Another jump through hoops for Warner sales. How
to promote an air preparedness boost where Natalie Wood stars? Trouble was her
never going near a plane in Bombers B-52. Schizo structure has the star barred from
narrative as next-billed Karl Malden takes the sky in massive birds loaned by
the Army on usual condition that WB laud the Force. Bombers B-52 was encore for
studio/service hand-hold, previous year's Toward The Unknown with test pilot Bill
Holden doing credit to the branch. Defense themes were robust so long as each
unveiled a still faster jet to reassure that ours was still a bigger stick than
Soviets wielded. Bombers B-52 spent meanly beyond take-off/landings the Army enabled
gratis, negative cost at $1.4 million holding WB's flight below altitude ofStrategic Air Command, a Paramount salute with bigger names (James Stewart, June
Allyson), and lots more polish. But maybe it's unfair to compare, SAC available
now on glorious Blu-Ray, while Bombers B-52 glides as DVD minus High-Def.
Key art of Natalie Wood in a tight dress and
torrid embrace of Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. would garland planes drawn erect toward
the sky. The fact she's barely seen in such costume, let alone panting in
Zimbalist's arms, was beside point of merchandising Bombers B-52 by however
means profitable. The fix had been in for Natalie Wood vehicles so far,
misleading ads forThe Burning Hillsrousing complaint from exhibs who'd
complain of luridity (first-ever use of a non-existent word I've just
invented), andThe Girl He Left Behinddidn't play much fairer. Wood was still a teen (born 1938), so movies tread cautious as ads made
up difference. Result was audiences feeling the cheat. So long as they came in
knowing Karl Malden would dominate Bombers B-52, all was OK, but greater number
of tickets sold were to fans for Natalie Wood, and they surely balked at so
little of her on display.
Safest harbor for young players was putting them
among seasoned talent as confidence built up before the camera. It was
policy applied to James Dean, then Tab Hunter, and now Natalie Wood. To come
were Connie Stevens, Troy Donahue, a whole menagerie. These were hula hoop
equivalent to Bogart, Davis, Flynn of a last generation, so no wonder Mom and
Dad felt movies and their stars had gone to dogs. It was perishables a
cynical Warners was peddling, most of staff old-timers who'd been around when
stars glowed brighter and product was better. Money more ill-got from
television, and getting away with so much less spent, led WB to conviction that
features could be palmed off as cheaply. Again, Bombers B-52 beside Strategic Air
Command is a lesson in margarine vs. butter, the patron risking his/her money's
worth each time they entered theatres. The Warner shield was looking more
and more like a barn door. Customers had to be choosier than ever, unless they
were kids who'd not mind being duped --- but did they? TV was catching up in a quality race, and free besides. It would be tougher to
ingrain a moviegoing habit with stuff Hollywood,
particularly WB, was foisting. How many said "Enough!" to dishonest ads and letdown pics where viewing comforts at home offered just as much, if
not more?
...Basil Rathbone above? Above where? He was not in "Bombers B-52." Did I miss something?
Those grubby sets are at their worst in black & white.
This movie has numerous "problems" and doesn't hold a candle to Paramount's earlier Air Force saga. I recently commented on it at: http://unknownhollywood.blogspot.com/
5 Comments:
Is that Basil Rathbone above?
Those grubby sets -- ugh! Looks like a Columbia B from the '40s.
...Basil Rathbone above? Above where? He was not in "Bombers B-52." Did I miss something?
Those grubby sets are at their worst in black & white.
This movie has numerous "problems" and doesn't hold a candle to Paramount's earlier Air Force saga. I recently commented on it at: http://unknownhollywood.blogspot.com/
Basil was on the ever-changing website header.
Thanks, migma. I was figuring all comments were related specific to this Warners film.
Post a Comment
<< Home