Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Ads That Sold Sizzle and Steak


Illicit Precode As Fresh Fruit For 1931

I always figured exhibitors were creative participants in movies because it was them that applied punctuation to what Hollywood produced. No film was really finished till showmen got hold of it. They'd look at a pressbook, trailer, synopsis, or trade ad, and right away know what aspect might sell. A single ad done right could boil a convoluted story to its essence. Scholars have spent book lengths trying to define precode, the job having been done for them long ago by original merchants of the form. What west coast producers shipped each week was less finished product than rawest clay to be molded by east coast personnel, with finishing touch applied by theatre management where all bucks stopped. He/she would size up ad accessories and decide if same could be applied to needs of his/her community. Local desks where promotion got prepared was where rubber met the road insofar as keeping lights lit and staff paid.
 
 
Illicit was mother's milk to aggressive selling. Consider first the title --- one word and quick to the point, a natural for marquees needing what space there was to boost support attractions (Illicit plus Mickey Mouse!). The old Embassy Theatre in San Francisco, lately renamed the Warner Bros., had been swallowed by earthquake during construction (1906), then rose from ash to be named, renamed several times during interim. Warners used the site to showcase Vitaphone (as above with Disreali in 1929), then bought the 1,387 seats outright. Illicit would "World Premiere" on 1/9/31 at a dollar per ticket, Jack Warner, Barbara Stanwyck, and Mervyn LeRoy personally appearing. Babs was billed as "San Francisco's Own Daughter," but cursory research says she was Brooklyn-born. Suppose anyone challenged the boast?
 
 
Illicit isn't really much of a movie, precode or otherwise, being  stiff in joints thanks to talk and pace still on wobbly feet. There hadn't been a lot of lively WB work out of 1930 gates (a few like The Dawn Patrol being notable exception), but the following year showed big strides. What's good about Illicit is forthrightness of modern girl philosophy as expressed by Barbara Stanwyck. She spends whole of a first reel explaining to dullard live-in James Rennie why they should not be married, speech given from horizontal clinch on a divan. He's tired of "pussyfooting" and shun of standards, ... but I Love Pussyfooting! says she, an excerpt that would decorate a number of docus about precode. These ads from first and holdover weeks at the Warner Bros. cull all of what's hot-cha from Illicit ("If I, the woman, do not ask for marriage ... why should you, the man?"). To it's credit, Illicit does deliver on promise of taglines, if doing so at relax pace. Warner Archive offers a DVD, and Illicit streams in HD at Warner Instant.

5 Comments:

Blogger Jeanette Minor said...

I used to attend shows at that theatre in the 70's and 80's. By then it was a dingy grindhouse. Three movies, second and third run for $2.00. It was finally torn down in 1989.

5:32 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

Man, if some theatre put up that Vitaphone sign today, whether it showed old movies or not, I'd go every week.

8:53 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer considers how "Illicit" and its kin led to strengthening of the Production Code:


The ad campaign for "Illicit" pretty well summarizes why the Prodcution Code was given effect. The woman of the piece is no longer the guardian of marriage and home, but a shill for free love. Consider the "She Dared!" ad, where a "tiny voice," presumably of her conscience, tells her that "if she didn't take her love when she found it...openly and thankfully...she could never take it at all." Any cad in the movies had more or less the same operating philosophy. Everyone else is doing it, too, the ad said, "And who are we to say they are wrong?" Well, certainly none of the Warner brothers would raise a question about it. And probably few people would today. Besides, the mouthpiece is no mere actress but "Miss Barbara Stanwyck," the honorific suggesting the class she brought to the presentation.

It's no wonder, though, that the Roman Catholic Church regarded this and other such offerings as direct assaults on sexual morality and the family, or why Cardinal Dougherty of Philadelphia threatened a boycott of all Warner Bros. theaters in the city. Harry Warner added up the potential losses and began weeping copious tears, or so it was said. And since Cardinal Dougherty was also campaigning for government oversight of the movies, Warner also got the other members of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America to face facts and put some teeth into the Production Code. Will Hays remained head of the MPPDA, but as a functionary. Joseph Breen, the publicity man for the organization, was given the job of reviewing and censoring films. Breen was a Roman Catholic himself and popular with the Church hierarchy. He was an anti-semite as well, but no matter. The important thing was getting the Catholics off their backs and getting the product out.

9:32 AM  
Blogger Robert Fiore said...

It's on Turner Classic Movies on August 5th.

10:29 PM  
Blogger rnigma said...

Interesting, the posh billing of "Miss Barbara Stanwyck." The only other place I've seen her so billed was on "The Big Valley."

5:08 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014