Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, November 17, 2006





Finally --- A Good Babes In Toyland DVD


Sometimes a new DVD will come down the pipeline and surprise you. I hadn’t expected much for pre-ordering Babes In Toyland. It’s always been a problematic show, having passed through innumerable hands over decades of tangled ownership. Worse, there were title changes and edits --- lots of them. They called it March Of The Wooden Soldiers from 1950 on. Some renegade prints circulated in the guise of Revenge Is Sweet, as bizarre a title as was ever hung on a family musical comedy adapted from Victor Herbert. And what of the colorized version? Babes In Toyland was the great unknown among Laurel and Hardy features. Seeing it truly intact seemed as unlikely as rediscovering The Rogue Song, or finding decent prints of The Flying Deuces and Utopia. Now there is (finally) good news on DVD fronts. Babes In Toyland is available in a transfer worthy of a holiday favorite too long out of quality circulation. Box art says March Of The Wooden Soldiers, but the print carries all original MGM credits, including Babes In Toyland's main title. I could see detect nothing missing. All footage from any 16mm print I ever had appears to be here. There is a colorized version on the disc, but that is in addition to black-and-white, and extras here are plentiful, but more of that anon …





Are there over-aged kiddie show patrons out there? I was one on several occasions during the seventies and eighties. Here’s the conundrum --- a theatre schedules a program you’ve just got to see. Trouble is, it only plays matinee, specifically ones designed for small fry. What to do when you’re 18, or 21, even 30, and there’s Gorgo, The Time Machine, or Jack The Giant Killer beckoning to you from ticket windows lined with eight-year-olds accompanied or being dropped off by parents, the latter casting uncertain looks as you gingerly approach the ticket window --- by yourself. Gosh, lady. I don’t want to prey on your child. I just drove down to see "The Wizard Of Oz." Try selling that to a doubtful exhibitor as you enter his auditorium with a gaggle of innocent babes. I doubt they’d even let me in today. A first encounter with March Of The Wooden Soldiers was no small embarrassment in that respect, though clearly worth it. To my astonishment, a theatre in Winston-Salem played MOTWS in 1972, and I'll claim without fear of correction that I was the only high school senior in attendance. My peers, had they known, would assume I’d gone way beyond geekdom, but friend Brick Davis accompanied me, and he was but a year younger. I distinguished myself at least for being the only kiddie there to put coins in a parking meter. Better still was March Of The Wooden Soldiers being a brand new print in 35mm that had probably never looked better.





The film's birth was difficult. Producer Hal Roach started out writing a treatment for Babes In Toyland. I’ve read his synopsis --- it sounds awful. Stan Laurel thought so as well. He and Roach wrangled until the producer gave up and allowed Stan to proceed his way. Estrangement that caused would fester with Roach into old age. He maintained that Babes In Toyland was lousy, and a commercial disaster besides. Fans would argue it was neither. Laurel wanted to model Babes in Toyland after Christmas pantomimes he had grown up with. Such a concept was simple and straightforward. Disney’s 1961 remake would show what happens when such pageants get overstuffed. Laurel and Hardy are better integrated into the story than is customary for their features. Usually, narratives stop to allow extended routines. Good as it is, The Devil’s Brother tends toward this, and later ones like Bonnie Scotland and Swiss Miss are pretty rough going when Laurel and Hardy concede a spotlight to romantic sub-plotters. Ninety sustained minutes of any comedians was thought excessive by studio supervision. Audiences needed relief from too much fun making. Now it seems ludicrous to have turned a camera’s gaze away from these clowns, but few seem to have questioned policy then. Stan wished later that Babes In Toyland had been made in color. Four years hence, that dream might have been a reality, but no major studio was shooting Technicolor features in mid-1934, this being transition between the old two-color process and introduction of a substantially improved three-strip system. Sole Technicolor that year would be novelty sequences in otherwise B/W features. Granted Babes In Toyland would have looked fabulous in color, but timing was wrong for that, and besides, with what we now have on DVD, the movie looks as good as one could hope for in monochrome.





