Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Thursday, February 11, 2010


George Stevens' Passionate Play --- Part One



I’d long been promised an ordeal should I ever try sitting through The Greatest Story Ever Told. Its reputation was that of most failed among Sunday School roadshows, a bore of … well, biblical dimensions. Last week the MGM channel played TGSET in High-Definition. My time and test had come. Lest anyone think I propose dumping on George Stevens’ epic, let me say straight off that to my mind, it’s outstanding, and that appreciating The Greatest Story Ever Told has everything to do with presentation. First of all, without a really big screen, you can’t even read the credits (specifically designed for Cinerama delivery). Mine is fourteen feet across and those titles are still a strain. Watching TGSET flat or even in 35mm is pure misuse of time. You’d be better off to miss it altogether. Some will say that's a good idea in any case. For whatever truncated opportunity they’ve had to see it over the last forty-five years, I can’t blame them. There’ll probably never be enough money or interest in a serious restoration of the film as Stevens envisioned it, though I guess that unhappy circumstance is no worse for most 50’s-60’s roadshows gone to ruin since. MGM-HD has become a sort of elephantine graveyard for discredited epics. They own the United Artists library, and UA handled a lot of beached whales during a widescreen’s heyday. You can see Khartoum there most months, and it’s stunning. Also The Pride and The Passion, Hawaii, and others. HD really levels the playing field for all these. You may not be persuaded that they’re good, but neither would you be likely to come away with the sour aftertaste of prior televised broadcasts.






One could almost call The Greatest Story Ever Told an art film were it not for the parade of stars in roles major and miniscule. So much of Stevens’ film is resolutely anti-Hollywood. Had he led with Max Von Sydow and a minor cast in support, we’d have had a Jesus story along lines European directors might have told. To that sensibility, and in 1965 when art cinema was near a fashion’s peak, TGSET missed its chance at becoming a real critic’s darling. John Wayne horning in on the Crucifixion was the film’s own Golgotha, however. From a first sight of him and the New Testament Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World preceding, there was little chance of reviewers heaping anything other than ridicule upon Stevens and the project he expended nearly a decade of his life realizing. The Greatest Story Ever Told generated some of the snidest notices on record, another of those occasions when critics felled a wounded ox and went about demonstrating how cleverly they could gore it. There was derision over running time (initially 225 minutes), so United Artists handed Stevens a choice: Either you cut it, or we will. Analysts said TGSET was the most expensive film yet produced in the United States, and resentment flowed too from that. Slick magazines had promised the moon, so knives were sharpened from premiere night. It was The Greatest Disaster United Artists Ever Had as of 1965, and that’s mostly what we remember about the show now. George Stevens’ name came off bankable rolls as a consequence and he’d never be entrusted with such extravagant resources again.










Daryl Zanuck had purchased rights in 1954 to Fulton Oursler’s book, The Greatest Story Ever Told, which remained a paperback evergreen from initial 1949 publication. It seemed a natural to follow up on success of The Robe. Besides, no one in the US had yet attempted a talking dramatization on the life of Christ. George Stevens took an interest and started negotiations to produce and direct. His fee would be a historic million dollars, unheard of for anyone behind the camera. It was November 1958 before final contracts were signed. Stevens wanted and got control few others could bring to term, this achievable following a three-punch of A Place In The Sun, Shane, and Giant, each long-runners and all profitable. Stevens was a physically imposing man whose judgment no one questioned (sturdily built … square-jawed, said The New York Times). He'd regularly (and publicly) let fly on moguls too obtuse to realize this director knew best. The plan was for Stevens to get his script ready through 1959 and begin shooting in 1960. In the meantime, he’d pilot The Diary Of Anne Frank, also for Fox release. Maybe this was too much heaped on a plate, for delay and anticipation brought others to the Holy table from which Stevens hoped to sup. Metro had gone ahead with King Of Kings by mid-1960, and August of that year brought announcement of producer Ray Stark’s The Young Christ, a three million-dollar venture to be filmed in 3-D and possibly star Robert Wagner as Jesus. Stevens had to somehow keep kettles boiling on The Greatest Story Ever Told even as 1960 passed without cameras rolling.














