements alone justify ownership --- the color and Alfred Newman's score. Otherwise, there is a miscast George Sanders --- I know it's hard to imagine G.S. as an unwelcome participant in ANY film, but he's just too urbane for athletic excesses he's put through here (George was notorious for ducking stunt work) --- and that flaming red beard too often conceals the beloved Sanders sneer we know to lie beneath --- this one's clearly among the actor's "take-the-money-and-run" parts. Director Henry King was ideally suited for Americana subjects (see the wonderful Margie and Wait Till The Sun Shines, Nellie), but was versatile enough to hoist the Jolly Roger when necessary, though you sense he'd rather be doing something else. Maureen O'Hara's the usual spitfire (she even got around to playing a character named Spitfire a few years later with Errol Flynn) --- you wonder why these guys put up with so much aggravation to get at her --- then that fadeout clinch, surprising for a code pic, comes along to remind you. She and Power also do a bedtime variation on the old It Happened One Night
gag that is actually the most suspenseful scene in the show. Don’t get your hopes up for a Zorro worthy climactic duel --- here it's undercranked and ludicrous --- like running a silent at the wrong speed. Tyrone Power was peeling potatoes by the time this got into theatres --- he'd never look so frisky again --- even in similar post-war projects, it was clear the party was over --- just compare Swan with Captain From Castile --- same star, color, director, composer --- but now the milk had curdled, and a noirish malaise had definitely set in. Power may have looked back on the Black Swan(s) of his past as childish unworthies (or "monuments to public patience" as he liked to call them), but this was the sort of vehicle that took him to the top, and would have kept him there, had the war and his own displacement by newer faces not occurred (think Burt Lancaster and The Crimson Pirate, virtually a remake of The Black Swan). In a sense, it’s Power's own swan song as the impossibly handsome matinee idol --- a status he would soon exchange for a marine uniform, and never really get back.




Fast forward to 2006 and another viewing of The Black Swan. These are not very dangerous pirates. They seldom do anything piratical. All of them talk about it a great deal, describing horrific acts of pillage and mayhem that have taken place offscreen, if at all. "Your fulminations, my Lords and Gentlemen, are filled with bilge and blather," says Laird Cregar
, and indeed, this show is rich with fulmination --- never have I heard so much fruity and high-flying dialogue as this. At times it’s exhausting. Laird waxes eloquent on the subject of tearing out Power’s gizzard and hanging it from the highest yardarm, then tells Maureen O’ Hara how he’ll soon see Power dangling in chains from an even higher gibbet. Nothing remotely as violent actually happens in the movie, and certainly nothing in the behavior of any character suggests it will. The Black Swan is itself a lot of bilge and blather, but enjoyable none the less, if only for being on and off in 85 minutes (I understand the new Pirates of The Caribbean sequel runs 150 minutes, including four or five apparent endings prior to the actual one). I will say Laird Cregar is absolutely resplendent in period attire. This man could have lived and prospered three centuries ago, I have no doubt of that. Maybe someone should have taught Ty that No Means No insofar as his dealings with Maureen --- she gives a pretty convincing show of not wanting anything to do with him, and yet he persists. Come to think of it, this woman’s always pushing guys away --- remember To The Shores Of Tripoli, The Quiet Man, all those costume shows where she’d rather run the man through with a sword than go to bed with him (and don’t forget the time she gave Brian Keith that wicked black eye)? Man, I would just give up. So long, baby, it can’t be that good! The veritable treasure chest referred to in a trade ad shown here amounted to $5.7 million worldwide. There was $2.5 domestic, $3.1 foreign, and a profit of $2.3 million. This was the biggest money 20th Fox had seen in its history, and would not be surpassed until after the war and Leave Her To Heaven.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Spencer Gill (opticalguy1954@yahoo.com) said...

George Sanders miscast in THE BLACK SWAN? I must respectfully disagree. It was different casting but Sanders was a lot of fun in the part. The fact that George Sanders was a hulking 6'4" was seldom used in his films but when he threatens Tyrone Power you reallly don't want to bet on Tyrone's chances.

Of course I haven't seen this film since they would run an original nitrate, IB technicolor print at the Vagabond Theater out here in LA. I assumed that the owners of the Vagabond had an under the table arrangement with some friends at UCLA's film archives since so many of the prints (this is from 1977 to the early 1980s) had the archive's logo spliced on at the head.

I hope the transfer is better than the transfer of THE ADVENTURES OF ROBIN HOOD that TCM ran a week or so ago. It looked like bad Cinecolor. The 1980 single strip negative looked vastly better. I had actually seen an original nitrate, IB technicolor print not too long before I saw the 1980 single strip and it's pretty darned close.

Spencer Gill (opticalguy1954@yahoo.com)

4:33 PM  
Anonymous Jim Lane said...

So do tell us, how is the color on this new DVD? Those old Foxes have come up looking mighty good on DVD and laserdisc -- e.g., Week-End in Havana, Leave Her to Heaven, The Gang's All Here. I'd always heard that no Technicolor 16mm prints of The Black Swan were ever struck and -- worse yet -- that no IB Tech prints have survived even in 35mm. Is this true? Inquiring minds want to know...

12:38 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Hi Jim --- Always great hearing from you. Check out Spencer Gill's comment above. He saw a 35mm nitrate print. It must still reside with UCLA. I was frankly let down by the color in "The Black Swan". I used to have a 16mm print from those same CRI elements they used for this transfer, and if anything, it looks as though they've deteriorated in the interim. Problem is that these appear to be the only elements they have left, the original three-strip negatives having been junked many years ago. It still looks acceptable, though a long way from definitive.

6:19 AM  
Anonymous Spencer Gill (opticalguy1954@yahoo.com) said...

I cannot say anything definite about the survival of IB Technicolor prints but I would like to throw this query to the various board denizens. Much (if not all) of Fox's Technicolor stuff was actually shot on the old Kodachrome stock. The Kodachrome reversals (often shot in the full or silent aperture) were then reduced to academy at Technicolor which shot black and whire seperation negatives. You would assume a massive contrast build-up but there were two factors involved. First of all the old Kodachrome professional stock wasn't as high contrast as the later Kodachrome 2 used by consumers to shoot slides. Secondly, since black and white duplication always used a very contrasty positive this would pretty much of take care of itself. Add to that the flatness of both the lighting in Technicolor (an amazingly contrasty stock to begin with) and the careful compression of tonal range (shirts were never white but pearl gray, makeup was quite dark, and sets were painted pretty dark as well) that would take care of a lot of problems.

Anyway, forgive the long lead-in, if the Technicolor elements are too shrunken to match up with each other I wonder if the original Kodachrome still exists? I have some 1937 vintage home movies shot on Kodachrome and they're totally unfaded and in great shape. For new elements a new negative could easily be shot onto 5272 (alas, the most expensive stock Kodak sells at $1 per foot) using a wet gate. If the perfs are too shrunken the dupe could be done contact, continuous wetgate (where the perf shrinkage wouldn't matter) and the reduction could be done from the dupe negative.

3:34 PM  
Anonymous Carole Becker said...

I have to disagree about Power. First of all, I thought he was excellent in Captain from Castile. Secondly, when he died he was still an international star with top billing, unlike Errol Flynn. In fact, he turned down Witness for the Prosecution and only took the part when he was offered an obscene amount of money and percent of the gross. Yes, he changed during the war, but he continued to make popular films.

7:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016