Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Thursday, October 08, 2015

That Super-Man Is In Again


Man At Large (1941) Pits G. Reeves Against Saboteurs

A Fox B celebrated by few fortunates who have seen it, Man At Large shouldn't go missing in our era of plenty. Other and more obscure Fox programmers have turned up via On-Demand DVD, but so far not this one. Man At Large did play television at one time, generously from the late 50's after first reaching airwaves, and into the 60/70's where it joined others of similar genre as part of a "Mystery/Suspense" package offered by TV packager NTA. Man At Large was also fondly recalled by Don Miller in his indispensable B Movies book, the author referring to it as a best of low-budget Hitchcock homages. Man At Large began shooting on a same June 1941 day as John Ford's How Green Was My Valley, the latter tabbed for prestige playdates and eventual Academy recognition, while humble Man At Large made do with support placement befitting its category. But would modern viewership be as eager to watch all-too familiar How Green again? Ford's classic is sold on Blu-Ray, and streams everywhere, but try finding Man At Large ... I couldn't locate modern appraisals even at IMDB.


The story is typical of actioners leading up to WWII; an escaped Nazi airman, not unlike ones in two-years-later Northern Pursuit, spearheading would-be conquest as our G-Men give chase. Much of fun is in the pace, a rapid 70 minutes that seems less, and with engaging cast top-lined by young George Reeves, doing work here to make us regret his missing brass ring of feature stardom. But then if he had clicked, we'd have no definitive Superman. You'd not beat Man At Large for timing in any case, its arrival keyed to war clouds darkening (released September 1941), and plenty of subsequent play after Germany became our declared enemy. We can never know sock like Man At Large delivered in first-run, then-emotions set on hot with more and more ticket-buyers in uniform, or headed to enlist. Silly though Man At Large may seem today, it was call to arms and reassurance for millions in anxiety over a conflict which outcome was anything but certain. Fox was among most sure-footed at making programmers look lush, thanks to sharp-as-pin camerawork, re-use of standing sets from A's, and trim of fat from narrative always on the go. Man At Large is a rarity that should go back in circulation.

3 Comments:

Blogger Bill O said...

Mark Sandrich promlsed Reeves a star build-up once Reeves returned from the war. Sandrich died before it could happen. Reeves' career path strewn with Kryptonlte.

7:38 AM  
Blogger CanadianKen said...

Glad to see you're enthusiastic about this elusive programmer. I've yet to catch up with it. But as someone who likes both George Reeves and Marjorie Weaver, I've wanted to for years. You're so right about the sheen Fox put on most of their B's. Warners was good at it too. Check out their "Spy Ship"(1942), which neatly fuses plot elements of an early Bette Davis film, "Fog Over Frisco", with wartime espionage thrills. George Reeves isn't in that one. But Irene Manning is unexpectedly terrific in it. Reeves spent time as a contractee for both Warners and Fox. And though his Superman hasn't ever been on my radar (never saw it as a kid), I've always been impressed by his work as a big screen up and comer in the early 40's. Of course he was handsome - to an extreme degree. But to that add personable, plucky and effortlessly accomplished. With an easy comic flair that's on nice display in "Always a Bride" and "Father is a Prince" (both 1940). I've always connected him with William Lundigan, Richard Denning and Richard Greene. All genial, dashing and uber-photogenic contemporaries of his. And as with Reeves,their careers were interrupted at critical points by wartime military service and they were never able to regain big screen momentum afterwards. Luckily, all four did at least enjoy substantial success on TV in the 50's. I really like the teaming of Reeves and Dennis Morgan as brothers in Warners' action-packed "Tear Gas Squad"(1940). They have great chemistry together. It's only a briskly entertaining little B, but when Reeves gets killed early on, he's already made such a winning impression that we genuinely miss him. "Thunder in the Pines"(1948) is a Poverty Row buddy adventure/comedy. But the happy teaming of Reeves and Ralph Byrd invests the whole thing with major league snap, crackle and pop. This one's available on DVD in its original glorious sepiatone too. A must for Reeves fans.

8:50 AM  
Blogger Bill O said...

Reeves got a glimpse of the future when he did support ln The Good Humor Man '50,concernlng Superman's comlc book rival Capt. Marvel.

6:19 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024