Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Monday, July 13, 2026

Stills That Speak #11

 

So Much Meat on the Hoof. Can Cornel Bring One Down?

STS: Three That Speak to Survival

Been fasting this week. Told by You Tube that it’s a good idea. They could be wrong, in which event I’m in little better circumstance that casts of three seen of late to rise and fail during the mid-sixties when bare-fist survival stories had not a vogue perhaps, but did appear to come out of nowhere in a seeming lump. Said trio unique for ferocity of content and unblinking grip at reality were The Naked Prey, Sands of the Kalahari, and Flight of the Phoenix, each deserving of success none would get, proof again that good pictures never assured good grossing. Movies were/are called candy-coated, then comes ones like these refusing to compromise, each spanked by a shocked trade and put-off public. I recall them coming/gone on scant notice. The Naked Prey limped to the Liberty as part of a Saturday only combo skipped by me for a too harrowing trailer. Cornel Wilde chased by natives through seeming whole of Africa was anti-Tarzan and reassurance that series had stood for. I was not old enough at twelve to process what looked like non-stop torture for Wilde, him in mid-fifties capable of astonishing feats not unlike Burt Lancaster at same age scaling sheer rock in same year’s The Professionals. I’d be years steeling myself to watch The Naked Prey, a kind of dread discoloring the interim. All know certain titles that compel and yet repel. Will they do psychic damage should we submit? Criterion has a splendid Blu-Ray to argue for The Naked Prey as one of key features done in the sixties, utterly unlike anything out the same decade, shamefully ignored then and still so now.

Torture Served Stark, and Never Mind the Guy They Roast Over an Open Fire

If auteuring may be defined, let alone exemplified, by any single artist, then surely it is by Cornel Wilde, who expressed by talent, let alone life and limb, his philosophy re man and limits humanity will pass where faced by savagery unchecked. I’ll venture that The Naked Prey is a lot more shocking today than in 1965-66 when it nibbled at edges of decorum movies upheld to that time. We’d witness crumble of the Code where a Naked Prey and ones like it (but wait, there was nothing like The Naked Prey) bent boundaries film hitherto observed, 1968 official recognition of a mainstream letting its ship of rules go ahead and sink. Of raw meat also served in ’65 was Sands of the Kalahari, the “baboon” one I heard mention of at school but missed a first go round despite a spectacular pressbook Col. Forehand gave me which cover had long-fanged apes forward lunging in full color, Paramount putting such aggressive sell on little else that blighted year. The Liberty brought back Sands of the Kalahari for a Saturday double where we'd finally intersect, my anticipation and appetite for baboons fierce as that aroused by Pom Poms and Baby Ruth. Guess Col. Forehand knew impolite product where he saw it, or maybe Paramount’s field man tipped him off that these were best snuck in on shortest terms, then hustled out before parents caught the odor. Worry over warpage of young minds had basis where such shows applied, Sands of the Kalahari cruelest exploration of man’s inhumanity to other men and a woman (Susannah York). Sands is of classic “ordeal” structure. Can ones off a wrecked plane survive on a parched and endless desert? All are reduced to same level of beasts that stalk them, Sands of the Kalahari Brit-cast and backed, if shot in South Africa, a re-teaming for folk behind Zulu success previous (director Cy Endfield, star Stanley Baker).

Not Your Next In-Flight Movie, I Hope

Sands of the Kalahari
is one for watching in maximum comfort, “This could never happen to me” a soothing accompany, but not altogether as Kalahari fights complacency with brass knucks. Again, those baboons. They scared me more than otherwise apes in any movie. Did Stuart Whitman get extra pay for fighting one to the death with bare hands? Hope so. I would have been for handing out Academy Awards to Kalahari’s entire cast. For once such a trophy could mean something. We sweat with these unfortunates and wonder how one could endure even a fraction of what they go through. That last applies to the cast in undoubted real misery of shooting where clothes they wear become rags or discard altogether over two hour’s spread. Imagine Susannah York went from this to A Man for All Seasons. An actor’s life for thee but not for me (York incidentally gives a performance for the ages). S. Baker, Stuart Whitman, Nigel Davenport, Theodore Bikel, and Harry Andrews also suffer admirably. How much different to simulate such horror than to know it for real? Full marks for this ensemble. Same for miserable lot downed by defective aircraft in Flight of the Phoenix, star-hoisted by James Stewart as pilot for the group with direction by Robert Aldrich. Fox expected mighty things from Flight, entrusting $5.3 million to the negative and shooting on domestic desert floor rather than crossing oceans to do same. Reviews were rapturous but the public pointed thumbs down. Too many by now had bought color televisions. That much as anything was what put films in a doom loop during the mid-sixties. Fox chart, like every company else’s, dripped red in 1965 when Flight of the Phoenix did crash of its own ($3.4 million lost), proof again that you can make them good, excellent even, and still lose it all and more. Aldrich never got over the beating Phoenix took. At least there is Criterion to celebrate greatness achieved, their Blu-Ray outstanding with as fine extras. Stewart and distinguished support roast under a pitiless sun and we’re 142 minutes frying with them. Takes mettle to make this march, again mood of your moment to dictate.

