Classic movie site with rare images (no web grabs!), original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, June 05, 2017

More From Boyhood Scrapbooks

Someone Should Have Warned Me In 1965 About Indiscriminate Scotch-Tape Application

North Carolina Drive-Ins Yum-Yum Eat Up Elvis

Plops Go Auction Hammer and One-Time Albemarle Rd. Drive-In
Spend the night with Elvis! Lots wished they could, here at least a partial fulfillment. So much of him had accumulated by the mid-60's, and all, it seemed, could still be had from busy film exchanges. Ours in Charlotte kept Presley in constant circulation, theatres and drive-ins always wanting him back, so long as terms were fair (as in cheap). That's how I got to see my favorite of his, Tickle Me, at least twice at the Liberty. The Albemarle Rd. Drive-In, just outside Charlotte, was site of feast above, and how they must have chowed on burgers, dogs, steak sandwiches, the lot as tendered at concession huts like full-blown cafeterias. Being "All In Color" meant something to then viewers --- it showed up better especially on outdoor screens. I like how Girls! Girls! Girls! is pushed harder as "Return To Sender." That was the pic's sole hit tune, but a whale of one that played non-stop on transistors every kid carried. I'll bet the Albemarle Rd. booked the whole show for less than $100, then took in --- who knows how much? Elvis really was a gold stash back then.




Further proof comes courtesy of Greensboro's long-ago ad for double-up of Kissin' Cousins with Your Cheatin' Heart, both our then-idea of classics that would live forever. I'll not forget Kissin' Cousins when new at the Liberty. We drove past from church on opening day and saw lines run the entire block to circle around our local bank for a 1:00 show. Many of these would be turned away, but back to try again at 3:00. Elvis was rural and so was this story setting, result biggest yokel biz for a Presley since his early ones. Kissin' Cousins was said to have been shot "in the Great Smokies," but Sam Katzman produced, so I'm not so sure about that. Your Cheatin' Heart was the sad but ultimately uplift story of Hank Williams as done by George Hamilton. It was pure socko around here. Theatres couldn't get prints after a first couple years, a complaint MGM loudly heard from NC showmen who wanted more like this and less like Ryan's Daughter. The South Drive-In for this event had a "New, Giant screen." Let's hope they expanded the lot too for this blockbuster meet of the "King Of Swing" with the "King Of Country."

11 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

This blog continually inspires me: http://reghartt.ca/cineforum/?p=22109

9:28 AM  
Blogger Mike Cline said...

The Elvis prints, as you mentioned, remained in our local Charlotte film depot until they could not longer get through projectors. Elvis always available for Saturday or summer kiddie shows at fees as low as $25.00.

Our first drive-in engagement of ELVIS ON TOUR came with second EP hit VIVA LAS VEGAS, then eight or nine years of age. The 35mm color print was as red as a fire engine. Patrons would enter the concession stand asking me to adjust the color. I replied, "I wish I could."

They was no color to adjust. But most stayed to watch nonetheless. After all, it was Elvis.

10:28 AM  
Blogger radiotelefonia said...

Fortunately, I can adjust the red in videos.

4:31 PM  
Blogger Stinky Fitzwizzle said...

Hilariously placed pic of Olivia!

4:49 PM  
Blogger Joshua said...

Was the reference to Elvis as the "King of Swing" unusual, or was that designation used more commonly? I would expect Elvis to be referred to as the "King of Rock and Roll" instead.

1:35 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

The South Drive-In's manager was probably pre-rock and roll age-wise, if not pre-swing. In fact, he might have been more of a Paul Whiteman man.

5:22 AM  
Blogger Stinky Fitzwizzle said...

Elvis and Paul Whiteman. Stinky always gets those two confused.

11:55 AM  
Blogger Lionel Braithwaite said...

@Mike Cline: This is why I'm glad that cinema's gone all digital now-at least we can see older movies on screen again without having to worry about the picture quality of the movie in question being degraded (Cineplex here in Canada [Toronto] has shown It's A Mad, Mad Mad World, The Godfather, and a few other classics recently at two of the big theaters in downtown Toronto [the Scotianbank Theater and the Yonge Dundas at the corner of Yonge and Dundas.]) Perhaps the movie exhibhitor company where you live (or somebody else enterprising) couls show a schedule of Elvis movies again.....

11:01 AM  
Blogger Randy said...

Most of what I read about Presley's screen career treats it as, for the most part, a joke. Too many bad movies filled with too many cheesy songs. How were his movies regarded back in the day, though? They must have been popular, since he appeared in a steady stream of them for more than a decade.

11:19 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Presley films were reliable profit centers for over fifteen years, so long as they were kept to a fairly fixed cost. I know I liked them and went to see most during the 60's, even bought the soundtrack albums for a few.

12:03 PM  
Blogger Steven said...

True ELVIS fans of the day would attend the first showings of his latest movie, and then rush to the local record store to buy the 'soundtrack' album--soundtrack containing just the ELVIS songs of course , no music except that. In a check of his movie career, one can truly witness ELVIS-THE ACTOR vs. ELVIS -THE SINGER who had more songs to sing with each passing FILM. ( then again a few would not have count enough to fill an LP, so they would release an EP-album packing 4-6 songs each). Well, I guess point here being the fact that Elvis COULD DO BOTH, with the tilt on the totter toward the singer of course, since the singer sang awhile long before he showed on a movie screen. His individual performance in each one surely shows us a real difference in his characters--excepting that each of his characters would have to sing, and THIS, of course prevented Elvis-THE ACTOR from continuing with any serious attempt/effort to ACT from then on, belting out each soundtrack album of songs a cornier list as good or as bad as the last or next one?! THEN 1963. I grab this year as the beginning of his dive-down in any chart of popularity with the start of a long string of films made at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer starting the batch with a couple of good ones; then my first walk-out-of-a-theatre showing the latest (maybe worst?)'ELVIS FLICK' happened- and could any 'ELVIS FLICK ' BE ANY WORSE than "HARUM SCARUM"? Well, yes! "DOUBLE TROUBLE"!! and THAT one came later, ..and ..my GOD, what WITS encircling ELVIS brought us the insipid "STAY AWAY JOE", (with a co-starring cast who were rightly EMBARRASED, even if Presley WASN'T)?. The final role iced the cake for being the most embarrassing as well as being the most ill-conceived junker of all--"CHANGE OF HABIT"(1969).AND HOW (never really explained) did ELVIS PRESLEY WIND UP his MOVIE career over at UNIVERSAL, of all places?. That's enough, this boy can't offer anything to the soggy old saga(s) of a world icon excepting a few simple opinions added to all of the rest. Those not really in tune with ELVIS should check out his fist FOUR (and several after those 4) FILMS. THEY START WITH "LOVE ME TENDER" (1956). HINT: I believe the BEST OF ELVIS MOVIES were THOSE PRODUCED BY HAL WALLIS'/PARAMOUNT. Let me comment then, on the WORST and LAST of THAT batch which contained MY FAVORITE anti-ELVIS REVIEW of ALL..for "EASY COME, EASY GO"(1967),a ridiculous NAVY-SUNKEN-TREASURE YARN worded: "an enduring story containing the question of how to get Elvis to sing underwater!! Thanking the GODS he didn't.

7:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017