Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Thursday, April 11, 2013


Author Joseph McBride Talks About Shane

Greenbriar gets out an extra on Shane thanks to a fascinating e-mail received from noted film historian and biographer Joseph McBride, who got in touch following Tuesday's Part Two with word that he was in attendance at that 1966 University Of Wisconsin Shane showing attended by George Stevens, and subsequently interviewed the director. Mr. McBride has been kind enough to share his account of what took place and counts himself among those in favor of a Shane Blu-Ray release in Stevens' intended  ratio.





From Joseph McBride: I was at that 1966 University of Wisconsin, Madison, screening of SHANE and had the privilege of seeing the film for the first time with the director present. It was one of three times I've seen his personal print (1:33). It always looked spectacular. I have written my former writing partner George Stevens, Jr., to share my concern about how the Blu-ray release is chopping off parts of the film. This obviously must not be done.
 

There is no transcript of the Madison event, but my book PERSISTENCE OF VISION: A COLLECTION OF FILM CRITICISM (Wisconsin Film Society Press, Madison, 1968) contains a report on the visits of Stevens, King Vidor, and Shirley Clarke to our campus. William Donnelly wrote the article. Bill didn't much like Stevens or SHANE. There is nothing specific about the aspect ratio, but Bill does write of Stevens, "Loves his films and will fight for them (suing NBC for what they did to one of them)." Bill also writes of Stevens,
 
"Convinced he makes films from conviction. Convinced films made from films bad. Doesn't like idea of film being a mass of conventions. Prefers to think of them as moving records of reality. Feels that what will authentically move him will move audience. Unable to defend SHANE as a film growing out of his revulsion at killing. Though he calls it his 'war film' and tells how he waited impatiently to make a statement on his war experiences, when asked to reconcile stated theme with action in film shoots out a cloud of abstractions like a squid. Doesn't allow himself to be pinned down philosophically. Doesn't realize that SHANE is one of the most archetypal of Westerns."

I know Stevens did realize that. As I recall that event, the aspect ratio wasn't discussed. The film simply looked great.


Patrick McGilligan and I interviewed Stevens in 1974. This interview appeared in Gary Morris's magazine Bright Lights and is collected in Pat's book FILM CRAZY: INTERVIEWS WITH HOLLYWOOD LEGENDS (St. Martin's Press, 2000). Stevens talks about how carefully he composed the shot of Shane framed through the grazing elk's antlers (a shot that would lose some of the sky and mountains above the elk if it is shown in 1:66). When we mentioned that Alan Ladd is a marvelous piece of casting but unconventional, particularly since he is short for a Western hero, Stevens said, "It was an interesting thing for the picture because he didn't tower above the others -- the mountains did. We kept him as high off the ground as possible so he wouldn't be dwarfed by people." And Stevens talked about the importance of deliberate pacing and editing. He said,
 
"It's related to music or painting, the arrangement of film, and it has an enormous effect on an audience. They never relate to it as being devised, any more than I presume I'm seduced because Renoir devises the composition of what he shows me in a painting. I know he sweated it out, erased it, but he got it. There's no question about it, there's the grand man. It surprises me how well audiences, also critics, reward a film that has that kind of thing in mind, by design, not because it just happened. Sometimes we find really fine quality in a film by looking at it, looking at it, and then looking BACK at it -- why, this darn thing's designed as the BOLERO is designed!"

This was a man who took great pains over every aspect of his work, including composition. I am sure he would be appalled to see SHANE cut down to 1:66 again when it could be released in the Academy ratio in which he shot it.

 
Greenbriar highly recommends the many fine books Joseph McBride has written on lives and careers of directors John Ford, Frank Capra, and Orson Welles, in addition to other works on film history, all of which are outstanding.


5 Comments:

Blogger Bob Furmanek said...

Fascinating, and thank you to Mr. McBride for sharing his experiences.

I have one question; was the print shown at the University 35mm or 16mm?

11:03 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Joseph McBride responds by e-mail to Bob Furmanek's Thursday comment and inquiry:


Thanks for your input, Mr. Furmanek. The print shown at the University of Wisconsin in 1966 was director George Stevens's personal 35mm print. I later saw the same spectacular, well-preserved print at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and at a private memorial for Mr. Stevens at a small screening room in Marina del Rey. I was very fond of George Stevens as a man and think he is the most underrated great American filmmaker.


I hope, Mr. Furmanek, that Warners will put out a set with Stevens's masterpiece, SHANE, in both ratios, including the one in which Stevens shot it (1.33) and for which Loyal Griggs won an Oscar for color cinematography. Thank you again.


****


Best,


Joe

5:02 AM  
Blogger Bob Furmanek said...

That's great information, thank you very much Mr. McBride. I appreciate your input.

Best,
Bob

11:38 AM  
Blogger Ralph Schiller said...

I have read Mr. McBride's book on Orson Welles which is required reading for Welles afficionados.

9:53 AM  
Blogger Ralph Schiller said...

I have read Mr. McBride's fascinating book on the films directed by Orson Welles.

In Fact Joseph McBride plays a reporter in the unseen, unreleased Orson Welles film 'The Other Side Of The Wind'.

9:55 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016