Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Tuesday, March 11, 2014

There's Vampires In The House!


Bela Back at Bloodsucking in Mark Of The Vampire (1935)

A thing I found fascinating in Famous Monsters day was Carroll Borland (vampiress attired) turning out with Forrest Ackerman at shop center monster meets, Tor Johnson also in sometimes appearance. Borland showed up too at the LA 1965 premiere for Tomb Of Ligeia. Had any player traded on so small a part from such an obscure movie? Mark Of The Vampire was, at least for me, impossible to see during Shock Theatre days, being pre-48 Metro and thus not in packages NC stations bought. I was years brooding over stills run in FM and similar mags, these making Mark look a best ever of screen vampiring. A 16mm print at a Charlotte cowboy con turned out to be original from MGM storage, the dealer tagging it at $135, maybe because it didn't feature Buck or Hoot, a steal that would have justified my walking ninety miles to the Queen City for such treasure. Came the letdown with a first view so long anticipated, though Mark Of The Vampire has somehow since become one of my favorite 30's horrors, the 16mm, then a DVD, and now HD stream, having passed its single hour (yes, a mere 60 minute run time) two-three times per many annums since early 80's acquisition from Charlotte's under-pricing film wrangler.


Everything on a surface appears to blight Mark Of The Vampire: woeful and much comic relief, that the province of Donald Meek and a screeching maid, plus you could argue Lionel Barrymore as playing less than straight his Van Helsing variant. MGM's treatment of the supernatural as purest nonsense means a rug yanked from under trusting patronage when the vampires turn out to be fakes, 59 minutes a mere charade to extract a confession from otherwise unlikely killer Jean Hersholt. The cheat bothered me for years; now I'm almost charmed by it. Metro seems to do everything it can to undercut chills, so why construct creepiest sets imaginable to house what turn out to be ersatz bloodsuckers?



The look and atmosphere of this show was what patronage remembered, and took to troubled sleep. Photographing James Wong Howe should maybe take most credit here, plus whoever in Cedric Gibbons' department worked out the sets. There has been revisionist thought as to Todd Browning's contribution, survivor interviews suggesting he was no creative powerhouse and still in a Metro doghouse for the Freaks disaster of a few years earlier. Is ongoing lionization of Browning more a matter of monster boomer's wishful thinking? Then there is Lugosi, resplendent in Dracula-wear and prettified by a bullet hole to the left temple (how he came by that a plot element no one could hope to get past censors). BL has no dialogue save humor lines at a finish, but wow, those close-ups. Bela actually had more to say in Mark Of The Vampire's theatrical trailer, a classic in itself and thankfully included on the DVD.

3 Comments:

Blogger Dave K said...

The trick shot of Borland flying in, flapping her wings still startles. First saw this one when it was part of the early 70's theatrical triple feature re-issue along with MASK OF FU MANCH and the F. march DR. JECKYL.

9:01 AM  
Blogger MDG14450 said...

Unlike you, I can't get past the resolution of the story, no matter how gorgeous the thing looks (and it does).

Along with Devil Doll, it just puts the nail in the coffin (yes, intended) of championing Browning, at least after sound is added to the mix. Weak, if not stupid, stories coupled with a tendency to play it safe.

I'm perfectly willing to give credit to Karl Freund for the first third of Dracula and the cast for the rest. As for Freaks, the story and cast carried it.

MGM seemed to want to hold horror at arm's length. I don't know how Mad Love got through, but I can't think of any other films they put out that came near that movie's level of ickiness. (Maybe Fleming's Jekyll and Hyde, though disguised in a lot of freudian dreamery.)

I'ts always ironic for me to see the MGM logo at the beginning of videos like Zombies or Mara Tau these days.

12:59 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Like you I salivated over the stills from this film in FAMOUS MONSTERS OF FILMLAND and other publications. Like you I was severely let down when I first saw the film (how many watched the Italian version of MARK OF THE VAMPIRE thinking it was this one as that is how it was listed in the TV guide). Like you I have come to appreciate this film more as time goes by. One look at those ads with Bela Lugosi's name given first tier lets us know what the real draw of this film was). I will bet patrons on the day walked out similarly bummered out. As this film is a re-make of the Lon Chaney silent LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT we know without seeing it that that film too once it is (hopefully) unearthed will be a big let down. The vampire scenes in this film have never been done better. While we are on vampires I was lucky enough, after reading DVDBeaver, to track down one of the limited edition 1200 club pressings of Roger Vadim's BLOOD AND ROSES (1960) a film I have admired for years. It was terrible seeing it in the full screen el cheapo vhs Paramount produced. Last year I tracked down an uncut copy of the European version on the web. It was from a vhs with high contrasty colors that fell way short of the mark (of the vampire) but, WOW, what a film. Now I have it almost perfect. They forgot to have the roses turn to black at the vampire's touch. Extremely close but still no cigar.

1:14 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016