Scott Of The Antarctic (1948) Freezes Up At US Boxoffices
A shoot-the-works Ealing production, their most
expensive to date (negative cost $1.2 million), about the doomed Scott
expedition to the South Pole. Average time shooting a feature at Ealing (and
other Rank studios) was tenweeks. Scott Of The Antarctic took nineteen. It
didn't do well as hoped, at home or here. There are DVD's available, Amazon
reviews all over a map as to quality. Mine was a Region Two boxed with others
from Ealing, and looks fine. Had no idea how controversial Robert Scott remains
in exploration circles. Painted as a national hero since death, some since have
branded him a fraud and incompetent that led his party to avoidable disaster.
These claim too that Scott Of The Antarctic was a whitewash, Scott's widow as
assist foreclosing chance for an honest treatment. I didn't read Scott at all
that way. John Mills plays him as determined and in manyways admirable, but
judgment errors are made from a start, accumulation leading to failure and
demise for the crew. Missteps he makes are subtly indicated, Scott/Mills
dismissing advise to use dogs for all of pulling instead of primitive tractors and ponies that couldn't sustain coldest temperatures.
What may have doomed Scott Of The Antarctic was
publicawareness of how the title character's venture ended --- that history
could not be changed. Success of any mission that movies depict is a given. Why
sit two hours to see them fail? Answer was to ennoble the team by emphasis on
sacrifice that enabled others to conquer the Pole. To loss of Scott and his men
was added a midway stinger of someone else having reached the Pole first, a
rival expedition led by a Norwegian. Scott Of The Antarctic had to be told in
terms of victory rising out of defeat, and if that worked, Ealing would have a
click. Hardship onscreen was matched to degree by ordeal a cast/crew endured,
icy exteriors found in Switzerland
at 11,300 feet above sea level, then move to Norway
to capture backgrounds close-in-look to real thing captured in Antarctica by a second unit said by Ealing to havespent
six months gathering footage.
Ealing was a satellite in J. Arthur Rank's
orbit, his benign oversee granting a degree of autonomy for artists who'd not
enjoy such leeway from other big companies. And Rank was England's
filmic leader, from his far-flung and busy shooting facilities to cinema circuit
ownership (Odeon and Gaumont) that insured bookings for all of output. What
Rank wanted was entree to lucrative US markets, his sizeable interest
in Universal-International a pry to stateside theatres resistant to imports.
Mutual back-scratch saw Universal distributing select Rank features for
domestic play, while Rank would make room for Uni product on Brit screens he
controlled. Problem was sheer quantity of pics Rank produced; Universal
couldn't release them all. Choice of his best was theirs, and so 1949 would see
the following get a U-I berth: Christopher Columbus, in Technicolor withFredric March, The Blue Lagoon, also color, and Nevermore, aka The Passionate
Friends, a David Lean romance with Ann Todd, Trevor Howard, and Claude Rains.
Others of Rank origin went to Eagle-Lion
Classics, another entity where the UK producer had investment. Theirs
for the '49 season would include Saraband and BlancheFury, both with casts
obscure to Yank viewership, but enhanced by Technicolor. Between Universal and
Eagle-Lion, there would be 24 Rank features US distributed for the 1948-49
season (up from 20 in 1947). J. Arthur Rank had learned that prolific output as his would
need more than one stateside handler, and so built these relationships to insure
exposure for promising product. Scott Of The Antarctic as
Rank/Ealing's most ambitious venture to date would seem to guarantee placement
on U-I's release schedule, but arrangement had been made in 3-48 for Eagle-Lion
to distribute. Trade talk fromoverseas indicated wan US prospects, Variety's man at the
Royal Command performance wiring home that Scott's "appeal will be
restricted to audiences interested in a chapter of British history," the
film not falling into "top category" for boxoffice success. Upshot
was their celebrated hero not being our own. Besides, we had homegrown Admiral
Richard Byrd to teach Yank youth in terms of success --- he flew over both
Poles and lived to tell about it.
And so Scott Of TheAntarctic went with
Eagle-Lion, meaning spottier and harder-earned dates. They could make waves
with something really exceptional like The Red Shoes, but had a hill, or rather a
glacier, to climb with Scott. Variety didn't help with a 5-26-49 stateside review, bespeaking
"doubtful" prospects. "It won't attract run-of-the-mill
theatregoers and will take all of the E-L ballyhoo talent to enable it to meet
expenses," damning words to imply that loss was a fait accompli.
