Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Monday, December 02, 2013

Kicking Them When They're Down

1934's Skewed Notion of Wash-Outs and Has-Beens

Then-and-now of past stars engaged a public more as movies themselves went into a next generation. What had become of favorites eased off talking screens? Loyal enough fan following watched for updates and would save what scraps were served. That's how I came upon these 1934 newspaper features from an album long ago and lovingly kept as salute not only to fresh stars, but those for whom parades had passed. A forward-charging industry was quick to dismiss those it once celebrated, but outlying folk did not forget. They felt sacred bond to favorites Hollywood and an insensitive press put to pasture. If print outlets bothered with old faces at all, it was too often to note how far they'd fallen. The at top child star update sheds cold tears upon Baby Peggy "who can't get a job at 17." So long as we're separating winners and losers over a very long haul, I'd say Peggy was the biggest victor of all for surviving a spectacular longest, and continuing well into this century to represent an era of which virtually all other membership has passed (age ninety-five and going strong). Best evidence of her accomplishments can be had via Milestone's first-rate DVD dedicated to the child star of silents, which includes a fascinating documentary in addition to several of Baby Peggy's shorts-features.

Excavator scribes played rougher with grown-ups. When the Sun Goes Down in Hollywood, It Usually Stays There goes the headline at above left. Ouch! No wonder stars struggled so to stay on top ... but were these appraisals fair, or even accurate? History to come would put the lie to a lot of them. Bessie Love was called "a discard at 36," which may have come as shock in hindsight to a woman who'd work on stage and screen until her death in 1986. Colleen Moore was "all but forgotten by the cinema fans at 32," but wait, didn't she appear in two 1934 releases, the year this knock was published, with one of them a starring part? (Social Register and Success At Any Price). Anyway, Colleen had made her pile and married rich in the bargain. Emil Jannings was said to have gotten the hook because he couldn't master English, which I assume to be more or less true, but a "curtain" dropped upon his career was premature in light of numerous German talkers he'd do.

My favorite is Francis X. Bushman, as in "the talkies do without him." Fact is, they'd serve him well, as would  stage and television, right to the end. I recognized the mighty X at age twelve whilst watching an episode of Batman, and liked him besides in Sabrina on NBC's Saturday Night At The Movies, plus Ghost In The Invisible Bikini at the Liberty. That's how talkies did without FxB. A video of the 1960 Hollywood Christmas Parade is at Jerry Mathers' website and is fantastic for glimpse of then-luminaries in open cars, waving at fans. There's Gene Autry, Anne Francis, Bozo The Clown, countless others (the video runs twenty-three minutes) --- and then comes Francis X. Bushman, sat up with his wife on throne-like back seat of a convertible as well-known host of a Los Angeles televised movie show. God Bless Hollywood, says Bushman to an on-the-spot interviewer, the Grand Old Man having outlived all those who tried putting skids under him.


Blogger Kevin K. said...

Boy, even by Hollywood standards, those captions are cruel -- and whoever wrote them seemed to genuinely enjoy it.

Count me in as another TV viewer who remembers F.X. Bushman on "Batman." Even at that age, I was aware he was a silent movie actor, and was mightily impressed he was still acting.

4:12 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Donald Benson talks about Whatever Happened To ... some classic comedians:

Popular culture seems especially fond of tragic ends for comedians, although some of the poster boys were less tragic than legend:

-- Fatty Arbuckle was washed up onscreen, but I understand he was solvent and socially accepted (quietly) in Hollywood.

-- Harry Langdon wasn't rich (his son recalls his mother went to work after Harry's death), but kept working and lived comfortably.

-- Stan Laurel was likewise comfortable in official retirement. The normally cheery Stan was furious when a European news story had him living in poverty, triggering anxious inquiries from friends and a delegation delivering the results of charitable collection.

-- Keaton is remembered for sadly pratfalling through beach movies and early TV shows; but he was happily married, got a nice home out of forgettable biopic, and worked by choice. In "Buster Keaton Rides Again", his wife notes with some annoyance that he declares himself retired, then gets upset when there's not a part being offered.

If you've seen "The Comic," note how it lays most of the tragic clown cliches over something that looks like a grimmed-up version of Keaton's life (Dick Van Dyke's old man makeup and growly voice are almost explicitly Keaton). My suspicion is that Van Dyke and Carl Reiner, both friends and fans of Stan Laurel, wanted to distance their anti-hero as far as possible from their idol (even though they recreate several of Laurel's gags).

4:44 PM  
Blogger radiotelefonia said...

One of Francis X. Bushman silents have resurfaced a few months ago. My friend Andrea Cuarterolo located in Italy THE CHARGE OF THE GAUCHOS (UNA NUEVA Y GLORIOSA NACION). Fernando Martín Peña managed to see it at the Pordenone film festival and reported that, unlike the successful film that it was in Argentina (the version is the international edition, with less scenes), he found it to be a B production. I haven't seen it yet, and while it is not the great film we wanted to be, many people like me are still eager to be able to finally see it. Bushman, in the lead, is fine.

4:57 PM  
Blogger Jim Lane said...

I'm with Kevin K. -- the most depressing thing about that "When the Sun Goes Down in Hollywood" piece is the cruel relish the writer takes in recounting the various "downfalls". I couldn't help noticing, however, how cravenly he or she toadies to Wallace Beery. Given that Beery was by all accounts just about the most horrible person who ever basked in the California sun, and allegedly not above beating you to death if he got drunk enough, I'd say that writer was your typical bully -- happy to kick you when you can't hurt him/her, but a cringing coward otherwise.

1:43 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017