Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Monday, January 03, 2011

Favorites List --- Ruthless

Netflix streaming looks to be putting us by way of libraries no one's entered for years, not least of them Eagle-Lion's branch, from which I lately borrowed Ruthless, director Edgar Ulmer's Citizen Kane-ish flashbacking over lives of robber baron Zachary Scott and unfortunates in his orbit. Ruthless used to play television, granted not often (at least where I was), but enough to make an impression and set me upon quest of 16mm permanence, that had with difficulty but never to complete satisfaction due to spotty or banged-up prints. UCLA would preserve the 1948 release, but theirs isn't what Netflix streamed to me. Allowance must be made for orphans like Ruthless. It's another of those where you wonder if owners are even aware they own it. Who'll come to this one's rescue on DVD? --- especially now with sun setting on disc formats. Eagle-Lion fathered Ruthless and died shortly after, being another well-intentioned David bent on conquering studio Goliaths. History labels Edgar Ulmer among Kings of B's, but Ruthless belongs not in that category. Eagle-Lion insisted this was no cheapie like product out of cocoon from which they'd emerged, to-wit, Producer's Releasing Corporation, aka PRC and shorthand for cheapest refuse Hollywood had temerity to offer. Railroad magnate Robert Young (not him) had bought PRC for a personal toy train and set upon conducting it to parity with big-cheese majors he wanted to hack down to size. That, of course, had been tried by wallets and egos bigger even than Young's, and would be again, to ultimate loss of all such moneyed upstarts.

You can read of Eagle-Lion's brief life in Tino Balio's excellent United Artists history, where he tells of E-L's climb toward "A" status despite an industry establishment greasing poles. No one outside long entrenched oligopolists had much chance breaking in, for Leo, Warners, Fox, RKO, and Paramount held exhibition reins and weren't letting go (gov't anti-trust action eventually pried them loose, but not in time to benefit E-L). For those couple of seasons it lasted, Eagle-Lion did remarkable things with little money and fewer names. They cleared paths with film noir others would follow, what with based on Feds blotter T-Men and Trapped, plus nerve-tingling He Walked By Night and Raw Deal. Good as these were, it was all uphill getting dates into first-run theatres where percentage money was, as each booking for E-L came tooth and claw. Top stories, large budgets, and meaningful star casts came for granted out of big studios ... for an Eagle-Lion, these were beyond reach and splurge upon one or more could break their bank.

Ruthless came closest to shooting works for the company. They'd pay first for the source novel, Prelude To Night, by Dayton Stoddart, not a best seller, but indication E-L was striving beyond yarns written for two-to-three week shoots. Former agent Arthur C. Lyons would supervise for Producing Artists Corporation, an independent linked with Eagle-Lion for what Variety reported was a pair of two-million dollar projects, of which Prelude To Night was planned first. Forty-six sets would be built, according to Lyons, with an "all-star cast" including (as of August 1947) Zachary Scott, Diana Lynn, and Sydney Greenstreet. These were names, not top-of-bill ones, but capable and got for rates Producing Artists and Eagle-Lion could manage. Signing Edgar Ulmer was a masterstroke for his ability to wring absolute most out of budgets given. Short of prior hyperbole was Prelude To Night 's actual cost at $1.4 million --- according to E-L's sales division, $2.2 million would be required to break even. Getting that wouldn't be easy, what with ongoing resistance from first-run venues (New York palaces had shut out a number of Eagle-Lions). Coming to (hopeful) rescue would be J. Arthur Rank, British producer and exhibition kingpin, who'd also partnered with Eagle-Lion to get his pics released in the US and supply berths for retitled-to Ruthless across the pond ( ... a heavy play in England now seems assured, said Variety).

Prospects for Ruthless looked good. Eagle-Lion had managed a world premiere date at Chicago's State-Lake Theatre for April 16, 1948, backed by what The Motion Picture Herald called the largest opening newspaper advertising and radio campaign ever given any Eagle-Lion picture. A lot was getting spent before anything came back, but there was confidence in Ruthless. The house toppers (at State-Lake) are expecting the film ... to do the job, said Billboard, reviewing vaudeville in support of Ruthless in its opening engagement, which included so-called Cruising Crooner Jack Owens, local radio fave Fran Allison as her broadcast alter-ego, Aunt Fanny, a typical gossipy old rustic, said the trade, plus, and oddly for a house seating 2649, a marionette act (The Martin Brothers ... would do well to build a bigger puppet next time they add a routine, for their current dolls cannot be seen past the middle of the second balcony). All this to bolster what proved a slow week, according to Variety. Ruthless sustained a pan as well from the latter's reviewer ... picture is a victim of clich├ęd and outmoded direction and of weary dialogue to which no actor could do justice ... this would be no help for merchandise needing all the boost it could get.

