Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, May 25, 2026

History for Fun #2

Beware Austerity Eyes That Paralyzed

From Fact: Doing Without Even After You Win

Lots imagine how great it would be to have met one or all of the Beatles. What fun to find common ground with that irreverent lot, but here’s the thing, a massive thing. We of stateside spoilage had not a thread in common with these or any Liverpool boys or girls, virtually all of whom knew life in the rawer than we of comparative, if sustained, privilege, ever would. Did postwar Yanks experience rationing, meatless most days, endless austerity as did all four Beatles plus pop faves off the Isles we thought spoke for us? They might not have remembered the war but sure understood scarcity of necessaries afterward. Bombs had stopped falling, but still was shortage of most staples, this to gruel another nine-at-least years, time aplenty for Beatles and contemporaries to know want as way of life. How did they respond to us who had things so easy? Brits still in the 1960’s were rags beside Yank riches, us swimming in gravy from babyhood. All who grew up in England after the war knew what it was to be without. They’d darn a sock rather than toss it away and buy a new pair. Everything was had in minimum. Kids swapped toys for sweets, soap was precious, “Make Do and Mend” meant patches on clothes and forget embarrassment because all your mates endured a same thing. Think life was markedly better by the swinging sixties? Not so pampered Americans would notice. Look close at English films from after the war, and years after, to see dimes stretch to dollars, putting on appearance of prosperity where really there wasn’t any. 1963’s Children of the Damned is a UK home movie for how desolate life still was long after Britain had “won” its war. I use quotations for fact the country went flat broke financing what in many ways was pyrrhic victory. Yes, they were free and no longer nightly blitzed, but who financed their defense? Us Yanks, us who boomed after the surrenders and never had things so good as we would for generations to come.

Not Much of a House, We'd Say, but Postwar Blighted Britishers Were Thankful to Get It

Britain emptied vaults to secure “lend lease” and other loans from the US. Their gold supply ended up in our Fort Knox. Ironic to see James Bond rescue that US asset from clutches of Auric Goldfinger. British empire crumbled in the wake of war. They just couldn’t afford colonies anymore. India split in the late forties and Egypt rebelled in 1956. The rest disappeared like mercury over hardwood flooring. A cultural comeback came with the sixties, music and movies, though they’d not last at pitch with which they began. Back to semi-doc Children of the Damned which seems to me another of “wreckage” work Englanders engaged to make a best of settings that would loudly reflect a world struggling from under rubble of war. Children’s civil servant chums share a tolerable flat, those they assist in hovels you’d not house dogs nor cats in. Titular children are damned by everyday circumstance no less than whatever unholy force guides them. Children of the Damned lifts veil off hardship but barely relieved by 1963. Much location in London sees houses, buildings, too few rebuilt from mess left after Germans hit, most telling a famous church, St. Dunston-in-the-East, blasted by the Blitz (1941) to leave but outer walls, a tower and a steeple. Initial building went up in 1100, remains today a public garden. As if to emphasize devastation from the war, Children of the Damned used also interiors of the church, no set adequate to convey impact upon said ruin. Were horror-seekers put off by real horror Children of the Damned conveyed? I sensed much at age nine that was barren and hopeless in this London, in-part product of story told, but more so places utilized to tell it, stark beside my gingerbread world. And to think the Beatles would within weeks debut on Ed Sullivan where a whole new face for England would emerge.