Extras on this DVD are bountiful. There are actually Castle Films here! Christmas Toyshop was produced in the mid-forties. It’s a sort of reel Dad bought to show the family on new home movie projectors. 8 and 16mm boomed after the war. Parents who could afford it were eager to capture offspring on film. Castle supplied entertainment subjects to supplement a family’s own efforts. Judging by volume of these reels that turn up on ebay, tens of thousands must have been sold. Christmas Toyshop presents a comforting fantasy for post-war suburbia --- Mom, Dad, and two kids listen to radio on Christmas Eve (not having yet put up a tree). Kids dream of encountering Santa, through as they are guided through an early thirties cartoon depicting his workshop. Meanwhile, Dad pursues blundering effort to set up a tree and disguise himself as Jolly Saint Nick. All ends happily in less than nine minutes. According to Scott MacGillivray’s excellent Castle Films book, these subjects were cobbled together from old Yuletide trailers done for theatres, animated footage of yore (some of it by Paul Terry), and whatever new material could be shot, very cheaply, to link content together. The Babes In Toyland DVD also includes Castle’s Night Before Christmas and a really strange Howdy Doody’s Christmas, produced specifically for Castle in 1951, according to Scott. I’ve little memory of Howdy Doody from television, and judging by this subject, that may be as well. Guess this is where you really had to be there. How many of these Kinescopes survive? For all I know, this may be an only time the act was captured on film, as opposed to being shot off a TV monitor. Is it me, or does Howdy seem overburdened with strings? I kept waiting for Clarabelle to come along with shears and collapse him altogether. What a traumatic moment that would have been for kiddies. The clown’s routine made me flinch, especially when he (or she?) drove a nail into a mantelpiece with his/her forehead. I don’t know that I needed to see that. Buffalo Bob comes on strong toward a fragile Howdy, forever jutting his finger at the puppet and barking in his ear. For reasons too obscure to recount here, they all decamp to the North Pole (aboard a stock footage Flash Gordon rocket), where a deranged "Ugly Sam" holds Santa Claus prisoner. I assume Sam was a staple on the TV program. Suffice to say a little of his routine goes a long way. Howdy stands (hangs) by impassively as Bob, Sam, and Clarabelle wrestle briefly on the floor. Santa effects an all-round reconciliation and we dissolve to his animated departure from the Pole (courtesy a Van Buren, Iwerks, Terry --- who knows? --- cartoon). Howdy Doody’s Christmas is one priceless artifact. No telling how many fathers threaded this up on the Bell and Howell each holiday season between 1951 and 1961 (the years it was available through Castle’s catalog). Kids at home must have been thrilled to watch Howdy on their family’s own movie projector. I know I plenty enjoyed it on DVD. 

8 Comments:

Blogger Uncle Gustav said...

Excellent write-up -- this new DVD sounds terrific!

6:56 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Received an e-mail just now requesting a link to the DVD of "Babes In Toyland", which I've included below. The label is Genius Entertainment/Legend Films. Accept no substitutes! --- and rest assured I'm not advertising for them, as I've had no contact with these folks. I just happen to like what they did with this DVD.

http://www.amazon.com/March-Wooden-Soldiers/dp/B000HLDFKO/sr=1-1/qid=1163777191/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-0260781-4762302?ie=UTF8&s=dvd

10:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another 1934 black & white picture with a Technicolor sequence was MGM's all-star catastrophe HOLLYWOOD PARTY, which included a gorgeous Walt Disney color cartoon featuring the Freed & Brown song, "Hot Chocolate Soldiers." L&H also turn up briefly (and very effectively) in this star-crammed fiasco -- though unfortunately they have no scenes with Mickey Mouse, who is also a member of the picture's gigantic cast.

As a child, I always liked that Disney allowed Roach to include costumed versions of The Three Little Pigs among the denizens of Toyland -- he even licensed a few bars of Frank Churchill's theme song!

10:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You've talked me into it John; this Babes in Toyland DVD is for me. I think I'll even get it myself rather than put it on my Christmas wish list (for fear of some well-meaning niece or nephew giving me the Disney version by mistake).

As for the supplements, I can't wait to check them out, especially the Castle Films stuff -- intensely nostalgic for me. Why, I even remember the Castle nickelodeons in our local Woolworth's and Ben Franklin stores; if I could wangle a dime from my folks I could enjoy a loop of Abbott and Costello as they Hit the Ice.

As for the Howdy Doody bit, I'm a little nervous. I for one remember the Howdy show vividly; I seldom missed it ("Hey kids, what time is it?!?!"). But I've reflected often on the last 30-or-so years on how my memory has no doubt rosified the experience. Can my nostalgia withstand the hard evidence of how truly cheesy the show no doubt was? (Besides, if this one doesn't include Dilly Dally, Princess Summerfallwinterspring, or the Flub-a-Dub, what's the point?)

11:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

L&H's Babes In Toyland is the ONLY film I've ever preferred in the colorized version. If I watch it in black and white now it seems flat.

2:26 PM  
Blogger radiotelefonia said...

"Babes In Toyland" is my favorite of all Laurel and Hardy films.

Here is a souvenir from its original release in Spain:

http://www.bermemar.com/cepashis/ecosocia/gordoflaco36-entero.jpg

And here I found something from my native Argentina:

http://www.moviecard.com/laurelandhardy/lhcards4.htm

6:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kino Video offers an excellent DVD of "Flying Deuces." As with your endorsement of "Babes," there's no association here. It's just a great disc of a movie that's all over the place in really poor copies.

Now if someone could just come up with a DVD of Bob Hope's "My Favorite Brunette" that's watchable!

9:22 PM  
Blogger Aaron Neathery said...

I disagree about Roach's original BIT treatment, and it has been suggested that Laurel's refusal to have any part in filming it had more to do with his desire to maintain control over the team's material than with its perceived quality. The film as it exists is still wonderful, colorized or not, although the fact that it isn't the "All Star" vehicle it was slated to be leaves a faint bitter taste in my mouth. I wonder how Charley Chase and Our Gang would have fared in it...

1:22 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024