Blowing Out 1973 Candles ...
When Warners Turned Fifty
Warner Bros. threw an anniversary party for themselves in 1973. History went back to 1923 (or somewhere thereabouts) but owner of the pre-49 backlog was United Artists, which meant birthday showings of WB classics would have to be cleared through UA. It had been that way since the mid-fifties when Warners perhaps foolishly (no “perhaps” about it) sold their library outright for ludicrously low $21 million. As Greenbriar and others have said before, the cartoons alone were worth that. So long as viewer eyes still beheld the shield on openings of Warner work, they’d figure it all still belonged to the stripped-down company, which had more lately bartered themselves to a buyer top heavy with parking lots and garages, plus funeral homes and other unappetizing assets. Warners did a lookback to show at festivals, saluting the old but emphasizing the new, in this instance Mame, which was in production and sucking up money as only over-produced musicals could. Heritage was acknowledged by revivals where anyone wanted them. Late shows had used WB oldies long enough to be less enamored by them now, but nostalgia gained ground by the seventies and there was cult interest in some of inventory (Bogart, James Dean, individual titles here and there). The ABC network did honors with a late night (appropriate) celebration of the studio co-hosted by Bette Davis and Jack Benny plus then-WB chief Ted Ashley. I watched the show on that historic ninety-minute December 12 occasion, a Wednesday, getting a jolt when special guest Jack L. Warner (himself) strode out to bandy with Bette. Still not sure if maybe I dreamt it. Principal writer was Tony Thomas, an undoubted benefit, though I was less familiar with him at the time. There’s no trace of this “Wide World of Entertainment” at You Tube, pre-VCR 1973 early for home sitters to record stuff off TV. There is no indication of ABC having repeated it. Of all bizarre broadcasts, here is one I’d dearly want to watch again.
![]() |
| A Rich Book from 1976 and Easy to Find for Cheap from eBay |
Can’t recall much detail apart from Bette saying how dreamy Errol Flynn looked. She and J.L. got along OK … it hadn’t been so many years since Dead Ringer. Further peal of anniversary bells came with the release of two record sets, boxes to contain music from past films and/or memorable dialogue exchanges. It all seemed too good to be true, but proof was in the listening, and we had every reason to think old films were indeed on cusp of coming truly back. The Warners library did resurface on TV stations recently hatched on UHF bands, oldies filling primetime hours to compete with major network programming. Our ABC affiliate in High Point surprised watchers by bumping the net’s schedule in favor of WB classics, Channel 8’s weatherman the on-air host and booster. Frank Deal had once tried acting, recalled for a broadcast of Sergeant York how he worked with a small part player in that film. It made a good story, and Channel 8 gave two and a half hours to at least most of Sergeant York. United Artists benefited by circulating the WB back library they owned, on 16 and 35mm. Our wretched College Park Cinema booked Casablanca and while yes, the 35mm looked great, it would also accentuate yards of footage gone with every splice, oodles of those it seemed. The Adventures of Robin Hood came back in 1976 with fresh promotional paper, a one-sheet (at right) more pleasing than the original from 1938 had been. Cherry atop was Little, Brown releasing a coffee table sitter called Here’s Looking at You, Kid: 50 Years of Fighting, Working, and Dreaming at Warner Bros. The writer was James R. Silke, him of dizzying past research plus popular culture pursuits of every sort. He was a graphic designer and drew comic books, lived to ninety-three. Silke had Warners cooperation on his book and interviewed a score of names not otherwise accessible. He used stills I don’t recall seeing elsewhere, presumably got before WB cabinets were rifled by collectors who by the nineties would cream most of studio inventory.