Well-Traveled "Black Forest" Near Hammer's Humble House That Doubled as Studio

Speaking of horrors, was there good reason for Hammer Films to focus on period backdrops? Did these  spare us lingering looks on post-apocalypse peeking still from an English landscape? Bray’s picturesque if sinister “Black Forest” seemed a garden spot beside London even when and where it swung. People beset by vampirism and werewolfery at least were not poor and just this side of ration books. Peter Cushing’s Van Helsing, Victor Frankenstein, the rest, dress elegant and wear tall toppers. To step into parlors, even pubs, in a Hammer horror is to sample a Whitman box filled with flavors. I never had to worry where their next feast came from. The Baron breaks from cutting a cadaver and there’s chicken alongside his bloody scalpels to sample. Compare with also-Hammer but contemporary-set Cash on Demand where Cushing heads bank management  and won't waste a copper-plated steel penny. Where Hammer staged latter-day scares, it was often sparce conditions that scared us more. The Quatermass series excels for science explored on penurious terms, Brian Donlevy having constructed a rocket, but who heck paid for the thing? He investigates alien intrusion largely on his own dime it seems, facilities he’ll consult barren of resource as we’d expect for British sci-fi set in 50’s there-and-then. The Quatermass Xperiment in 1956 (known here as The Creeping Unknown) captured reality frightful as whatever alien posed a threat. Latter on-the-loose stalks a riverbank mostly mud and, in all ways, uninviting where a dingy little girl plays with her dolly to seeming satisfaction, daily life for the character and maybe Jane Asher (b. 1946) who plays her,  Asher of later and close association with Paul McCartney and co-starring with Vincent Price in Masque of the Red Death. If anyone could tell of Britain in sustained hard times, then 60’s rebirth if but partial, it would be Jane Asher. Has she shared insights from the era? I note from Google that she has not so far done a memoir but has written several novels plus a tome about cake decorating.

Hammer's Idea of a Splurge Would Easily Have Been These Picturesque Models

Scores of others, many still around, sat both ends of Britain’s cultural seesaw. Think Dave Clark, who with his Five recorded hit after hit plus starred in Catch Us If You Can (US title: Having a Wild Weekend), which Greenbriar visited in 2013. There are but two of Clark’s Five left, Barbara Ferris, also of Catch Us, having lately left at eighty-eight. It’s been writ, by me on occasion, that UK imports rode a tough sled because we wouldn’t groove with their accents and idiom. I begin to wonder now if it was more the defeat their contemporary-set features reflected, that “wreckage” earlier referred to. Was this why late 40’s Brit melodrama leaned so heavy on period backdrop, where production wealth could at least be simulated by costumes, real castles or estates, maybe Technicolor for added splash? Look at recently released Saraband for Dead Lovers, an astonishing Blu-Ray, or restored Blanche Fury. There are others. Hammer took a lot of stylistic instruction from these. Were postwar British movies more palatable where set way past? Remember it was solidly Brit and puffed sleeve Tom Jones that took 1964’s Academy Award, this after Lawrence of Arabia, also British and set far back, took the prize for 1963. Not to dump on The Apartment, but given the authority, I’d have awarded Brides of Dracula in 1961. Still would, even at this point in life where I should know better.

6 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

BRIDES OF DRACULA is excellent in every way excellence can be had. So is CHILDREN OF THE DAMNED altho why the blond hair from VILLAGE was not carried over always escaped me. Author of THE MIDWICH CUCKOOS John Wyndham had praise for it as an original work. Today's column is EXCELLENCE. Great way to start my day. It's expensive not to stand up when standing up is required. Had Britain stood up when Hitler marched into Austria we would probably be living in a less advanced but better world.

11:07 AM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

As Keith Richards put it, in the '50s England was black & white while the US was in color.

11:31 AM  
Blogger DBenson said...

Remember that the Great Depression hit pretty much everywhere, so a level of austerity was a widespread fact of life before official policy made it austere-er.

The acidic 1984 comedy "A Private Function" puts postwar rationing center stage, with intrigues around a pig being illegally fattened for a village banquet. The commentary on VCI's release of the 1951 "A Christmas Carol" notes that a holiday feast is modestly scaled with intent. Rationing often figures in "Foyle's War", an excellent series of mysteries set in WWII, while the latest version of "All Creatures Great and Small" puts a nostalgic spin on scraping and trading to gather ingredients for special occasions.

A chunk of Britain's postwar industrial output was earmarked For Export Only to draw desperately needed cash, which meant among other things long waiting lists for domestic car buyers. And Disney's run of adventure films began because they had to spend British earnings in Britain.

