A Thriller Hit With Zither Background
Selznick-Korda An Uneasy Producing Pair of The Third Man (1950) --- Part One
Modern Art Meets Movie Merchandising |
Again to the Mitchum point: I agree with Selznick that he'd have been better. Mitchum had danger, was capable of anything, even diluting penicillin for children, Harry Lime's worst of many crimes. Perfect casting his would have been for Bob having lately been tapped by
There's more lore on The Third Man than for most from the Classic Era. Several book-length studies were written, and interviews abound with many who survived to the film's placement among settled greats. Enduring myth claims Orson Welles directed his scenes, de facto helming much of The Third Man, according to some. Well, it does look and play like a Welles project. He might have done something nearly as good if someone had let him, but by 1948, OW was a "detriment" to ticket-buying, according to Selznick when he demurred on Orson-casting. Sift through the record shows Welles did not write his dialogue for the Ferris wheel, but did contribute the gag about
Selznick made a lucrative deal on The Third Man. For loan of Joseph Cotten and (Alida) Valli, along with some financing, he'd get
The Third Man wouldn't be a first Occupation-set thriller. That distinction may go to Berlin Express. Earlier arrival in terms of comedy was A Foreign Affair from Billy Wilder/
Go HERE for Part Two of The Third Man.
6 Comments:
I can only imagine what kind of impassioned responses your preference for a Mitchum Hsrry Lime over the Wells version is going to bring! I myself have to disagree. Sure Mitchum was more physically imposing (and a great actor) but Lime isn't the unstoppable brute of CAPE FEAR --- he's the smug schoolboy gone bad, who can peddle bad penicillin to children as proof of his own innate superiority over the "masses", the inconsequential ants he sees from atop the Ferris wheel. He's Leopold and/or Loeb.
Had Welles directed it, he'd have spent a year in the editing room, getting distracted by another project, before Selznick fired him and butchered it himself.
Well, every film hits people differently. I can't imagine anyone BUT Welles as Lime. His performance chills me to the bone because I totally buy how utterly charming he is, to the point that he could convince anyone to aid him in his diabolically evil doings. I've watched this movie many times over (I consider it the apex of film making, the movie that most of any I've seen compellingly uses the tools of cinema to tell its tale) and every single time I fear for Martens and the potential to be tossed out of that Ferris wheel by Lime. For me, I have to buy that Lime can convince me I'd need pants even if I didn't have legs... and I do buy it.
Another vote for Orson Welles as Harry Lime, this one from Dan Mercer:
I'm afraid that I'll have to agree with bpiper, quite dispassionately, you know, but very definitely. Mitchum's casting would be decidedly offbeat, but he's just too strong for the role. The "Adventures of Harry Lime" radio show gives the back story of the character, with Orson Welles's reprising his bit. Lime was a small-timer living by his wits. Poisoning children wasn't something he was really up for, just nothing he could avoid. But we have to understand what a weakling he was. Of course he would skulk in shadows or flee down sewers. And Holly was the inconsequential sort who'd pal with a Lime, laugh at his jokes, and think what a clever fellow his friend was, never being aware or much concerned that that was about all there was. With Mitchum, we'd have an entirely different sort of character, someone much more dangerous, maybe a corn-fed Dr. Mabuse. But then we'd also have an entirely different kind of movie in need of another director. Good as Carol Reed was, who would be better than Fritz Lang for this kind of show? Keep Valli, though. She's great playing the sort of woman whose beauty suggests ideals and mysteries that intrigue but don't really exist, when you consider that she'd give it all up for a man like Harry Lime.
If he didn't benefit from director confusion, Welles said his star rose immeasurably as an actor following this."My one moment as a traffic-stopping superstar". Deluged with offers, he went back to working on Othello.
The main problem with promoting Mitchum onto a role done to perfection by Welles in the first place, is that we are projecting Mitchum's future persona towards an earlier time. Mitchum's post-war stardom was predicated on his essaying the role of the soft-spoken, amiable ex-veteran (with a hint of cool) finding his place in the world (TIL THE END OF TIME, CROSSFIRE, HOLIDAY AFFAIR). Even when he ventured into thriller or noir territory his characters were morally on the straight and narrow path. In UNDERCURRENT it is Robert Taylor who plays the psycho. Mitchum is the late-inning hero. As he is in PURSUED and BLOOD ON THE MOON. His proto-type noir role in OUT OF THE PAST is essentially a hard-boiled version of Chandler's Marlowe or Hammett's Spade - men who can skirt the rules but have their own code of integrity. The twist being that Mitchum is too trusting towards femme fatales.
That wouldn't happen in the 50's as Mitchum's roles hardened and became more corrosively cynical (BANDITO). But in 1949 he wasn't ready to essay Harry Lime's amorality.
Post a Comment
<< Home