Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Saturday, June 29, 2013

It's 1983, and Gene Kelly Is Ushering In The Real Golden
Age For Vintage Movies

Old Extinct Movies Are Better Than Ever --- Part One

Being another of those hectoring "opinion" posts like THIS and THIS, mercifully spread to two parts. As Bob said when Bing started to sing, this might be a good time to go out for popcorn:

There's been talk in a last year of old movies facing extinction like dinosaurs, whereas it seems to me the only dinosaurs may be ones making that complaint, judging by what is, by all appearance, a peak period we're experiencing of interest and enthusiasm for vintage pix. Do so-called "millennials" indeed shun classics? Naysayers (folk I'd guess to be at least as old as me) claim there'll never be another Golden Age of film appreciation like the 60/70's, when viewing generations were said to happily co-exist in shared love of relic stuff. I'd say agreed to those who claim today's generation is not interested in the classic era to degrees we were ("we" being those who came of age in mythic Gold days). The current generation is, in fact,  more engaged than any I grew up with.

We who aren't deep in the life of IPad/Phones, Twitter, and the universe of social networking have but faint idea of what goes on. Old-timers feed off each other's mistaken notion that no one loves old movies like we love old movies. What goes on among a large and appreciative modern-day film culture sometimes makes me wish I'd been born closer to now than back when. There are high school students, many, not a few, who blog or tweet insightfully on film. They didn't come to it the way middle-age and olders did. Pictures that were nowhere in my alleged Golden Age can be seen in the palm of their hands.

To those who would say this is no way to view a classic, I'd refer to a ten-inch B/W tube that many a night traded me classics for sleep through a glaze of snow and endless interrupt for ads (imagine viewer reaction if TCM dropped a commercial into one of their movies). This was reality of coming up then. I was lucky to see a Bride Of Frankenstein once in three years, always diminished through vagaries of syndication. Now there are numerous formats by which to enjoy it in a next five minutes. Today's student of film needn't wait for favorites to surface in revival joints ancestors attended. Those are mostly gone in any case, and never mind the romance of revival housing ... many, if not most, of them used 16mm prints that wouldn't pass muster today. Movie fans now can watch whatever they want, anytime and anyplace. It's (mostly) all out there somewhere, legitimate or otherwise.

TCM remains the temple around which everyone gathers. That is the happy co-existence many recall (or imagine) from the 60/70's, and it's a larger body by far than Shangri-La seen through rose-color glass. When came the truest awakening to classic movies? Everyone likes to think it was when he/she was young and discovering the life. I was introduced in the 60's and entrenched by the 70's. That was a Golden Age only because my enthusiasm was so, but if I'd come along in the 80's or 90's, things would have been better, at least more accessible. They had video cassettes, plus AMC when it was starting out and worthwhile. Surely this would have been a Golden Era had I been ten years old in 1984 instead of 1964.

There were two dozen oldies broadcast by the 80's for every one that I plowed for and could barely receive on stone-age TV, and wasn't TNT rolling out recently acquired MGM and pre-48 Warner titles by 1985? The Showtime network had Red-Headed Woman, Reunion In Vienna, and any number of rarities around this time (and now Reunion In Vienna's gone again, though homemade VHS of it floats freely). Certainly I wasn't the only one watching these. Things would improve yet, with TCM's 1994 arrival a buff's equivalent to invention of the printing press. This to my mind is where our Golden Age truly began. DVD's bow a few years later merely confirmed that here was opportunity's loudest knock to discover and make a life's pursuit of classic movies. The ability to record on VCR and later DVR made film librarians of us all. I still have, and can still watch, a VHS cassette of Manhattan Melodrama captured off Chicago's WGN back in 1978. There's a guy not half a mile from me who has over ten thousand movies on every format introduced since the late-70's, even Beta. Ask him about a Golden Age and he'll tell you it's been going on for thirty-five years.

13 Comments:

Blogger Kevin K. said...

How well I remember staying up late one Sunday night to watch Frank Capra's "Dirigible" (1931), the snowy landscapes rivaled only by the snowy image barely coming through as I twisted and turned the rabbit ears on my portable TV. I lived in Rhode Island, and I had to depend on the kindness of the weather to bring in that Connecticut station. If you had told me then that some day I'd be able to own a good copy on a little disc to watch any time I wanted with no commercials, I'd have asked you to stop teasing me with your lies.

The only thing that lessened the TCM glow was when our cable company stopped broadcasting it in analogue. Now that it's digital, I can no longer record (and preserve) the movies of my choice on DVD. I have to rely on the DVR as a temporary way station rather than a permanent collection. On the other hand, it's a comfort to know that almost everything is available, often restored, at a reasonable price. And free on YouTube!

