Film Noir #33
Noir: Was The Killers (1964) Too Tough for TV?
Fascinating mid-60's Universal project, actually one of their key ventures of the decade, as it led off a hugely profitable arrangement with NBC for TV-movies. Why make features for the tube? Simply this: the Hollywood pix backlog was drying up and soon there'd be nothing fresh to show, post-48's having been consumed lots quicker than anyone imagined since 1961 when they began unspooling in earnest. NBC had dabbled in long-form programming, Universal their supplier for weekly ninety-minute episodes of The Virginian. For watchers at home, this was like getting a bonafide movie each Thursday night, and for nothing other than patience with drop-in ads. The western was cheaply shot, done largely on backlots, but had a solid cast of regulars and big names in guest capacity. The Virginian was a hit from outset and lasted years, being a best argument for passing the hour mark on televised drama.
A lot would say U's theatrical features by then befit the tube more than paying houses, pallets of these dumped to the network along with quickies getting "World Premiered" on primetime. Lew Wasserman was string-puller at Universal, having come to power from agent ranks. His were ice-cold business doings with indifference to quality product, but Wasserman knew The Killers had to deliver as inaugural run at Made-For-TV's. Don Siegel wrote vividly of head office bead on every Killers aspect; they'd even overshoot budget toward good as possible outcome. This was wise investment for long view re the NBC deal and dozens of custom pics that could be sold if The Killers worked out. Trades took an interest from early 1964 when Variety touted Johnny North (later renamed The Killers) as "something never before attempted for the small screen," NBC and Revue (Universal's TV arm) agreeing to each put $300K toward completion. The trade reported twenty-five days spent shooting, plus a few more by a second unit.
Don Siegel was bullish on The Killers, calling it "the only hope for TV," and vanguard of whole new concepts in programming. His version was also an improvement on Mark Hellinger's 1946 original, said Siegel, who credited Wasserman for coming up with the idea of hit-men Lee Marvin and Clu Gulugar on their own investigating a robbery-gone-wrong, "which gave it a whole new flavor," according to Don (angling here for more MCA work?). Siegel was an ideal pick for fast and economical work over "epics." "They bore me," he said, and what's more, his twenty-five days spent on The Killers could and would be trimmed to 15-20 days on future projects, this music to ears of Uni brass. In what reads like bald appeal for a next assignment, Siegel recounted how thrifty he'd been over a long filmmaking career. Saying TV movies should cost around $500,000, Siegel added that his could be done for less. "I made Baby Face Nelson for $175,000, Riot In Cell Block 11 for $225,000, (and) The Body Snatcher (as in Invasion Of ...) for $300,000."
NBC had initial objection to violence in The Killers, said Variety, but withdrew complaint "after (Siegel) explained it was essential to the story." Another tender spot was action involving a rooftop sniper, this a flag after the Kennedy assassination which took place while Johnny North was in production. As the scene was locked into narrative, all Siegel could do was shoot "in a different way, and now the killer is unseen," which in the finished film played somewhat ragged (who was firing the weapon?). Universal knew early that The Killers would be released theatrically in Europe, and it was for that reason a widescreen framing was used, with an open matte for TV broadcast in the states. Costs on Johnny North had crept to $900K, and that concerned NBC program chief Mort Werner, him acknowledging that pilots tended toward bigger spending in order to lure advertisers, but "they're trying to make this look too good."
Saying that NBC had balked on Johnny North (now The Killers) for "an overdose of sex and brutality," Variety gave the now-theatrical release a nasty pan on 5/27/64, calling it "a throwback," and "essentially an anachronism," saying that only buffs of crime melodrama would "get much of a charge out of this exercise of hate, double-cross, and sadism." Insiders knew that The Killers had gone wide of what Universal and its network customer intended, but this still was a Lew Wasserman project, to which he applied creative effort, atypical role for this ultimate bean-counter, so who would dare slap his wrist for botch that was outcome? Besides, The Killers brought $949,260 in domestic rentals, not bad for a minor actioner, but foreign receipts of at least that much would be needed to keep it from going into red. Now The Killers is a classic, a 1.85 Blu-ray out of Region Two that captures vividly how the film would look on theatre screens.
