The Lawless Takes Its Lumps --- Part Two
Pine/Thomas and
Showmen Pushed for Trade Screenings as Part Of Their War Against Blind Bidding, But Many Ignored the Screenings Once They Were Implemented |
Paramount's deal with eight venues getting first (and exclusive) play on The Lawless called for each to run it as a single --- no combos or supporting features. Several among these must have got cold feet, as the bargain was not kept. What became clear was fact that June's were do-or-die engagements. If
British Theatres played The Lawless Under This Different Title |
Pre-Release Site Boston Goes With The Time-Honored Sandwich Board Bally |
Pine/Thomas were still bullish, predicting, said
Variety, an eventual net profit of at least $1,000,000. They even pledged ten
percent of Lawless profits to Paramount branch
managers, salesmen, bookers, and field exploiteers, a 240-odd group of
beneficiaries --- and they'd get quarterly statements with their checks for as
long as they stayed on staff! A balloon this inflated had to be popped, and
word from the pre-release did just that. The Lawless pulled a first week's "great"
$15K in San Francisco ,
maybe due to its nearby story setting, but biz elsewhere didn't come near their
haul. Buffalo was "fair" ($9,000) ...
at least The Lawless played a single there, but Boston ,
Baltimore , and Detroit took the bobsled. These broke faith
with Paramount by adding co-features: a Gene
Autry here, a Roy Rogers there, or worse, a "B" out of Monogram,
Father Makes Good --- each was fine in and of itself, but this was not
company Para sales wanted its prestige pic to
keep.
Kids, Cherry Coke, and The Latest Pine/Thomas Slugfest --- As Close To Sure-Fire As Theatres Could Get in 1950 --- Until The Lawless Came To Town |
Yes, The Lawless Was On Broadway, But It Didn't Gross There |
Even hope of a click in Gotham
was dashed, The Lawless opening there in late June at the 1,300 seat Astor Theatre.
Very slow was their two weeks play-off, $12K in a first, $8K for the second. What biz
The Lawless drew was attributed to a July 4 holiday boost. Variety's nationwide tally
for June called Paramount 's
effort extremely spotty to date. Further tie-ins with schools and civic groups
weren't helping, as screenings followed by egghead discussion was like anchors
tied to mass patronage. Paramount
seemed ready to pull plugs on that big push they'd pledged, and who could blame
them? There was surer cash in ongoing juggernaut Samson and Delilah and My
Friend Irma Goes West, Para 's two other July
centerpieces, and both hits. Autumn months saw The Lawless playing as a second
feature to safer bets like Broken Arrow and, in Chicago, even Pine/Thomas' own Tripoli. At least Omaha
tried helping with popular orchestra man Blue Barron and his stage revue ---
light receipts here were attributed less to The Lawless than sport events on TV
that siphoned off matinee trade.
It was small towns that really ripped The
Lawless. Was this cowboys, a melodrama,
or what the hell? They'd take their genres straight, thank you. Used instead of
a western --- sorry I did, came word from Paynesville ,
Minnesota , Plenty of action, but
my farmers and cowboys want a western. Robert H. Perkins of the Lynn Theatre
in Woodbine, Kentucky
put rhetorical spin to his comment ... It's another of those "lesson"
films. Maybe your customers go for them. "Woody" at the Palace
Theatre in Golden City , Missouri seems to have missed Pine/Thomas'
point altogether: A messed-up try at a super western. Very poor draw in a
theatre that thrives on westerns. The Motion Picture Herald maintained a weekly
chart where independent film buyers rated movies. They were honest, sometimes
brutal, and gave The Lawless an acid bath --- none called it Excellent, two
said Above Average, seventeen went with Average, thirty-seven Below Average,
and twenty-three Poor.
Bill Pine was philosophical by a scorched
November. He told Variety that The Lawless might have been more successful if
released a year earlier, when much of the public "was actually going to
see message films." Bill added that he and his partner were still glad
they made The Lawless because it was the first time they'd done "a real
critic's picture." Admitting it wasn't as profitable as their others, Pine
and Thomas at least "proved we're guys whose only interest isn't making
money." As to afterlife of The Lawless, there was 1960 syndicated-to-TV
release amongst a group of twenty-two Pine/Thomas post-48's, most in color. I
found no indication of The Lawless being shunned by programmers. Indeed, there
are listings in a number of vintage TV GUIDES I've come across. What we haven't
had is wide exposure on satellite and cable carriers, but that seems to have been the case
with most Pine/Thomas titles (some of them are streaming on Netflix, however). My query: Does Paramount own all of these at present or do
P/T heirs still maintain a controlling interest?
1 Comments:
I don't think back then they really appropriated acting as a art. Now actors that are good are paid huge amounts of money. I think we pay to much importance to entrainment in our culture. Why does a doctor that saves lives make so much less then a actor or professional athlete?
Post a Comment
<< Home