Nature was mostly served raw before Walt Disney
made it a profit center with his True-Life documentaries. In fact, WD took the
onus of education off nature shorts (later features) by making each
irresistibly entertaining. Most called them breathtaking for keyhole
view of private animal life. It was for Disney to make informative content pay,
luring admission for what schools had been force-feeding. Yes, there had been
"nature" subjects before, most aimed at exploiting wildlife for shock
or sensation. What were folks going to movies for, after all? It didn't occur
to most that straight recount of creature habits might engage. Exploration
themes had clicked, like Chang,Byrd at the Pole, and others such, but
four-footed friends cycling at life was beyond what even Hollywood-trained
magicians of the camera could capture, that is, until Disney got his
revolutionary idea and commissioned outsiders to execute it.
First off, he'd shun the human element. Nix on
native women hauled off by gorillas, or Killers Of The Sea making meals of
frogmen. Walt wanted animals to speak for themselves, so put stringers in
far-flung fields to document habits ... survival, mating, feeding, and
otherwise ... from which best of the best, as in millions of feet perused,
would be shaved tohalf-hour or so length. Camera/nature bugs Alfred and Elma
Milotte shot miles of footage on Alaska
(frozen) soil using 16mm Kodachrome, SealIsland the boiled-down
result of effort that took a year. Disney sunk "some $75,000" (Variety)
into the finished 27 minutes, from which he refused to cut an inch despite RKO
entreaty that his long short was, for booking purposes, neither fish
nor fowl, completion-date of 1948 being also one that favored double-features,
as in features, not hybrids.
Disney had qualified SealIsland
for Academy consideration by getting a late '48 LA date and thus sealing bid
for a Best Short Subject Oscar. That came off with the expected win, and though
RKO still sought cuts, they'd give in to Walt's determination that there would
be none. Migration of seals was to venues summer-booking a Disney reissued pair, Dumbo and Saludos,Amigos, the program "designed to lure
vacationing moppets intotheatres," said Variety. SealIsland was a hit to modest
extent that any three-reeler could be, but confidence was such that Disney
announced it as first of a series of True-Lifes, their next, The Amazing
Beaver, already in progress on northern Idaho
location. Speculation was that Walt was really doing these things for
television, being that Seal's 27 minutes was ideal for a half-hour
programming slot. Disney had, after all, intimated willingness to embrace the
tube. Meanwhile, SealIsland was racking up
further awards and making Walt a friend to school teachers nationwide.
As to brilliance at marketing, 1950 was where
Disney's outfit really came into its own after a years-long slump. Cinderella
was out of the gate for an animated feature comeback, and an all-live actioner,
Treasure Island, cooked with frozen funds thawed in England, was ready for summer release. Walt sent invites to camera hobbyists for sneak
glimpse of his next True-Life, now named BeaverValley.
This wasby small way of how Disney smartly made outreach to patron
corners his competition ignored. Amateur photographers were no inconsequential
niche, but a force thousands-strong and connected by lines of communication
strong enough to swell lines for whatever Disney produced that interested
membership (The Amateur Cinema League, Inc. had a monthly magazine that Walt
Disney followed). These camera buffs raved over True-Life, calling WD a
visionary for putting nature photography front/center for mass appeal, and
giving reps of the amateur army, Alfred and Elma Milottes, opportunity to see
their work displayed before millions.
A biggest so-far pay-off came with BeaverValley.
WD sales force had formulated an "All Disney" program policy that
would serve variety to all ages, a three-pronged approach with BeaverValley
and a fresh cartoon served as appetizers to the main course that was Treasure Island. Ads cried, Don't Send The Kids --- Bring
Them! Thus was born truest concept of Disney as "Real Family
Entertainment." BeaverValley got the expected
raves, Variety calling it a "wonderment," and "one of the novel
film highlights of the year." Heads-in-sand RKO still had doubt of BeaverValley
pulling weight as a so-called second feature, and tried pairing it with mis-mates
Joan Of Arc, Our Very Own, and others off the company's release chart. Best
results, however, were obtained with the pure Disney mix, although BeaverValley
also sat well in offbeat berths like Cleveland's
Tele-News, a 500 seat newsreel housethat used Disney beavers to buttress
bulletins off baseball fields and out of Korea.
