Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
Search Index Here

Monday, April 17, 2006

Angie Dickinson Day

Today we’re participating in another "Blog-a-Thon", this one called by Dennis Cozzalio at his website (HERE) and dedicated to Angie Dickinson. Now, first off, I never saw a single episode of Police Woman, and while I do recall Big Bad Mama and Dressed To Kill, two of Angie’s major cult favorites, I would have to say that these two came a little late for Greenbriar bookings. Besides, I’m sure other contributors to the Angie-A-Thon will provide better illumination where these titles are concerned. My greater fascination with this actress revolves around those first films in which she was featured --- valiant efforts to launch a new star, but at a time when the studio machinery was in such decline and disrepair as to make it near impossible to introduce, let alone sustain, a new big-screen personality. The boneyard of distaff discards reads like the guest list at a 2006 Collector’s Autograph Show --- Pamela Tiffen, Carol Lynley, Paula Prentiss, Stella Stevens --- the lucky ones got a vid series --- the rest got a one way passage back to anonymity. Angie was one of the lucky ones, but only marginally so. Most would say she never got the career she deserved. I say she was planted right behind the eight ball from the moment Howard Hawks sold her contract to Warner Bros., not long after Rio Bravo. How could anyone get an even break at WB in the early sixties?

She’d done buckets of TV before Hawks "discovered" her for Rio Bravo. A lot of people think she’s really bitchin’ in that western. Candor forces me to admit that I fast-forwarded through some of her stuff the last time I watched it. No doubt H.H. considered her hot stuff, and heaven knows there wasn’t a better director in the business than Howard, but he does let Angie go on … and on … in her scenes with an indulgent John Wayne. A blue pencil to some of her dialogue might have helped. For that matter, a little more scissor application to Rio Bravo would have been a welcome thing as well (am I alone in thinking El Dorado the better show?). Angie was quite the starlet trophy on an otherwise all-male project, so you can’t really blame them for wanting to show her off. Wayne seems attentive here as they chat between set-ups (always that damned cigarette in his hand --- why didn’t somebody make him quit?), and old Howard looks like the cat that swallowed the canary at this cocktail reception --- Angie says he snubbed her royally a few years later when she sought work in another of his pics. She was a fish flung back to the sea when Hawks peddled her to Jack L. Warner, where she’d henceforth ply her trade in support of major talent (Frank and Dean!) and minor fads (Troy Donahue

Ocean’s 11 was a good one --- I personally think it’s very underrated --- but am also willing to concede Angie’s having had such a thankless role in it. That it could have been a better picture is obvious enough --- Peter Lawford actually had a hand in setting up the project --- he made an honest effort to develop the story and make something worthwhile of it, but cool cat Frank saw the whole thing as a slumming party, telling Lawford to order another drink and forget about it. There’s not much Hollywood embellishment on those cramped and seedy casino locations --- that authenticity may have been purely inadvertent, but it's there, and I for one like it --- and isn’t Caesar Romero the coolest thing ever in this? His style and presence makes the Rat Pack look like pikers much of the time. Rome Adventure is a movie we never hear about anymore, let alone have an opportunity to see, but there are those of a certain age group who remember it fondly, and not a few of them rushed out to buy that soundtrack album of Max Steiner’s romantic score. This was another of director Delmer Dave’s plush vehicles for the Warner youth, which now (1962) counted Angie Dickinson among its membership. Those clinches with Troy (one of them shown here) were benign enough, but things got considerably rougher when steely Lee Marvin
took over leading man duties in The Killers and Point Blank, two for which Angie’s fondly remembered. We watched The Killers not long ago and really liked it --- a modest little Universal crime thriller that looks as though it escaped from television into the theatres (in fact, I understand that’s exactly what happened). Ronald Reagan slaps Angie silly in it. Come to think of it, Angie took a lot of punishment as a hangover from the Code-compliant fifties gave way to the baser elements of late sixties filmmaking. I wonder if she regarded that as progress.


Anonymous Griff said...

" I alone in thinking EL DORADO the better show?"


DORADO is better thought-out, more deliberate (yet shrewdly paced), and ultimately far more resonant. I can watch this again and again, savoring it. BRAVO, apart from the excellent set-pieces, is kinda tedious.

While I like Dino, Ricky, Angie and Brennan, I don't believe 'em in BRAVO -- they're playing at being those characters.

Duke, Mitchum, Hunnicutt -- and the rest of the DORADO cast... yes, even the frequently dismissed Caan and Christopher George... seem to be who they're playing. Ed Asner is particularly good as the heavy, and I believed in the connection -- probably long-running and turbulent -- between Wayne and Charlene Holt in a way that I never could vis-a-vis Wayne and Angie. [Note to Angie, on your well-deserved day: not your fault; DORADO is simply a better movie.]

10:24 AM  
Blogger That Little Round-Headed Boy said...

Yes, I agree, too. I don't quite get the love for RIO BRAVO, or for Dickinson's unsubtle performance there. Another great post, John. Loved the still from POINT BLANK.

10:36 AM  
Blogger Axe said...

Count me as also having a preference for "El Dorado"!

And thank you again for your terrific site!

4:00 PM  
Blogger Dennis Cozzalio said...

Re the slapping around, it may not have exactly been progress, but she gave as good as she sometimes got, though, in Point Blank, even though Marvin takes her punches with characteristic stoicism. (See Flickhead for a really great series of screen grabs illustrating this sequence.) It's been ages since I've seen El Dorado, but I do remember it fondly. I am one of those Rio Bravo fans, though. I find its relatively slow pace (at times) and indulgences of character as fascinating and as fun as its terrific action scenes. And I think Angie really is terrific in it, beyond the fact that she's oh so very easy on the eyes. John, I really enjoyed your post (and that goes for your visit to the world of Roger Corman a while back, which I was delinquent in responding to and for which I apologize). Thanks for logging such a keen collection of photos and observations. I'm really glad I've discovered your site.

4:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Next to Point Blank, my favorite Dickinson flick: the unappreciated and (as far as I know) unavailable-on-DVD "Bramble Bush" starring the immortal Richard Burton.

5:42 PM  
Blogger J.C. Loophole said...

Count me as a fan of both- though I tend to lean towards Bravo-mainly because of Dino and Hawks set-ups of both scenes and characters. Dino's struggle between bottle and duty is very watchable. Besides, it makes a good double feature companion with Sons of Katie Elder. Anyone want to buy a glass eye?

8:29 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Here's a comment that for whatever reason would not publish last night ---

Surely 'Network" has to be included along with 'Wild Bunch' as an undisputed classic of William Holden's autumnal years .

Posted by Robert Wales to Greenbriar Picture Shows at 4/19/2006 08:50:04 PM

Thanks for the reminder, Robert. You're right about "Network" --- it's a terrific show and one of Bill's best performances. Thanks to you readers who weighed in on the "Bravo" vs. "Dorado" debate. Perhaps this should be the subject of a future posting, you think?

6:31 AM  
Anonymous PaydayLoans said...

4fR0MY You have a talant! Write more!

12:52 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019