Thunderball broke beyond success of so-far
Bonds. They spent more, and it showed to a point of making Goldfinger and
before look like programmers by comparison, but what choice was there? The
series was now a recurring event, and nothing less than spectacular would do.
Critics took harsh note, saying Connery's Bond was swamped by size and decor.
Partly that was true, as sets do dwarf he and co-stars much
of the time, but my recent view found 007's wit and personality much intact,
even as ceiling levels above him increased by a seeming thirty feet. What
series chroniclers forget is that we wanted Thunderball to be a most
extravagant of Bonds. Summer '65's run-up encore of Dr. Noand From Russia With Lovefound both wanting so far as fans (many) whose first exposure had been
slicker-than-either Goldfinger. How could movies but a couple years old
suddenly have seemed old-fashioned? Maybe Thunderball falls appropriately into
you-had-to-be-there category, and for having indeed been there, I treasure it
all the more.
THE VIRGINIAN (1946)--- Some have knocked this
remake of admittedly more memorable 1929 adapt of Owen Wister's story, but it's
such a natural for picture-telling that it's hard blaming Paramount for another go. Characters so vivid
would even tube-endure from 60's into early 70's weekly riding at NBC,
Universal being heir to the property thanks to MCA purchase of pre-48 Paras in
a meantime. Retroplex ran this '46 rendition in startling HD, a kickstart
toward enjoyment that made me happy to have waited lo these years to watch.
Joel McCrea takes Coop's part, Sonny Tufts isill-fated Steve (what's all this
bad actor stuff? --- he's fine here), and Brian Donlevy, kitted out all-black,
does Trampas for he and Joel's reprise of deathless When you call me that, smile.
Top-lined by Paramount in that biggest of all movie attending years,
gad-zillions saw this Virginian and likely recalled it better than an early
talkie original that had been out of wide-view since a '34 reissue. Big
westerns needn't be great westerns to be a joy, as proved by this and super-A's
Paramount did to showcase 40'sstars (I'll wait now for Retroplex to H-DoWhispering Smithwith Alan Ladd, and maybe Streets Of Laredo).
THE MUMMY'S SHROUD (1967)--- This mummy has
been pilloried for loping about in a union suit (some have even detected
zippers). Hammer's Egypt
forays kept better faith with fans than did Universal with earlier, and
diminishing, Kharis chapters. Bray restaging of ancient environs came across
like English drawing rooms, a tomb just entered well lit and near-spotless
despite three thousand years' passage of time. Hammer hadn't run out of style
by 1967 --- far from it --- they could still do lush from a lemon budget, and
actors never played down to content, however ludicrous such often was (stalwart
Michael Ripper gives probably his best-ever performance here). You'd nearly buy
into this Mummy but for grievous shortcutthey took with his costuming, a fatal
decision to dress rather than wrap him. Would a Rugby uniform have been any less inapt? I skipped The
Mummy's Shroud in 1967 ... something about the trailer put me off. Others may
have done the same, as it earned but $256K in domestic rentals. Now I've
watched a gorgeous Region 2Blu-Ray, and thanks in part to that, The Mummy's
Shroud fulfills modest expectation after a forty-six year wait.
SALT WATER DAFFY (1933)--- It's a "Big
V" comedy from Warners, now packaged by courtesy of their DVD Archive.
What a treasure find these are. Salt Water Daffy turns out to have been largely
remade as Buck Privates eight years later. Same set-up, a near identical first
half. Comic writers had long memories ... of other writer's stuff. Some of salt
water seems to have lodged in these clown's throats, as Daffy evolves into a
contest of harsh voicing by Jack Haley vis a vis tough drill master Lionel
Stander. Haley sure tamped down by the time he became the Tin Man. Here he
sounds more like Bud Abbott to come, another linkwith Buck Privates, to which
parallel add an awkward squad routine with Stander anticipating Nat Pendleton's
frustration. Funny after a curious fashion as oddball two-reelers invariably
are. We're disc-supplied with this because Shemp Howard's a clown in support of
Haley, which goes to further flavor an already must-see short. Is it a wonder
comedians worried of Shemp stealing their spotlight? He does so handily here, being among most naturally funny faces to ever go before a
camera.
THE MUMMY'S SHROUD isn't much of a movie but the Mummy's wardrobe is a faithful replica of one found in the British Museum. Gotta give Hammer points for trying something new at any rate.