![]() |
| Really Hoping Someone Other Than Just Me Will Remember This Long-Ago Magazine for School-Agers |
Producers like Robert Lord and Henry Blanke sat down with Silke. Show me where else these spoke or cooperated with anyone. Warners cleared roads for Silke otherwise shut. Here’s Looking at You, Kid is not a puff job. Bluntness like this you’ll not find in subsequent histories of WB or any studio, rabbits that much more scared since. Silke’s book goes 317 pages, a lot for its being oversized in the bargain. I read the whole thing again last week, a first revisit in decades. Memory suggests it cost twenty-two or twenty-three dollars when new. Our local newsstand unaccountably had it and I knew waiting would see the price knocked down, which sure enough it was (who else in my town would be interested?). That brings me to a paragraph from Silke’s preamble to sort of pour ice water going in: “The Audience remembers the Warner Bros. stars even if it only met them on the pale gray tube late at night in a lonely apartment.” A few years short of a lonely apartment in 1976, I still felt label of loser for caring about topics Silke embarked upon. Was old film exclusive province of the friendless and forlorn? The author implied so, a mainstream caring only where oldies held “camp” promise like Busby Berkeley chorines dancing with electric-lit violins. Those of us more committed stayed so on solitary terms. To watch an old film was to stay up too late, normies' sleep not to be sacrificed for piffle offered at owl hour. We got a monthly magazine in eighth grade called “Scholastic Scope” which actually wasn’t bad and free besides. The February 29, 1968 issue was devoted to “The Story of Movies,” sole reason for my saving it all these years. Ads included Kellogg’s cereal (Win a Guest Role of The Monkees TV Show!) and early Army recruitment (!!), latter relevant as there was still action happening in Viet Nam if any of us hoped to one day get in on it.
![]() |
| I Used to Wonder at Age Fourteen if Viet Nam Would Last Long Enough for Them to Scoop Me Up |
Scope’s cine-history was eight pages and did a fair job summing up the so-far story of American film. Nibbling round edge was “Famous Lines from the Movies” kidding cliches gleaned from late nights sat before television in those lonely apartments Silke referenced. He’d not coddle us re past pictures. As Warners “ground out” approximately sixty features per year --- well, how could even half of them be good, and what of these, if any, achieved greatness? Permit detour to a Warner studio tour some of us took in 1989, perky guide showing off a backlot where immortality was daily captured and recorded. Me being know-it-all plus snide toward present days said yes, but look at televised rubbish occupying mock-up streets today. Our hostess who up to then was sunshine itself must have been ready for my remark, her quick to retort: “Bear in mind, sir, that half if not most of movies from the so-called “Golden” age were B at best, the classics always in a minority on a busy lot like Warners.” I shrank smaller than Grant Williams for realizing how right she was, the reproof richly deserved. Even “star” vehicles could be commonplace, good because we’re predisposed to figure any Warners of the era will be good. One seen of late was The Big Shot for middling example of a thing neither special nor especially bad. It was a starring part for Humphrey Bogart after doing High Sierra and The Maltese Falcon except instead of Raoul Walsh or John Huston directing, he got Lewis Seiler. The Big Shot is fun accompany to Here’s Looking at You, Kid. There is Bogart plus pace and tempo unique to WB, music too a decided asset (Adolph Deutsch) and link w/ previous successes, the score oft- salve to shows otherwise ordinary. The Big Shot is blessedly unburdened by expectation that all from Warners must score at Falcon level. Silke’s book understands this and credits output fine as it was under endless pressure that was limited budgets and nonstop stress to begin and finish always on schedule.







12 Comments:
Paramount selling off their pre-1948 catalogue was equal to and perhaps surpassed Warner Brothers selling off their pre-1948 catalogue. Great post.
Imminent writer/historian James Curtis supplies welcome detail re the ABC Wide World of Entertainment episode from 1973, plus more on James Silke's book:
John,
I don’t know how much readership your new post will attract, but to me it seemed as if it could have been personally addressed.
I’m afraid I had largely forgotten about the Silke book, but that shot of the jacket brought it all back to me. Like you, I remembered it as a solid piece of work, not fluff by any means, and one that I bought when it first came out. I’m certain I don’t have it now, but I’ve made a note to find a copy and re-acquire it. Regarding some of the WB personnel he talked to, I don’t know about Robert Lord, but Henry Blanke did an oral history interview for UCLA back in the 70s, and it’s still in their inventory. I’ve not read it, but I’ve always wanted to, and maybe I’ll have an excuse to do so sometime soon. Which makes me wonder where Silke’s papers might end up, and if the transcripts of those interviews he did for the book might be among them.
However, I occasionally think about that ABC Wide World of Entertainment special, which I believe was titled “Here’s Looking at You, Warner Bros.” Strangely, I don’t think I’ve ever encountered another person who remembered seeing it. My memory is that Jack Benny didn’t co-host with Bette Davis, but rather it was George Siegel. I have no memory of Benny even being on it, although he may well have been. I vividly remember J.L. Warner at the end, and Siegel graciously introducing Paul Henreid, seated in the audience, as “one of my heroes.” One time, having thought of the show, I looked around to see if it was preserved somewhere. I don’t remember if Paley Center has it, but I believe a copy is at the UCLA TV Archive, and that’s another long-ago memory I’d like to revisit.
