Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Thursday, November 04, 2010


Buried Treasure --- Standing Room Only





We all find out eventually how subjective humor is. I learned long ago never to guarantee an audience laughs, as there's no faster route to a hosting Waterloo. One comedy I'll always walk the plank for, however, for fact it's so utterly forgotten if nothing else (especially by owning Universal) , is Standing Room Only, a delight worthy of revival on TCM, if not DVD release through their Vault Collection. This wartime frolic (released 1944) enjoyed underground renown among 16mm collectors who called it hilarity's improvement on better known The More The Merrier, which has run on TCM and is available via Sony disc. Maltin's Movie Guide gives Standing Room Only but two stars and calls it "dated." Well ... duh. That's half this movie's charm. How does SRO play to an audience? Mine have liked it lots. Given a crisp digital alternative to the milky spliced-up print I had to run this weekend for lack of anything better, they'd have cheered more. Presentation is crucial to enjoyment, but what can you do when a thing's not available save battered 16mm remnants someone snuck out of a warehouse thirty years ago? And how many signatures would adorn petitions to exhume a farce about Washington housing shortages during WWII? It's when advocating on behalf of a Standing Room Only that I realize how alone in the world we fully-vested fans are. No wonder civilians think we're a little cracked.














Is anyone at TCM or Universal listening? I sometimes wonder if those behind corporate walls read movie blogs, let alone GPS. Maybe one of you in contact with decision makers can forward my earnest plea. As it turns out, Standing Room Only as a 16mm option sort of crashed when my take-up reel froze and a thousand feet of film cascaded onto the projection booth floor, a reminder as if one were needed of why I stopped collecting film in favor of DVD. We did get through the show, but only just. A big disconnect between folks that live with old movies and those that don't is fact the latter can't know character faces as we do, recognition of these being well past adjustment to conventions of dialogue, pacing, and fashions long out of fashion. Linger enough on TCM and shows like Standing Room Only wear as comfortably as fleece robes (all the more reason it would fit ideally there). Hey, there's Roland Young ... we know pretty well what he'll be up to, having seen Topper, The Philadelphia Story and two-dozen others where he's type-cast ... and here comes Edward Arnold, a known quantity welcome for us as surely he was to 1944 audiences. Still, I can't blame people who reject past Hollywood. There's nothing familiar for them to latch onto, and it's worse now than even a few decades ago when at least a handful of veterans were alive to stir memory of work they'd done more recently. I was able to sit Ann down for Standing Room Only largely because of Fred MacMurray being the lead, his name and face she'd recall from My Three Sons, but how many others as of 2010 still know My Three Sons?

































Shows like Standing Room Only were customized for theatres aspiring to SRO conditions of their own. On-screen players paused for laughs same as if they were on a stage. Paramount especially paced their comedies to the rhythm of packed houses. Modern viewers wonder why Bob and Bing halt a beat after sock lines. Well, it's because they didn't want two thousand then-patrons to miss the next sock line. There are moments in Standing Room Only that I'll bet took roofs off flagship venues like the Chicago Theatre (ad below). SRO played mid-May 1944 as part of an entertainment smorgasbord that headlined live-appearing Gil Lamb, eccentric comic of much Paramount exposure (having been in Riding High, Rainbow Island, others), along with the Glenn Miller Band's crooner Ray Eberle, a frequent attraction on Chicago's stage (clicked well with the femmes and begged off after four curtain calls, said Billboard). Broadway's Deluxe Tapsters Lathrop and Lee rendered "Darktown Strutter's Ball," with plenty of flash and high-class stepping, followed by Lamb joining harmonica whiz Bob Coffey for a go at Rhapsody In Blue to accompaniment of a farcical jitterbug dance. There was also the Glenns, whose remarkable acro (batic) work ... stopped the show. Bandleader Lou Breese had signed a year's contract to front the theatre's orchestra and was performing a record eight shows a day (imagine his fatigue at conclusion of that). Buying a Chicago seat to Standing Room Only yielded 83 minutes of feature plus such gravy to swell entertainment well past two hours, surely a bargain at whatever the price.






































Few remember Paulette Goddard beyond appearances as Chaplin's leading lady (offscreen as well), but war years saw her emblazoning marquees in crowd pleaser A's that vaulted PG to most valued distaff name on Paramount payrolls. Fred MacMurray never forgot her wangling favored billing in Standing Room Only, even if the film itself was more or less a blur. Paulette had ways of managing ... always ... what was best for Paulette, and talent or lack of it figured but lightly into equations. Her birthdate was cited as 1910, but closer scrutiny, done after stardom's closure, suggested 1905 as likelier date of arrival. Goddard might well have been easing toward forty by time of Standing Room Only, but looks wouldn't betray age until a few seasons later and 1947's Unconquered, her last of consequence for Paramount. She'd got by with va-voom and ready willingness, although insiders swore Goddard had ten times said appeal behind cameras. There may be sauce beyond even that if visiting friend Dan's randy interpretation of a certain "whipping cream" line she utters in Standing Room Only is correct, though I'd prefer thinking that's just D's baser instincts at work yet again. All this yammer, by the way, and I'd forgot to mention what SRO is about. The set-up, not simplicity itself, but productive of much misunderstanding, close calls, and prat-falling, has hard-charging Fred and pretend secretary Paulette forced to become butler and maid for "hen-pecked wolf" Roland Young. Now a kicker here, though not one felt until a decade later, is fact Fred plays a toy manufacturer, just as he would in There's Always Tomorrow (1956), a foolproof companion for Standing Room Only that I'd hereby commend to TCM and revival house programmers. Book these end-to-end and put your own reading to go-getter Fred's 1944 character beaten down by 50's conformity and family obligation as calendars roll round twelve years --- and all the while he's moving toys. There's got to be monograph potential there for Sirk (and maybe Sidney Lanfield!) scholars.
Some more nice images of Paulette Goddard at Greenbriar Archives here.

