For Happy 1957 Holidays ...
Clouds Form Over Raintree County
It was MGM president Joe Vogel's first meeting with gathered press. He had been installed a few months before to replace deposed Dore Schary, who was himself a sub for sacked Louis Mayer. This, then, was windmill spun at Loew's, parent corp of MGM, a lion roaring fainter what with viewer loss to TV and better things to do than see movies. Hopeful toward plugging the dyke was
A 1957 show world was drunk on roadshows. They fairly spat money from still-running hits The Ten Commandments and Around The World In 80 Days. Then too were the Cineramas, one after other that came to towns and stayed for year minimum, or to whenever a next of the ultra-travelogues was ready. Roadshows were based on two-a-day principle, reserved seats, "theatre parties" with patronage there by busloads. It took an event movie to stir such interest, but what was
Kansas City Has Raintree County In Its '57 Christmas Sock |
Louisville, Kentucky Makes A Holiday Of Raintree's World Premiere |
Montgomery Clift Joins Edward Dmytryk At The Los Angeles Opening |
Cincinnati Promised a Roadshow ... Settled For Grind |
"So-so" was biz in
A Rarity Book Thicker and More Detailed Than What Sold For Souvenirs in Roadshow Lobbies |
MGM sales manager Charles M. Reagan said his company was acting in accord with showman request, which would be marvelous if they had done that all along, but showmen knew what crock such a statement amounted to. Variety, on the other hand, put things more honestly: "It's no secret ... that the pic did not win the critical acclaim that had been anticipated and that b.o. results to date have not met expectations. In addition, Metro faced some difficulty in obtaining theatres for hard-ticket runs because of the critical reception." To hand
Lunch Break On The "Atlanta Street" Built For Raintree County |
Back in Cincinnati on 2-27-62 |
14 Comments:
Some very interesting observations from Griff via e-mail:
Dear John:
I note in your long, authoritative discussion of the marketing of RAINTREE COUNTY that MGM licensed a more-elaborate-than-usual book/program about the making of the movie. How I'd like to peruse that! But I would guess that it omitted a key chapter -- that is, the story of the meeting in the Thalberg building in which Metro execs decided to hire Edward Dmytryk to direct the movie. I will concede that Dmytryk had previously done a passable job on THE CAINE MUTINY, but RAINTREE was far beyond his skill set. Whether you regard the ambitious Ross Lockridge, Jr. novel as literature or as simply a thoughtful pot-boiler, this had great possibilities as a screen epic... possibilities that Dmytryk was unable to realize. A shame, because much of the movie looks great -- Robert Surtees did a superb job photographing all three "Camera 65" movies (all right, by the time the MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY remake was finished, the process had been renamed Ultra Panavision). Nice John Green score. Wonderful cast. But the damn thing never comes to life. This was a picture for a Zinnemann, a Cukor, even an up-and-coming Mann or Sturges to direct. A shame.
Many years ago I read John Leggett's Ross and Tom, the tragic story of two American authors -- Raintree County's Ross Lockridge and Mister Roberts' Thomas Heggen -- who both achieved great (and sudden) critical and commercial success... and took their lives not long afterward. It's a sobering account of troubled men that has distinctly colored my view of life in some ways; I'd recommend this. [When Joseph McBride later subtitled his excellent Capra biography "The Catastrophe of Success," I thought, well, it was even more catastrophic for Lockridge and Heggen.] Anyway, there's some very interesting material in the book about MGM -- which sponsored that $150,000 prize that the Raintree novel won -- and Lockridge; the author even came to Culver City and met Mayer.
Regards,
-- Griff
That so-called Atlanta Street looks like the same ol' T-squared MGM city street. Is that the often used marquee on the left?
I must have been all of nine when I saw this one. And I still remember what an endurance contest it was. Nine year olds don't fall asleep in movie theaters so I was awake for every endless minute of it. And this was in a small town so I'm sure it must have been the shortened version. I remember being perfectly okay with the hardly kid friendly "Until They Sail" when I saw it around the same time. But this and the godawful "comedy" "Oh,Men! Oh, Women!" with Ginger Rogers and David Niven remain in my memory as that year's entertainment lowlights. Thank God "The Vikings" was only months away. Now there was a movie that lit up 1958 for me!
At one time, about 30 years ago, the 33 rpm record of the soundtrack from Raintree County was a hard to get and valuable recording that was in the top five of rare recordings.
Montgomery Clift predicted this film would make money because people would pay to compare the before and after his car wreck footage.
