Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Wednesday, February 21, 2007























Psycho Salesmanship --- Part One










What a shame the startling effect of a groundbreaking new film can be only felt by those who come to it first. My initial exposure to Psycho was on television, so I’ll never relate to traumatized viewers wandering out of first-run New York theatres during that summer of 1960. Biggest problem with a life spent in adoration of classic movies is the fact you’ll never get the rocker punch folks received when these things were new. We can read about opening nights of Gone With The Wind, A Star Is Born, or House Of Wax, but never mind feeling what they felt, no matter the restorations placed before us. Chasing a sensation likened to that experienced long ago in crowded and excited auditoriums is pretty much what this site is about, tempered by realization we’ll never come within hailing distance armed with nothing other than yellowed ads, faded photos and a few memories. How many of even veteran moviegoers saw seminal shows on the front end? Southeastern venues were first to get Bonnie and Clyde and The Wild Bunch, long before these were discovered by a critical establishment (and prior to TWB being cut for general release length). My sole voyage of discovery, as in being among those truly first in line, took place in the summer of 1975, when our USC class was directed to a screening room on the Universal lot to see a brand new movie about sharks. Beyond that sketchy description, I had no information. Jaws wasn’t set to open for at least another two weeks, so we knew from nothing what lay in wait. I do remember screams among my classmates. For once in our spoiler-contaminated lives, we had no one to prepare us for the experience. I remember the film’s mechanical shark parked forlornly on a trailer as we crossed Universal's lot afterward. Just another prop awaiting storage, but fun encountering such a thing but steps from having watched the movie. My digression here is just by way of imagining what a similar Psycho initiation might have been like --- entering those magic portals (and what striking marquees these are), knowing not that your senses are to be assailed in ways unknown to that time. Reliable accounts say many screamed and fled for home. Police were summoned to calm disturbances. I’ve read of such incidents during first-run engagements of Frankenstein in 1931, but weren’t we past this by 1960? May-be, but was this only because there’d been no one like Hitchcock to upend us anew? Psycho demonstrated it was still possible to shatter senses on a mass scale. Jaws has perhaps come closest since, but what else?

















Taking critics off the loop for advance screenings was nothing so radical in 1960, but barring exhibitors from same was a near declaration of war. Who can help launch a film better than an exhibitor who has seen it?, asked Pete Harrison in his June 6, 1960 Reports. Paramount’s excuse can only make theatre-men suspicious of the hidden feature’s merit. Harrison despaired of Psycho’s critical fate as well. Furthermore, it is understood that Paramount will not screen the film for trade reviewers before it opens at a theatre. Under such conditions, even the fairest of critics will have trouble viewing the film objectively. Indeed, Hitchcock had gambled his dollars (Psycho being largely self-financed), reputation, and showman good will in a go-for-broke campaign that might easily have backfired and cost the director everything he’d built up over a twenty-year period in the US. Had grosses not been so extraordinary, would the excesses here have finished Hitchcock’s career, as many predicted after seeing Psycho? It took nerve to put your name on the line for product rough as this, and where was assurance that audiences would sit still for it? If ever a filmmaker read the pulse of his constituency, Hitchcock did that summer, for Psycho lured business vast beyond wildest expectation of ordinary shockers --- so much so as to suggest he’d invented a whole new genre. You could opt for a simplistic explanation and dismiss the new Hitchcock as merely an upscale William Castle, and indeed, he envisioned Psycho as a riposte to all those Hammer, AIP, and, yes, Castle films nipping at Master Of Suspense heels. Summer of 1960’s release schedule is fun for the glimpse it affords of Psycho’s thriller competition. Bowing before and after Hitchcock was American-International’s House Of Usher (June), Universal/Hammer’s Brides Of Dracula (July), and Columbia’s 13 Ghosts (August). Castle (shown at top shilling for 13 Ghosts with moppet "fan club") was a particular thorn in Hitchcock’s side, as their marketing techniques often overlapped, and Hitchcock didn’t enjoy seeing his work confused with the likes of The Tingler and House On Haunted Hill (writer applicants to A.H. faced veto for having worked on previous Castle shows). Was Castle the Hitchcock doppelganger?Comparisons would end at the ticket window, for neither Castle nor fellow shockmeisters ever realized grosses approaching Psycho. This might have proven a mixed blessing for Hitchcock, as adult expectations of star-laden and more or less civilized suspense were now supplanted by newly-won youthful acolytes awaiting a topper to horrific thrills he’d furnished with Psycho, and later, The Birds. I distinctly recall the letdown attendant on my family’s beach outing to see Torn Curtain in August 1966. Owing to the reputation of Psycho and The Birds, this twelve-year old craved stronger meat than Paul Newman and Julie Andrews playing at tepid espionage behind Kremlin lines. Hitchcock was trapped in his own house on a haunted (Psycho) hill, and immature (if exacting) fans such as myself weren’t disposed to let him out.






