9:35 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Charles D. Miles shares some fascinating memories of video disc players from long ago:


Today’s header on your blog is an ad for RCA Spectravision CDE player



I’ve still got two players, one still works. About 120 movies. My dad and I bought one in late 1981. Remember a VCR was a thousand dollars, and the cheapest tape of a classic film (not PD) was between 50 and one hundred dollars. The RCA system had a better picture quality than VHS (I can’t comment on Beta, never saw one), and I wanted to OWN classic films (long before AMC or TCM, you’d get to see classics one time a year. Even when I was a poor, struggling actor, I’d put my change in a coffee can at the end of each day. When I had the money to buy a RCA disc, I did.



That was over 30 years ago. Sometimes I wish I bought stock in WalMart or McDonalds with all that money, but I got a lot of joy out of the CDE player, joy is better! I used it quite a bit until 2000 (when I got Turner Classic), and then infrequently, but I did use it. Like an old Studebaker in grandpa’s garage, I’ll turn it over once or twice a year, to make sure it still works. It sputters and stalls (both the car and CED player), but still works. I watch a copy of FAREWELL MY LOVELY, a film not on DVD in the USA, just to remember how great Robert Mitchum is. I’m now only a few years younger than he was when he played Phillip Marlowe, life goes by so fast.



I found your blog in 2005. Yours is consistently the best.



Thanks



Charles D Miles

11:03 AM  
Blogger antoniod said...

Many young people today know the Three Stooges, but haven't heard of the Marx Brothers, W.C. Fields, or Laurel and Hardy. And I'm finding that young Germans today aren't aware of the 30s-40s "Ufa" stars (Save immortal Heinz Ruhmann), whereas a decade ago many were.

1:37 PM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

Entering my teens in the NYC Metro area during the early '70s, I well remember staying up after 11pm to catch WB-Busby Berkeley musicals on WNEW-5, the Astaire-Rogers pics on WOR-9 (still running that C&C Movietime package of RKO gems into a third decade), and the MGM Marx Brothers on WCBS-2. My mom introduced me and my younger sister to most of these joys. WNEW also ran L&H, while WPIX-11 had the Rascals; Hal Roach was a comedy god to my generation. I was collecting silent comedies on Super 8, never dreaming of owning the bounty of classic cinema that we have today. On the other hand, the more "shows" I go to - the Cinevents, Slapsticons, etc. - the more I'm reminded that these films work best with an audience. Hopefully the abundance of instant gratification won't consign that experience to oblivion.

4:11 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

Well said, though what's harder to find is the social dimension; it's understandable why those who once went to full houses for Keaton films in 16mm now feel they're guardians of lost knowledge when they sit at home alone with a Kino blu-ray. Which is why I started NitrateVille, for one thing, and try to go to the conventions, for another, and try to proselytize to newbies for the Silent Film Society of Chicago, for another...

5:47 PM  
Blogger williampl7 said...

Boy, growing up around Chicago television in the 60’s and 70’s, classic films were everywhere. My fondest memories was first discovering the Marx Brothers and W. Fields on the Saturday late, late night movie on WLS-TV Channel 7 in 1969, Abbott and Costello on the WBBM-TV Channel 2 Afternoon Movie, many of them making their Chicago television premiers during the mid sixties, and of course the Three Stooges everyday after school on WGN-TV Channel 9, with Andy (Bob Bell) Starr!

5:51 PM  
Blogger Neely O'Hara said...

Hi John, what a wonderful (and encouraging) post!

I remember as a kid "watching" movies I could barely even see, as they were pulled in via rabbit ears on the 21" B&W Zenith. I recall the horror of being halfway through a movie when my parents would haul me away for one reason or another, and thinking, "If only I could invent something by which I could come back later and resume watching at the same point I'd never ask God for another thing!"

I invested first in Betamax (buying an enormous, top loading, second-hand one 1983) and thought I'd died and gone to heaven (even though the only film I had for months was the 1973 'Mame'), going next to laser disc, to VHS, to DVD, and now to streaming.

I should have learned my 'archiving' lesson in 1996 as I stood above a landfill, nearly in tears, and dropped my collection of 400 plus Beta movies over the edge, when the last Beta machine I could find was judged to be beyond repair.

I thought the DVD recorder with hard drive such a miracle that when they began to disappear I bought 2 more, both of which remain sealed in their cartons in the attic.

I find now that aside from movies unlikely to ever see a DVD release (Ash Wednesday, 1973 anyone?) which I've transfered to DVD from other formats, I have lost my passion for "owning."