Ah-h-h ----- "...plugging the dyke..."?
The Wolf, man.
One of those films Ive just never caught up with. Ive only ever heard 2 things about it....that prints of it are a mess, and that it is boring as all get out. Back in the day when I sold movies at Borders bookstores, older customers occasionally asked for it...so it had its fans.
If warners gave it a full restoration...I'd get onboard. A beautifully presented widescreen, stereo presentation has made many a mediocre film come back to life, and film buffs love a good re-apparaisal of an ignored classic.
During the mid eighties this film was released on video by MGM and it was one of the very few that from around 1988 to 1992 played constantly on cable in Argentina. The pan and scan version didn't help... I have always find this film to be very annoying and the story is idiotic. Everybody underperforms and even good art direction and camerawork is able to rescue this show from mediocrity.
In fact, I don't have any patience for any of these roadshows with overtures and intermissions.
THIS MGM PICTURE was filmed in TECHNICOLOR, a very rare item for the studio. MGM was one of the first to bail out from TECHNICOLOR GOING TO THE DREADFUL METROCOLOR(EASTMAN) about the time CinemaScope was introduced (1953). A mistake MGM BOSSES made during this 1950's period had to be the METROCOLOR decision-- along with the major effort of filming and throwing at us SOME of the most dreadful musicals ever made, instead of the regular western- adventure- and family oriented fare that was the norm. . So then, the soon-to-fade general release prints of ''RAINTREE COUNTY" were METROCOLOR prints. Check out the LATER posters for "HOW THE WEST WAS WON" and notice the ads are TECHNICOLOR; but when it left CINERAMA, all prints/ads were/said METROCOLOR. The 16mm prints of "RT" AND "HTWWW" were Eastman/METRO COLOR PRINTS!! ("BEN-HUR", as well!!!). Later, a King Brothers production of "MAYA" in 1966, (a little known CLINT WALKER entry, filmed in INDIA), was lensed in TECHNICOLOR, and although I recall seeing a first drive-in-showing of that film that year, I can't remember whether a TECH, or a METROCOLOR print was shown. Looking back at the event I'm not sure that at that young age did I know the difference, because admittingly, EASTMANCOLOR DOES look good when PRINTS are BRAND-NEW! .So it Seemed MGM $ dollar factors looked favorably towards METROCOLOR release prints; and aside from a few imports here and there, they never used TECHNICOLOR again (what a mistake!). Eastmancolor release prints during the 50's DID NOT EXCLUDE the OTHER STUDIOS from doing this same thing-but only for a short period. By the time the decade was over, MOST studios went back to TECHNICOLOR (early 60's)-- and grateful we are that they did. Throughout it all, ONLY PARAMOUNT and WALT DISNEY KEPT TECHNICOLOR. A wise choice, for sure.
When I lived near a photography store (ah, film: the good old days!) I watched a THE TIME MACHINE example of the daily ravages of the sun on non-technicolor advertising prints in the window. They gradually faded to a hideous sun-burn color. Three-strip Technicolor printing will make the oldest film look brand new. But why spend money on stuff like that? Who in the world wants to watch old movies? The Wolf,man.
It's a very flat film. Lifeless. No energy.
Yes, even in the stills, you can tell the before and after Monty.
Nobody who hasn’t read Ross Lockridge’s novel can ever comprehend what a miserable, misbegotten travesty this movie is. If all you know is the movie, it’s only mediocre; that’s both the best and worst you can say about it. But as an adaptation of the novel (which my English Lit PhD nephew once called “definitely the greatest novel I never heard of”), there’s nothing bad enough to say about it. Dmytryk, to my mind, forever branded himself a shoddy hack by boasting that he hadn’t read the book. (For that matter, I’m not sure Millard Kaufman did either.)
To be fair, the novel, covering as it does 50 years in time-jumbled flashbacks from a single day in 1892, would have challenged far greater talents than Dmytryk and Kaufman; probably nothing less than a miniseries could do it (myself, I’d like to see the Game of Thrones gang take a shot). And by the way, Montgomery Clift, with or without the auto accident, was hopelessly miscast (and not for the first or last time).
Here’s a challenge for your readers, John: Read Lockridge’s novel (complete, not the abridgment released with the movie). Then sit through the movie. And just try to imagine what we’d have had in 1939 if David Selznick had treated Gone With the Wind the way MGM treated Raintree County.
I confess to not having read the novel, so your remarks present a temptation to seek it out.
Post a Comment
<< Home