Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, February 09, 2018

Vas You Dere, Sharlee?


Meet The Baron (1933) Is Tunnel Through Comic Pyramids

Under heading of things MGM did for boxoffice came Meet The Baron, a screen launch for Jack Pearl of radio fame. Leo brought him and Ed Wynn aboard because free broadcast was too big to ignore. Each got a single starring vehicle at the lot. Metro wouldn't warm to radio like Paramount, but then they weren't invested in radio like Paramount. Somehow producer David Selznick fell on the sword that was Meet The Baron. He wanted no part of the project but did want to be a team player. Selznick spoke to wretchedness of Meet The Baron in notes done years later for a proposed memoir. "A horror I produced," he'd recall, "I made the picture with a loathing for it." Selznick confessed he had "never been a devotee of radio comics," indeed had never heard Jack Pearl perform. Hard as DOS labored at movies, I'd not imagine him listening to much radio, what with time off spent gambling and wenching per this dynamo's wont. Only hardest airwave-cores would know Jack Pearl today. Some of his programs can be heard online. Jack mangled words and made malapropisms a found art for schoolboys. They'd spread far/wide his catchphrase, "Vas You Dere, Sharlee?," this Pearl's response when funning partners tried catching him in a lie. "World's Biggest Liar" was in fact his shtick, hence "Baron Munchhausen" as air identity. Here's but sample pearl of Pearl's humor ... I'll spare you more ... Announcer to Jack: What did you have for breakfast, Baron?, to Jack reply: Baseball pancakes, then the announcer again, Baseball pancakes? What do you mean, baseball pancakes? Jack: I don't know, but we used a batter to make them!




The above lobby card from Meet The Baron sold at auction in 2005 for $6900. Can you guess why? Mind you, this was an 11X14 piece of paper. Could be someone bought this instead of paying their child's college tuition, or for that operation so Dad could walk again. Nuts as I was for collecting, I'd like to think I was never this far gone. But hey, it's the Stooges, and Ted Healy, so many might let the family stay lame for such treasure. Would the same card hammer for so much in 2017 as in 2005? It's a cinch there aren't as many Stooge fanatics above ground as twelve years ago. Let that pass, as they say in precode, but I'll add this: Meet The Baron is lush with Ted and his slap-ee boys. He and Stooges are prolific through running time, enough to cull into a solid two-reeler, if one were of editing mind. For most, of course, it's Stooges that make Meet The Baron bearable. I had fun for ardent clowning by not only them, but Jimmy Durante (minus Keaton, could he sustain as lead, or continuing second-lead, comic? --- MGM certainly tried), Zasu Pitts, Edna May Oliver, plus curiosity satisfied on seeing Jack Pearl do his way-back thing. Who knows? There might be a latent Jack Pearl fan within us all. I'm just waiting to spring "Vas You Dere, Sharlee?" on a next person that doubts my veracity. Should I save it for the next GPS reader who tries to factually correct me?

16 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Just watched this last week after having had it for years. Got it for THE STOOGES. As you write, they make it barely bearable. Somebody was out to lunch on this one.

7:27 AM  
Blogger Tommie Hicks said...

Many of the DVD pressings of this film have decomposed, turning brown and not playing. I've had to buy this disc twice.

8:44 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I saw it at TCM on a day when they had several features where the Stooges had small parts, including another interesting one, STUDENT TOUR.

9:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What, will no one defend MEET THE BARON for having the raciest number ("Clean as a Whistle") in MGM's entire musical canon, and possibly in all of pre-code? Yow-WHEE!!! Whenever I see it, I too am "wearing a great big smile!"

11:56 AM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Without THE STOOGES on it would that lobby card have sold for that price?

6:31 AM  
Blogger Beowulf said...

I doubt it, Reg.

Years ago, when I played some Pearl/Munchausen stuff for my classes, no one so much as burped up a giggle. Humor ages quickly and this Pearl didn't emerge from an oyster!

The Wolf, man.

3:51 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dear John:

Great post -- and wotta lobby card story!