I still have thousands of discs (commercial ones as well as those recorded from TCM), but even though I've cut the cable and said goodbye to Robert Osborn, I rarely haul out a disc anymore. I'm more than satisfied with Netflix, YouTube, and Warner Archive Instant, which Greenbriar turned me on to!

6:20 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Donald Benson reveals a whole series of Golden Ages from his life:


I had a Spectravision, which I got just before VCRs began to plunge in price. When I got a VCR, I discovered I could tape stuff off the RCA discs onto tapes, like taping LPs onto cassettes. No editing or anything fancy, but I could put a cartoon before a feature. As VHS began to wildly outstrip RCA in terms of content, I ended up hauling it all to Salvation Army when I moved.


I had a bunch of golden ages, each superseding the previous:
-- 8mm: First Castle-style highlight reels and whole cartoons, then the two-reel wonders of Blackhawk
-- The summer a local station ran all the Universal Sherlocks on weekends, with a live host.

-- A later summer series of feature versions of Republic cliffhangers.
-- Discovering UHF, home not only of vintage Paramounts but strange animated imports.
-- Various silent showcases on local & national public television.
-- Attending UCSC, with classic stuff shown on campus and a nifty revival house, Sash Mill Cinema, in town
-- Finding the Vitaphone, another great revival house, after graduation
-- Spectravision and then VHS, especially when they began pricing tapes to sell
-- Disney embracing home video and also showing great old stuff on their cable channel
-- DVD, TCM, and legit releases of assorted holy grails
-- The ongoing appearance of mind-boggling, once-forbidden treasures. Wartime Disney! Charlie Chan! Harold Lloyd! Short subjects! The GOOD Popeyes!


In terms of availability and quality, it does indeed keep getting better. But if I had to base a golden age on anything else, I'd say around the 70s when there were more venues where the faithful could gather and experience old movies as movies. Yes, it was Casablanca and Duck Soup every other week; and other favorites had to be relived through the photos in "The Films of" books, or soundtrack LPs with snatches of dialogue. But scarcity was balanced by the sense of community and a certain anticipation. Fantasies of owning a Bell & Howell projector and being rich enough to rent from the 16mm catalogs.

7:39 PM  
Blogger Vienna said...

My first machine was bought in 1976 - a Phillips 1500 VCR, a heavy, bulky machine - and I couldn't even record a complete film! (The discs ran 45 and 60 minutes and were very expensive.)
And then my first VHS machine in 1979. Such a thrill to be able to tape off Tv a favorite film.
One great regret is not being able to see classic movies on the big screen. Other than the National Film Theatre in London, here in the UK you couldn't see vintage Hollywood in cinemas.

3:46 AM  
Blogger Brother Herbert said...

Pardon my random blathering...

Being 11 years old in 1984, I suppose I would've been in this new "golden age" of video. It's a good thing home video came along when it did then, because I am also among the last generation, as I've stated on these pages before, to enjoy daily doses of Little Rascals/Laurel & Hardy and all-night classic movies on TV. Within a few years the changes started coming - FOX (and later, UPN and CW) came along and took away evening movies from our best local UHF channels, and infomercials began to replace all-night movies.

I remember our first VCR, a $600+ VHS top-loader with a corded "remote" that controlled play and pause only. I also remember going to the local Tower Records to rent tapes for the first time. The first rental tape I ever watched was a PD Chaplin Keystone collection from Video Yesteryear. I was shocked by my father when he told me we had to return the tapes the next day - I thought it was like the library where you got to check them out and keep them for a couple weeks!

My father wasn't a big technology person so we never paid attention to VHS vs. Beta vs. CED vs. Laserdisc. We never owned a lot of movies either, as we mainly used the VCR to record stuff off TV (I have precious few magnetic time capsules left from that period and they are slowly deteriorating). Only in the last few years did I actually purchase a Beta machine for myself, because I finally realized that with every new format or tech that comes along, less and less becomes available. Some really obscure stuff initially released on Beta never saw release on VHS, which means it was probably never on DVD and will never be on streaming (a technology I have yet to embrace).

The flip side of this is YouTube, where, as Kevin noted, all kinds of stuff is available for free, much of which actually has no reason to be released in a hard format (old TV commercials and station IDs, for example). Archive.org is also a wonderful and surprisingly extensive source of material. And with browser addons and extensions, capturing and saving videos is easier than ever - especially on YouTube when something could disappear at any time due to copyright or account issues.

2:37 PM  
Blogger phillyrich said...

I wish you were right--but I'm sure you are wrong: young people (under 40) are incredibly ignorant about film history. And lazy.
Check dvd sales. Only a few classic sell (Wiz of Oz). Even free youtube views for classic films and scenes are minimal--often less than ten thousand worldwide (!) even for Fred Astaire.

