Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, August 02, 2010




Part Two of Robert Siodmak and Phantom Lady







Phantom Lady, at least from a commercial standpoint, justified more spending on Universal's part than Robert Siodmak's just preceded Son Of Dracula. The latter was a case of a director outclassing material he'd been given, but even at that, Son Of Dracula was accorded a higher budget ($207,750) and longer shooting time (24 days) than horrors usually got. Off-the-rack and representative of typical U chillers Captive Wild Woman finished for far less (negative cost $89,725) and on much reduced schedule (11 days). It's as though Son Of Dracula was audition for better things to immediately follow provided Siodmak came through, which he clearly did, having wrapped the film under budget for $193,152, saving Universal over $14,500. Promotion to Phantom Lady put Siodmak close as most Universal directors could get to an A. The mystery thriller was earmarked for $350,400 and 30 days shooting, from September 20 to October 28, 1943. Its cast held promise, if not immediate marquee strength. Top-billed Franchot Tone had done leads at Metro and was not as yet associated with humbler fare (that came later). Ella Raines had been groomed by Howard Hawks, was featured in a property he'd developed for Universal called Corvette K-225, but something had distracted his interest (Lauren Bacall?), so he ultimately sold her contract to the company. Phantom Lady was designed for appeal to first-run audiences, being suspense of a romantic rather than horrific nature. Robert Siodmak's creative touches figured to lend distinction and fire word-of-mouth for a yarn off well beaten paths.















Alfred Hitchcock's fame had by that time inspired others to seek his level. Those with links to the recently anointed Master Of Suspense might sprinkle fairy dust on projects they pursued elsewhere, among them Joan Harrison, valued assist to AH on successes Universal hoped to duplicate. She'd produce, Siodmak would direct, and William Irish's novel would be adapted for Phantom Lady. Irish was actually prolific Cornell Woolrich, a to-be most familiar name credited on what we now call Film Noir. Siodmak began earning repute as a stickler for realism with Phantom Lady. He'd say audiences know all the plots, so character would be his emphasis. There was also this thing he had for stairways and certain items of furnishing (Siodmak also likes to shoot scenes with mirrors and beds in them, said a Times profile). Well, even dumb publicity was better than none at all, and Siodmak benefited from columnists willing to put him at least within reach of Hitchcock's grade. Fritz Lang was looking to crack that circle as well, and around the same time (with The Woman In The Window and Scarlet Street). Both he and Siodmak were getting out thrillers very much of the AH sort, but critics like Bosley Crowther weren't having any, at least where Phantom Lady was concerned. Vaguely impressed with Germanic touches RS applied, Crowther nevertheless withheld approval: We wish we could recommend it, but ... they forgot to provide their picture with a plausible, realistic plot. Reviewers were so much more about story over style in 1944 (February when Phantom Lady was released) and raked many a noir over coals for failure to cohere. We appreciate now that logic is what matters least in Phantom Lady. Siodmak drenched his 87 minutes in shadow and effect to compensate for narrative lapses. At least one dynamic sequence (about midway through ... wonder if Siodmak shot it first) has been lately described by dazzled newcomers as orgiastic, being a souped-up jazz riff wherein Ella Raines arouses Elisha Cook and his drum set. It is a remarkable moment, and I can imagine Siodmak looking to that Code-challenger as attention-getter and checkmate to censorial watchdogs.
























Phantom Lady turned on psycho killing in a contemporary setting, a device fresher then, its highlights Siodmak emphasized making up for drags and nonsense elsewhere. This one wouldn't rank among noir classics, but there were moments we'd not forget. The tier below The Maltese Falcon and Double Indemnity is, after all, made up of pictures like Phantom Lady. Completists look to these now for having seen acknowledged betters over and again, savoring unexpected pleasures such modest noirs provide. I'd not elevate Phantom Lady past minor status it's always had, but there are images clearer in my mind's eye than other more celebrated ones call up. Siodmak was realist enough to know how difficult it was to achieve just part of what he was after: Even in a film you make as you want to and because you want to, you're lucky if there are five minutes which satisfy you, in which you see just what you intended on the screen (this from Russell Taylor's 1959 interview). We might best classify Siodmak then, as a director who accumulated a lot of those five minutes over a Hollywood career that saw its brief summit during the 40's and mostly at Universal. There would be The Suspect, The Killers, and Criss Cross, among others. By 1951, he'd regret having been impaled upon the spike of melodrama, as a columnist that year put it, though being typed was preferable to representing no type. Siodmak's hit that was The Killers inspired leasing Realart Pictures to reissue Phantom Lady with a new title (Condemned To Hang), placement of The Killers between the director's first and last name, and rifling of a tag line (Told The Untamed Way!) that had been used to sell the 1946 film. It would be The Killers for which Siodmak was best remembered, but Phantom Lady is a more than worthy runner-up and deserves a DVD release in this country.

2 Comments:

Blogger Dugan said...

Thanks for the post on Phantom Lady, absolutely agree with you it is a minor film but a very good one.

8:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful post on Phantom Lady. It was my first exposure to Ella Raines. It is not top-of-the-line noir, but is a welcome addition to the noir category.

11:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016