First Runs Limping came report from Los Angeles when Ruthless landed in five venues there for early July. Double-billing with Shed No Tears saw modest returns and eleven days' screening before replacement by another from Eagle-Lion, Canon City. Eventual loss for Ruthless and recriminations from same would follow. Actor Louis Hayward sued Producing Artists in 1951 for salary unpaid, his original deal having called for a flat $100,000. Bank Of America in 1950 repossessed Ruthless along with twenty-nine other independent features for which they'd loaned production funds, but BOA wasn't in the picture business and knew not how to recover loss sustained on these. Choices were few and simple --- reissue the lot to theatres or sell to television. Favorite Films Corporation arranged with BOA to put Ruthless back on large screens in 1953 with a new title, Ruthless Men, but that wouldn't recover coin needed to restore account ink to black. 1954 television syndication among Bank Of America's now-32 title package would be final stop for Ruthless. They'd tried for a network deal, but none could be generated, trouble being too few of these titles were outstanding ones. Still, it was the strongest clutch of Hollywood movies offered to free-vee so far (this several years away from big studio syndication dumps), and included Body and Soul (the only title in the group that is believed to have shown a profit theatrically, said Billboard), Arch Of Triumph, Force Of Evil, A Double Life, Orson Welles' Macbeth, and others. General Teleradio handled distribution, paying Bank Of America $1.35 million to lease the package for four years. Ruthless would become one of the most familiar movies playing mid-50's televised days and night, as Los Angeles' KHJ, among others, first-ran it five primetime nights in a row, with repeats in abundance to follow.

You couldn't sensibly call Ruthless a B picture, though many have, and continue doing so. It was run as such at a Filmex B Movie Marathon in 1983, plus elsewhere, and the label remains affixed partly due to Edgar Ulmer's career association with lowest of low-budget ventures. Ruthless was by far his richest meal, one he viewed in hindsight as having been compromised by an interfering producer, common refrain among directors wanting to explain away flawed work. After the first release, they cut it, said Ulmer to interviewing Peter Bogdanovich in 1970 (I've found no evidence of this --- Ruthless opened at 104 minutes and that seems to have been running time since). Ulmer called his film a very bad indictment against 100 percent Americanism --- as Upton Sinclair saw it, this undoubted music to cultists' ears, though critics in 1948 don't seem to have caught his drift. What impresses about Ruthless is Ulmer's reach beyond resources given, always a hallmark with his films, but never pursued so ambitiously as here, with the director hauling his own Citizen Kane out of Eagle-Lion's basement. Something else maybe not noticed then is young Bob Anderson, playing Zachary Scott's character as a boy, saving another flashback character from drowning, just as this actor had done in the role of adolescent George Bailey in two-years' before It's A Wonderful Life, although outcomes in Ruthless are considerably different. Whatever it misses, and critics unimpressed then with Ulmer were right that it misses plenty, Ruthless makes up with what he pulls from an ensemble cast, each given roles with thicker meat on bones than customary, and period mood (the pic spans decades) that no name director could have nailed with greater precision than Ulmer. It's a show well worth seeking out.


Blogger Mike Cline said...


June 30 - July 1, 1948 - GROVE Theatre, China Grove, N.C.

September 8 - 9, 1948 - STATE Theatre. Salisbury, N.C.

January 10 - 11, 1949 - SALISBURY DRIVE-IN Theatre

11:20 AM  
Anonymous Chris said...

I have not seen this film but I'll put in on my list.

By the way:

Something else maybe not noticed then is young Bob Anderson, playing Zachary Scott's character as a boy, saving another flashback character from drowning, just as this actor had done in the role of adolescent George Bailey in two-years' before It's A Wonderful Life, although outcomes in Ruthless are considerably different.

... I love weird parallels like this. Seems impossible that it was intentional but ... great catch!

12:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Happy new year, John!

I was a movie-mad teenager (with a well-loved copy of "Kings of the Bs") visiting my sister in Boston when I noticed "Ruthless" playing on television at 3:00 AM. I received her permission to wake up and watch it (for the first and only time) and was mightily impressed. "He wasn't just a man, he was a way of life." I can't believe I remember a line of dialogue from a movie I have not seen in 35 years.

The Film Goer's Companion's Leslie Halliwell also took a dim view of Ruthless, quoting a contemporary (1948) English reviewer's rhyming pan:

"Beginning pictures at the end

"Is, I'm afraid, a modern trend

"But I'd find Ruthless much more winning

"If it would end at the beginning."

Upon seeing Ruthless myself, I couldn't DISAGREE more!