There was a pair of teaser trailers in addition to the six-minute deluxe wherein Hitchcock hosted a tour of the Bates Motel and environs. The latter attained legendary status and was bootlegged/sold by collectors for years to come. Universal included it among DVD extras, but the teasers have remained unseen. One was a plea urging top secrecy regarding the content of Psycho, while the other set forth policy for all bookings of the feature. See It From The Beginning was used since movies began, but never was it actually enforced with regards arriving patrons. Embattled showmen happy to get their quarters any way they could were alarmed to find these uncompromising terms written into Psycho contracts. Our opening playdates have proved, beyond the shadow of a showman’s doubt, the success of this required policy, said Hitchcock in a trade appeal to exhibitors. If the word "required" startles you, please try to think of a box office besieged by patrons anxious to purchase tickets. Feel better? Hitchcock forecast theatre owners happily startled all the way to the bank if only they’d comply with his absolute bar against late arrivals to Psycho. For first-run houses with definite start schedules (several shown here), this was well and good, and promotional budgets at metro venues allowed for stunt emphasis on Hitchcock’s edict (Pinkerton guards, off-duty officers, etc.), but what of grind situations down the line where double and triple billing prevailed and start times were uncertain at best? My guess is the policy was abandoned after the first month or so of general release, though scrambling for prints of Psycho aroused the ire of circuit heads denied early run privileges. Here is a black-and-white picture for which Paramount could make up at least 100 more prints for "peanuts" and take advantage of the publicity the picture is now receiving, said Allied Theatre’s North Central president. It could then be booked into the smaller towns and earn thousands of more dollars and help keep the small-town exhibitor alive. The problem of popular titles going stale before less populated areas could get them was an ongoing grievance among rural showmen --- Can the revenue derived from the comparatively few who are lured from their communities to the big cities possibly compensate the film company for the losses resulting from the local theatres’ lessened prestige and the positive manner in which such sales policies date a picture and render it passe in the minds of local theatergoers? The backlash stung as Psycho limped its way into the sticks. Not as good as William Castle’s "Macabre" was manager Chuck Gerard’s dismissal in the wake of patrons’ migration to catch Psycho in Iowa City or St. Louis rather than wait months for Warsaw, Illonois’ modest house to book a date.




























Photo Captions




William Castle Hits The Road For 13 Ghosts
Three-Sheet Art for Psycho
Hitchcock Lays Down The Rules
New York crowds greet Psycho's opening
Paramount field men working on the campaign
A little context --- Paramount's Line-Up for Summer 1960
More Marquee Magic
Hitchcock preparing to hang the "O" on Psycho (but how'll he reach that far?)
More anxious crowds at the Arcadia
Check Your Watch! Can't come in if you're late!
Mobs amassing for evening show
Skittish patron cows before uniformed admissions guard

7 Comments:

Anonymous Griff said...

Since the manager/operator of the Greenbriar clearly has this particular subject down, let me ask (or settle) a question regarding the actress who briefly appears at the climax of the famed PSYCHO trailer featuring AH's tour of the film's sets...

That IS Vera Miles, right?

Talk about showmanship!

7:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What happen to glamour mondays????????????????

9:21 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

That is Vera Miles at the end of the "Psycho" trailer, and another Glamour Starter is coming soon.

9:30 PM  
Blogger East Side said...

I remember when the first network showing was cancelled due to that murder, but I won't spoil the details for others who are out of the loop. Suffice it to say, I was mighty disappointed -- and, honestly, never saw the connection between the two.

As for experiencing a big movie on its initial run without hype... I saw a sneak preview of "Alien" in the '70s. All those around me were jumping out of their skin, but I just sat there thinking, "Isn't this just a high-tech Allied Artists movie?" Now, "The Stepfather"(1987)sneak preview -- that was something else entirely...

6:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You will have to excuse my ignorance, but you run a movie theatre also?

9:35 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

It's a campus theatre, not a commercial one, and I don't actually run it. If I did, there'd be no time to write posts for GPS!

10:25 AM  
Anonymous Hannah said...

Oh man, wish I could have been at that campus theatre! Damn my California zip code! "Psycho" still gets credit for being my favorite movie; although others may have passed it (including "Frankenstein"/"Bride of Frankenstein"), it's what sparked my interest in old movies. I rented it with my dad from Blockbuster when I was 11 (this was 1998), and although I knew the ending had already been ruined for me during a 1995 tour of Universal Studios, I still loved it! I was completely obsessed with it for a couple of months, then I branched out to the other Hitchcocks and old movies. Even though I knew the ending, I still found it very effective; it scared the heck out of my 9-year-old brother, who also knew the ending, but hadn't expected Mrs. Bates to look so scary! Wow, I managed to ramble on for a while. Anyway, great post as always.

10:30 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018