THUNDERBALL was my first Bond film and I was lucky enough to see it on the giant "Panoramic" widescreen of the Loews here in Richmond in early 1966. I guess for that reason it remains my favorite Bond film
My first experience of Thunderball is one I'll never forget. My buddy Clyde Patrick and I went to see it on opening weekend at Sacramento's Tower Theater, and we were bowled over. It was fast, it was exciting, it was suspenseful, it was cool, it was sexy -- everything a James Bond movie should be. We decided to stay and see it again -- this was in the days of continuous showings -- so we called our folks, told 'em we'd be late, and settled down to relive the experience.
What a shock! This movie was stupid. The plot was silly, the action was cheesy, Connery's double entendres were arch and corny. We trudged out of the Tower and shared our bitter disillusion all the way home. (I emphasize that this wasn't just me; we both had the same catastrophic letdown that second time through.)
Dissolve to 47 years later, last December. While cat-sitting for vacationing friends, I popped their Blu-ray of Thunderball into the player, what the heck, just for a chortle; once ever 50 years or so won't kill me.
Well, what can I say? I decided that night that I was closer to the truth the first time I saw it back in '65; this is one of the very best Connery Bonds -- i.e., one of the best ever, period. Still, I'll never be able to shake off the memory of that night in 1965. I guess the moral is: Never watch a James Bond movie twice in succession.
Just saw THUNDERBALL again, first time in many years. I'd still rank it as one of the best... ya' gotta love the under-cranking in the speedboat finale.
BPiper's right about the costume in THE MUMMY'S SHROUD. A lot of publicity at the time of release on that subject, but for forty plus years I bought into the idea that this was rock-bottom-end-of-the-pier Hammer and avoided it. Finally caught it (twice!) in the last couple years and it's kinda okay. As you noted, worth the price of admission for Michael Ripper alone!
Weird enthusiasm counter balance on the subject of Shemp Howard. Slight heart sink when you see his name in the credits of a Stooge short ("Shit, Shemp's in it!")versus that little lift when you see his name in anything else! ("Hot damn! Shemp's in it!")
4 Comments:
THE MUMMY'S SHROUD isn't much of a movie but the Mummy's wardrobe is a faithful replica of one found in the British Museum. Gotta give Hammer points for trying something new at any rate.
THUNDERBALL was my first Bond film and I was lucky enough to see it on the giant "Panoramic" widescreen of the Loews here in Richmond in early 1966. I guess for that reason it remains my favorite Bond film
My first experience of Thunderball is one I'll never forget. My buddy Clyde Patrick and I went to see it on opening weekend at Sacramento's Tower Theater, and we were bowled over. It was fast, it was exciting, it was suspenseful, it was cool, it was sexy -- everything a James Bond movie should be. We decided to stay and see it again -- this was in the days of continuous showings -- so we called our folks, told 'em we'd be late, and settled down to relive the experience.
What a shock! This movie was stupid. The plot was silly, the action was cheesy, Connery's double entendres were arch and corny. We trudged out of the Tower and shared our bitter disillusion all the way home. (I emphasize that this wasn't just me; we both had the same catastrophic letdown that second time through.)
Dissolve to 47 years later, last December. While cat-sitting for vacationing friends, I popped their Blu-ray of Thunderball into the player, what the heck, just for a chortle; once ever 50 years or so won't kill me.
Well, what can I say? I decided that night that I was closer to the truth the first time I saw it back in '65; this is one of the very best Connery Bonds -- i.e., one of the best ever, period. Still, I'll never be able to shake off the memory of that night in 1965. I guess the moral is: Never watch a James Bond movie twice in succession.
Just saw THUNDERBALL again, first time in many years. I'd still rank it as one of the best... ya' gotta love the under-cranking in the speedboat finale.
BPiper's right about the costume in THE MUMMY'S SHROUD. A lot of publicity at the time of release on that subject, but for forty plus years I bought into the idea that this was rock-bottom-end-of-the-pier Hammer and avoided it. Finally caught it (twice!) in the last couple years and it's kinda okay. As you noted, worth the price of admission for Michael Ripper alone!
Weird enthusiasm counter balance on the subject of Shemp Howard. Slight heart sink when you see his name in the credits of a Stooge short ("Shit, Shemp's in it!")versus that little lift when you see his name in anything else! ("Hot damn! Shemp's in it!")
Post a Comment
<< Home