Seems like I always had to get up during the wee hours to catch any of any Edgar Ulmer's work (Bluebeard, Detour, The Black Cat, The Man from Planet X are fondly remembered). Best, Mark Hendrix

5:22 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Received an e-mail from longtime GPS friend Griff:

Dear John:

Happy New Year! (May you see many, many more.)

A sensational post, crammed with fascinating hitherto unknown details, and Greenbriar's signature obscure stills and publicity graphics about one of my favorite movies. I much appreciate the distinction you make here -- whatever RUTHLESS is, it isn't a B-movie. I'd love to see this picture again -- it's been far too long.

I've never forgotten that tag...

"He wasn't just a man... He was a way of life."

-- Griff

Thanks Griff --- and Happy New Year to you!

7:05 AM  
Blogger Scott MacGillivray said...

I think the most famous (if not the most familiar) Eagle-Lion picture is Abbott & Costello's THE NOOSE HANGS HIGH. It's certainly one of the company's few comedies. Funny movies were E-L's weak suit -- the only other ones I can think of offhand are DOWN MEMORY LANE, the Mack Sennett compilation with Steve Allen; and THE GAS HOUSE KIDS IN HOLLYWOOD, a PRC picture that was released on Eagle-Lion's first day in business.

Eagle-Lion was an offshoot of Rank's failed United World Pictures merger; Universal and International stayed partners, while Young and Rank (represented by the American eagle and the British lion) went off on their own. E-L may have been too ambitious for its budgets; it merged with Film Classics (which itself had been taken over by Cinecolor), and the whole thing was absorbed by United Artists in 1951.

11:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I was thinking about posting this comment about RUTHLESS, but wasn't sure it was worthy...but after reading Mark Hendrix's post about seeing the movie on late-night Boston TV years ago I decided why not? At least he might enjoy reading it.

Yes, RUTHLESS was shown a few times in the mid-1970's on Boston's Channel 5 during their "Five All Night" programming (also consisting of the Universal horror package, Charlie Chan, Mr. Moto, and an assortment of NTA-distributed features, as well as TV shows like "Boston Blackie").
"Five All Night" was hosted by a genial gent named George Fennell, who conducted the night's shows like a radio DJ (which I believe he went on to become a few years later). He introduced the movies and came back for comments, trivia questions, etc. during commercial breaks.
One crack he made has somehow stayed with me: during one showing of RUTHLESS he informed us that the movie was called RUTHLESS because there was nobody in it named Ruth!

6:13 AM  
Anonymous Bob said...

I've never seen this, and don't seem to recall it playing in New York City television in the late 60s/early 70s (why I caught most of my classic movies). It's a shame, as I'm a big Louis Hayward fan. (My favorite movie Saint!)

Great post!

11:25 AM  
Anonymous r.j. said...

Happy New Year, John and dear friend Scott,

Eagle-Lion which had formerly been PRC and before that Educational Comedies was a very tiny lot located on Santa Monica Blvd. directly next-door to the formidable Samuel Goldwyn lot. I knew it well as it was my virtual playground and second-home, because after E-L folded, it became the Ziv Televison lot, where Dad was employed for a hell of a lot of years working on practically series they produced. My most vivid childhood memory of the studio was running down a ramp outside a soundstage and falling and being sent to the studio nurse for attendance.

I also really recall the studio commissary, a far cry from the plush Cafe de Paris at 20th, but according to Mom, Nick Adams, probably doing something or other out there, and I, became fast-friends there one afternoon. Wouldn't have had the slighest idea who he was at that time, but it doesn't matter, as "hams" always recognize each other on sight.

Closer to home, interestingly,Dad said he was doing something or other out there and Zachary Scott was in the cast. Dad introduced himself and said he remembered him from Warners. "Not like the old days!" Scott said disgustedly, walking away.

The site of what was Ziv, et al, is now a very small shopping mall. Whenever I pass by now, I can't believe how really small the acreage was, but the place is full of ghosts, I'm sure!

Always, R.J.

9:24 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Happy New Year to you, RJ, and thanks again for these and all the other fantastic anecdotes you've shared with us!

9:31 AM  
Anonymous Ray Faiola said...

John - I just got a mint Kodak original of RUTHLESS from Veto. I got a trailer a few months ago, which led me to seek out the DVD. Gad, was THAT awful. So along came Veto's print on eBay and I was the lone bidder. Talk about having gold dropped in your lap. Thanks for posting the pressbook pages! Your article is superb and let's hope the UCLA preservation print gets a release!

12:38 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Thanks for the nice comments, Ray, and I'm really glad to hear you scored such a nice print from Veto --- and the trailer ... Wow! I've never even seen one for "Ruthless."

7:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016