Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Wednesday, May 03, 2017

More Tricky Warners Bally


Accent On Sex Sells Bombers B-52 (1957)

Another jump through hoops for Warner sales. How to promote an air preparedness boost where Natalie Wood stars? Trouble was her never going near a plane in Bombers B-52. Schizo structure has the star barred from narrative as next-billed Karl Malden takes the sky in massive birds loaned by the Army on usual condition that WB laud the Force. Bombers B-52 was encore for studio/service hand-hold, previous year's Toward The Unknown with test pilot Bill Holden doing credit to the branch. Defense themes were robust so long as each unveiled a still faster jet to reassure that ours was still a bigger stick than Soviets wielded. Bombers B-52 spent meanly beyond take-off/landings the Army enabled gratis, negative cost at $1.4 million holding WB's flight below altitude of Strategic Air Command, a Paramount salute with bigger names (James Stewart, June Allyson), and lots more polish. But maybe it's unfair to compare, SAC available now on glorious Blu-Ray, while Bombers B-52 glides as DVD minus High-Def.



Key art of Natalie Wood in a tight dress and torrid embrace of Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. would garland planes drawn erect toward the sky. The fact she's barely seen in such costume, let alone panting in Zimbalist's arms, was beside point of merchandising Bombers B-52 by however means profitable. The fix had been in for Natalie Wood vehicles so far, misleading ads for The Burning Hills rousing complaint from exhibs who'd complain of luridity (first-ever use of a non-existent word I've just invented), and The Girl He Left Behind didn't play much fairer. Wood was still a teen (born 1938), so movies tread cautious as ads made up difference. Result was audiences feeling the cheat. So long as they came in knowing Karl Malden would dominate Bombers B-52, all was OK, but greater number of tickets sold were to fans for Natalie Wood, and they surely balked at so little of her on display.




Safest harbor for young players was putting them among seasoned talent as confidence built up before the camera. It was policy applied to James Dean, then Tab Hunter, and now Natalie Wood. To come were Connie Stevens, Troy Donahue, a whole menagerie. These were hula hoop equivalent to Bogart, Davis, Flynn of a last generation, so no wonder Mom and Dad felt movies and their stars had gone to dogs. These were perishables a cynical Warners was peddling, most of staff old-timers who'd been around when stars glowed brighter and product was better. Money more ill-got from television, and getting away with so much less spent, led WB to conviction that features could be palmed off as cheaply. Again, Bombers B-52 beside Strategic Air Command is a lesson in margarine vs. butter, the patron risking his/her money's worth each time they entered theatre doors. The Warner shield was looking more and more like a barn door. Customers had to be choosier than ever, unless they were kids who'd not mind being duped --- but did they? TV was catching up in a quality race, and free besides. It would be tougher to ingrain a moviegoing habit with stuff Hollywood, particularly WB, was foisting. How many said "Enough!" to dishonest ads and letdown pics where viewing comforts at home offered just as much, if not more?

6 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Is that Basil Rathbone above?

11:08 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

It is.

11:30 AM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

Those grubby sets -- ugh! Looks like a Columbia B from the '40s.

9:48 PM  
Blogger Kurt Burgess said...

...Basil Rathbone above? Above where? He was not in "Bombers B-52." Did I miss something?

Those grubby sets are at their worst in black & white.

This movie has numerous "problems" and doesn't hold a candle to Paramount's earlier Air Force saga. I recently commented on it at: http://unknownhollywood.blogspot.com/

10:08 PM  
Blogger rnigma said...

Basil was on the ever-changing website header.

9:42 PM  
Blogger Kurt Burgess said...

Thanks, migma. I was figuring all comments were related specific to this Warners film.

3:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017