An incidental boost for BeaverValley,
but a meaningful one, was the hit Christmas song, since a standard, that
emerged from Paul J. Smith's lively score for the nature short. Variety had
lauded Smith for the "brilliant undertaking" that
"materially" enhanced BeaverValley, and indeed, it's
hard imagining the True-Lifes without his accompany. One segment, "The
Frog Symphony," was noted in particular, and from that came lyrics and
further arrangement by Don Raye, whose idea it was to lay Christmas wreath upon
nature's canvas. Result was Jing-a-Ling, Jing-a-Ling, which was promptly issued
as sheet music, and recorded by the Andrews Sisters, Tommy Tucker and his
Orchestra, many others (this You Tube linkshould ring a bell).
The ongoing success that was True-Life
Adventures would enhance Disney programs ahead, and in fact, came to at least
partial rescue of occasional clucks like 1951's Alice
In Wonderland, the next feature to get a True-Life infusion in theatres
(Nature's Half-Acre). When the whole show was good, as withPeter Panin 1953,
the animal acts were like icing on a rich cake, Bear Country a bonus that made grown-ups
glad they'd taken Junior to the cartoon. True-Lifes would graduate to
feature-length in 10/53 with The Living Desert, and incidentally become
mainstays of the Disney non-theatrical market, 16mm prints renting from a 1954
launch to eager schools and elsewhere that paid $10 for a day's use of Seal
Island, Beaver Valley, and others from the shorts list. Price would triple by
late-70's juncture, the True-Lifes becoming evergreen as backgrounds they
celebrated. All are gathered since as four DVD sets from Disney, and highly
recommended.
Once again, Disney was way ahead of the curve seeing entertainment and commercial potential where the rest of the industry saw nothing. And, once again, this was all possible because of the technical brilliance of resident genius Ub Iwerks! The liquid gate optical printer he devised, built by co-worker Bob Otto, made scratchy 16mm field footage suitable for 35mm release... a big factor in the True-Life success story. You can see the original contraption on display today at the Disney Family Museum in San Francisco.
Donald Benson discusses strategy as practiced by the Disney company during the 40's and since:
Some late-night amateur speculation:
With the exception of "Fantasia," Disney's animated features tended to run pretty short . . . B-movie length. I'm guessing Disney or somebody in his employ realized they needed something to extend the program to a moneysworth's playing time. And since putting extra cartoons in front of an animated feature was overkill, that created a need for a suitably prestigious and family-friendly live-action short.
Problem was, such shorts were going the way of the one-hour B feature. On top of that, Walt probably bristled at the idea of his latest and greatest effort sharing billing with another studio's program filler -- the indignity of RKO double feature pairings was bad enough. Thus Disney found himself in need of quality live action shorts just as Hollywood was abandoning the form. And for quality assurance, branding and profit, Disney needed to make them.
So Disney -- again -- went into a business nobody else saw money in and reinvented it.
That extra reel made "Seal Island" too long to wedge into a typical double feature -- were ANY non-cartoons short enough to fit? -- but about right as a side dish to an animated Disney feature ("Dumbo" and "Saludos Amigos" combined clock in at less than two hours). And while it may have been pricy as a short, as a component of a larger Disney program (and as a non-dating asset) it was a bargain.
As you write, this solidified the all-Disney program as the concept expanded to include live-action features. Disney's short subject schedule likewise expanded to include the People and Places series (which seems to be locked away somewhere), select episodes of the Disneyland TV show (broadcast in B&W, but shot in color), and freestanding excepts from the package films.
Disney also produced a series of animated specials, even while winding down production of the traditional one-reel cartoons. These tended to run at least slightly longer than the Mickeys and Donalds, and ranged from one-joke oddities to the three "Winnie the Pooh" adaptations, which reversed the usual course by being repackaged as a single feature-length film.