This Should Have Clicked Instead of Jim in True Downer Shenandoah of a Same Year

Occurs to Me That All Three of This Week's Selected Shows are Triumphs of the Human Spirit

What did it say about 1965 where three of such stripe appeared, not by design obviously, just circumstance of culture giving birth to strikingly similar ideas around a same time, varied creators speaking similar language with all to depict hardship at levels not explored before by movies. There’d be little reward for harsh cards dealt, but what could they reasonably expect? Flight of the Phoenix was seemingly most hopeful of the lot, at least from money-spent-standpoint. There has to be hope in any venture, these three expressed by endurance and ours for enduring hours where no matter how well executed the telling, we take punishment same as those stricken on screen. There is precious little humor among the lot. We’d not want that for storytelling integrity kept intact. No one could accuse The Naked Prey, Sands of the Kalahari, and Flight of the Phoenix of being soft around the middle. None gave in to boxoffice call for compromise. How did Cornel Wilde negotiate studio support for a project so outlaw as The Naked Prey? --- him far from a Top Ten name in 1965-66 or any time. The Naked Prey collected $687K in domestic rentals. Short of walloping worldwide, it surely lost money. There would not be network airplay for Prey nor Sands of the Kalahari, which collected $931K in domestic rentals. Again hope … for another Zulu?, but word-of-mouth for Kalahari, Prey, and Phoenix was likely reserved if not ruinous among ticket buyers if not admiring critics (seldom much help in any event). Go At Nervous System Risk, leave kiddies home till a next Disney or Elvis, women will surely shun, all such reactions to collapse the boxoffice. I’d not discount these or claim “we weren’t ready” for these sorts of entertainment (but how “entertaining” was patron ordeal, detractors might argue). I instead say seek them out because all score in ways unique and not captured elsewhere, certainly not of timid now, and probably they won’t be equaled, even approached, again. Here’s too to note: None resolve on bummer basis --- you won’t go home to suck the gas pipe. I felt in fact invigorated by the outcome of all three. Fact the group are accessible in High-Def, streaming, discs, etc., well … there go excuses for not rooting them out. Go watch and collect Scout badges for doing so, earn real “Courage Awards.”

5 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Drinking age was 21 in Toronto when I began my programs. Provincial legislation, enacted July 28, 1971, that reduced the drinking age from 21 to 18. With that my audience died. That also killed every coffee house in Toronto. I bet the end of Prohibition had the same when Nationwide Prohibition in the United States was officially repealed on December 5, 1933, when the Twenty-first Amendment to the Constitution was ratified.

On top of that when the Motion Picture Code went into effect it made the movies safe for the people who did not go to them while at the same time taking the juice out of them for those who did.

I don't think the industry has ever recovered.

Great piece.

12:59 PM  
Blogger Phil Smoot said...

Okay, for decades I have heard about "Sands of the Kalahari" and Baboons (of which we have many here at the NC Zoo in Asheboro), so you convinced me it's time to get the Kino Blu-ray of the movie. Ordered. I've seen "The Naked Prey" and "Flight of the Phoenix" - - So now to be complete.

9:10 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer remembers his father taking him to see FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX:


My father would take me to movies occasionally, probably as a way of sharing something he knew I loved and maybe for something more. It was during the mid-sixties and the ones we saw included "On His Majesty's Secret Service," "The Blue Max," and "Grand Prix." We also saw "The Flight of the Phoenix." I enjoyed it immensely, for its story of men facing life and death and through resilience and ingenuity finding a way back to life. It was suspenseful and engrossing and, as you say, didn't "resolve on a bummer basis." All the characters were interesting--the proud, aging pilot who shows that he still has the right stuff, his navigator, underconfident and turning to the bottle, but finding his true strength in holding together the plucky band of men, the designer whose brilliance finds a way back for them, the honorable army captain who will do what is right, regardless of the risk, his subordinate, whose choices are far more pragmatic, and the others, all of them with distinct, even quirky personalities, and all of them broadening my perception of what men are or could be. Later, I realized that I was beginning to see my father through that lens, for the life he lived and the price he paid for it.

You note that for all the rapturous reviews the film received, it didn't intrigue the public but may have turned many of them away. The other movies my father and I saw offered spectacle, as did "Phoenix," but also glamor and romance and heroics that were broader and perhaps more exciting than those accompanied by thirst and scabs and desperation. The movies my family saw together were those like "Goldfinger," "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World," "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines," and "The Sound of Music," which were entertainments emotionally lighter and far less challenging than "Phoenix." Families would not have wanted to see it, or couples, or women; and possibly it was the aversion of women to a film that was too close to what the men in their lives faced, if in much more commonplace ways, that was the essential reason for its lack of box office. It wasn't that they did not understand or appreciate what was done for them and the families they and their husbands and fathers were making together, this protection afforded them from the harshness of the world, but that they could not regard it as entertainment. For that very reason, though, I believe that my father had taken me to see it, to let me see how men should meet those challenges, that they might better serve the ones they loved.