More about The Killers, both versions, at Greenbriar Archives HERE.






7 Comments:
Both versions of this are great. The Burt Lancaster Robert Siodmak version is Hemingway as he wrote it.
Was "The Killers" ever on a Network broadcast in any (edited) form?
I'm glad you mentioned the TV vs Theatrical Aspect ratio (1.33 & 1.85), as many people don't believe me when I say you often had to frame safely for both.
Phil, THE KILLERS(filmed 1963, released 1964) didn't have a prime-time television network premiere or any kind of premiere on the networks. Why? I don't really know. You would think the movie would have had a prime-time network premiere on NBC-TV, either on NBC's SATURDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES, MONDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES, or TUESDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES in the late 1960's. Universal Pictures had a licensing deal with NBC-TV to premiere their features and their World Premiere Movies(made for tv).
Universal Pictures licensed THE KILLERS to local television stations for airing. As far as I know(if anyone else has different information please inform us) the movie began appearing on local tv stations in 1968. As far as I can find it first aired on Friday January 26, 1968, by way of Sacramento, California's CBS-TV affiliate KXTV Channel 10 at 9:00 PM(Pacific Time). Channel 10 showed their own FRIDAY MOVIE instead of the network's THE CBS FRIDAY NIGHT MOVIE, which aired the ISLAND OF LOVE(filmed 1962, released 1963).
Thanks for this detailed info, Walter. THE KILLERS indeed went into that large Universal syndicated package which included a number of off-network features plus a group of Hammer films U had distributed, a few but not all of which had played on NBC's prime time movie slots.
All I can say is that the trailer to this movie got a hell of a lot of laughs at a local niche movie theater here in San Diego in the early 70's.
Do you recall what made them laugh?
Dan Mercer shares some thoughts about THE KILLERS:
It’s fascinating, this background you’ve provided for “The Killers.” I’ve little doubt that it was pulled from network release for its violence, but I have a feeling that it was less for the violence itself as for what that violence represented.
Even with the skill and efficiency of Don Siegel's direction and the higher than anticipated production costs, there are still signs of corner cutting in the film, as in the flat lighting to allow for more setups, the obvious use of process screens in the race sequence, and the too familiar street sets of Universal City. It lends a visual aridity to the film, everything bright and bland, though this complements the moral aridity of the film itself.
In the Hemingway short story, there is a protagonist who sees the events unfold, in the killers come to kill the washed-up boxer, the boxer’s resignation to his death, and the willingness of others to go about their daily routines, indifferent to impending killing. Unsettled, he leaves town. The film provides a back story to this, but in telling the story itself from the perspective of the killers, it removes that overview, with its suggestion of a moral order apart from that of the characters. So, no one serves any good purpose, all motivations are questionable, and everyone comes to a bad end.
The killers see behind the apparent reality, but only to the extent of sensing the possibility of a big score. Otherwise, they are as blind to the implications of what they are doing as anyone else. Even with their shrewdness, they find themselves lured into the same kind of trap as the man they killed. At that, their would-be killer is also blind and cannot foresee that one of his victims may be too tough and determined to fall without trying to see his own plan through to the end.
The violence in “The Killers” is sharp and pungent but not excessive by network television standards of the time, when you consider the number of police, detective, and western shows airing then, with their gunplay and death. The blood is more apparent, but that is all. In those shows, however, there was always the gloss of moral justification, with the “bad guy” receiving his just deserts at the end, thus making up for his less justified killings between commercial breaks and restoring the moral order.
In those television shows, the moral justification was often a sham, a mask to allow the audience to enjoy the surreptitious delight of seeing lives violently extinguished, provided that manner in which that was carried out was somewhat discrete. In “The Killers,” that mask was ripped away. In it, every death diminishes the characters and the audience, for it is not merely the way death is administered or the number of people killed, but why they are killed. There is always a want of goodness and charity. It’s little wonder, then, that it was considered unsuitable, when it told a truth that would have unsettled a lie.
Post a Comment
<< Home