Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, January 14, 2011



Can't Shake Stroheim!



Realizing it was hasty to call The Crime Of Dr. Crespi "risibly cheap," I dug for and found a Sinister Cinema DVD got a while back, but unwatched till now. Here is to confirm it's indeed cheap, abominably so, and maybe risible too, though 63 minutes passed easier than on many a larger budget occasion --- difference being those didn't have Erich von Stroheim as hypnotic lead. There are personalities, only a few, who can withstand basest vehicles. Lugosi was one ... Stroheim surely another. I'll watch him in any circumstance, most happily as a Dr. Crespi who's mad, murderous, and there for virtually every scene. Von was debased, it's true --- they called him Saturday to report on Monday and shot the mess in a week, according to Lenig's book. Was the money good? ... no one's reported as to that, but enough for a fortnight's groceries would probably have bought him. When a great actor gets a part sufficiently bad, he'll resort to whatever tricks are at disposal to lend something of gifts accumulated. For Stroheim, that means gaming with props, eccentric line reading, and even fluffing words that left me wondering if it's really a slip, Crespi-filmers too strapped to do it again, or Von putting us on a bit.








There's business, constant business, with cigarettes and lighting them. Blowing smoke every which way, practically spitting it out ... EvS plays fags like music accompaniment. Stills dating years back showed him working the ritual. Imagine time in front of mirrors to get smoking effects down, probably as much effort Von-applied here as Bill Fields put to juggling. I'll bet Stroheim arrived at no set, even Crespi's, without full retinue of cigarette case, shot glass, a monocle perhaps or some such to adorn his features. There's a ceremony he does with said glass, four times at least in Crespi, where a drink is poured, Von positions it, then slings back his head for the gulp. It's a trick he'd used before and would again in Grand Illusion, a performing signature seldom overlooked. Stroheim will begin dialogue quietly, then suddenly raise decibels to throw co-players (and us) off center. You never know where he's headed with a scene, being not one to play by convention. Was all this genius or self-centered posturing? EvS reminds me of a vaudevillian with an act down pat that wouldn't stand for much variation, but when it's an act so good as Stroheim's, who's kicking? (although he was brilliant when great writer/directors like Billy Wilder or Renoir took charge). I haven't heard of actors patterning selves after EvS. Anyone lacking that face and scarred forehead would be hard put to approximate him.



The Crime Of Dr. Crespi reminds me of outlaw sleaze like Maniac and Damaged Lives, back-dooring into theatres not on Code-approved lists, yet it did enjoy first-runs a promoting equivalent of higher-powered horrors out of Universal and elsewhere, as evidenced here. Did 1935 viewers feel rooked as most still do coming away from The Crime Of Dr. Crespi? For all its economies, there are creepy moments, made more so by Stroheim's Man You Love To Hate-fullness. Burial alive of one victim borrows from Vampyr, a show fewer would have seen when Crespi was new. Dwight Frye is along via unaccustomed "straight" casting, always tough sledding for this oddest of screen presences. Do other women like Frye as does my Ann? She'll sometimes do his Renfield laugh when time comes to unsettle me, and likes hearing the story of how he took Dwight Jr. to see Dracula and Frankenstein at the Regina (as Dwight Jr. once told it to me at an Arlington monster conclave). Forget about decent prints of The Crime Of Dr. Crespi. Sinister's looks to have been dragged out of graves of its own (still the best around, however), another cast-off defining what an "orphaned" movie is ...


9 Comments:

Blogger Christopher said...

This would usually get mixed in with the tv package that included The Missing Guest and The Blue Room mysteries on the Tele years ago.

6:22 PM  
Blogger Lou Lumenick said...

John, I've read -- I think it was in Erik Barnow's broadcast history "Tube of Plenty'' -- that this was the first American film shown on TV here, broadcast by NBC in 1939.

10:57 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Now that you mention it, Lou, that sort of rings a bell. I read that book, but it was a while back. Thanks for passing along this very interesting info ...

11:13 AM  
Blogger Mike Cline said...

Very odd...The AMA must not have given the good doctor a license to practice in my area as this movie had zero bookings at my local theatres.

5:32 PM  
Anonymous Bill Luton said...

This was reissued in the early 1950's as Tiger Man. Haven't seen it yet but is there any connection to that new title?

6:35 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Bill, I think it was actually "The Lady and The Monster" that was reissued as "Tiger Man" --- can't imagine how or why they came up with that title. It might just as well have been appended to "Crime Of Dr. Crespi."

6:48 PM  
Anonymous Bill Luton said...

Oops.....sorry, meant this to be on the previous post!

9:39 PM  
Blogger film_maven said...

The camera seems to love his stance- Stroheim dominates the frame no matter what is going on.

Lighting or pure personality?

1:17 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Both, I think!

1:22 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014