Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Saturday, October 05, 2013

Is "Tall T" For Terror, Tall, or a Tall Or Terrible Ranch?

I Would Ride The Caterpillar, Possibly The "Full Circus Size" Carousel, Skip
the Roller Coaster (safety concern), and Maybe Part Of Hellcats Of The Navy
In Favor Of The Canteen and Other Jolly Roger Kiddieland Attractions.
Note That It's Here Where They Identify The Tall T As A Ranch. 

Greenbriar's Tall T Way Of Life Enhanced by HD

T Is For Terror? Now I Am Confused.
A first exposure to Scott/Brown/Boetticher came via this, among few times a movie really transformed me at adult age (that story told here). How many pics do we know virtually by heart? (my list may well run into hundreds) I don't tire of The Tall T, and now having captured it on HD (Sony's Movie Channel) redoubles likelihood of increased revisit. Interesting how Randy smiles near constant right up to onset of crisis, then never does again for Tall T's balance. And what of the title's meaning? The ad above links it with character Tenfoorde's ranch, being his smaller-scale Rieta or Spanish Bit, I suppose. The S/B/B's were shot almost entirety outdoors --- was that cheaper in a long run? Had to have saved insofar as set construct, rock and scrub being all TT needed for backdrop. The Tall T is a western where writing amounts to chief contribution (Burt Kennedy), that hoisting the auteur theory upon a petard, as it was clearly Kennedy over Boetticher that distinguished the S/B/B's (then why don't we call them the S/B/B/K's, or better yet, the K/S/B/B's?). To think 1957 took The Tall T so utterly for granted; if we toted up titles of outstanding small pics from that year, the number would be considerable.

Willard Mims (John Hubbard) Is Yellow, Selfish, and No Good, But He Does Save Lives

Richard Boone Explains To Randy That a Western Is Only
As Good As It's Principal Heavy
A Greenbriar reader once recalled seeing The Tall T on an ozoner triple with The Lineup and Seventh Voyage Of Sinbad. What bliss ... with corndogs and sodee pop for a chaser. Westerns getting tougher by '57 allowed shotgun blasts to the face, a new level of screen violence; in this instance, it happens twice. They say actioners are measured in terms of a villain's strength, for which The Tall T stands as vivid-est example. Some call Richard Boone's performance "method," a damning with faint praise. I say if this result came of method, give us more. Randolph Scott was said to have spent breaks reading The Wall Street Journal. For him, the movies were pure business, art entering in to extent of making them saleable. Maybe we need more like him and them today. I'm beginning to rethink the despised character of Willard Mims (John Hubbard) --- after all, it's his selfish idea that preserves life for others --- without it, we'd have he/Randy/Maureen in the well, and a movie over in thirty minutes. Sometimes it's cravenest cowards that enable heroism to save the day.


Blogger John McElwee said...

Dick Dinman remembers a 1957 encounter with "The Tall T" at Jones Beach, with "Loving You" for a warm-up! ---

Hey John, I have vivid memories of the first time I saw THE TALL T which is one of my five or six all-time favorite westerns. It was summer and my mother and I took the train to Jones Beach which then necessitated a transfer to the bus that would take us directly to the beach. The bus terminal was across the street from a neighborhood Loew's theater which was playing the Presley film LOVING YOU which interested me not a whit but I happened to notice that the barely visible on the marquee second feature was THE TALL T and since I made it a point never to miss a Scott film (easy to do in N.Y.) I convinced my mother to drop me off at the theater while she continued on to the beach. I remember grudgingly tolerating the last half of LOVING YOU (and being aghast at how much Lizabeth Scott had aged) but after ten minutes of THE TALL T I knew even then that this was a very special film and it remains to this day , along with RIDE THE HIGH COUNTRY, one of my two favorite late career Scott films. I consider it a masterpiece from first frame to last. Cheers, Dick Dinman

4:51 PM  
Blogger Mark Mayerson said...

I agree with you about Burt Kennedy. When I saw Scott-Boettichers like Decision at Sundown that he didn't script, the films were a disappointment.

However, I'm also disappointed by the westerns I've seen that Kennedy directed. They also don't live up to his work with Boetticher.

Boetticher and Kennedy were good, but they were much better together.

5:47 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

I'm putting my vote in for Boetticher-Kennedy being better than Kennedy alone, but Boetticher alone has some very fine films (notably The Bullfighter and the Lady and The Killer is Loose) without Kennedy (or Scott). The fairest thing to say is that when you had a dry, spare, tough script from Kennedy, Boetticher had just the virtues of rendering it in a dry, spare, tough fashion that didn't screw it up and achieved its full cinematic potential.

The other figure here is Harry Joe Brown, who produced most of the Boetticher-Scott westerns. He too, at minimum, knew how not to screw these up, and probably played a major role-- as did Scott-- in encouraging Kennedy to write without concern for conventional commercial sentiment. (Cinesation just played a silent Ken Maynard that Brown directed, and even in 1930 it's got a tough, no-BS tone that Scott et al, wouldn't have disapproved of in the least.)

So I don't think anyone is the auteur of the Scott-Boetticher films-- I think they had a team in rare sympathy at work on them.

10:08 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016