Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Wednesday, August 02, 2006

A Few Disney Moments
I always understood that in Hollywood, success is based largely on the company you keep. If that’s the case, then I guess we can say Walt Disney was indeed a very large success in 1932, based on the grouping shown here --- but what was Walt doing with the Royal Family? Ethel and Lionel are in costume for Rasputin and The Empress, and I’d assume they’re on the Metro lot --- do you suppose Walt has come over to ask permission to use their caricature likenesses in Mickey’s Gala Premiere? The Barrymores were no different from anyone around Hollywood in the early thirties --- they were willing, nay anxious, to pose with the youthful prodigy that had made animated cartoons top-of-the-bill attractions. All doors were open to Walt Disney --- I’d imagine that in the town’s social stratosphere, he’d have been a dream guest at any dinner gathering. The man was doing something utterly different in an industry that thrived on formula, and everybody recognized talent that approached genius, if for no other reason than the fact that so few had it.

Moving the clock forward to January 30, 1959, we now see Walt unveiling a bold initiative to introduce stereophonic television into our homes, by way of "three-source reception" combining radio and TV. The idea was to place the FM receiver on the left, the television set in the center, and AM on the right, separating each radio from the center set at a distance of four to six feet. Walt’s demonstrating the "simplicity" of the plan here, and according to the caption, ABC was right on board for the experiment, which would be conducted by way of the network’s broadcast, The Story Of Peter Tchaikovsky. I assume the program itself had a stereo track, but that’s easy enough to check if anyone has the DVD of Sleeping Beauty
, which includes Tchaikovsky as an extra. I’m just sitting here thinking how neat it would be if you could reproduce this whole set-up today, with a black-and-white TV set and those two vintage radios on either side --- wonder what it would sound like --- probably better than you’d think. What a visionary this man was.


Here’s Walt close to the end. He’s visiting the set of The Happiest Millionaire, the last feature on which I understand he had hands-on involvement. That’s Fred MacMurray and Greer Garson standing with him. There are several generations of us who will always remember where we were at the moment we learned of Disney’s death. For me, it was in front of the television late in the afternoon. I was watching a local kid show called Clown Carnival, hosted by a station employee suited up daily as "Joey" --- sort of a Freddie The Freeloader for Charlotte area kids. Anyway, Joey broke character near the end of the show to announce that "we all lost a good friend today", and that’s when I learned Walt had died. At the time, it honestly didn’t seem possible, especially since I had no idea he’d been sick. That was December 1966. Only a few months before, my friend next door had sent a letter out to the studio asking for Walt’s autograph. He got back a slip of paper with the signature. At the time, I questioned its authenticity, as this looked nothing like the fancy scroll that often accompanied ads for Disney pics. Of course, now there’s no question in my mind it was the real thing. Walt Disney would never have sanctioned fake autographs going out to his fans (and don’t any of you dare submit any comments confirming that he did!).

7 Comments:

Blogger Kevin K. said...

One of my Mickey Mouse B & W DVD sets has that cartoon. I remember because my wife thought Lionel Barrymore (as Rasputin) was supposed to be Abraham Lincoln. What Lincoln was supposed to be doing at a 1932 premiere, she didn't say. (She's not an expert on old movies, so I forgave the mistake.)

7:00 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Thanks, East Side. After seeing your comment, I went back and found the cartoon on the DVD set.

8:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's hot, and lately the world seems rotten -- headed for terrible anarchy, chaos and destruction. Accordingly, I am unashamed to admit that the last few lines of today's post made me start to weep...

12:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't it true that around this time (ca. 1932-3), Disney and MGM were working together on the "Hot Chocolate Soldiers" sequence for "Hollywood Party?"

7:32 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I believe that "Hot Chocolate Soldiers" would have been sometime in 1933-34. "Hollywood Party" was released in 1934.

8:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some years ago I had an interesting conversation with a colleague. She asked me who I would consider "the most influential artist of the twentieth century." She clearly expected me to name Pablo Picasso, or Salvador Dali, or James Joyce, or someone like that. But I told her flat out, "That's not even a head-scratcher. Walt Disney, hands down." She was flabbergasted, but the only reply she had was to deny that Disney was ever an artist. Needless to say, this was so absurd that I didn't bother to refute her. But I stand by my words. There's not even a close second.

12:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for sharing your memories... Walt Disney has always been my hero.

I have to agree with Griff - the world today *is* rotten, and I'm kind of *hoping* it's heading for destruction. And rebirth. We need Walt Disney today.

2:14 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024