Fan mags were generally less mirror to truth of
star living than reflection of control imposed by studios and bow-down by
editors who had to maintain supply line to "news" out of
picture-land. Print media beyond wassomething else however. They loved it when
players fell out with management. Contretemps led to loose talk and strip-away
of masks a secretive industry wore. On-suspension stars gone rogue warmed many
an ink well for sheets always on lookout for trouble in Hollywood's paradise. Warners was noteworthy
for spanking talent and locking same outside gates as punishment. Most crawled
back on employer terms for need of renewed wage. Even biggest names relied on
morphine drip of weekly checks. Stardom wealth was illusory as movies
themselves.
Bette Davis and Humphrey Bogart were brought
to heel by family obligations both had, Davis with a mother and troubled
sister, Bogart's circumstance the same. Management knew any revolt they staged
was bluff. "Loans" were a way of tightening chokehold. Sometimes itwas called an advance of salary. Either way, they owned you. One who got closer
to loosening chains was Ann Sheridan, here the subject of breathless '40 news re the
"oomph" girl's four month (so far) stand-off with Warners. Referring
to herself as "the Sheridan,"
Annie promised they'd not "starve me out." Key words, and what
probably made the studio back down, was Sheridandeclaring her five year saving of cash toward just such eventuality: "I can
sit just as tight as they can." No side is ever stronger than one that doesn't
need the money. At issue was difference between $600 Sheridan was getting and $2000 she wanted. Warring
factions got together, but was middle ground tilted her way or theirs? If asked
two decades later, I'll bet Sheridan
would have remembered to the penny.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home