19 Comments:

Blogger Dugan said...

I would love to see this film. I saw Paulette Goddard in the two Bob Hope thrillers and thought she was great she really worked well with Hope. Fred MacMurray never got enough respect. How many Disney films did he save? He's about the only reason to sit through "The Reluctant Millionaire," and believe me I've sat through it.

9:06 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Just received an e-mail from reader Griff ---


Wonderful post. John, I'm not sure if I've ever seen this, but I have an odd late-show-memory-fogged question: does it begin in a rainstorm?

Regards,
-- Griff

Griff, there's a rainstorm that figures into action during the first third, but not at the beginning. Maybe the print you saw was edited for TV!

9:11 AM  
Blogger Dave K said...

Paulette Goddard! I think Robert Benchley said something like "That woman could charm a rock!"

1:03 PM  
Blogger VP81955 said...

I was able to sit Ann down for Standing Room Only largely because of Fred MacMurray being the lead, his name and face she'd recall from "My Three Sons," but how many others as of 2010 still know "My Three Sons"?

Well, a lot of people do know another movie MacMurray made in 1944, although it wasn't a comedy...

1:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think TCM shows much stuff from Universal. Mainly MGM, UA, Columbia and Warners.

2:09 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Actually, they've been using quite a lot of Universal-owned material in the last several years, including a fair number of pre-48Paramounts controlled by that company, so "Standing Room Only" is a reasonable possibility, if only TCM would consider it.

2:17 PM  
Anonymous Bill Luton said...

I've always assumed it was a dud by the lack of interest I've always found when trying to sell movie posters from the title but it looks like it was because few people in recent years have seen it!

4:58 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Bill, I'd noticed too that prices on "Standing Room Only" posters and lobby cards are really low. I think the one-sheet I have, by the way, might have originally come from you ...

12:48 PM  
Anonymous Chris said...

I believe Griff is thinking of There's Always Tomorrow which begins with a title card reading "Once upon a time, in sunny California ..." and dissolves into a shot of the rain pouring down outside of Fred MacMurray's toy factory.

8:54 PM  
Blogger Mike Cline said...

Re: Today's usher inspection banner...only one of them will be needed to handle the crowds to see "Hemingway's Adventures of a Young Man."

12:24 PM  
Anonymous Jim Lane said...

[chortle!] Bolo's right; talk about all dressed up and no place to go...

1:35 PM  
Anonymous Paul Duca said...

You can see the other feature being promoted behind the ushers...THAT TOUCH OF MINK. I'm sure that needed a full set of them, as this was when Doris Day was queen of the box office.

Dugan...the movie you are thinking of is THE HAPPIEST MILLIONAIRE. Disney cut a deal with the Hallmark Movie Channel (and TCM) for its older live-action titles, and it's one they have been showing often.
I also read that it was Disney's first large budget road-show production (MARY POPPINS wasn't handled in the same way--that was before another musical showed Hollywood that the hills are alive with the sound of money, getting them to jump on the song and dance bandwagon).

8:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for this, John -- your association of SRO with THE MORE THE MERRIER, a picture of which I'm very fond, is enough to whet my appetite.

C'mon, TCM -- come through!

10:43 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Donald Benson has an interesting observation about Fred MacMurray and an earlier film, "True Confession.":


For this boomer it's still odd to see MacMurray in something other than his Disney/My Three Sons persona -- Even his SOB exec in The Apartment seemed to consciously play off the avuncular TV dad.


The comedy True Confession foreshadows the Disney MacMurray: Fred's a lawyer whose high principles keep him clientless. When his wife (Carole Lombard) is charged with murdering a lecherous employer, he gets her off with a brilliant case of self-defense. In fact, she's perfectly innocent but lets him think otherwise so he'd get this high-profile, career-changing break. Then John Barrymore staggers in as a blackmailer who threatens to ruin everything by proving she IS innocent. The script doesn't fully exploit all that potential -- one wishes Wilder or Sturges got a shot at it -- but it's solidly amusing, even when you worry Barrymore isn't going to make it through a scene.

6:55 AM  
Anonymous Jim Lane said...

You talked me into it, John. By a happy coincidence, when this post was current, there was a 16mm print of Standing Room Only on eBay, and I won it. (I was the only bidder; had to perch like a hawk on the auction to make sure one of your other readers didn't snatch it off at the last moment.) Looking forward to seeing it...

1:02 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I noticed that e-bay print too, Jim. I think you'll really like the film, and hope the print will be good.

4:06 AM  
Blogger Erik Weems said...

I don't know how much TCM takes notice of the "voting" mechanism on their pages about individual films: SRO has 44 votes for a DVD release, one of which is mine just based on the GPS recommendation here (and that association with "More the Merrier".)

11:50 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Hey Erik --- I haven't paid much attention to those voting options at TCM, or Amazon, but I should. For all we know, they may have a lot to do with titles that are selected for DVD release. Thanks for the reminder ...

5:30 AM  
Blogger Tbone Mankini said...

As a child who like many others only knew the Disney/MY THREE SONS Fred, imagine my shock at THE APARTMENT closely followed by DOUBLE INDEMNITY,a few of his Westerns etc....and as a young leading man!!!

4:08 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024