There are other MGM comedy disasters (HOLLYWOOD PARTY, anyone?), but this was something ill-conceived from beginning to end. Jack Pearl was a veteran vaudeville comic (he also put in time in burlesque) who hit it unexpectedly big in radio... but the "Baron" character just didn't transfer to the screen. It's a fascinating curio.

By the way, Tommie Hicks is correct. Last month I tried to look at my MEET THE BARON/GOLD RAIDERS dvd, and it was unplayable.

Best regards,
-- Griff

4:22 PM  
Blogger Robert Fiore said...

On the Munchausen theme, I recently watched the UK Blu-Ray of The Fabulous Baron Munchausen, the largely stop-motion animated picture by Karel Zeman. As I recall from my 1960s childhood this was on syndicated TV a lot, which was unusual for a quirky foreign film. (I'm not sure my memory is reliable on these things; I had been convinced the Mary Martin version of Peter Pan was rerun every year in the 60s, until I read in Wikipedia that it was actually only rebroadcast twice, years apart.) Since you're so hep to the subject of movie broadcasts on television, could you tell me what was going on with that?

6:09 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

I don't recall our having "The Fabulous Baron Munchausen" on television around here. Or maybe I just didn't notice it. It was part of a 29 title "Chiller Package" that was syndicated to local stations during the 70's, others of the group including "The Flesh Eaters," "Horror Of Party Beach," etc.

6:20 PM  
Blogger Barry Rivadue said...

Walking along Manhattan's Upper East Side in the '90s, I overheard two oldtimers on a bench talking. One said "Vas you dere, Sharlie?" I had already recognized the catchphrase from somewhere, so thanks for clarifying its origin!

8:56 PM  
Blogger Randy said...

I had been convinced the Mary Martin version of Peter Pan was rerun every year in the 60s, until I read in Wikipedia that it was actually only rebroadcast twice, years apart.)


Well, a little more often than that. The Mary Martin PETER PAN was staged live in 1955 and again in 1956. A new production was produced and aired on tape in 1960. That taped version was repeated in 1963, 1966 and 1973. Years later, NBC restored the tape and ran it in 1989 and 1991.

Yeah, though, that seems to be a not-uncommon lapse of childhood memory, remembering the Mary Martin PETER PAN as having been aired annually, like THE WIZARD OF OZ was. I've had people swear to me that they saw it every year.

1:23 AM  
Blogger DBenson said...

Mr. Flore: I also had "Peter Pan" down as an annual. I remember "Hoppity Goes to Town", "Hansel and Gretel" (the stop-motion version), and the Robert Youngson films as running a lot when I was a kid, but maybe they just made a really strong impression on one or two viewings.

Only in the past year did I see "The Horn Blows at Midnight". The climax has Jack Benny caught in a display of a giant coffee pot constantly pouring into a giant cup. I had a very vivid childhood memory of that scene, but not remembering who was in it. For decades, any time an old comedy had a character wandering near a ledge, I expected him to fall into that coffee cup. For some reason I mentally tied it to a Shirley Temple movie. At some point I figured it might just be a remembered dream.

3:07 AM  
Blogger Robert Fiore said...

The 1970s Chiller Package would fit the time frame. I don't think anyone would have the nerve to try and pass off The Fabulous Baron Munchausen in their "Chiller Theater" show. I don't doubt a lot of stations treated it as dross they had to take to get the package, and never showed it at all. I do remember Munchausen being played more than once in L.A. during a local station's regular weeknight movie programming. I also remember our local horror host Seymour (Larry Vincent) showing Horror of Party Beach. Everybody thinks their local horror host was a genius.

12:20 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

Outside of the Stooges and that first production number, this is a dreadful movie, right up there with Ed Wynn's "The Chief". I may have overanalyzed it somewhat on my blog a few years ago:
http://theolfisheye.blogspot.com/2012/12/movie-of-day-meet-baron-1933_12.html

1:36 PM  
Blogger Dave K said...

Durante, Healy, The Stooges AND Stan and Ollie in BUSY BODIES? I'd plunk down my quarter for that bill, Jack Pearl not withstanding!

1:58 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

There are far more laughs in the two reels of "Busy Bodies" than in the six or seven of "Meet the Baron". But you could say that regarding most Laurel & Hardy shorts.

4:13 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024