Bogart Makes A Soft Landing
Chain Lightning (1950) Flies Warners Economy
Postwar Bogart a test pilot? Seems ill-advised, or maybe armed forces needy for guinea pigs did send up hard drink/chain smokers to do the job of men thirty years younger. Did Bogie balk? He split w/Warners not long after, path littered by scripts better than Chain Lightning that he'd nix out of hand (including Trouble Along The Way and The System, latter turning out fine with pinch-hitter Frank Lovejoy). HB spent hours in mock-up aircraft against process sky, having to realize through it all that Chain Lightning would do his career no good. He'd had a string of clucks. None of Bogart's own Santana productions amounted to much, including now-lauded In A Lonely Place, a flop at the time. The African Queen came not a moment too soon to airlift Bogart from stalled vehicles like Chain Lightning.
Warners had adopted a spend-less policy from 1948. You could see cuts applied to
Back to Chain Lightning, or any late 40/50's output of hobbling
HB Poses for Key Art to Enhance CL Ad Campaign |
6 Comments:
That's quite a pose by Bogie. Looks like he's auditioning for Elmer Gantry.
When the TNT channel was launched in Latin America in the early 90s, instead of lousy and unwatchable content, they would play movies from the Turner library. This Humphrey Bogart vehicle was among the many of those films that would frequently surface and I saw it there. It is no great film but just OK. Yet, I would never pay any money to have it on video. Many movies, products like TOP GUN (which I curiously saw on a broadcasting station around the same time) were quite overrated at the time. That is typical, and it is also typical that many of them enter a cable TV rotation becoming extremely available. Seeing these films in these conditions they become rather routine productions and not really memorable. The real memorable movies are those that managed to overcome this kind of overexposure and still gather interest. The last 40 or 30 years produced no films I would spend time revisiting. When I go back to the older films and the classics I have to say yes, I can see them again. But the other movies produced at the same time are not appealing enough to spend time and specially money on them.
Love that ad and its all-WB show! Did you cue up the McDoakes comedy and Daffy cartoon (both readily available) to recreate the full experience?
Richard M. Roberts relates his own recent Bad-Bogie experience (or should I spell it "Bogey"?):
Hello John,
Say, this must have been Bad Bogey weekend as we watched THE TWO MRS.CARROLLS, where Bogey and Barbara Stanwyck do their darndest in parts that seem tailor-made for Vincent Price and Joan Fontaine, is Peter Godfrey in the Directors Chair a warning sign on too-many late-40's Warner Bros pictures or what? Bogey is just not the tortured-artist type, though he does manage creepy-psycho quite easily in the last 20 minutes (shades of the future Fred C. Dobbs and Captain Queeg in his performance),but I was thinking that with CARROLLS and CHAIN LIGHTNING outweighing the TREASURE OF SIERRA MADRE's and KEY LARGO's in the scripts Jack Warner was sending him by this time, no wonder Bogie wanted out. THE ENFORCER was a bit better, but too little too late.
And who buys Stanwyck as withering suffering damsel in distress? This is a woman who'd slam dunk a psycho-Bogey first time he got a bit twitchy and bury him in the back yard, never bought her in SORRY WRONG NUMBER either, I say both leads are working off a contract caring little what picture Warners put them in. This isn't the type of film Mark Hellinger produces well either. Did anyone involved really want to make this film?
RICHARD
Hey Richard: As to anyone wanting to make "The Two Mrs. Carrolls," I remember one of the bios said Bogart was OK doing this one because he had just married Bacall and was in a good enough general mood to tolerate another bad vehicle. But yes, HB as a tortured artist is sure enough spectacular miscasting.
John.
Craig Reardon considers Warner poster art in general and "Chain Lightning" in particular:
With Bogie, either title would work!
I was pleased to see this pop up today, John, as there used to be a local deli where I took my family often, and it preferred to decorate the walls with vintage theater and movie posters. And, one which always intrigued me was---yup (as Cooper always supposedly said, and DID often say!), it was "Chain Lightning"! It was similar to the one you have printed near the bottom, but formatted in such a way that Bogie's entire pose was reproduced, the 'pointing up' one, and though it didn't make a hell of a lot of sense, really, it had a dynamic feeling, and always drew my eye when I'd to to this restaurant. It makes a lot more sense now, as your text clarifies the 'up' part sufficiently! I have friends who don't care for the admittedly somewhat-similar WB ad art of the '40s, but I personally love it. Because of its streamlined quality, it still seems modern where posters out of studios like Fox or MGM---really, most of the others---seem stodgy and like your grandmother's parlor, comparatively. Could be a bias for seeing the performers stripped-in, via photography, versus the often dicey illustrations on other studio's ad art. Experts in this area would know who I'm about to cite, but the guy who painted the posters for RKO had an uncanny knack for photographic realism (I'm imaging some Mitchum vehicles in my mind's eye), but sometimes the posters just barely resembled the actual stars. Whoever ran WB's promotional art then obviously felt the public should see the stars, themselves, and accompanied their images with zippy, 'modern'-looking, minimal graphic flourishes and simple, punchy fonts. That is no doubt why they still look airy and smart, today---to me, at least. Talk about sub-trivia to trivia! But, what else are we living for?