Anyway, thanks for today’s post. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Jim
it was kind of amusing when Time Warner, or whatever it was then, merged withTed Turner to regain their own film library (along with other studios's sold-off vaults). Did any other studio or corporate successor try to retrieve their creations?
Interesting that Paramount never celebrated / marketed its past like Warner, MGM, Universal, Fox, and Disney. Perhaps because only the current library owners would really benefit.
Paramount got back a number of their cartoons, had kept control not only of their post-49 features, but their silent titles as well. Of course, all the latter are now in the Public Domain.
Here’s Looking at You, Warner Bros. was a TV special from 1993, released as a snapper bonus disc on some WB DVD sets. The 1973 WB Movies - A 50 Year Salute that aired on ABC late night was repeated Friday June 14, 1974. I well remember both, have the latter DVD. What I remember from the first was a long, humorous montage of clips, from Cagney “Who did it?” to “Mrs. Norman Maine” as the guilty party. The WB multi-part history from a few years back I found a dud as complete history, although a decent over view of the last 50 years. I still have my three record album of WB music from 1973. Great set.
I remember a similar ABC WWOE salute to Columbia Pictures, hosted by Glenn Ford, with Phil Silvers making a guest appearance.
Regarding the pre-48 sales by Paramount, Warners, et al, while hindsight is always 20/20, one has to wonder what the studios were thinking. While it did give a one-time boost to the bottom line, the obvious question is, what about next year? Did they really think the film biz would miraculously rise again? Am I correct in recalling that Sam Goldwyn was pretty much the rare holdout, preferring to lease films to tv versus selling his library outright?
Walt and Roy Disney were obsessive about owning their output after losing Oswald the Lucky Rabbit. They never sold outright, although it must have been mighty tempting given Walt's penchant for risky and expensive projects. An empire was built on re-releases and powerful branding.
-----------------------
Our host has explored the selling of vaults in the past, re cartoons as well as features. The postwar era saw the end of weekly filmgoing, the rise of television, and studios themselves changing hands. Allowing studio products to run on television was at first regarded as treason to the industry. But resolve softened, and studios realized this fresh new medium was drooling for films exhibitors had long since stopped booking. This window of opportunity might slam shut once production for television kicked into high, so selling to syndicators -- or investing the time and money to syndicate their own product -- may well have looked like a last chance to reap anything from vault titles. For executives under pressure, a flat out sale probably looked like the smartest move.
Sleep is precious to a child, certainly to the mother of the child, as it was to mine, yet I was able to persuade her to wake me up to watch "Silents, Please" during my impressionable years. Always, however, there was the possibility of a dreadful denouement, awakening in my bed to a dawn gray upon my bedroom curtains, with an explanation forthcoming that she tried and tried but just couldn't get me to stir. Hardly likely, I thought to myself. Scarcely better was to be sitting before the family Magnavox at the proper time, only to have the program pre-empted by some international crisis being debated at the United Nations. Put "Silents, Please" aside for that? Ridiculous. In later years, I'd attend to such matters myself, watching the likes of "Let Us Be Gay" or "Way For A Sailor" during those fabled early morning hours, though awakening on the living room floor in darkness, save for the illumination provided by a test signal on the television set, remained a danger. Such an experience marked my first attempt to watch "The Big Sleep."
Reissue incident that often comes to mind is MGM's loss taken when they spent dollars for new accessories (better one-sheets for example), to escort NORTH BY NORTHWEST back to theatres in 1966. One so good as that still flopping would have told Metro, along with observers industry-wide, that vaulties, with few exceptions, were best handed over to where they could at least earn SOME revenue ... to wit television.
Hard to imagine NORTH BY NORTHWEST flopping. It, as the saying went, delivers on all cylinders. I, too, was hooked by "SILENTS, PLEASE."
Wow! I had that WB book and those LP sets, forgot all about them until now. Those soundtrack albums were the closest I ever thought I'd get to "seeing" most of those movies, although I was most interested in the pre-1940 stuff. It was something of a thrill when the original trailer for "The Jazz Singer" was included as a bonus on the 2007 DVD release of the movie after being familiar with only the audio -- and only a tiny portion at that.
And I, too, spent too many nights staying up late watching whatever oldie struck my interest. This really is the golden age for us movie fans -- or freaks.
I remember that Warner Bros. 50th Anniversary book opened with word pictures of classic Warner films. My favorite: "Bette Davis, atop a grand staircase. A dozen men at her feet... several dead."
Post a Comment
<< Home