Cast announcements were one way of maintaining interest. John Wayne and Sidney Poitier were committed as of October 1960. Trade ads (as shown here) with Wayne appeared that year. Elizabeth Taylor was rumored for Mary Magdalene, while Marlon Brando mulled possibilities of essaying Judas. Spencer Tracy meanwhile held promise for a swell Pontius Pilate. Against said glittering constellation (which financing Fox encouraged), George Stevens got more press than if he’d already finished TGSET. There was an appearance with son George Jr. (named the film’s associate producer) on Person To Person, wherein the director lent professorial authority to explanation of the Gospels and how he’d dramatize them. For many observers, Stevens’ own integrity as a picture maker was Greatest Story’s most valued asset. His quiet indifference to the hectoring of budget-watchers and script-kibitzers has won this square-jawed (that again!) director the nickname of "Great Stoneface," said admiring Hollywood correspondent Murray Schumach, whose dispatches gave full vent to Stevens as artist first and foremost, indeed one of few the town could boast. Prestige was further enhanced by the addition of Carl Sandburg to Greatest Story’s screenwriting team. He was credited as a consultant, but Sandburg was toiling away daily at script conferences with Stevens and co-scribes. Above everything, Stevens wanted a Christ story not to be confused with excesses of DeMille and other Hollywood chariot-racers: I want it told simply, without embellishments. We want to make a picture that will be alive fifty years from now.









Others of Greatest Story’s company sought distance from Biblical movie artifice. Max Von Sydow was lined up for Jesus in late February 1961. That got respect Jeffrey Hunter missed when MGM signed him to play their King Of Kings (often referred to thereafter as I Was A Teenage Jesus). Von Sydow exemplified Euro resistance to Golly-wood toga parties gone before: I thought with horror of Cecil B. DeMille and such things as "Samson and Delilah" and "The Ten Commandments." But when I saw the script, I decided that the role of Jesus is absolutely not a religious cliché. Was Stevens getting boxed in by his own seriousness of purpose? After all, merchants in filmland temples were still counting dollars pouring forth from The Ten Commandments (just then enjoying its first reissue) and no one made so persuasive a commercial role model as DeMille. Maybe Fox saw writing on Jerusalem walls, for by September 1961, they were pulling out. Three million had been spent without a frame exposed. Calling it an indefinite postponement, 20th president Spyros Skouras withheld reasons as to why, but a previous year’s $13 million studio loss undoubtedly entered into the decision, plus fact they were knee-deep in The Longest Day and Cleopatra, two enormously expensive projects. Competing King Of Kings would also be released the following month. Either way, Stevens was incensed and went to the mat against Wall Street powers interfering with the creative aspects of moviemaking. He assured a news conference that The Greatest Story Ever Told would be made in spite of Fox’s faltering and timidity. Monies the company had advanced would be repaid out of the film’s eventual profits. Stevens projected a $6.5 million budget toward completion sometime in 1962. That was the third year deadline he’d announced, and the third (but not the last) he’d miss.

15 Comments:

Blogger Scott MacGillivray said...

Beautiful! Can't wait for part two! (Now I'll never think of the '61 KING OF KINGS without thinking of that other title!)

9:03 AM  
Blogger Samuel Wilson said...

Looking forward to more on one of the most infuriatingly erratic films ever made, and a somewhat-guilty pleasure of mine.

12:42 PM  
Blogger Dugan said...

I saw pieces of it on TV and was intrigued, I purchased the DVD which was he 199 minute version, I know I'll never see it as it was intended. I was still very impressed with the film, maybe time will take away some of the "spot the star" odor in the film, it has been over 40 years since the film came out. Looking forward to part two.

1:18 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Donald Benson e-mails about biblical epics:

Two anecdotes: There was a DeMille wannabe film, Sodom and Gomorrah, which I think was destroyed from within. There's a scene where military leaders from the rival cities are planning a defense against a common enemy, and the plan involves the troops of Gomorrah (led by silver-maned Stewart Granger) leading, followed by the troops of Sodom. For just a little too long, Gomorrah's leaders seriously debate the wisdom of having the Sodomites behind them. How did they even shoot that with straight faces?