10:37 PM  
Blogger Jim Lane said...

All excellent points, John. This is certainly a Golden Age for those of us who spent decades gallivanting all over (in my case) California every time there was a chance to see San Francisco or Meet Me in St. Louis or The Gang's All Here, eagerly grateful for whatever we got. But what's the value of gold when it's easily manufactured? I'm afraid many today don't know enough not to take this cornucopia for granted. Witness the appalling number of youngsters who flatly refuse to watch a black-and-white movie; for them, film history began the night Daddy drove them and little-Suzie-next-door down to the multiplex to see Titanic.

Charles D. Miles's memory plays him slightly false regarding that early RCA foray into home video. Its commercial name was SelectaVision, and the technology was the CED (capacitance electronic disc) system. Otherwise his recollection is right on the money, and I share his nostalgic fondness for it.

Like him, I bought my player because I couldn't afford VHS, which in those days could cost as much as a washer, dryer and refrigerator combined; 150 1980s dollars was about my limit. The picture was indeed superior to VHS. Only real drawback was that the discs had a tendency to skip, this being an actual needle-in-groove technology (each SelectaVision "caddy" contained a 12-inch vinyl disc with a wide center hole like a 45rpm record). I found that the skipping could often be alleviated by manipulating the reverse button to run through the offending spot over and over, like ironing a crease in a pair of pants.

When RCA bailed on SelectaVision in 1984, stores in my area started dumping the discs, both new and rentals, for a buck a pop, and I stockpiled quite a library, four or five hundred of them. Like Mr. Miles, I still have two players, and as far as I know they remain in perfect running order. There's no room for them (or the discs) in the house anymore, and I couldn't give them away, so they've been banished to the garage. But I still get a little nostalgic frisson at the memory of that shimmering little fanfare that accompanied "An RCA SelectaVision Videodisc Presentation" at the beginning of each disc, and I kind of miss it.

12:15 AM  
Blogger Chris H. said...

Mr. McElwee, I enjoyed reading your recent Greenbriar posts on extinct classics and home entertainment formats. I am a part of the millennial generation, and I highly appreciate classic film.

My true encounter with classic film began while attending middle school, reading Dorling-Kindersley's "Chronicle of the Cinema" (back in 2001). I still have that book, and it is still a handy reference.

During my sophomore year in High School, my family and I went to the Weinberg Center for the Performing Arts in Frederick, Maryland (formerly the Tivoli, which was owned by Warner Bros. from the late 1920s until the 1948 decree). We watched a film print of the 1942 classic, "Holiday Inn". Everyone enjoyed it.

While attending Frederick Community College (2007-2011), I took "Introduction to Film". That class turned out to be a complete joke. The instructor knew little to nothing about film. He never covered the early days of cinema, the transition from silent to sound (he never even heard of "Vitaphone"), how television affected cinema, foreign film, documentaries, etc.

At the end of that course, I was flattered that many of my friends and fellow students stated that they learned more from my expertise than the instructor! The only classic film shown was Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho".

In my last year of college, I took a course called "Film as Literature". Just like the previous course, it was disappointing (and had little to do with the subject). The films shown in that class were less than stellar (classics were never shown), and had nothing to do with literature. Overall, the sad part was that both instructors had never seen "Gone with the Wind" or "Casablanca".

Classic film (along with independently-produced features) falls on deaf ears in Frederick. The area missed out on the TCM revival screening of Casablanca in 2012, when Regal Cinemas decided that it was more important to show the re-release of James Cameron's Titanic (1997) in 3-D. Around the same time, the former Tivoli (Weinberg) decided to ignore their classic heritage by screening films from the 1980s.

Not that there's anything wrong with some features from the 1980s, but they wouldn't have been shown at the Weinberg during their general release period. Those features would have been shown at several area multiplexes (the three that we had quickly disappeared after Regal built their 16-screen eyesore in late 2002).

I still watch classic films on DVD/Blu-Ray, TCM, Public TV, and the local commercial stations' sub-channels. Antenna TV programs several Columbia oldies depending on that day’s lineup. Me-TV airs classic Universal horror features on Saturday night- presented by iconic Chicago horror host “Svengoolie” (despite having commercial breaks).

Even though in this day and age of streaming, I would rather own my own copy of a classic on DVD or Blu-Ray (even if it was a title through Warner Archive or any of the other studios' MOD services- whenever the price fits my budget).

As a student of film and television production, I think that all generations should appreciate classic cinema sometime in life. It seems like that today’s movies look the same (mostly action, horror, and superhero-related features).

Some of my old friends have appreciated the classics (whether broadcast on TCM, viewed on DVD/Blu-Ray, or through some streaming service).

10:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016