US release was announced for April 1949, with a Washington benefit premiere to be attended
by Mrs. Truman. Also to this fete came MGM's Nicholas Schenck and Paramount's Barney
Balaban, "helping Anglo-American film relation by lending their names and
themselves ..." said Variety's "Washington Hullabaloo" column on
4/20/49. This followed a benefit preview in Miami
(2/9/49) to aid "British needy children," and a "special"
showing at theMuseum
Of Modern Art the
following month.
Eagle-Lion seemed to be positioning Scott as
most prestigious of their current line, but that wouldn't translate to
boxoffice, despite promise of"The Noblest Adventure Man Ever Dared"
(itself problematic for US viewers with faint interest in "noble" adventurers). Ads
with heading of "Had We Lived ..." tipped off the downer finish, word-of-mouth doing the rest. Scott Of The Antarctic ended up doing some of
poorest business recorded by any Brit/Euro offering for 1949. Los Angeles' Four Star Theatre, a haven for
arties, saw a miserable five days, Scott yanked before completing its week with
receipts at $900.00. A reissue of ten-year-old Pygmalion had preceded and done
$4,400 a first week, $2,700 the second. Replacing Scott was a duo of more
oldies, The Seventh Veil andGreat Expectations, which earned $2,500. It was as
if the public specifically did not want to see Scott Of The Antarctic. Philadelphia's experience was much the same, Scott doing
half the $5,000 that Brit predecessor The Small Back Room earned for the 500-seat
Trans-Lux, while failing to match Italy's Bitter Rice, which snagged
$3,000 in its 24th week. Scott Of The Antarctic froze at ticket windows sure as
members of that doomed expedition. Maybe it was a story better told in
documentary rather than dramatic terms. A public then as now was reluctant to
invest emotion in two hours they knew would end disastrously. Jack Cardiff,
principal cameraman for the film, might have been on to something when he said:
"It was so faithfully portrayed that it was almost unbearable to
watch."
Interesting post on the attempt to make this film a success in the USA. I'm prejudiced because I've read about the competing explorers to be the first at the South Pole. Norway's Roald Amundsen being much better prepared than Scott.
Donald Benson ponders the Scott expedition as basis for British comedy:
Early on, Monty Python had a sketch about a Scott remake being shot at a British seaside resort by a drunken director. The cast includes a bikini-clad Mrs. Scott, who walks in a trench while standing on boxes; the locale is changed to the Sahara when it's realized that would remove the need to cover all the sand with white sheets; and the (American?) producer insists on a lion fight, a giant laser-shooting penguin and carnivorous furniture.
Here we often reference Custer's Last Stand in comedy; did the British have a similar attitude towards Scott and/or the movie or would this have been risky satire?
5 Comments:
And yet "Titanic" was the biggest movie of all time. Must have been the bogus love story.
Maybe I'm getting old, but I can't watch any of these doomed-adventure movies. I don't get what the entertainment value is supposed to be.
Interesting post on the attempt to make this film a success in the USA. I'm prejudiced because I've read about the competing explorers to be the first at the South Pole. Norway's Roald Amundsen being much better prepared than Scott.
The Ralph Vaughn Williams score is one of the greatest ever. He took some themes from his score for his seventh symphony, Sinfonia Antartica.
Donald Benson ponders the Scott expedition as basis for British comedy:
Early on, Monty Python had a sketch about a Scott remake being shot at a British seaside resort by a drunken director. The cast includes a bikini-clad Mrs. Scott, who walks in a trench while standing on boxes; the locale is changed to the Sahara when it's realized that would remove the need to cover all the sand with white sheets; and the (American?) producer insists on a lion fight, a giant laser-shooting penguin and carnivorous furniture.
Here we often reference Custer's Last Stand in comedy; did the British have a similar attitude towards Scott and/or the movie or would this have been risky satire?
"And yet "Titanic" was the biggest movie of all time. Must have been the bogus love story."
By dollars earned, maybe. By tickets sold, it's number five, behind GONE WITH THE WIND, STAR WARS, THE SOUND OF MUSIC, and ET.
Post a Comment
<< Home