Recall reading a piece somewhere about the early James Bond films. To Americans, Bond going through an airport was utterly mundane, even with the dramatic music. To British audiences in the early 60s, the whole concept of air travel was exotic and near-unattainable.

3:39 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Keith Richards once again NAILS it.

5:35 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer considers loss of empire and debts from two world wars (Part One):


You’ve taken a thoughtful approach towards the context within which movies and other entertainments came to our country from Great Britain after the Second World War. The privations you noted show just how exhausted it was then, not only by the cost of that war, but the one preceding it as well.

In the First World War, Great Britain lost 886,000 men, suffered another 1.6 million wounded, and expended the equivalent of $4.7 trillion in today’s money. Just 21 years later, it entered the Second World War, in which it lost another 384,000 men, had 277,000 wounded, and expended $3.5 trillion. There were also 70,000 civilian lives lost, since the island was subjected to aerial bombardment throughout the war.

As you suggested, empire is less a source of strength than an expression of it. Indeed, Great Britain released its Indian colony after the war because it realized it wasn’t strong enough to retain it, if there should be an armed rebellion. During the war, it had been terrified by Subhas Chandra Bose, an Indian nationalist who led insurgent forces alongside the Japanese.

The official end of the Empire can be dated to a few years later, in July 1956, when Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal and Great Britain and France sent a military expedition to take it back. In this, they were successful, but the United States, under President Eisenhower, insisted that they withdraw their forces. Eisenhower disliked colonies and saw no place for them in the modern world. He was also alarmed when the Soviet Union threatened to attack London and Paris with nuclear missiles in retaliation—this as a distraction from its occupation of Hungary. Perhaps most tellingly, he was annoyed that the two countries had not asked his permission to take this action. The United States was now the dominant power in the world, not Great Britain or France. Great Britain and France acknowledged this fact, withdrew, and thus left the world stage forever as first rank powers. The remaining British colonies were soon lost, as you say, like mercury spilled on a hardwood floor.

5:48 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Part Two from Dan Mercer:


So, that was the end of the Empire. The beginning of the end can also be dated, to March 31, 1939, when Great Britain gave a guarantee to Poland, promising to take military action if Poland was attacked by Germany. Britain knew that it had no way of honoring the guarantee in a timely manner, something the Poles did not understand, but it had not intended the giving of it to be a deterrence against war. Rather, it assumed that it would precipitate a war by making the Poles intransigent in their negotiations with Germany over Danzig, the German city governed since the end of the First World War as an open city, but effectively controlled by Poland. This was considered desirable, in that it would allow Great Britain and France to engage Germany militarily before Germany became any stronger.

The context for this action was that British foreign policy had traditionally been opposed to whichever continental power was strongest at any time. It might be Spain in the 16th century, France in the 17th and 18th centuries, or Germany during this period. After the takeover of Austria and the Munich treaty partitioning Czechoslovakia, German ambitions were apparent. Foreign Office minutes indicate that the beginning of hostilities was expected to begin within a year of the guarantee. As it happened, Germany attacked Poland on September 1, 1939, just six months later.

A few months after that, as France was being overrun by Germany in May 1940, several cabinet ministers, Lord Halifax most prominently, urged Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister, to accept German peace overtures and look to the future for more favorable circumstances under which to resume hostilities. Churchill, however, did not believe that such circumstances would present themselves unless Great Britain was allied with the United States, in which case there was no reason to enter any peace negotiations.
In his book, “Five Days in London: May 1940,” the historian, John Lukacs, regards the decision to continue fighting as sacrificial on the part of the British Empire, and as salvation of Western Civilization. Ironically, Churchill’s hope had been that it would save the Empire.

5:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025
  • June 2025
  • July 2025
  • August 2025
  • September 2025
  • October 2025
  • November 2025
  • December 2025
  • January 2026
  • February 2026
  • March 2026
  • April 2026
  • May 2026
  • June 2026