11:24 AM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer returns with more pithy observations re favorite films and players (Part One):


Gloria Swanson in "Stage Struck"

It's a pity that "Sunset Boulevard" will be for most people the introduction and end of their acquaintance with Gloria Swanson. It's a marvelous performance in a great film, but she could do much more and did.


Audrey Hepburn and Gary Cooper in "Love in the Afternoon"

The controversy was invited by the way the film seemingly tried to hide the disparity in age between Hepburn and Cooper, filming him in shadow or from odd angles. The ending, however, was flawless and just the way the film should always have been. The difference only made more poignant the realization by a man who had wasted so much of his life that this was his last chance for love and romance.


Picture of Louise Brooks

The hooded bangs so emphasize her eyes, as though she is gazing not at something within the photographer's studio, but the heart of another or some other place in the infinite distance.


Audrey Hepburn and Roger Moore at Danny Kaye International Children's Awards

If I'd been him and she fixed me with a look and said, "Behave now...do it," I don't know what else I could have done but to behave. But Sir Roger was made of sterner stuff, though no less enchanted by her than I would have been.


Pictures of Louise Brooks, young and old

When young, her physical beauty seemed absolute, as though fashioned from some noble material by an artist with superb technique. All true beauty, however, comes from within. However it is expressed and with whatever flaws, it is that which finds a spiritual basis that is sustained. So, in this juxtaposition of pictures taken early on and near the end of her life, one finds the same beauty. At the end, even with the ravages of age and a life lived too rashly sometimes, that beauty, found in her tortured intelligence and directness, has only been enhanced for the clarity allowed by age.


Buster Keaton in "College"

Always a highlight of his later silents, a sequence demonstrating his incredible athleticism and grace as a runner. Though intended for a gag, as here, one can't help but marvel at the beauty of a human being in motion.


Pictures of Louise Brooks with Begging Bonzo and Dismal Desman stuffed toys

She is thought of as such a beautiful and iconic movie star now, that it's easy to forget that she was a young, fun-loving woman too, once upon a time. And it was a time that had more than a little frivolity about it, as in this picture.

6:53 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Part Two from Dan Mercer:


Jeanne Eagels in "The Letter"

"The Letter" is one of two sound films Eagels made before her untimely death and the only one that still exists, in what was evidently a work print. Her performance in it is absolutely electrifying, especially in the last scene, when her husband has confronted her and she confesses that, "With all my heart and all my soul, I still love the man I killed." Had her personal demons been stayed a while longer, she would have been a premier headliner for Paramount and no doubt have performed in the repertoire Ruth Chatterton made a success of.


Orson Welles in "'F' is for Fake"

With that organ voice of his, there is a sense of truth found as much in the sonorities and resonance as in the words.


Audrey Hepburn in "War and Peace":

Audrey Hepburn was perfectly cast as Natasha, filled with joy and vitality but who did change, discovering love and living for it. This was a quality that always seemed a part of her, in her performances and perhaps in life as well, something to be sheltered in her shyness until she met the one she'd always waited for.


"The Island of Lost Souls"

"The Island of Lost Souls" was one of the grimmest of the horror films made during the initial wave, considering more deeply the implications of a scientist who substituted himself--and his own sense of morality--for that of God in creating a population of humanoids. The Panther Woman represented the acme of his skill. He wanted her to mate with a human being, to validate his theories. And he wanted to watch.


"L'Inferno" (1911)

The imagination is potent and often what we imagine is more vivid than anything that can be created through effects. For the people who first saw this film, however, I can well believe that they found their imaginations impoverished before such images, which were all the more horrifying for being literal transcriptions of their deepest fears.


"Desert Nights"

Not a film that Gilbert liked, because it seemed to cash in on his great successes in "The Big Parade," "The Merry Widow," and "Bardelys the Magnificent" without sustaining his reputation. There is no denying his charisma, however, or that this was a very entertaining outing.

Harold Lloyd in "Bumping into Broadway"

Does it seem that Lloyd makes a prop of time--or at least time pieces--clocks? The regulator of the well ordered bourgeoise life, but appearances aside, he seeks his own way in the world.

6:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025
  • February 2025
  • March 2025
  • April 2025
  • May 2025
  • June 2025
  • July 2025
  • August 2025
  • September 2025
  • October 2025
  • November 2025
  • December 2025
  • January 2026
  • February 2026
  • March 2026
  • April 2026
  • May 2026
  • June 2026
  • July 2026