Trial (1956) Combats Lynch Rule and Commie Mischief
It struck me about a third of the way into this
that William Holden would have made a far better Trial lead than Glenn Ford.
The two had been friends, began as two sides of a callow coin, then
achieved popularity as spokesmen for outraged decency, the 50's a peak decade
for both. Holden was world-wearier, cynicism having been instilled by work with
Wilder, while Ford kept busy as men who'd be pushed but so far. What he missed
was association with a greatdirector who could define him for subsequent work
with others (Fritz Lang came a closest, had they teamed on more as good asThe Big Heat). Still, there'd be a string of hits through the decade,
Blackboard Jungle a standout, and from that came momentum for more at MGM, hit after hit until Cimarron
broke the string. Trial's Ford is a law professor who'll be let go for lack of
courtroom experience, a policy that would pretty well clear the deck at most
schools. He's given the summer to participate in a start-to-finish murder trial, a
nutty premise as those are customarily way longer getting to real-life resolve.
Object of courtroom exercise is a Mexican teen charged
with rape/strangle; his name being "Angel" with requisite baby face
and sweet temper removes any/all doubt as to innocence, just like stacked deck
that would be Twelve Angry Men a couple of years later. The premise was besides
a familiar one thanks toThe Lawless, which had kept houses empty for Paramount in 1950. We at
least dispose of time-honored lynch mobbing in a first act, being pages ahead
of Don Mankiewicz's script (based on his novel), and for that slow haul, it
looks like Trial will be another of earnest pleas re justice/tolerance, but then
off comes mask of lead attorney Arthur Kennedy at a rally he organizes to whip
up minority support. They're all Communists! And Trial doesn't chicken out by
having them misunderstood or witch-hunted. Here, then, is where the show cranks
up, Ford trying to save his client from a conviction Kennedy orchestrates in
order to raise cash for himself and the Party. And GF's love interest is a
fellow traveler (Dorothy McGuire) fresh from Kennedy's bed, anidea I'll bet
Ernest Lehman and Hitchcock borrowed to develop "Eve Kendall" for
North By Northwest.
That rally iscenterpiece and big wow of Trial,
being (accurate?) depiction of crowds whipped up for causes near or far away,
fiery speakers like Kennedy manipulating his mob and raking off thousands
garnered from donations. You figure from watching that homefront Reds operated on
large scale and could/did affect outcome of high profile cases. But then Trial,
perhaps in interest of balancing scales (and to please MGM chief Dore Schary?),
aims barb at offscreen demagoguery of HUAC-like investigators putting squeeze
on Ford after he's spotted at the Red rally. Overall chips consequently fall in accord with whatever stance appeals to an individual viewer, Leo being the
clever lion by giving no one the decision. A happy end is further dry clean,
accuracy of courtroom procedure a most egregious crime on view. Trial is dated,
sure, but reflective of concerns and attitude folks had then, and there is good
performing amidst welcome support (John Hoyt, Elisha Cook, Katy Jurado,
many more). Best of these is majestic Juano Hernandez as judge, or better put,
ringmaster, of this circussy Trial. He should have got Oscar-nominated for work
done here. Mark Robson directs --- we await proper appreciation of him (his great The Harder They Fall out a same year). Warner
Archive has Trial on DVD.
A very important film in my life. I first saw it at the age of 12 its influence looms large in my cynical attitude toward politics and groups of any kind. I owe Mankiewicz a debt.
1 Comments:
A very important film in my life. I first saw it at the age of 12 its influence looms large in my cynical attitude toward politics and groups of any kind. I owe Mankiewicz a debt.
Post a Comment
<< Home