Dan Mercer contemplates Disney's Tru-Life Adventures:
The technical brilliance of the Disney organization was especially evident in the beautiful color photography of the "True Life Adventures," which set them apart from all other nature films until that time.
The key was combining lightweight 16 mm cameras and long lenses, which could bring back images shot in the field, with Kodachrome film stock, which conveyed those images in deep, natural color. Kodachrome was a 16 mm process unsuitable for commercial prints, but as Dave K noted, here the genius of Ub Iwerks was displayed.What Iwarks was exploiting was the availability of Technicolor's single strip Monopak system for 35 mm cinematography. By enlarging the 16 mm images with his liquid gate optical printer, he was bridging the gulf between what could be done in the field and what could be released to the theaters.
Like Kodachrome, Technicolor Monopak was a single strip reversal film. This was not a coincidence, as Monopak was based upon Kodachrome Commercial, but it meant that the Kodacrhome could be developed in the same fashion as Monopak. After developing, the 16 mm image was enlarged in the optical printer and transferred to the same 35 mm black and white separation negatives used in the Monopak system. Matrices were then made from the 35 mm negatives in the same manner and used to generate the release prints.
Monopak was grainier than three-strip Technicolor, and the images of the "True Life Adventures" were grainier still, since they had been enlarged from 16 mm. This was especially noticeable in the entries which had animated introductions. Given the pleasing depth of the color, however, it is not all that objectionable.
If a criticism could be made of the series, it was that they were structured to tell little stories, as though beaver and seal were not so different from the rodents familiar to fans of Disney cartoons, with their struggles and triumphs. This meant that the "True Life Adventures" had a point of view and a very human one at that. It is a key to the popularity they enjoyed in their time, though their value in documenting a world which even then was fast disappearing ought not to be dismissed simply for that.
Donald Benson responds to Dan Mercer's comments on the True-Life Adventures:
The early True Life films could and would treat their subjects as characters, most infamously with the square-dancing scorpions (another bit of optical printer magic). But perhaps in response to critics, the films did become much more scrupulous as they went on. There was still occasional trickery to get some shots, but the story told was increasingly true to life.
By the time Disney was making True Life features like "The African Lion", most critics of the earlier films were won over. The early reputation lingered, probably because the earliest films kept on playing, not just in classrooms but on the TV show as well.
Donald Benson adds a footnote to the True-Life discussion:
Snopes has the essentials right -- The lemming migration in "White Wilderness" is staged, and the extras on the DVD actually explain how.
What Snopes misses is that the actual narration on the film explicitly dismisses the suicide theory, suggesting the lemmings think they've come to another crossable body of water.
7 Comments:
Once again, Disney was way ahead of the curve seeing entertainment and commercial potential where the rest of the industry saw nothing. And, once again, this was all possible because of the technical brilliance of resident genius Ub Iwerks! The liquid gate optical printer he devised, built by co-worker Bob Otto, made scratchy 16mm field footage suitable for 35mm release... a big factor in the True-Life success story. You can see the original contraption on display today at the Disney Family Museum in San Francisco.
"Nature In The Raw" -- that's the only time I've seen that slogan used in anything other than a low-rent '50s exploitation picture.
And that "Killers of the Sea" bally about hand to hand battles... with turtles? That's kind of an unfair fight if you ask me.
Donald Benson discusses strategy as practiced by the Disney company during the 40's and since:
Some late-night amateur speculation:
With the exception of "Fantasia," Disney's animated features tended to run pretty short . . . B-movie length. I'm guessing Disney or somebody in his employ realized they needed something to extend the program to a moneysworth's playing time. And since putting extra cartoons in front of an animated feature was overkill, that created a need for a suitably prestigious and family-friendly live-action short.