The other, reported in an ancient Herb Caen newspaper column: A San Francisco TV station ran the silent King of Kings on Easter. Directly after the betrayal of Christ came a Certs commercial: "If he kissed you once, will he kiss you again? . . . "

5:13 PM  
Blogger Christopher said...

some truely great scenes in here..
The tempting in the cave with Donald Plesence..raising of Lazarus..Some pretty impressive Set designs and the evening lighting in Herod's castle with Torchlight,reminds me of Maxfield Parrish meets Georges de La Tour...

10:08 PM  
Anonymous Jim Cobb said...

From what I have read Alfred Newman used much of the music from THE ROBE for his score for GSET. I am not sure why the movie was produced so soon after both BEN-HUR and KING OF KINGS... maybe a case of going to the well too many times. For a good and hilarious read, take a look at ON MOVIES by Dwight MacDonald where he has damming reviews of BEN-HUR, KING OF KINGS and GSET. Even if you disagree with his conclusions, this is very witty writing.

10:10 PM  
Anonymous Griff said...

I agree that the MacDonald piece on TGSET is very funny, but it is basically a wittily composed cheap shot in most ways. [If memory serves, at least he conceded that he left at the intermission.]

Alfred Newman was reportedly pretty unhappy that Stevens insisted on recycling so much of his ROBE score in the picture. It's unfortunate, because Newman's original work for TGSET is top-drawer.

Please tell us more about all this soon, John.

1:14 PM  
Blogger Samuel Wilson said...

From what I've read, Newman was also irked that Stevens ditched most of the original music he'd written for the running scene following Lazarus's resurrection in favor of Handel's Hallelujah Chorus. Stevens also threw some Verdi into the stations of the cross sequence, though I don't know if Newman wrote original music for that part.

10:07 PM  
Anonymous Term Papers said...

Well George I also fond of MGM channel because there are play interesting movies and you saw this great movie of Khartoum.

1:41 AM  
Anonymous Marc H said...

You have a FOURTEEN FOOT screen?!

Sigh.

I have to agree, seeing movies on a larger screen does cause me to revise my opinions of previously shrug-worthy films, and thats just on my 62" flatscreen.

Besides widescreen epics, I notice that silent films are particularly improved. "Sunrise" and "The Crowd" were just OK on 27", but on a larger screen they were devastating.

Fourteen feet?

10:08 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

It's fourteen feet for 2.35 projection thanks to a retrofitted parking garage I use.

10:23 AM  
Blogger CanadianKen said...

I'm so glad you enjoyed GREATEST STORY. Like you, I avoided it for decades. And for pretty much the same reasons. It's a picture that's been permanently lumbered with a mega-dud reputation. I happened to see a bit of it inadvertently on TCM one December - and was intrigued enough to rent it the next day.
I think it's terrific. More specifically, I think the first half stands as a wonderful film all on its own. Not that there aren't things I liked in the post-intermission segment. i just found it a bit of a let-down after that incredible initial section. The movie definitely does have an art-film feel to it. Beautiful to look at and listen to - sometimes sombre, often exhilarating - but always proceeding at its own distinctively contemplative pace. I've watched that first half many times since - and have never lost my enthusiasm for it. Once a friend and I turned off the color and watched it in black and white. In that context, it really registered as some magnificent European art-house film from the
60's. I love the way the camera roams across the landscape to finally zoom in on John the Baptist. And how on earth did Claude Rains miss out on a supporting actor nomination? Now THAT's the definitive Herod! Anyway,I'm looking forward to your Part Two. And though I've never commented here before, I've got to say it's always a pleasure to visit your unique and marvelous site.

11:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cool story you got here. It would be great to read more concerning this matter. Thanx for sharing that information.

1:30 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Thanks a lot, Ken. I too thought Claude Rains was amazing as Herod.

I've just been reading over at your own terrific site, "Canadian Ken On ...":

http://canadianken.blogspot.com/

The post on Best Actress Performances in 1956 was wonderful, and I loved the appreciation you wrote for Adele Jergens and "The Day The World Ended."

5:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

nice post. thanks.

5:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014