Now, maybe someday I'll actually SEE "Chain Lightning"!
Bogart, along with Errol Flynn, and James Cagney, were truly lost after leaving WARNER BROS. with the last of their pictures at THAT studio finally petering out some pretty weak stuff; alas Flynn did well with the Warner- British-made "MASTER OF BALLANTRAE"(1953),he seemed to have been somewhat humiliated- and "replaced" by the younger and atheletic upcomer BURT LANCASTER. I still can't understand Jack Warner while winding down the costs of product for his earlier-created superstars, (who seemed ready for a "comeback" status by the late 40's, and seemed especially promoted by RE-ISSUES of their earlier stuff), but I guess economics as well as the nervous politics of the times- explained. ONE BIZZAIRE exampling there, was especially reflected with the BLACK AND WHITE RE-ISSUE PRINTS OF "THE ADVENTURES OF ROBIN HOOD"(1947)-- (WHAT??t??!!--WAS SOMEBODY KIDDING??!!). However who could argue that, by that time that the post-war casts containing popular has-been stars appearing in run-of-the-mill- pics--had fans leaving theaters frowning and puzzled, wondering WHY Errol Flynn, for example, was cast in such a contrived mess ( in one of his absolute WORST films) as was "ESCAPE ME NEVER" (1947)?!! . Then Jack Warner does a FLYNN-REBOOT in Vincent Sherman"s MAGNIICENT and TEHNICOLORED "ADVENTURES OF DON JUAN" (1949), with it's $$ loss in U.S. only because of it's HUGE production costs! Then we have BOGART with his FRED C. DOBBS character in John Huston's "TREASURE OF THE SIERRA MADRE" getting an oscar nod- but no win. AND how about JAMES CAGNEY-- who SHOULD HAVE- but DIDN'T get-a BEST ACTOR nomination for what was probably his BEST ROLE EVER as Cody Jarrett in RAOUL WALSH's "WHITE HEAT" (1949). Then it seemed back to junkers, with both male and Female stars at WB who were, by then, not very well armed for exposure with their star powers spiraling down and evident in such cost-saving yet always excellent production values that were worthily used as always, even with ho-hum mediocracies such as FLYNN'S "MARA-MARU" (1952); "COME FILL THE CUP"(1951), with CAGNEY (huh?); and BOGART'S escape to COLUMBIA PICTURES- which ONLY RESOLVED for him A HUGE STAR-POWER MELTDOWN-( which started earlier with "SAHARA" (well..o.k.) and SAVED only with another one for HUSTON finally bringing BOGART who turned his-- deserved-earlier OSCAR-LOSS into a kind-of-late OSCAR-WIN with the weird "AFRICAN QUEEN" (1951)( ..a picture in I am STILL trying to like!) and therefore finally earning HIS RE-BOOT at the start of A DECADE with some of the other TOP WARNER BROS. stars freelancing AS WELL, after EXITING WB , WITH PICTURES-- some good/some bad--, but NEVER
I believe, could they compare on equal terms with the OUTSTANDING WARNER BROS. PRODUCT of ANY ERA. I'VE ALWAYS HELD AN ACQUIRED ADMIRATION FOR ALL WARNER BROS. PICTURES, IN ABSOLUTE AWE OF EVERY DEPARTMENT THERE. EACH CONTRIBUTING THEIR PART WITH THE EXPECTED, OUTSTANDING COAT OF QUALITY. EACH PRODUCTION STAMPED,ON THE SCREEN HAVING THAT INSTANTLY RECOGNIZED WB FORMULA AND STYLE. ALL OF THIS- A VERY SOOTHING FORMULA, INDEED; FOR ANY ANXIETIES THAT ONE MIGHT HAVE AS A VIEWER- AWAITING-- FOUND THE USUAL RELIEF, AS THE WARNER BROS. LOGO BACKED BY MAX STEINER'S THUNDERING MUSIC-- CAME ONTO THE SCREEN. THEN, FOR THIS BOY, EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED THAT MOMENT ON THE SCREEN WOULD BE (and still is)JUST-- FINE!!.(2017).
Post a Comment
<< Home