Problem was, such shorts were going the way of the one-hour B feature. On top of that, Walt probably bristled at the idea of his latest and greatest effort sharing billing with another studio's program filler -- the indignity of RKO double feature pairings was bad enough. Thus Disney found himself in need of quality live action shorts just as Hollywood was abandoning the form. And for quality assurance, branding and profit, Disney needed to make them.
So Disney -- again -- went into a business nobody else saw money in and reinvented it.
That extra reel made "Seal Island" too long to wedge into a typical double feature -- were ANY non-cartoons short enough to fit? -- but about right as a side dish to an animated Disney feature ("Dumbo" and "Saludos Amigos" combined clock in at less than two hours). And while it may have been pricy as a short, as a component of a larger Disney program (and as a non-dating asset) it was a bargain.
As you write, this solidified the all-Disney program as the concept expanded to include live-action features. Disney's short subject schedule likewise expanded to include the People and Places series (which seems to be locked away somewhere), select episodes of the Disneyland TV show (broadcast in B&W, but shot in color), and freestanding excepts from the package films.
Disney also produced a series of animated specials, even while winding down production of the traditional one-reel cartoons. These tended to run at least slightly longer than the Mickeys and Donalds, and ranged from one-joke oddities to the three "Winnie the Pooh" adaptations, which reversed the usual course by being repackaged as a single feature-length film.
Dan Mercer contemplates Disney's Tru-Life Adventures:
The technical brilliance of the Disney organization was especially evident in the beautiful color photography of the "True Life Adventures," which set them apart from all other nature films until that time.
The key was combining lightweight 16 mm cameras and long lenses, which could bring back images shot in the field, with Kodachrome film stock, which conveyed those images in deep, natural color. Kodachrome was a 16 mm process unsuitable for commercial prints, but as Dave K noted, here the genius of Ub Iwerks was displayed.What Iwarks was exploiting was the availability of Technicolor's single strip Monopak system for 35 mm cinematography. By enlarging the 16 mm images with his liquid gate optical printer, he was bridging the gulf between what could be done in the field and what could be released to the theaters.
Like Kodachrome, Technicolor Monopak was a single strip reversal film. This was not a coincidence, as Monopak was based upon Kodachrome Commercial, but it meant that the Kodacrhome could be developed in the same fashion as Monopak. After developing, the 16 mm image was enlarged in the optical printer and transferred to the same 35 mm black and white separation negatives used in the Monopak system. Matrices were then made from the 35 mm negatives in the same manner and used to generate the release prints.
Monopak was grainier than three-strip Technicolor, and the images of the "True Life Adventures" were grainier still, since they had been enlarged from 16 mm. This was especially noticeable in the entries which had animated introductions. Given the pleasing depth of the color, however, it is not all that objectionable.
If a criticism could be made of the series, it was that they were structured to tell little stories, as though beaver and seal were not so different from the rodents familiar to fans of Disney cartoons, with their struggles and triumphs. This meant that the "True Life Adventures" had a point of view and a very human one at that. It is a key to the popularity they enjoyed in their time, though their value in documenting a world which even then was fast disappearing ought not to be dismissed simply for that.
Daniel
Donald Benson responds to Dan Mercer's comments on the True-Life Adventures:
The early True Life films could and would treat their subjects as characters, most infamously with the square-dancing scorpions (another bit of optical printer magic). But perhaps in response to critics, the films did become much more scrupulous as they went on. There was still occasional trickery to get some shots, but the story told was increasingly true to life.
By the time Disney was making True Life features like "The African Lion", most critics of the earlier films were won over. The early reputation lingered, probably because the earliest films kept on playing, not just in classrooms but on the TV show as well.
One of the "True-Life" films unfortunately featured a bit of faking to depict lemmings committing mass suicide, something they never actually do:
http://snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.asp
Donald Benson adds a footnote to the True-Life discussion:
Snopes has the essentials right -- The lemming migration in "White Wilderness" is staged, and the extras on the DVD actually explain how.
What Snopes misses is that the actual narration on the film explicitly dismisses the suicide theory, suggesting the lemmings think they've come to another crossable body of water.
Post a Comment
<< Home